Do you know a case where product variations caused panda?
-
Would like to add 300 products to ecommerce site of which 150 products are just variations in different colors.
In this particular case there are some reaons for:
- Not writing partially unique product descriptions for each product variation
- Not setting them up as variations on one product page
So I would have several product pages with nearly identical product descriptions (proprietary description written by us), just name of color in title and description and EAN in description being different, as well as over time different user generated content showing up. Also different product images used.
I would not mind if google would not index some product variations.
Do you think I should be concerned about Panda? Do you know any website which had a Panda problem caused by product variations?
Thanks
-
I don't think anyone really knows how much of the text needs to be unique in order to trigger Panda.
I just finished an audit for a site that had pages that had content that was completely duplicated on another site, yet the information was all in a different order than the other site. The site was not affected by Panda. But does that mean that simply changing up the order of text is enough to evade Panda? One case like this is not enough to prove anything.
I think you need more than just a change in the meta description though.
-
Marie, thanks a lot for sharing this.
I will use the canoncical then as you suggest for now.
At a later point I will have unique product descriptions written for product variations.
From your experience, do you think small variation of description text is enough, or do you think that the majority of text may need to be unique. At zalando I actually saw that they implemented minimal variations in the beginning of the meta description. Just adding sometimes 2 words or changing word order.
-
I have done a large number of traffic drop audits for Panda hit sites and I can tell you that I have seen many sites where product descriptions have gotten them in the doghouse.
In most cases, however, the main problem is that the site is using stock product descriptions that hundreds of other sites are also using. As such Google sees that xx% of your site contains information that is exactly the same as other sites and decides that your site is of low quality and should not rank well.
In your situation though, you are talking about duplication within your own site if I understand you right. So, you are saying that you would write a unique product description and then have slight variations on each page.
I worked with one site that sold not products, but reports. The reports produced thousands of pages on the site that had 90-95% duplicated content and then just a few words that were unique to that page. I believe that the Panda issue was connected to this mass duplication.
You asked why large brands can get away with this. That is a really good question. This is a personal theory, and not something I have proven, but I am wondering if Google has some leeway in regards to Panda for brands who sell products. When I look at the site you mentioned their product descriptions are thin and yes, they are duplicate. There is almost no text on the page for some of them. These are classic things that can cause other sites to be affected by Panda.
I really think your best option is to use rel-canonical for these pages. This type of situation is exactly why Google developed rel canonical (see http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394)
-
thanks.
I understand that this is considered best practice.
But do you know about a case or heard about a case where this really was the likely reason for panda?
I noticed that some very big ecommerce sites such as zalando with top-notch SEO, actually publish color variations with near-identical product descriptions and without canonical or noindex. I was wondering, maybe google is more understanding in terms of content duplciation when it comes to product variations on ecommerce sites as it is generally not done for manipulative purposes.
-
As you describe your problem it seems to me that you will have lots of very near duplicate content pages on your site. That can cause a panda problem and is a waste of your website's power.
There are multiple solutions.
-
combine all of these color,etc. variants to a single page
-
use rel=canonical to attribute duplicates to a master version
-
write very unique descriptions for each color,etc variant, optimizing each for a different query
-
-
Use excel to concatenate unique product descriptions using different parts of the sentence as different variables.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
PLEASE HELP - Old query string URL causing problems
For a long time, we were ranking 1st/2nd for the term "Manual handling training". That was until about 5 days ago when I realised that Google had started to index not only a query stringed URL, but also an old version of the URL. What was even weirder was that when you clicked on the result it 301 redirected to the page that it was meant to display... The wrong URL that Google had started to index was: www.ihasco.co.uk/courses/detail/manual-handling?channel=retail The correct URL that it should have been indexing is: https://www.ihasco.co.uk/courses/detail/manual-handling-training I can't get my head around why it has done this as a 301 was in place already and we use rel canonical tags which point to the main parent pages. Anyway, we slapped a noindex tag in our robots.txt file to stop that page from being indexed, which worked but now I can't get the correct page to be indexed, even after a Google fetch. After inspecting the correct URL in the new search console I discovered that Google has ignored the rel canonical on the page (Which points to itself) and has selected the wrong, query stringed URL as the canonical. Why? and how do I rectify this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | iHasco1 -
Noindexing Thin News Content for Panda
We've been suffering under a Panda penalty since Oct 2014. We've completely revamped the site but with this new "slow roll out" nonsense it's incredibly hard to know at what point you have to accept that you haven't done enough yet. We have thousands of news stories going back to 2001, some of which are probably thin and some of which are probably close to other news stories on the internet being articles based on press releases. I'm considering noindexing everything older than a year just in case, however, that seems a bit of overkill. The question is, if I mine the logfiles and only deindex stuff that Google sends no further traffic to after a year could this be seen as trying to game the algo or similar? Also, if the articles are noindexed but still exist, is that enough to escape a Panda penalty or does the page need to be physically gone?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlfredPennyworth0 -
Did I get hit with a panda update?
I have a site that is a marketplace. We don't own any items, the sellers fill everything out and then it goes up on the site. Many of our sellers also have their own sites and just send us a spreadsheet with all of their items and we bulk upload. In that case what we are putting up is very similar to what they already have up on their own site. I used the Fruition penalty checker and they seem to be suggesting that we got hit with some penalties for Panda and Quality Content. With the Google Algorithm it is hard to know for sure what we got hit with. Is it possible Google sees us as one of those crappy scraper sites? Is there anything we can do? We never see the items so I can't add to peoples description.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Site Rollback for Careless Website Design That Caused Rank Drop
New PPC Client (out of necessity) had their site redesigned for mobile without much care given to it by a "SEO Expert". None of the meta data was copied over to the new images and pages, much of the old content was simply deleted, intra site links completely changed. Huge hits in organic rank, resulting in traffic declines occurred as their lead volume hit zero the following month (April 21 until Present). Any concerns I should have in doing a simple rollback beyond redirects and GWT (Search Console) ops? Current plan is 1. Setup redirects back to old site 2. Launch PPC campaign to recover call volume and leads. 3. Optimize old site for mobile simultaneously with simple responsive framework for menu, text. 4. Start disavowing poor-quality links that were added (got 10 with spam rating >4). 5. Eventually move them back to Wordpress and the theme they paid for with site content, meta data, etc all in tact.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jclmns0 -
Internal Duplicate Pages causing dip in rankings
Hi Guys, Need help in understanding whether having duplicate pages on your site push you down in rankings. Our all product pages getting indexed by Google with different parameters i.e. filters, affiliate id, utm_source etc. and then we have 10-15 duplicate for one product page. I am observing dip in rankings whenever Google starts indexing these duplicate but when I asked this question to John Muller and other Google team they said if you set up canonical then you don't have to worry about having different urls for same page but we are not ranking on Google and if we do then we dropped from page 1 to page 2 or sometimes page 3. Example - http://goo.gl/G5p3X5 Any suggestions.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webmaster_SEO0 -
Looking for an open source way to host product reviews...
We currently use power reviews for our item reviews but want to move towards something that can be hosted internally and thus forgo the cost or power reviews and actually see user generated content play a role in our site. Any suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MichealGooden0 -
Site Search Tracking Of Non Existing Products
I am working towards optimizing the site search box of an ecommerce website and I wish to track the keywords which users are searching but which are yielding no results. Please see the image for the same. I wish to assimilate data on the same which would then allow me to add products which users are searching but which the site doesn't have. However my problem is that I don't know how you could obtain this data in analytics because these results manifest itself in the form of searchresults.php. I know that analyzing search refinements and percentage of exits in Google Analytics is an option but I want a more compact and simpler solution to the problem where I could see exactly all the data in one place. Does anyone have suggestions on how this can be done? Thanks in advance, Y35Mj.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pulseseo0 -
Does anyone have any tips for optimizing your Google Product Feeds?
How often do you submit them? What have you seen work? Are there any tricks aside from filling out all of the data fields?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eric_since1910.com1