Rogerbot Ignoring Robots.txt?
-
Hi guys,
We're trying to block Rogerbot from spending 8000-9000 of our 10000 pages per week for our site crawl on our zillions of PhotoGallery.asp pages. Unfortunately our e-commerce CMS isn't tremendously flexible so the only way we believe we can block rogerbot is in our robots.txt file.
Rogerbot keeps crawling all these PhotoGallery.asp pages so it's making our crawl diagnostics really useless.
I've contacted the SEOMoz support staff and they claim the problem is on our side. This is the robots.txt we are using:
User-agent: rogerbot
Disallow:/PhotoGallery.asp
Disallow:/pindex.asp
Disallow:/help.asp
Disallow:/kb.asp
Disallow:/ReviewNew.asp
User-agent: *
Disallow:/cgi-bin/
Disallow:/myaccount.asp
Disallow:/WishList.asp
Disallow:/CFreeDiamondSearch.asp
Disallow:/DiamondDetails.asp
Disallow:/ShoppingCart.asp
Disallow:/one-page-checkout.asp
Sitemap: http://store.jrdunn.com/sitemap.xml
For some reason the Wysiwyg edit is entering extra spaces but those are all single spaced.
Any suggestions? The only other thing I thought of to try is to something like "Disallow:/PhotoGallery.asp*" with a wildcard.
-
I have just encountered an interesting thing about Moz Link Search and its bot: if you do a search for Domains linking to Google.com , you find a list of about 900 000 domains, among which I was surprised to find webcache.googleusercontent.com
See the proof below in attache screen shot.
At the same time, the webcache.googleusercontent.com policy for robots is as shown in the second attachment.
In my opinion, there is only one possible explanation: Moz Bot does ignore robots.txt files...
-
Thanks Cyrus,
No, for some reason the editor double-spaced the file when I pasted. Other than that, it's the same though.
Yes, I actually tried ordering the exclusions both ways. Neither works.
The robots.txt checkers report no errors. I had actually checked them before posting.
Before I posted this, I was pretty convinced the problem wasn't in our robots.txt but the Seomoz support staff says essentially, "We don't think the problem is with Rogerbot, so it must be in your robots.txt file, but we can't look at that, so if by some chance your robots.txt file is fine, then there's nothing we can do for you because we're just going to assume the problem is on your side."
I figured, with everything I've already tried, and if the fabulous SEOMoz community can't come up with a solution, that'll be the best I can do.
-
Hi Kelly,
Thanks for letting us know. Could be a couple of things right off the bat. Is this your exact robots.txt file? If so, it's missing some formatting like proper spacing to be perfectly compliant. You can run a check of your robots.txt file at serveral places.
http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml
http://www.searchenginepromotionhelp.com/m/robots-text-tester/robots-checker.php
http://www.sxw.org.uk/computing/robots/check.html
Also, it's generally a good idea to put specific inclusions towards the bottom, so I might flip the order and put the rogerbot directives last and the User-agent: * first.
Hope this helps. Let us know if any of this points in the right direction.
-
Thanks so much for the tip. Unfortunately still unsuccessful. (shrug)
-
Try
Disallow: /PhotoGallery.asp
I put wild cards all over usually just to be sure and had no issues so far.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When Should I Ignore Moz's Report Canonical Missing?
I'm dealing with an eCommerce website which has a category, subcategory, products. Moz is showing all of these and the individual products as missing a canonical. The site is very thin on content at the moment, but all the pages are clearly different, and I don't see why they need a canonical unless this is some rule that eCommerce sites have to follow. Should I ignore Moz's missing canonical report? My understanding is if the product appears in multiple categories, then a canonical should be put in place to the product. Any advice would be appreciated. Christina
Moz Pro | | ChristinaRadisic0 -
Meta Robots query
Hi guys, I was ranking really well on my home page for certain keywords which has all dropped pretty dramatically over the last 3/4 weeks - I think the issue is since since the configuration of Yoast SEO Wordpress plugin. In March (when my rankings were strong) my crawl test showed the top data in the attached image, and in May (now the rankings have dropped severly) they show the bottom data. I don't fully understand canonical and Meta Robots so I am hoping someone can shed some light on the following points. 1. Will the change result in my loss of rankings.
Moz Pro | | RocketStats
2. How can I put it back to how it was in March? PS. I haven't had any Google penalties. Thanks,
Joshua RfTar0 -
Will moz crawl pages blocked by robots.txt and nofollow links?
i have over 2,000 temporary redirects in my campaign report redirects are mostly events like being redirected to a login page before showing the actual data im thinking of adding nofollow on the link so moz wont crawl the redirection to reduce the notification will this solve my problem?
Moz Pro | | WizardOfMoz0 -
Do the SEOmoz Campaign Reports follow Robots.txt?
Hello, Do the SEOmoz Campaign Reports (that track errors and warnings for a website) follow rules I write in the robots.txt file? I've done all that I can to fix the legitimate errors with my website, as reported by the fabulous SEOmoz tools. I want to clean up my pages indexed with the search engines so I've written a few rules to exclude content from Wordpress tag URLs for instance. Will my campaign report errors and warnings also drop as a result of this?
Moz Pro | | Flexcin0 -
Does Rogerbot recognize rel="alternate" hreflang="x"?
Rogerbot just completed its first crawl and is reporting all kinds of duplicate content - both page content and meta title/description. The pages it is calling duplicate are used with rel="alternate" hreflang="x", but are still being labeled as dupes. The title and descriptions are usually exactly the same, so I am working on getting at least those translated into different languages. I think its getting tripped up because the product page its crawling are only in English, but the chrome of the site is in the translated languages. The URLs look like so: Original: site.com/product Detected duplicates: site.com/fr/product, site.com/de/product, site.com/zh-hans/product
Moz Pro | | sedwards0 -
Rogerbot not showing in logs
Hi All Rogerbot has recently thrown up 403 errors for all our pages - no changes had been made to the site so I asked our ISP for assistance. They wanted to have a look at what rogerbot was doing and so went to the logs but rogerbot was not listed anywhere in the logs by name - any ideas why? Regards Craig
Moz Pro | | CraigWiltshire0 -
How to get rid of the message "Search Engine blocked by robots.txt"
During the Crawl Diagnostics of my website,I got a message Search Engine blocked by robots.txt under Most common errors & warnings.Please let me know the procedure by which the SEOmoz PRO Crawler can completely crawl my website?Awaiting your reply at the earliest. Regards, Prashakth Kamath
Moz Pro | | 1prashakth0 -
To block with robots.txt or canonicalize?
I'm working with an apt community with a large number of communities across the US. I'm running into dup content issues where each community will have a page such as "amenities" or "community-programs", etc that are nearly identical (if not exactly identical) across all communities. I'm wondering if there are any thoughts on the best way to tackle this. The two scenarios I came up with so far are: Is it better for me to select the community page with the most authority and put a canonical on all other community pages pointing to that authoritative page? or Should i just remove the directory all-together via robots.txt to help keep the site lean and keep low quality content from impacting the site from a panda perspective? Is there an alternative I'm missing?
Moz Pro | | JonClark150