How to "on page" seo a small local service business - particularly headers
-
First off, let me apologize if this question is posted elsewhere, worded differently. I've looked around quite a bit and have been unable to find the answer.
Basically, we are a small web design firm just getting our feet with with SEO. Most of our clients, especially initially, will be quite small, local, service businesses.
For example: and electrician, a pet sitter, a retail printing and map store, a surgeon etc. Almost all of their sites will follow a basic "business card on the web" format...
Home Page - About Us - Testimonials - Rates - FAQ - Contact Us - Etc
So, from what I've read about on-page optimization, making sure my keywords are in the title, header, body, and meta description is one of the easiest and quickest things we can do for our clients. This is a straightforward concept for me when applied to the homepage. For example, take the local pet sitting business. Her keywords are: Pet sitting, Dog walking, and the city we live in, Anytown USA. So, I've used those keywords in all the appropriate places on the home page:
title: Dog Walking and Pet Sitting Service in Anytown USA
header: Dog Walking and Pet Sitting Service in Anytown USA
first sentence of body: We are a professional Dog Walking and Pet Sitting Service in Anytown USA
meta description: We are a professional Dog Walking and Pet Sitting Service in Anytown USA. At Business Name your furry friends become a part of our family.
So, my question is:
Do I also optimize the "about us" page? I've changed the title of all the pages to follow this format:
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - Home
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - About Us
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - Rates
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - FAQ
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - Etc
Easy enough so far. Also pretty easy for the meta description, and the body. However, how would I add keywords to the header without making it look ridiculous? We use wordpress with the genesis framework, and child themes from studiopress. The header is always prominently visible at the top of the page. Most people would expect to see the header be the same as the link they clicked on the nav bar: for example, on the "about us" page, people expect the header to be: "about us" Not: "dog walking and pet sitting in Anytown USA - About Us"
Do I just not worry about the headers on the other pages? For that matter, I'd really like people to "land" on the home page, not any of the other pages, so should I not optimize them at all? Does optimizing the rest of the pages help the home page to show up higher in the SERPS? If I do end up optimizing the rest of the pages, should I use slightly different spellings of the keywords: like Dog walker instead of dog walking? Or pet sitter instead of pet sitting?
I've repeatedly seen people talk about not using the same keywords on more than one page... but for most of these businesses there are really fairly few keywords. There just isn't that many different ways that someone is going to search for an electrician, or a plumber, or a pet sitter. By the second or third page that I optimize on one site, I imagine I'll start running out of different variations of the keywords.
I recognize that a lot of what we'll do that will be most helpful to local clients has nothing to do with on page optimization (setting up google places, google+, yahoo + bing local, etc). I'd just like to make sure that I'm doing the on page stuff as perfectly as possible.
Thanks for your time and responses!
-Matt
p.s. while I'm at it, let me ask another question about domain names as well. Right now the pet sitting client mentioned above is using:
www.petcare_Anytown_.com
After operating her business for the last year she realized she is much more interested in dog walking than pet sitting. We are in the processes of redesigning the site, and when finished, are considering moving it to:
www.dogwalking_Anytown_.com
My assumption is that as long as we use permanent redirects from the old site to the new one, we shouldn't lose much SEO value. Is this thinking correct?
On a related note though: another article I read mentioned that using a brand name in the domain may actually be more useful than the keyword rich domains above. However,
www._businessname._com happens to already be taken by a pet sitting business at the other end of the country. We could however use:
www.businessnameAnytown.com
Which one do you think would work better? The keyword/location domain, or the businessname/location domain? Thanks!
-
Matt,
Cody has given you some excellent replies. Just want to be sure this point hits home. Do not write your title tags like this:
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - Home
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - About Us
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - Rates
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - FAQ
Dog Walking and Pet Sitting in Anytown USA - Etc
These are nearly duplicates. Title tags appear as the first line in many search engine listings and should read in a manner that engages the user, as well as incorporating your keywords. Be sure you are writing a unique title, header and meta description for every page on the website.
Further, if you are planning to work with mainly local businesses, it will be critical that you understand not just traditional SEO best practices for on-page optimization, but also Local SEO best practices for on-page optimization. There are special opportunities and best practices both on-site and off for Local business that your website design firm will need to master in order to be helping clients achieve the visibility they will be hoping for.
-
Optimize for the visitor first, then the search engine. Make sure the titles and the headers read naturally. Everything that you put on the page should be relevant to the content of the page - that includes titles, headings, pictures, etc. If anything on your site sounds spammy or irrelevant, dump it and start over.
Be like Google and focus on providing the best user experience possible. The Google philosophy: "Focus on the user and all else will follow."
-
Thanks for the response! I realize now that I actually asked a few too many questions, and didn't do a terribly good job of separating them out clearly.
1. Is this how I would optimize the titles? I understand your answer. Thank you.
2. Do people expect the title tag to be the same as the menu option they click? I'm afraid this isn't really the question I intended to ask. I agree that people don't normally expect the title and menu option to match. I'm actually pretty comfortable with the titles. My concern is about the header. When you click on "Rates" on the nav or menu bar, when you arrive at the page, what do you expect the H1 header to be? Most people would expect it to be "Rates" not "Dog Walking Rates in Anytown", or "Dog Walking Testimonials in Anytown" etc.
3. Should I not optimize the titles? (Question should be: Should I not optimize the headers?) I understand that it's pretty easy to optimize the titles, and using your convention above makes sense. Again, my bigger question is about the H1 header. Should I put keywords in the header of every page, or just the home page?
4. Should I not use the same keywords on every page? My keywords do fall naturally into most of the pages body content. Again, my biggest question I guess really has to do with the headers. Assuming I do need to put keywords in the H1 header of the other pages, would I continue to use "dog walking" as my primary keyword, or would I need to come up with a variation that I haven't used in one of the other headers?
5. Should I use a brand domain instead of a keyword domain? Makes sense. Thanks for the answer.
Thanks again for taking the time to respond. Sorry I didn't make the questions clearer from the start.
-Matt
p.s. I updated the title of the original post, when I realized that most of my questions are actually about the H1 Header.
-
1.Is this how I would optimize the titles?
Each page should have a specific keyword group you are trying to target, minus the about us page. In theory your pages would look more like this:
Rates: Dog Walking Rates in Anytown | Business Name
FAQ: Dog Walking FAQ's in Anytown | Business Name
Etc.
You would then want to link to those pages internally with the their main keywords, if possible. So, you would like to the home page with "Dog Walking in Anytown."
2. Do people expect the title tag to be the same as the menu option they click?
People don't really pay attention to the title tags at the top of their browser. The only time I check is when I'm bouncing between pages.
3.Should I not optimized the titles?
You would create unique title tags for all the pages to just make sure that they were unique. Duplicates can hinder your site.
4. Should I not use the same keywords on every page?
Search Engines look at the whole context of your site as well as individual pages. You will want to use the keywords whenever they fall naturally into your text. You can then link them internally to the page that is most relevant.
5.Should I use a brand domain instead of a keyword domain?
Depends. Is the person an active blogger, and will they garner a bunch of links from the amazing content? If yes, then go ahead with a brand. If not, keep it simple with an exact match domain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Image scale Error On page seo
I Have an Image Scale Error in Gtmetrix how to solve it which is the best way to solve it I tried many ways but it's not working.
On-Page Optimization | | AlexSmithh0 -
Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question. This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight 🙂 Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community. **Context... ** We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat. However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme. In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth. Make sense so far? Context end..... Issue. Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on). Possible reason? Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO. 2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO). When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page? I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout. Isaac. EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
On-Page Optimization | | isaac6630 -
Is a resource page bad for SEO
This is the page http://www.christoit.com/free-resources/articles. While this page isn't what I would consider to be a "resource page" (there are no downloads or any other resources) The question is, does a page like this that just has links to articles, hurt the overall ranking of the site. If you have any examples to support your opinion that would be great! Thanks so much for all awesome threads and answers on this site. There are some really smart people all in one place!
On-Page Optimization | | Britewave0 -
Does having landing page text beneath the products at the base of the page hinder SEO?
I have a site that is capable of hosting the landing page description either above the products under the H1 or below them at the bottom of the page before the footer. I have always chosen to keep the text "above the fold" as presumably this would be crawled sooner in relation to the rest of the page content than had it been at the bottom. However, this means that I can only really write just a few sentences for each landing page - otherwise the products would shift further down the page - and I don't think this is good from a UX POV. Question: If I move the bulk of my landing page descriptions to the text snippet located underneath the products, could this negatively affect my SEO? Text at the bottom of the page is obviously not significant for users, so is there a chance this could be seen as spam?
On-Page Optimization | | Silkstream0 -
Bad to have "As Seen on" links sitewide
I've seen a lot of people saying that sidewide external links are a no-go. Does this also apply to links of a vanity variety? What I mean by this is "as seen on" links or links to awards given to the business? This intellectually seems okay to me, but I want to make sure I'm not shooting myself in the foot. Any evidence, case studies, anecdotal stories would be appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | Oren.0 -
Local SEO Title-Tag Optimization
Hi Everyone! A bit of a greenhorn SEO here, and I'm trying to learn a bit more about some of the best practices in local SEO. I'm wondering if anyone can help me with the following scenario: Business: Dental Care & Surgery Location: Springfield IN Name: Springfield Dental Care Experts (example) Website: 18 content pages, pages dedicated to each service Since there are 18 pages to work with, there are plenty of places for us to mix-up the title tags. However, I am still unclear as to what the best way would be to do this. I understand that the Geo-modifiers should go at the front, and that the brand name is considered optional. Would tags such as this make sense? Springfield IN Dentist | Springfield Dental Care Experts Nearby town Mountainview IN Dental Care | Springfield Dental Care Experts Last question: The website has pages for each of the services offered by the dentist, ex: Dental Cleanings, Consultations, Fillings, Surgery, etc. Should each of the pages be included in the title tag? Springfield IN Dentist | Springfield Dental Care Experts - Dental Surgery My concern is that buy adding this, the title tag would be too long. Thank you for taking the time to read and respond!
On-Page Optimization | | kbaltzell0 -
What does this mean on first step up setting up a campaign? "Having two "twin" domains that both resolve forces them to battle for SERP positions, making your SEO efforts less effective. We suggest redirecting one, then entering the other here."
I am BRAND new to this, and setting up my first campaign. I choose subdomain, and entered www.pdsaz.com. This is the message I receive: We have detected that the domain www.pdsaz.com and the domain pdsaz.com both respond to web requests and do not redirect. Having two "twin" domains that both resolve forces them to battle for SERP positions, making your SEO efforts less effective. We suggest redirecting one, then entering the other here.
On-Page Optimization | | cschwartzel0 -
Is On Page SEO Dead?
Hey Guys, Search Engine Roundtable has published a short post about this a few days ago, quoting senior member at WebmasterWorld forums who said: "The way I see it, on-page text today is for the "relevance" part of the total algorithm. The whole algorithm is, in broad strokes, "relevance + connectedness + quality". After you've clearly stated the relevance of the page, then the rest of your ranking power comes from elsewhere. I've added on-page bold tags with no effect. I've added or changed h1 elements with no effect. Not too long ago, those might well have done something, but that's not the game anymore. And moving from a table layout to a CSS-P layout today might get you nowhere, too. It all depends how deeply complicated the table layout was, I think." http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4408395.htm Is it true? Is on-page SEO really dead? What do you think?
On-Page Optimization | | ShivaS0