301 Redirect or Canonical Tag or Leave Them Alone? Different Pages - Similar Content
-
We currently have 3 different versions of our State Business-for-Sale listings pages - the versions are:
**Version 1 -- Preferred Version: **
http://www.businessbroker.net/State/California-Businesses_For_Sale.aspx
Title = California Business for Sale Ads - California Businesses for Sale & Business Brokers - Sell a Business on Business Broker
Version 2:
http://www.businessbroker.net/Businesses_For_Sale-State-California.aspx
Title = California Business for Sale | 3124 California Businesses for Sale | BusinessBroker.net
Version 3:
http://www.businessbroker.net/listings/business_for_sale_california.ihtml
Title = California Businesses for Sale at BusinessBroker.net - California Business for Sale
While the page titles and meta data are a bit different, the bulk of the page content (which is the listings rendered) are identical. We were wondering if it would make good sense to either (A) 301 redirect Versions 2 and 3 to the preferred Version 1 page or (B) put Canonical Tags on Versions 2 and 3 labeling Version 1 as the preferred version. We have this issue for all 50 U.S. States -- I've mentioned California here but the same applies for Alabama through Wyoming - same issue.
Given that there are 3 different flavors and all are showing up in the Search Results -- some on the same 1st page of results -- which probably is a good thing for now -- should we do a 301 redirect or a Canonical Tag on Versions 2 and 3? Seems like with Google cracking down on duplicate content, it might be wise to be proactive.
Any thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
- Matt M
-
Thanks for the response.
Do you think we need to stay consistent - for example if we decide to use this version - http://www.businessbroker.net/State/California-Businesses_For_Sale.aspx as the preferred version - should we use this as the preferred version for all states -- even if this version is not the ranking version for a particular state?
Thanks again,
- MM
-
Does it matter which version is getting ranked the best in the eyes of Google in terms of which URL's we chose to 301?
If I was doing this I would redirect the pages that rank lowest. The page that ranks highest is there for a reason.
**If we 301 a version that is getting ranked well in Google, does this hurt us in any way? **
I don't know... but your other pages are not ranking as well for a reason.
STICK WITH A WINNER! (However, I might work to improve that page.)
-
Hello, you provided a very good response to the question I posed last year. We never pulled the trigger on this change and now it is back on the radar screen. I was hoping you'd be willing to answer a follow-up question for us. Does it matter which version is getting ranked the best in the eyes of Google in terms of which URL's we chose to 301? I started to look at where we rank for certain "state" related keywords -- i.e. Utah Businesses for Sale, etc.. If we 301 a version that is getting ranked well in Google, does this hurt us in any way? For example, if we decide to 301 redirect Version 3 (http://www.businessbroker.net/listings/business_for_sale_california.ihtml) to this page -- http://www.businessbroker.net/State/California-Businesses_For_Sale.aspx - if Version 3 ranks well for keywords like California Business for Sale, etc..
Thanks in advance for any help/guidance on this.
Below is original post.
- Matt M
-
Yes, I would do 301 redirects.
I would do that to consolidate my link power into a single page and eliminate the potential for duplicate content problems.
-
Thanks for the quick response -- quick question - when you say "eliminate" do you mean to 301 redirect these pages? These are all existing pages that are indexed by Google and have various search positions. Thanks again.
- Matt
-
I agree with EGOL. Are the pages being generated? How many search queries will end with the same information?
It looks like your doing URL ReWriting now since the url:
http://www.businessbroker.net/State/California-Businesses_For_Sale_test.aspx
shows the same information. Start adding canonical to all pages so that the above link will not be seen as duplicated content.
-
I looked at version 1 through 3 for California and agree that these pages are substantially similar.
If this was my site I would eliminate version 2 and version 3 and put all of my linkjuice into version 1.
I would not do this without some analytics... and might try an experiment with a couple of states before doing it across the site. However, my bet is that one version will pull about as much traffic as all three versions combined.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical - unexpected page ranking
We are getting good ranking for an unexpected page, rathewr than the one we were trying to get ranking for. Should we put a canonical on the 'unexpected page' to the page we would like to receive the ranking for - or do we risk losing the ranking? Any suggestions welcomed. Ian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Substance-create0 -
Shall we add engaging and useful FAQ content in all our pages or rather not because of duplication and reduction of unique content?
We are considering to add at the end of alll our 1500 product pages answers to the 9 most frequently asked questions. These questions and answers will be 90% identical for all our products and personalizing them more is not an option and not so necessary since most questions are related to the process of reserving the product. We are convinced this will increase engagement of users with the page, time on page and it will be genuinely useful for the visitor as most visitors will not visit the seperate FAQ page. Also it will add more related keywords/topics to the page.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lcourse
On the downside it will reduce the percentage of unique content per page and adds duplication. Any thoughts about wether in terms of google rankings we should go ahead and benefits in form of engagement may outweight downside of duplication of content?0 -
Unintentional wildcard 301 Redirect?
I have migrated a client's site to a new domain. I used Yoast tools to add 301 redirects for all active site pages from old domain to new domain in the .htacces files as neither the client nor I have access to hosting server via FTP (long story). Redirects are working as I intended, and we didn't lose too much in our rankings. Unfortunately, as soon as I saved the .htaccess file in Yoast, old-domain.net/wp-admin began redirecting to new-domain.net/wp-admin. I can no longer login to the wordpress site on the old domain. I did not enter a redirect for /wp-admin. Any thoughts on how this is happening or if there is some other way to get back in? Without server access, I'm pretty stumped. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | c_estep_tcbguy0 -
How and When Should I use Canonical Url Tags?
Pretty new to the SEO universe. But I have not used any canonical tags, just because there is not definitive source explaining exactly when and why you should use them??? Am I the only one who feels this way?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | greenrushdaily0 -
To redirect or not to redirect, that is the question
I work for a software company that is redeveloping the website (same domain.) We have tons of content in the form of articles and documents for support, how to use the product better, case studies, and blog posts. I've downloaded a landing page report and many of these have low impressions and little or no clicks (some ranked high other very low.) Should I redirect all this content to the new site where some of it won't exist or forget about it because of the lack of juice? Is there a rule-of-thumb threshold for redirecting for content?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Nobody15969167212220 -
Are 1x Event pages considered thin content? Should they be archived or redirected?
Since past event pages will become stale after the event, should they be keep alive and archived with only a link from a couple of places (for instance the main event page and html sitemap). Or should they be "retired" and redirected to the main event page if they are really no longer needed? They would probably be considered thin content because they won't have much traffic and will have very few links pointing to them. Right? Thanks. Inquiring minds want to know... 😉
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cindyt-170380 -
Redirect 301
Hi, I `m redirecting some pages in htaccess The first 15 pages that i redirected it worked. But the last 3 dont work, and i cant figure it out why it is not working. Redirect 301 /analyseverktoy/ /webanalyse
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SGacic
Redirect 301 /index.php/ledige-stillinger/ /
Redirect 301 /?page_id=352/ / Anu suggestions?0 -
Canonical tag for similar page with different theme.
Our commerce system allows products to be shared across multiple categories/sections of our site. E.G. /boxes/blue-box.html /circles/blue-box.html This enables the product to show up in different areas of the site, but does not link to an evergreen URL. We are considering using the canonical tag to resolve this issue, but our question relates to the similarity of the pages. Each section folder (e.g. /boxes/ and /circles/) has a different header, left navigation and footer. They are similar in layout and some content is the same, but a good portion is different in the header and nav. Each category nav basically deals with deeper links in it's own category. The product title, image, description, etc. is all the same and makes up the bulk of the page. Is this a good candidate for the canonical tag or should we attempt to accommodate an evergreen URL?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | josh-att0