Image Alt Text: Do I Need to Link my Image for it to Count?
-
Hi
I learned from a very senior SEO that I must link my images if I want Google to read my alt tag for my images.
I don't believe this though... is it true?
If the answer is not true (which I suppose it is), then maybe you can help me answer this:
1. was he confused or why would he tell me this?
2. i didn't know what i should do so now, whenever i embed an image on my blog posts, i just link them to the blog post in which the image shows... in essence, by clicking the image, the page gets refreshed.
does this sound like a good strategy for images?
thanks in advance!!!
-
Paul,
excellent response. thank you so much.
i use Yoast SEO plugin. Why do you say the yoast image 'redirect' is not the same thing as I am doing? It seems like the exact same?
Ben
-
Agree with Francisco!
if this senior is your BOSS lol i have had a boss in one of ex company i worked for! THe only difference is he called himself an expert!
-
I'm with Francisco - whoever told you that is flat out wrong.
The alt tag in it's purest function is to provide a text description of images for vision-impaired page visitors. It is designed to be read by screen-reader software so the visually impaired can still understand what the image is and how it relates to the rest of the page. There is absolutely no reason a link would need be included in order for the alt attribute to do its job. Put another way - the alt attribute is applied to the img source tag. The link tag (href) is totally separate.
As far as what you're doing now, the link is totally extraneous and would probably annoy/confuse a user who though clicking on a linked image should actually take them somewhere else.
Unlike Francisco, I strongly suggest, unless you're linking to a larger version of the same image, that you simple include no link at all. Having it link to its attachment page in WordPress is also a very bad idea as that creates huge numbers of very thin-content pages which give no value to the visitor, cause major site-crawling problems and are worthless if they get ranked in image search.
There's even a setting in Yoast's Wordpress SEO plugin to handle this issue by redirecting the attachment page back to the original blog post the image appeared on. (Note this is not the same as what you're currently doing) Again, if Wordpress, simply set None for the link URL.
Hope that makes sense?
Paul
-
-
I think he may have been confused. I have never heard of that. The img alt"" attribute works for SEO, but I have never heard that you needed it to <h ref="">to something in order for it to work. </h>
-
Don't do that. You're just creating loops.
If this senior SEO is your boss, then just link it to the regular image as it's done in WordPress. It won't hurt anything.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No follow links on a blog
Hi On our blog, we have a section called 'Tags'. I have just noticed that these links are all "no follow" links. The tags section does appear on every single page on the blog - is this recommend to have them as 'no follow' links or should I get our developer to change them. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Andy-Halliday0 -
Link building with AddThis URL
We've begun using AddThis for tracking our social sharing. AddThis has been adding the snippet to the end of the URLs on our pages and we've been finding that people linking to us are linking to the URL with the snippet. AddThis says this isn't a problem for SEO. Is this correct? Here is an example: https://www.harborcompliance.com/information/how-to-start-a-non-profit-organization-in-colorado.php#.UunCfPldVig I want to make sure this is not affecting our SEO in any way, particularly that Google would see this as an affiliate or paid link since it has the "#". I may be crazy but I just want to make sure!
Technical SEO | | Harbor_Compliance0 -
Are no follows leaking link juice?
Recently, in a discussion on resources pages EGOL informed me that just because I had no followed the links on my my resource page, I was still leaking link juice. He mentioned that this was a recent change in Google policy. This was quite a surprise. I have done a couple of searches on this recent change but have not found any information. Am I simply the last one on the planet to learn this and this change is widely known and understood? If so, does that mean honest resource pages (I have two such pages) that are there to help visitors are negatively impacting the site - at least in terms of SEO? If they are leaking link juice is it comparable to a followed link or a smaller amount that has less impact?
Technical SEO | | leatherhidestore0 -
Is there a need to have differen GWT account
Hi, in your opinion and practice, do you think that it is necessary not to put too many web sites that you optimize in the same GWT account? Can this always give Google a signal that there is a strong relation between this websites?
Technical SEO | | vladokan0 -
Advice on too many onpage links
Hi Just done a 250 crawl on a new site I am working on (still under development), all 250 pages seem to have too many on page links, however they do not have any links I can take away This page, for example, http://empleous.com/gb/store/category/398743/shoes?price=20-50 has (according to moz crawl) 252 links on. Seems a little high. What would be the best way to correct this please? I cannot find that many links. I know there are about 85 links in the menu bar but they are all needed and none of the others can really be replaced either. Thanks Carl
Technical SEO | | Grumpy_Carl0 -
Tracking Links Tool
I think someone may be trying to harm my site by adding spammy links so I want to track the links going to my site on a daily basis. Any tool suggestions? Majestic SEO is great for getting an overall picture of my links, but is not updated daily. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | theLotter0 -
Too many external links?
Ok, so I am finally focusing more on SEO of my hobby website as I am notice the relavent keywords are not really onsite what I want, for example, according to analytics "post" is my most popular keyword which I assume is from the vbulletin forum. My question today is that according to the moz scan, my forum has too many external links, my question is what are some measures I can do whether within the vbulletin forum or custom coding to reduce the amount of links/increase power? www.rcnightmare.com
Technical SEO | | TheTippingPoint0 -
Javascript funtion as link? Why not show up?
We joined our Chamber of Commerce for the "link" as much as anything. After 9 months of having a link from our local chamber it has never showed up anywhere. You can see the link on my Chambers page, and you can click on it and it works. But it does not show up anywhere else....Not in any backlink checker, not in SEOmoz, not in Google Webmaster Tools. When I hover over our link on their page I see "javascript:encodeclick........my url" Is this link worth anything? What is a javascriptencodeclick? Does Google know it exists and give me credit for it? Our Chamber is clueless... they hire someone to do their website. Their webmasters response to my question was: Hi, These links look like this because this is just the way our system parses URLs that are entered into the membership directory so they can be clickable when displayed in the lister. These links will not have a negative effect on Google or SEO indexing purposes if that is what you are concerned about. They are not encoded or encrypted, this just happens to be the name of the Javascript function.
Technical SEO | | SCyardman0