How do I Avoid Excessive Internal Links on an eCommerce site?
-
I think I'm getting dinged for this on Term Target because the page is full of products, which have links to their product page, but I'm not sure.
-
From the usability point of view and to help sort the problem you're facing I would suggest a few things - first I would make sure that each page with products doesn't display more than say around 12 of them and use pagination or view all option for the rest of them. If you are using 'view all' option, make sure that it is not implemented by hiding the remaining products, but by actually loading them on request.
If you're navigation uses a lot of links try to tidy it up - perhaps grouping them under main categories, which when go to the sub-categories, also - try to use breadcrumbs, which are a good way of navigating backwards and not necessarily showing all these sub categories in the sub-navigation.
Additionally, you should check all of the column items - are there any unnecessary links, which could be taken off?
The E-commerce site is more user friendly when visitor doesn't have to think twice what to do - and too many items is not only bad from the usability point of view - but also - as you have found out for SEO.
As Nakul has mentioned - you should check any duplicate links - if you have any in the main navigation, then in the side bar and footer - perhaps you could remove a few of them and have them only in one place.
It's really more guessing here as I don't know what you're site looks like, but I hope this will help a little bit.
-
I have seen certain "monster" brand-names doing stuff like shrinking their drop down menu's or completely disabling them on inner pages vs the homepage. IMO that is a big usability issue.
Imagine going to a homepage of a website and selecting Green Widgets from the Dropdown Widgets.
Now once you are on Green Widgets, you again mouseover on Widgets expecting the same dropdown, and it works. Good.
However, if you want to browse to a different product category, from the Green Widgets page, which lives under a different Tab, it doesn't work. I think that's a usability nightmare.
From Search Engine perspective, having the same redundant set of links in Header and Footer on every single page devalues the internal link juice you are passing from one page to another. It's a Catch 22 situation here.
In my experience, moving the repeating header and footer lower in the HTML helps. Other then that if the domain has decent authority and you are not facing any indexing issues, which you shouldn't I would not worry about it. It also depends on how many are too many
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should an internal link open in a new tab or in the same window?
Should an internal link open in a new tab or in the same window? Seems like this is an issue that has never had a definitive answer one way or the other. But I couldn't find any recent articles from reliable sources taking a stance and answering this question. Does anyone know if user engagement metrics (time on site, bounce rate, pages per visit) are impacted if a user clicks a link that opens in a new tab? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | NicheSocial0 -
Ecommerce Canonical Question
Hi all, first question (eek) Could I pick the brains of fellow users around an issue we are having with canonical urls on a magento website. At the moment we do not have these enabled as it seems to break our indexing. Cut a long story short, we have thousands of products but haven't rewritten many of the descriptions from the manufacturers yet and so have noindexed all the product pages (freeing them as we go). The goal, for now, is to pull in traffic via the filtering options we have on the site The goal, for now, is to pull in traffic via the filtering options we have on the site. For example, if you go to Dresses, there then are several filtering options which would allow you to choose a colour, shape and material - if you wished to filter that precisely. These filtering options are all crawlable and so we would then have a page that google could index for, for example, Green Lace Maxi Dress. All good there, few people search for specific products and a lot search for types of products so we are covered. To get back to the issue at hand. If we enable the canonical option on our magento plugin it will stop us from being able to target these terms. Whereas the filtering option would create domain.com/dress/green/maxi/lace with the page title of Green Lace Maxi Dress, if we enable the canonical part of the seo plugin the canonical link which would be added to the page would be - instantly removing our ability to rank for longer tail dress related searches (we are not going to compete with the big players on the premium terms, yet!). There are alternative plugins we can buy for magento to add the correct tag, however, if every page's canonical just points back it itself like this, is there really much point spending nearly $1000 on the 4 licences we would need to cover our range of sites. Is it really necessary, in this case, that we have a canonical for the product filtering? Sorry for the long post, hope it made sense. Thanks for any assistance.
On-Page Optimization | | DSCarl0 -
Pre-launch site or not
We are going to set up a new site in four months. Historically we always set up a simple Wordpress "Pre-launch-site" with relevant texts to start ranking in the SERP. Anyone with experience of doing/not doing this and what is had led to? A site with relevant texts also should have incoming links, which needs more work.
On-Page Optimization | | fredrikahlen0 -
Do NoFollow links still split link equity?
So I realize that Google will split link equity between all links on any given page. Example, if a landing page has 10 links then the authority from the landing page is split into 10 and each link given its own smaller amount of equity from that landing page. My question is if I were to turn 9 of the 10 links on this page to NoFollow links would the equity still remain split 10 ways or would it simply pass all of it to the one DoFollow link left on the page?
On-Page Optimization | | PageOnePowerGang0 -
Internal link to the home page
When building menus and other internal links, should the link to the home page be http://www.domain.com/ or http://www.domain.com/index.html or does it matter? Best,
On-Page Optimization | | ChristopherGlaeser
Christopher0 -
Link juice question
In theory: If i have a page with only two outgoing, do-follow links,
On-Page Optimization | | elgoog
and both have the same target,
only the first one will be counted.. right? Will that link pass 100% or 50% of the link juice? (if the anchor text is the same or different does not make any difference i think)0 -
Setting up a domain for a future site
Hi there, That may be a bit of a silly question to ask, but we've setup a new domain for an existing site. While the site is in the making, the site owners wants to already start promoting the new URL on stationeries etc. Hence, we need to setup the new URL so that it forwards to the site, but so that Google doesn't give it the history of a secondary (less important) domain. What is the best way to do this? Currently we've put in a 301 redirect, but will that bear no future consequences on the SEO of the site, when the site is moved to this new domain, and the old domain is 301 redirected. Thanks, SEOeclipse
On-Page Optimization | | Bozboz0 -
Relative links
Hi, How much of an SEO issue is it to have relative links vs. fully written out links, like http://www.seolinkquestion.com/my-silly-question ? If I have a site that uses relative links, should I change them all? Thanks...Mike
On-Page Optimization | | 945010