Domain restructure, sitemaps and indexing
-
I've got a handcoded site with around 1500 unique articles and a handcoded sitemap. Very old school.
The url structure is a bit of a mess, so to make things easier for a developer who'll be making the site database-driven, I thought I'd recategorise the content. Same content, but with new url structure (I thought I'd juice up the urls for SEO purposes while I was at it)
To this end, I took categories like:
/body/amazing-big-shoes/
/style/red-boots/
/technology/cyber-boots/And rehoused all the content like so, doing it all manually with ftp:
/boots/amazing-boots/
/boots/red-boots/
/boots/cyber-boots/I placed 301 redirects in the .htaccess file like so:
redirect 301 /body/amazing-boots/ http://www.site.co.uk/boots/amazing-boots/
(not doing redirects for each article, just for categories which seemed to make the articles redirect nicely.)
Then I went into sitemap.xml and manually overwrote all the entries to reflect the new url structure, but keeping the old dates of the original entries, like so:
<url><loc>http://www.site.co.uk/boots/amazing-boots/index.php</loc>
<lastmod>2008-07-08</lastmod>
<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
<priority>0.5</priority></url>And resubmitted the sitemap to Google Webmasters.
This was done 4 days ago. Webmaster said that the 1400 of 1500 articles indexed had dropped to 860, and today it's climbed to 939.
Did I adopt correct procedure? Am I going about things the right way? Given a little time, can I expect Google to re-index the new pages nicely?
I appreciate I've made a lot of changes in one fell swoop which could be a bit of a no-no... ?
PS Apologies if this question appears twice on Q&A - hopefully I haven't double-posted
-
If your developer will be making the website dynamic via a system like WordPress there will be automated ways to keep your sitemap up to date every time you publish a new page to your system and then it will even ping the search engines that the sitemap is updated
It will be a "set it and forget it" type of thing with sitemaps if you are moving in that direction
Good luck!
-
Oh, no what you did is perfect! I guess I meant the site architecture/navigation, but you answered it in your original post when you said "Same content" so disregard that question.
Congrats.
-
Sadly I did change the internal linking structure, so that internal links now point to new urls not the old ones. The good news is that even with changing the internal linking structure, Google seems to be keeping abreast of it all. The number of urls indexed has now jumped - in a day - from 939 to 1024, so good old Google is clearly keeping up with the changes. Looks like my fears were ungrounded. Yay
-
Looks perfect to me too. Did the internal linking structure change at all or is that still the same? If it's all the same you should be right back where you were in no time. And you should see some benefits from having a more common sense, easy to understand URL structure. Cheers!
-
That's fair. I get that you're not recommending it personally - but it does seem popular with consistently good feedback from people, so I'll give it a go
-
Just to clarify, I know the sitemap tool I mentioned is very popular. Many small sites use it because it is online, fast and free. I have used it a few times myself. I can't necessarily say I recommend it because I have never personally purchased the software. I would say that if I was looking to obtain a sitemap for your site, I would start with that tool but may take a look at some others.
-
Thanks Ryan, that's a weight off my mind. I'll definitely take up your advice on the sitemap generator, too. Thanks for the recommendation - I'd seen a few around, but wasn't sure - it's great to be pointed in the right direction!
-
Did I adopt correct procedure? Am I going about things the right way? Given a little time, can I expect Google to re-index the new pages nicely?
I would say Yes to all three, but clarify with details below.
When you submit a sitemap to Google with 1500 pages, there is no guarantee they will index all of your pages. It sounds like you have done a lot of intensive, manual work. Fortunately, you have done things the correct way in properly redirecting each page to the new URL. If Google indexed 1400 pages before, they should index around that same number once again. It may take several weeks depending on a few factors such as your site's Domain Authority, navigation and how many links each page has received.
With respect to the sitemap, I would highly recommend using sitemap generation software. It is simply not reasonable to manually update a sitemap with 1500 entries. I would have updated the lastmod date on the sitemap but it may not make any difference.
A popular sitemap tool: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/. The free version only generates 500 pages, but for $20 you can buy the full version and automate it.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should search pages be indexed?
Hey guys, I've always believed that search pages should be no-indexed but now I'm wondering if there is an argument to index them? Appreciate any thoughts!
Technical SEO | | RebekahVP0 -
I am looking for best way to block a domain from getting indexed ?
We have a website http://www.example.co.uk/ which leads to another domain (https://online.example.co.uk/) when a user clicks,in this case let us assume it to be Apply now button on my website page. We are getting meta data issues in crawler errors from this (https://online.example.co.uk/) domain as we are not targeting any meta content on this particular domain. So we are looking to block this domain from getting indexed to clear this errors & does this effect SERP's of this domain (**https://online.example.co.uk/) **if we use no index tag on this domain.
Technical SEO | | Prasadgotteti0 -
Indexation and visibility problem
Hi I am working on a website (usarrestsearch org) for 6 months. I wrote about 100 pages full of good content. for some reason I see only 75% of the pages indexed in GWT. and Im having problems with SERP positions not rising. I suspect that it might be connected to the structure of the site. will appreciate any help thanks
Technical SEO | | holdportals0 -
Type of sitemap
I have a client with a large sitemap in html for his web shop. I am wondering though if i would be better to have a xml sitemap for Google. Is there any advantage in type of sitemap?
Technical SEO | | auke18100 -
Canonical needed after no index
Hi do you need to point canonical from a subpage to main page if you have already marked a no index on the subpage, like when google is not indexing it so do we need canonicals now as is it passing any juice?
Technical SEO | | razasaeed0 -
We just recently moved site domains, and I tried to set up a new campaign for the new root domain, but it threw an error?
It threw an error saying we cannot access the SERPs of this site? Any reason why? It is an https:// site instead of the http://, but even our older domain had an https://
Technical SEO | | josh1230 -
URL restructure and phasing out HTML sitemap
Hi SEOMozzies, Love the Q&A resource and already found lots of useful stuff too! I just started as an in-house SEO at a retailer and my first main challenge is to tidy up the complex URL structures and remove the ugly sub sitemap approach currently used. I already found a number of suggestions but it looks like I am dealing with a number of challenges that I need to resolve in a single release. So here is the current setup: The website is an ecommerce site (department store) with around 30k products. We are using multi select navigation (non Ajax). The main website uses a third party search engine to power the multi select navigation, that search engine has a very ugly URL structure. For example www.domain.tld/browse?location=1001/brand=100/color=575&size=1&various other params, or for multi select URL’s www.domain.tld/browse?location=1001/brand=100,104,506/color=575&size=1 &various other non used URL params. URL’s are easily up to 200 characters long and non-descriptive at all to our users. Many of these type of URL’s are indexed by search engines (we currently have 1.2 million of those URL’s indexed including session id’s and all other nasty URL params) Next to this the site is using a “sub site” that is sort of optimized for SEO, not 100% sure this is cloaking but it smells like it. It has a simplified navigation structure and better URL structure for products. Layout is similair to our main site but all complex HTMLelements like multi select, large top navigations menu's etc are all removed. Many of these links are indexed by search engines and rank higher than links from our main website. The URL structure is www.domain.tld/1/optimized-url .Currently 64.000 of these URL’s are indexed. We have links to this sub site in the footer of every page but a normal customer would never reach this site unless they come from organic search. Once a user lands on one of these pages we try to push him back to the main site as quickly as possible. My planned approach to improve this: 1.) Tidy up the URL structure in the main website (e.g. www.domain.tld/women/dresses and www.domain.tld/diesel-red-skirt-4563749. I plan to use Solution 2 as described in http://www.seomoz.org/blog/building-faceted-navigation-that-doesnt-suck to block multi select URL’s from being indexed and would like to use the URL param “location” as an indicator for search engines to ignore the link. A risk here is that all my currently indexed URL (1.2 million URL’s) will be blocked immediately after I put this live. I cannot redirect those URL’s to the optimized URL’s as the old URL’s should still be accessible. 2.) Remove the links to the sub site (www.domain.tld/1/optimized-url) from the footer and redirect (301) all those URL’s to the newly created SEO friendly product URL’s. URL’s that cannot be matched since there is no similar catalog location in the main website will be redirected (301) to our homepage. I wonder if this is a correct approach and if it would be better to do this in a phased way rather than the currently planned big bang? Any feedback would be highly appreciated, also let me know if things are not clear. Thanks! Chris
Technical SEO | | eCommerceSEO0 -
I have a site that has both http:// and https:// versions indexed, e.g. https://www.homepage.com/ and http://www.homepage.com/. How do I de-index the https// versions without losing the link juice that is going to the https://homepage.com/ pages?
I can't 301 https// to http:// since there are some form pages that need to be https:// The site has 20,000 + pages so individually 301ing each page would be a nightmare. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | fthead90