Anyone getting anything from paid submissions?
-
I was wondering if there was still effectiveness in the finding of directories via: plastic surgery "submit site". Below is an example of the directories I found that offer paid listings into their directory.
How do you measure what a good price is versus too expensive? How do you evaluate which directories are worth it? Alexa rank, pr and inbound links? If so what are the metrics you use? Obviously we are purely looking from a rankings/seo perspective because nobody actually uses these directories right?
Avia directory pr5 - the featured page your link would be on is pr 4. http://www.avivadirectory.com/Health/Cosmetic-Surgery/
A permanent link is $149 and a annual link is $49Findelio pr 4 - however page where my liink would be is pr0 http://www.findelio.com/5981/Cosmetic_and_Plastic_Surgery/
One time fee is $39. So although this is much cheaper but the pr is none. So in this instance do you not buy the submission?I do notice some of my competition in some of these directories. Should that be my indicator?
I thought that maybe these companies bought into these directories a long time ago and wouldn't still do so today. Is there more effective uses of my $50, $100 or $150 or whatever?Interested to see what peoples thoughts are on this type of linkbuilding in todays world. Or if that even matters and this will always be beneficial? Thanks!
-
My valuation is based primarily on page authority with consideration given to domain authority (both SEOmoz metrics).
I usually discover about twenty potential links without buying any and create an Excel spreadsheet with the following columns:
- URL
- Page Authority
- Domain Authority
- Price per Year
With this information you can easily tell which are a good value and which are not. Make sure to keep track of the links you pass on because they may become more attractive when you've already picked all the low hanging fruit.
Recently I started using Raven Tools to manage this process because the spreadsheet starts to get out of control:)
-
Michael,
Thank you for the answer and suggestions. I was wondering if you could please clarify one thing.
What metric led you to suggest that Aviva is a good one to pay and submit to? Is it mostly based on the moz rank of the page? I am assuming you did but was there anything else? If not what is the number you look for in the mozrank for the page? is it above a certain number as a generality?
Thanks!
-
My Unqualified Opinion:
I think directories are the easiest way to get quality links as long as you use common sense when you submit. In some niches, they are the only readily available source of links.
Unfortunately, this type of link building is also the easiest strategy for your competition to copy because the barrier to entry is so low. Like most link building activities, directory submission has value when combined with other methods.
How to Find Good Directories:
Fire up Open Site Explorer and look at your competitor's links. The links with high page authority and high domain authority are the one's you want to pay attention to. Many directories contain the word "directory" in the URL or domain name.
Things You Should Check Before Submitting:
-
Do a search for the domain name in Google to verify that the site is not penalized
- You should see many results for the domain. If not, you are probably looking at a site that is penalized or delisted - stay away!
-
Check the historical page rank with the SEOmoz historical page rank checker to further check for an indication of a penality
- A sudden drop in PR is an indication of a penalty
-
Check the page authority of the page your site will be listed on!
- I blindly submitted to the Yahoo Directory and DMOZ only to discover that the pages my site is listed on were totally weak and not worth the money (Yahoo).
Directory Rant:
There is no such thing as a universally great list of directories mainly for the reason that some verticals are listed on low authority pages. Do not accept recommendations that are not specific to your vertical.
Also:
The Aviva directory is a good buy with a PA of 36 for the page you mentioned. For your vertical, I recommend you check out the following:
http://searchengineland.com/a-link-building-blueprint-the-foundation-62784
-
-
Good point and that's kinda what I'm trying to figure out. I know about those directories and those are DEF without question good ones to belong to as well as DMOZ.
But as part of an overall strategy that's what I am wondering if anyone is still incorporating this? You say that you are concerned with two things one of them being passing pr. Well in my first link example you would be listed on a pr4 page. So in that case would you consider that link or do you ONLY consider the 5 or 6 bigger directories we know about.
Thanks!
-
I would be concerned with two aspects here: visibility (non SEO) and passing PR (SEO). Based on those points, there are few directories left that I feel are still good choices. Here is a list I follow with new websites that appear as backlinks & pass some good link juice:
- Yahoo Directory
- Business.com
- JoeAnt
- BestOfTheWeb
It's tempting to base your site on what your competition does but that will not always work for your own property. The directories mentioned above are used and actually show up in search results. I wouldn't put too much stock in directories as your main platform for SEO but as a small part to an overall strategy - it can't hurt!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Landing pages for paid traffic and the use of noindex vs canonical
A client of mine has a lot of differentiated landing pages with only a few changes on each, but with the same intent and goal as the generic version. The generic version of the landing page is included in navigation, sitemap and is indexed on Google. The purpose of the differentiated landing pages is to include the city and some minor changes in the text/imagery to best fit the Adwords text. Other than that, the intent and purpose of the pages are the same as the main / generic page. They are not to be indexed, nor am I trying to have hidden pages linking to the generic and indexed one (I'm not going the blackhat way). So – I want to avoid that the duplicate landing pages are being indexed (obviously), but I'm not sure if I should use noindex (nofollow as well?) or rel=canonical, since these landing pages are localized campaign versions of the generic page with more or less only paid traffic to them. I don't want to be accidentally penalized, but I still need the generic / main page to rank as high as possible... What would be your recommendation on this issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ostesmorbrod0 -
How to get more keyword ideas
I am trying to get more keyword ideas for one of my project. For example the seed keyword is computer virus and the results which i get is keywords related to the phrase computer virus such as virus in computer , virus threats but actually i am trying to get search details on actual threat names or types of viruses and i expect output such as malware, trojan etc.. ( Currently using ad words keyword planner to fetch keyword data ) Is there any way to achieve this ? Even if i use "types of computer viruses" as seed keyword i am not getting the types of viruses people searching for instead i get keywords ideas such as computer viruses, computer threats etc... ? Can somebody suggest a solution ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NortonSupportSEO0 -
Should i get witty with folder name of Blog?
I understand the importance of keywords, but I also worry about the usability factor. Curious - anyone ever study about the impact of calling your WP folder "blog" vs "long-primarykeyword" Im thinking of something generic /blog
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | inmn
/community
/articles
/info Vs long keyword /long-keyword/ ANyone have any input? Every time I search, i see things about Folders vs Subdomains, etc. Thanks everyone for your feedback!1 -
Alternative Markup Challenge. Can anyone help?
I have a challenge around alternative markup. We currently operate a single domain with geo-targeted folders and alternative markup implemented. We are now now looking to expand this out to non-English content. Current Implementation; All generic English language content hosted on the main domain, with x5 English language content variations (locales) available under a folder structure (.com/en-us/ etc.). Alternative markup is in place for all locales within the HTML, implemented automatically by developers via the CMS. Locale folders geo-targeted via GWT and Bing WT. Planned Launch; Introduction of 5 new non-English locale folders (e.g. /de-de/ etc.), targeted to their respective country and language. Content language will be mixed, with around 1/10 of pages translated and the other 9/10 of pages (business listings) having their body content remain in English, with headers / footers translated. Locale folders will be geo-targeted via GWT and Bing WT. Folder and markup usage TBC. Options; Folders; Implement folder structure /de/, attempting to indicate country but not language (issue; usually a single identifier indicates language, not country?). Implement /de-de/ folder structure to match the English locales and maintain correct country targeting (issue; some content is not in language). Alternative markup; Do not make use of markup at all. Implement CMS based automated markup on all English and non-English content throughout the locale (e.g. /de-de/), but exclude English language versions (e.g. /en-gb/). Attempt manually implementing markup to bridge the English and non-English locales, potentially creating future issues with new content going live and content being removed. A heavy risk. Current approach is webmaster tools targeting, a /de-de/ folder structure and automated implementation of markup. This means English language URLs will have markup and non-English language URLs will have markup, but they will not match up (e.g. English pages will never have markup for non-English language content). If you minds haven't melted, what's your thoughts? Any help is much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HelloAlba0 -
Does anyone know why my website's domain authority has dropped from 51 to 49
However this does not seem to be in isolation. All of my competitors websites have taken a similar 1 or 2 points hit. I am thinking that as an industry we may have been affected by a mutual linking site being taken down, redesigned or just loosing its own domain authority. We do rank well for our keywords and we have been on a continual rise since I took over in January, we do a little bit of a guest blogging and I am trying to build links to the site but I am doing it slowly. Would anyone else have an idea on what has happened that would cause 4 sites in the same industry to take a 1 or 2 point hit? Thanks, Emmet
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CertificationEU1 -
I get warnings for overly dynamic urls, but have canonical links in place.
Hi, Seomoz gives me warnings for overly dynamic urls. This is mostly caused by a crumbtrail system. I have a canonical link in the header for all the urls I receive warnings on, should I still worry about this? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mooij0 -
Has anyone ever seen this canonicalization problem with Google?
I recently move my site (www.leatherhidestore.com/servlet/StoreFront) off of the ProStores platform because I could never get Google to show my homepage in SERP results - instead always selecting random product pages to rank. However, I never had this problem with Yahoo and Bing as they always defaulted to the homepage except when the category was a better match. Fast forward and I have just launched the site (www.leatherhidestore) on Magento Community and I STILL CANNOT GET GOOGLE TO USE MY HOMEPAGE FOR SERP RESULTS although I'm getting okay SERPS for random pages.....ERRRRRR! Of course, as if to rub salt in the wound, Yahoo and Bing are behaving just perfect. Still, I must think that if my Google would recognize my homepage (where the PR is and backlinks point to) I would be doing 10x better. I am showing duplicate page content and title problems which the developer is trying to solve but I do not know if this will fix the homepage Google issue. I feel like I must be in some sort of canonicalization death spiral. Has anybody dealt with this issue before and will mercifully share what I should do to fix it...please! Hunter
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | leatherhidestore0 -
How to get your company on the Google +, Right Hand side box of search results?
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-plus-content-replaces-ads/41452/ We have a Google plus page, but the results aren't coming up there Do you need a certain amount of people in your circles, what is the criteria to get your brand here? Any links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | xoffie0