High PR networks look like they are gaining traction - and working!
-
Let me put a disclaimer here that I do not use high PR networks in any of my seo endeavors. That being said, they have always looked attractive - especially post panda where in content links from high pr websites are valuable.
I run seo campaigns for a large lot of websites & have been noticing my competition creeping past me who are using links from these networks to increase their positions for hard to attain keywords.
Has anyone here had experience building links using these types of networks? It looks like they are under google's radar for now & are a great way to get some powerful links to your site. Any thoughts on if google will catch onto these types of links if they are properly protected (limited footprint, revolving links, unique content, etc.)?
It's tough not to be at least interested in networks like this b/c of the results they provide.
-
I want to say that I 100% agree with Ryan, but I will play devil's advocate.
There is a time and place for everything, including black hat SEO. If your goals are well-aligned with short term success, then black hat SEO is probably the cheapest and most effective option you have. To me, link building isn't an ethical consideration, but a business decision. If black hat tactics fit my goals, or my clients' goals, and everybody is aware of the risk involved and all of the options at play, then why not?
There's no doubt about it - these are paid links, and as Ryan said, they will eventually be addressed by Google's Webspam team, and when that happens, you're going to lose a large share of your link portfolio (at best) or receive a penalty (at worst). But there is no Matt Cutts fairy that haunts black hatters at night, preying on them as they dream of paid links and content farms. It's economics, plain and simple. I don't know what industry you are in or what your exact situation is, so it would be presumptuous of me to completely rule out black hat SEO strategies.
That said, I've yet to encounter a situation where I've needed to resort to black hat tactics, for personal projects or client work. Just sayin...
-
Do you feel something like this, if done right, will be "busted" by Google?
Of course it will. It's only a matter of time.
Many people refer to Google as a nameless, faceless group. People often refer to "the government" in a similar manner. The Google spam team, headed by Matt Cutts, is a highly educated, experienced and savvy group of people. They are also very patient. Time is on their side. When they find a violation, there is no rush for them to quickly take action. They could choose to study sites for months to gather further information.
So how does one person or group run these 35-55 sites in a cost effective manner? The only possibility is all these sites need to be offered by one host. Each host is assigned their own C block, but some companies offer "seo hosting". I don't know for sure how it works but I imagine they pay for rack space to have their servers hosted with dozens of ISPs, thereby acquiring numerous C blocks.
Google can easily open one account with any one of these companies, capture all the IPs, then effectively take down every site on the network. The entire idea of "seo hosting" is to manipulate search engine results, so it is definitely a black hat technique.
You are always welcome to report any paid links or other information to Google. They do listen. It's important your report is not a "this site is outranking me and I don't like it" type of report. I have read Google's forums and it seems MANY of the complaints take that exact tone. You need to offer very specific, verifiable reasons as to why you believe the links are a violation of Google's policies. Your suspicions and feelings are not of value and will be received with the standard "thank you for your report and we will investigate the matter" and that will probably be the end of it. But if you can offer a thorough, logical analysis, then you are making it easy for the Spam Team to investigate the issue.
-
Sorry, I should have been more specific with my initial question. A high PR network is a privately owned network of websites each hosted on different class c ip addresses, with unique or private whois information, no website footprint between the sites (the html structure / layout of each site is different), and all reflecting good PR ranging from 3-7 with no historical large fluctuations in PR.
Owners of these networks will sell in-content homepage text link advertisements for a monthly fee ranging from $80 per month to $150 per month. A network usually consists of 35-55 websites and the link to your site using your targeted keyword would be made available on each site, usually with a unique content "blurb" on each website of about 150 words. If you stop payment, your link is removed from the entire network.
This is a very "black hat" technique to attain rankings but it appears to be working well for huge serp gains. Do you feel something like this, if done right, will be "busted" by Google? It's not fair to engage in ethical SEO and be circumvented by the black hatters!
-
Can you be more specific about what you mean by "high PR networks"? Are you talking about Web 2.0 websites like Squidoo? Or microsites / linkwheels? I'm a bit confused.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Inherited site with high Spam Score backlinks
When building backlinks myself I have been conscious to avoid going over the 30 spam score as recommended on Moz somewhere. But one of the sites I have recently started working on: https://www.osborneplanning.uk/
Link Building | | Donsimong
has a number of very high spam score backlinks, 5 above 50. Some are follow some nofollow.
I am wondering if its a good idea to disavow them, or should I just leave them as they are, I have read some suggestions that Google will just ignore the majority of spammy backlinks, and its better just to keep them, I dont want to start deleting links if they don't cause any problems.0 -
Redirecting dofollow, high-domain-authority links from one site to another: good idea?
I have two sites that offer help for freelance writers. The first gets almost no search traffic and is very low priority for me. The second is my main priority and gets substantial search traffic. The low-priority site has a significant number of dofollow backlinks from high-domain-authority sites. Is it a good idea to 301 redirect these links to similar/related posts on my high-priority site? Would this potentially boost the SEO of my high-priority site? Thanks for any help!
Link Building | | John88990 -
Do article submissions work for SEO?
Im wondering if article submissions with backlink work for seo? How google handle with these submissons? Thanks
Link Building | | joeko0 -
Advisable to pay for a link from a highly reputed site in same domain?
Is it okay to pay for a link if the site is a very highly reputed (PR4) one in the same domain as your site? Thanks
Link Building | | EricMoore0 -
Should we imitate our competitor's blog network?
One of our competitors has built a little blog network, and I'm wondering if it's worth it for us to imitate it. Here's how they have it set up: They have domain.com, their e-commerce site, and blog.domain.com. They also have a half-dozen EMD blogs set up that all link to each other and to the e-commerce site, each one supplying content related to one niche of their busines (e.g. kitchenwidgets.com, widgetsforkids.com, etc.). It seems they've been doing this since December 2011. In my opinion, the content on these EMD blogs is pretty low value. Sure enough, they have basically no inbound links from outside the blog network, and it's not getting shared socially. I'm having a hard time imagining a lot of long-tail searches that would bring in qualified shoppers, since they basically just write up 300-word long descriptions of photos. Based on SEMrush data, it doesn't look like this approach is hurting them -- they didn't take a Penguin dive in April, for example. But how likely is it that this approach is helping them enough to justify the time they must spend writing (probably ~30-60m a day)? It would be trivial for the algo to determine that these are not natural links and completely devalue them. Would it not be better to consolidate that time into 2.5-5hrs a week spent researching and writing a valuable, link-worthy, long-tail-rich post for the main blog and then promoting it in hopes of attracting natural links?
Link Building | | CMC-SD0 -
Exact match domains still work??
I'm sure this has been asked and it also has been answered but I'd like some insight from another SEO as to why this site -> <cite>www dot newhomesglasgow.co.uk/ </cite> is ranking on the first page for the keyword(you guessed it) 'new homes in glasgow' OSE shows about 4 backlinks. Is it just the content on the page(that's jammed with keywords) and the matching URL? Any feedback would be appreciated 🙂
Link Building | | DanHill0 -
I was looking for the best practice to use anchor tags...
Seomoz says NOT to use your anchor terms on other external pages as you will cannabilize your main page - this is news to me. Appreciate any input on this.
Link Building | | impressem0