Do you think profanity in the content can harm a site's rankings?
-
In my early 20's I authored an ebook that provides men with natural ways to improve their ahem... "bedroom performance".
I'm now in my mid 30s, and while it's not such an enthralling topic, the thing makes me 80 or so bucks a day on good days, and it actually works. I update the blog from time to time and build links to it on occasion from good sources.
I've carried my SEO knowledge to a more "reputable" business, but this project is still interesting to me, because it's fully mine. I am more interested in getting it to rank and convert than anything, but following the same techniques that are working to grow the other business, this one continues to tank.
Disavow bad links, prune thin content.. no difference. However, one thing I just noticed now are my search queries in the reports. When I first started blogging on this, I was real loose with my tongue, and spoke quite frankly (and dirty to various degrees). I'm much more refined and professional in how I write now. However, the queries I'm ranking for... a lot of d words, c words (in the sex sense)... sounds almost pornographic.
Think Google may be seeing this, and putting me lower in rankings or in some sort of lower level category because of it? Heard anything about google penalizing for profanity?
I guess in this time of authority and trust, that can hurt both of those... but I wonder if anyone's heard any actual confirmation of this or has any experience with this?
Thanks!
-
That’s something I’ve seen. Credentialed folks taking up much more space in the first pages of the SERPS. I don’t have credentials, and will not be spending the time / money in that direction, but I see the advice in many of these higher ranking results, and it’s often used and abused / recycled info that doesn’t do the job, or outright incorrect (I know my stuff, not a hack job ;).
But yes, you bring up another concern of mine... Is what I AM unfixable.
Thing that gives me some light / hope are some of sites taking up high rankings are not credentialed at all either. One is a kid in his mid / late 20s who writes about SEO / Marketing and... random sex articles? I believe he’s a social / outreach / networking phenom though, has links from super high DA sources.
Get Roman and For Hims are obviously purely commercial, but have money for high ranking placement and to get MDs to write articles.
There are also several “pick up artist” and “alpha method” ”bro type sites” with no credentials, (and some with very little links built to them), ranking for mediocre content...
All this gives me hope to stay in there, but I’ve definitely seen the trend you’re mentioning here...
-
We don't compete in your space, but we do have a site that competes by keyword overlap with sites that advise on alternative medicine. The overlap consists of at least 100 keywords, many of which have a monthly volume of 10,000+
The comparisons of our site vs alt med sites are as follows...
university degrees and government-issued licenses vs. author panache and social cred
scientific terminology vs. common language (which has a higher search volume)
factual information vs. lore and creative writing
Over the past two years, on three occasions, we have received substantial improvements in rankings and traffic as the alt med sites have dropped. I attribute it to Google wanting the SERPs to be populated more with formal credentials and technical prose rather than with lore and panache. We intentionally improved how our E-A-T is displayed about two years ago and I think that has been helpful.
In these situations, a person can only guess at what might be doing this, however, other sites similar to ours have seen the same improvements at the same times.
-
Excellent insights... thank you for taking the time to look into this.
I like the analysis of the three groups... one concern I have is... what if I'm only ranking BECAUSE I'm using these dirty words... the higher authority sites such as WebMD etc. are controlling and taking over searches for the more technical verbiage. Also, big money brands such as Forhims etc. who can probably pay for massive link building campaigns and promotion.
What I would hope with this is that Google... especially with the new update that's supposed to concentrate on language, will see the similarities in the terms, and keep me there... however, I've seen that google can still be pretty straightforward when it comes to ranking for terms. You want to rank, you write it verbatim...
As to traffic, I was on a pretty good uptick of visits until October of last year, when there was a massive drop with the medic update... I'd say about 60 - 70% of my traffic. E-A-T was spoken about quite a bit.
The changes have been drops with each big update since then. Last time there was growth was after the long lull after penguin came into play, and I disavowed a ton of reciprocal links and shady links, and had a massive jump, a couple of years after that, when another major update came around (don't want to look at the analytics, but some time around 2015 -2016 I'd say)... since then though, mostly drops with a lot of the major updates.
But I get that feeling... they don't approve of something... trying to pinpoint what that is, and just began hypothesizing this may be it after seeing search terms I'm ranking for..
-
Imagine the population of people who are interested in the bedroom topics that you have written about... I think that they would fall into three groups...
-
people that enjoy the "dirty talk"
-
people who don't care about it - they just want to read the content
-
people who are put off by the "dirty talk" and don't share the content or even read it very far
I think that group 1 would continue reading if the language was cleaned up, but if the language was cleaned up group 3 might appreciate the content and read it and value it. Google might have a similar view and discriminate against "dirty talk", unless the searcher has safe search turned off. So cleaning the content up might improve rankings.
You said... "this one continues to tank". What exactly does that mean? A slow and steady ranking and traffic decline? A slow and steady loss of traffic through external links? Or have there been a small number of sudden drops in visitors, in rankings, in revenue?
If your answer is "slow and steady" then I would bet that much of the loss is coming from the increased competitiveness of the internet and the emergence of new competitors. Anyone who owns a 15 year old site that has not been getting a lot of regular new content and existing content improvement is seeing this.
If the losses are small and sudden, then it could be algo changes at Google that is knocking the site because they don't approve of something. Just speculations.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do the back-links go wasted when anchor text or context content doesn't match with page content?
Hi Community, I have seen number of back-links where the content in that link is not matching with page content. Like page A linking to page B, but content is not really relevant beside brand name. Like page with "vertigo tiles" linked to page about "vertigo paints" where "vertigo" is brand name. Will these kind of back-links completely get wasted? I have also found some broken links which I'm planning to redirect to existing pages just to reclaim the back-links even though the content relevancy is not much beside brand name. Are these back-links are beneficial or not? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Does Google push down for not ranking top for branded keywords?
Hi all, Usually websites rank for their branded keywords. Some times third party websites takeover the websites for branded keywords. If there are more number of such queries where website is not ranking (top) for branded keywords, Google push down website in overall rankings? Any correlation? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Will Russia's New Data Protection Law Impact SEOs and SMBs Outside of Russia?
We've all seen the news recently that Google will be closing its engineering offices in Russia due to new data protection laws coming into place in January 2015. The same law has also led to Adobe pulling out of Russia earlier in the year. I was wondering how you think this will impact SEOers and small/medium businesses that market _to _Russia, but are based outside of the country? Personal data has been defined in the new legislation as: Personal data means any information directly or indirectly related to any identified or potentially identifiable person. It includes, among other things, first name and family name, date and place of birth, address, information about family status, education, profession, income Source For those businesses which don't process personal data (affiliates etc), will there be any foreseeable impact? On the flipside, are there any benefits here for affiliate businesses inside of Russia? I'm using affiliates as an example to get the ball rolling, but I'm sure there's numerous more. Personally, I'd be interested to hear if you think this may impact corporate websites which don't process personal data, but operate outside of Russia.
Algorithm Updates | | ecommercebc0 -
Is there a we to get Google to index our site quicker?
I have updated some pages on a website, is there a way to get Google to index the page quicker?
Algorithm Updates | | webguru20140 -
Can I only submit a reconsideration request if I have a penalty?
Hey guys, One of the sites I'm looking after took a hit with their rankings (particularly for one keyword that went from 6/7 to 50+) post-Penguin in May. Although, after cleaning-up the link profile somewhat we started to see some slow and steady progression in positions. The keyword that dropped to 50+ was moving upwards in advance of 20. However, a couple of weeks back, the keyword in question took another slide towards 35-40. I therefore wondered whether it would be best to submit a reconsideration request - even though the site did not receive a manual penalty. The website has a DA of 40 which more than matches a lot of the competitor websites that are ranking on first page for the aforementioned keyword. At this stage, I would have expected the site to have returned to its original ranking - four-and-a-half months after Penguin - but it hasn't. So a reconsideration request seemed logical. That said, when I came to go through the process on Webmaster Tools I was unable to find the option! Has it now been removed for sites that don't receive manual penalties?
Algorithm Updates | | Webrevolve1 -
Mobi sites and sitemaps
Hi all, How does should one treat mobi sites which have a separate set of files to the main site - with regards to the sitemap? Doe we tell Google about them?
Algorithm Updates | | gazza7770 -
Google Rankings Jumping Around
Hi, Since January, the Google rankings for one of our sites has been jumping around. Sometimes it's on page 1, then it disappears and comes back around 1 month later. It's strange because it's only a small section of the site that it's happening to. Every other section of the site is doing really well. Just wondered if anyone else is having this problem, or has had it and can suggest any fixes. There are no technical issues, no changes have been made to the site, all I can think is it's Google messing around with their algorithm? Any help or advice would be much appreciated. Karen
Algorithm Updates | | Digirank0 -
What is the best way to build a Mobile Site?
I am looking into building a mobile version for my website, knowing that Google Likes Google should I stick with using their mobile building tool or build something from scratch in Dreamweaver? How to optimize for Google Mobile? Thx
Algorithm Updates | | Ben-HPB0