Link removal
-
We were hit by penguin and have been going through the process of removing bad links. Things were looking up but then wasa 20% jump in our bad links.
They all seem to be related. There are over 100 different domains that all seem to go back to mbiz. examples include
http://www.5stone.com.cn/Literature-holders-.html
http://www.building-stone.com/Display-furniture.html
http://www.china-tombstone.com/Display-exhibition-products-.html
It looks like they have automatically gathered data from google to create these pages. I would hope that the guys at Google are clever enough to be aware of these sorts of links. But if not I need to get them removed.
I have tried whois but I cant find out how to contact these guys. Has anyone got any bright ideas?
Thanks
-
You should definitely be able to ignore these as they're quite common (not specifically these websites, but these types of links). That said, if you are under penalty and can't work out which links are causing it, having cleaned up all the rest, I'd go for a disavowal. If you are 100% certain that the penalty is due to Penguin, approaching the manual webspam team isn't likely to help you at all. But getting that disavowal in before the next Penguin update (which, despite Google's updates of this week - Panda and "payday loans" - can't be far away) might help.
-
This is true Gary, but only if you're dealing with a manual penalty. The OP has a Penguin issue so no one from the webspam team is going to be reviewing their links. Still, there's no harm in making a spreadsheet in case the site were to undergo a manual review in the future. And, there's no harm in working hard to get links removed rather than just disavowing. But, in most cases the ROI just doesn't make sense. For Penguin issues I generally try to remove the links that I can easily remove and then disavow the rest.
-
Thanks for the kind words Tim.
And...thanks for pointing out that statement on my site. You're right...that post was written a while ago. In fact, it was written before the last Penguin refresh. When Penguin refreshed in October of 2013, the only sites that I saw making any kind of a recovery were ones that had done a thorough disavow. As such, I now DO recommend using it for Penguin recoveries. I've edited my post.
Submitting a disavow will definitely not flag your site for a manual review. John Mueller has mentioned this several times in webmaster central hangouts.
-
Hi Marie thanks for your response. Have been reading through your blog with interest. Re penguin you said
"I am still really cautious in my use of the disavow tool. I use it for getting manual unnatural links penalties removed. At this point though I still do not condone using the tool as a method to recover from Penguin unless you have a site with which you are willing to experiment
I realise that this was a few months ago and things move on but I'm concerned that submitting a disavow file might flag our site up for further investigation by google. Is there any evidence of this?
As i mentioned we have not had any manual penalty or unnatural links notifications
-
John Mueller at Google has said many times before that if it is not easy to find contact details don't waste your time, disavow and move on.
The web spam team want to see a good faith effort, not a miracle. Create an excel spreadsheet of all the links and mark next to each link if you were able to find contact info or a form and what action was taken. A word in each column as a reference is enough. Upload it as a google doc with your reconsideration request.
If they can see you really worked hard at going through all the links even if you have little removal success you stand a high chance of getting the manual penalty removed if you have disavowed all the bad stuff.
-
These links are popping up on pretty much every link audit that we do now. Often they are nofollowed, but it appears that yours are not. They're not ones that you made yourself and I really believe that they can be ignored. With that being said, there's no harm at all in disavowing them.
If you've got an algorithmic issue (Penguin) then contacting the site owner is nowhere near as important as when you have a manual penalty. As such, I'd just disavow and ignore.
-
Google tries to be smart enough to recognize when this sort of this is going on. They get it right the majority of the time, but I've encountered times where Google didn't recognize some sites as scrapers like this, and our client's site was still incurring a penalty. I know for a fact that is was scraper sites like this, because Google told me as much when they responded to my first reconsideration request.
Short version: Probably won't hurt you, but it is possible. I would disavow this stuff to be safe.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I am looking for a software to keep track of the back links or link building
Hi Guys, I am very new hear. I just joined. I have a few websites that I need to manage. I am looking for a software that will allow me to manually add the links that I have been able to acquire. It would also be a bonus if it could search for the links to my site and to see if its still active. Because I have a freelancer working a few hours a week on link building and I need to keep track of the links. I am looking for something simple and good. Any suggestions? By the way, I used Raven Tools many years ago, and it had this feature. But since joining Moz, I don't want to be paying for 2 subscriptions. And I don't know if Raven still has this feature. Your suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you. Ryan
Link Building | | RyanNewman0 -
Internal Links - First Link Rule Confusion
Hello All - I would like to create a guide for my team of rules for internal links and I could use some help. My understanding is that Google only counts the first link to a page, so any crafted keyword text links within the content do not count if the page in question is linked to from the main navigation. Is this correct? For example, if the menu or drop down menu in main site nav (which exists on all pages of the site) includes a link to a particular section that will be the only one that ever counts since the menu is on every page? Example: let's say a website selling cat toys includes a drop down menu on the homepage with links to "holiday cat toys". Does this mean that no other text links in content on the site will support that page from an SEO perspective since the link is in the main nav and will always be the first one counted? In the past we have added text links in the content on the homepage to important pages on the site. It seems to work, though now I'm questing these tactics based on the first link rule. I would appreciate some advice, clarification, thoughts, etc. Thanks!
Link Building | | JBMediaGroup0 -
Links Removed from Site but not Google Webmaster Tools
I have a new client who has been fighting to get past an unnatural links penalty. One of the biggest reasons behind it was that they paid to get a followed link/ad on a blog network, well this ad ended up being a site wide link which ended up giving them thousands of back links within a few days. After getting the owner of the blog network to remove the link i manually spot checked a handful of pages and used screaming frog to crawl looking for a link referencing their site. From what i can tell they are all gone. However they are still in Google Webmaster Tools as well as Google's index and it has been a couple months since they have been removed. Does anyone have any advice on getting them removed from Google's entities even though they are already off of the website? Thank you in advance,
Link Building | | kchandler
Kyle0 -
Link or Ad
I recently requested a link back from a site that is ranking 2nd for a term that i'm working on and they said they would gladly give me the link and remove my competitors but would also like me to have an ad on the same page for an annual fee that i could link to a landing page. I know that paying for links is no good and google can penalize you. so do i pay them and do a no follow to the landing page from the ad and call it a day? and how does google differentiate an ad from a link?
Link Building | | CHiP_RuN0 -
Where are all the sites that are linking to me?
I need to compile a list of all the siters linking to my site, but my open site explorer analysis shows very few links. I know for certain that there are many many more sites linking to it (it's an academic site and there are links to it from a lot of academic directories). What am I doing wrong?
Link Building | | michalseo0 -
Submit link wheel
I have created 5 spokes like wheel in last month I used the following sites to create my link wheel hubpages.com wordpress.com blogsopt.com blog.com squidoo.com I could find that all links are indexd by google search engine . I know that some SEO expert says they ypur link wheel shumitted to social bookmark and rss feed. Do i have submit this to social book mark and rss feed ? Because this is already indexed. If i submit to them what will be the effect
Link Building | | wise950 -
Link Farming
Are link farms still bad? I still am not sure about this question. I know that some people still do link farms. If they are bad, wouldn't a directory be considered a link farm? For instance I can get my site on a .EDU, but it will just be a list of links. Is that bad?
Link Building | | blackrino0 -
Question on Links from Directories…
Hello,
Link Building | | inhouseninja
When I do an OSE back link analyses of some sites that are listed in some directories we are considering, for almost all the directories and companies in them, the directories are listed in the OSE report, listed as followed, and usually have decent domain rank and page rank. So this means that the link from the directory is obviously being picked up by OSE and it’s listed as a followable link. My question is just because the link is picked up by OSE does that mean that the search engines value it too? Or could Google see the link ok but throw it out of the equation, presumably because it does not “like” the directory? Hope this makes sense
Thanks!0