On Page Report Card F Grade Critical Factors
-
The website and page in question is http://www.upstrap-pro.com/ I sell non-slip camera straps and FYI for key word(s) camera strap(s) we were for a number of years on page 1 or 2. Google sold our registered trade-name _UP_strap
all over the web including Amazon. And of course we were hijacked for the keyword. Be that as it mayAccording to SEOMOZ there are many errors on our homepage. I am having the host look at a number of SEOMOZ's report findings.
Two critical findings that are making me nuts because I do not have the tech chops to understand why are:
1) Accessible to Engines
<dl>
<dt>Explanation</dt>
<dd>Pages that can't be crawled or indexed have no opportunity to rank in the results. Before tweaking keyword targeting or leveraging other optimization techniques, it's essential to make sure this page is accessible.</dd>
</dl>
2) Appropriate Use of Rel Canonical
<dl>
<dt>Explanation</dt>
<dd>If the canonical tag is pointing to a different URL, engines will not count this page as the reference resource and thus, it won't have an opportunity to rank. Make sure you're targeting the right page (if this isn't it, you can reset the target above) and then change the canonical tag to reference that URL</dd>
<dd>So here is the code:</dd>
<dd>```
<html xmlns="<a class="attribute-value">http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml</a>"> <head> <title>DSLR-Camera-Straps Award Winning Non~Slip Shoulder Strapstitle> <meta name="<a class="attribute-value">description</a>" content="<a class="attribute-value">An Amazing Camera Strap that will NOT slip off your shoulder! Neck straps are bad for your neck & camera slings are bulky. Easy 60 day money back return policy.</a>" /> <meta http-equiv="<a class="attribute-value">Content-type</a>" content="<a class="attribute-value">text/html;charset=UTF-8</a>" /> <base href="http://www.upstrap-pro.com/Merchant2/" /> <link type="<a class="attribute-value">text/css</a>" rel="<a class="attribute-value">stylesheet</a>" href="css/00000002/cssui.css" media="" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="http://www.upstrap-pro.com/" /></dl> -
Do you have Google Webmaster Tools set up? That's the easiest way to confirm that Google is, in fact, indexing all or at least most of your URLs.
Who set up your canonicals? Can they look into it for you and make sure everything is okay?
-
There's nothing in the pasted code that shows why the crawler thinks your site is inaccessible. You should check for the existence of a robots.txt file in your sites root folder and make sure its not blocking access. You can also check the .htaccess file to see if thats blocking access.
In terms of the rel canonical, there are a couple things I'm noticing:
- It points to the root of the domain, without any index.php or anything like that. If the page report is for anything other than <a class="external" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.upstrap-pro.com/, for example without the www or pointing to an index page, it will be a conflict with the rel canonical tag. Even though they will load the same resource, they're technically different URLs.</a>
- You're using the base tag. I'm not familiar enough with this tag to know, but I suspect it might be messing up your canonical tag, turning it into <a class="external" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.upstrap-pro.com/Mercha...</a><a class="external" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.upstrap-pro.com/</a>
Good luck!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why are my pages de-indexed?
<form id="form-t3_37nfib9dz" class="usertext" action="http://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/37nfib/why_were_my_pages_deindexed/#"> Hello all, I am very new to SEO. For some reason many of the pages on my site were de-indexed. Specifically the ones linked from this page: However other pages, like the ones linked from this page and this page were not de-indexed. http://www.lawyerconnection.ca/practice-areas/car-accident-injury-lawyers/[1] However the pages linked from this page were not de-indexed: http://www.lawyerconnection.ca/practice-areas/slip-and-fall-lawyers/[2] http://www.lawyerconnection.ca/podcastresources/[3] That first page itself was not de-indexed, just the site that it links to. It just happened today, so maybe I am jumping the gun but I doubt it. When I enter the page into google webmaster tools again and press fetch, one of the child pages, it re-indexes. What could be the problem here? I had someone re-write the content for every city but I have a feeling that there is less differences in the car accidents pages? Is this considered duplicated content do you think? Am I making some other mistake I can't think of? Is it just a one day blip (I doubt it) Let me know, thanks. </form>
On-Page Optimization | | RafeTLouis0 -
Any issue with my On page SEO
Kindly review my website and let me know if there is any issue with On page or I am missing anything? Home page - http://www.ayurjeewan.com Deep Page - http://www.ayurjeewan.com/natural/divya-triphala-churna/
On-Page Optimization | | MasonBaker0 -
Confused by Moz page grading tool
Can anyone shed any light on why moz ranks this page an F: http://www.traditional-cleaning.co.uk/cleaning-in-tynemouth.htm for 'cleaners in tynemouth' and 'cleaning in tynemouth' Many thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | EdwardoUK0 -
Noindex child pages (whose content is included on parent pages)?
I'm sorry if there have been questions close to this before... I've using WordPress less like a blogging platform and more like a CMS for years now... For content management purposes we organize a lot of content around Parent/Child page (and custom-post-type) relationships; the Child pages are included as tabbed content on the Parent page. Should I be noindexing these child pages, since their content is already on the site, in full, on their Parent pages (ie. duplicate content)? Or does it not matter, since the crawlers may not go to all of the tabbed content? None of the pages have shown up in Moz's "High Priority Issues" as duplicate content but it still seems like I'm making the Parent pages suffer needlessly... Anything obvious I'm not taking into consideration? By the by, this is my first post here @ Moz, which I'm loving; this site and the forums are such a great resource! Anyways, thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | rsigg0 -
To Many Links On Page
I'm having a problem on a crawl warning for our main site. The warning is that every one of my pages has to many links, a little over 1,000 on almost all of them. I think this is because our category list on our left hand sidebar has so many categories, and that sidebar appears on every last one of our pages even all the way into our products. Can anyone take a look and tell me if this is the reason why and what I could possibly do about this? Thanks in advance! www.Ocelco.com
On-Page Optimization | | Mike.Bean0 -
Ranking for specific pages
HI, Lets say my website is abc.com and my targeted keyword is abc for index page. Internal pages, like abc.com/apple.htm, abc.com/banana.htm. The targeted keyword for apple.htm is fresh apples, buy apples, and for banana.htm, fresh banana, buy banana. How to define these keywords in the campaign. Please suggest. Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | younus0 -
Too Many on page links
What is everyone's opinion on this? < 100 at all times? 100 -200 Okay? 200-300+ A little much?
On-Page Optimization | | MirandaP0 -
DUPLICATE PAGE TITLE ISSUE
Hi We have 25 pages with a download form on it. People arrive at the page through a ink with optimised anchor text which sits on the information pages. As there is no information on these pages we do not need them to be optimised so the developer has given all the download pages exactly the same page title. Although the pages in themselves are not significant would this effect the way Google viewed the whole site, and would it pay to make each one unique or doesn't it really matter. Alternatively, is there a better way to handle this? and if so would that ligate the benefit of the anchor text. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | PH2920