How to do a non-spammy "doorway page"?
-
Hi there,
ISSUE:
I have a client who wishes to use a "doorway" page, but not in a spammy way. He would like to have a nice crisp URL for use in ads/brochures. The page is strictly a landing page (just with a separate URL).
DOORWAY/LANDING PAGE WILL BE:
Non-spammy -- There will be no attempt to optimize the landing page/no attempt to get the page to rank.
Strictly a vanity URL -- he likes the way a separate website looks in ads as opposed to a landing page on the existing website (i.e., www.websitename.com/landing page)
WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO:
I'm basically trying to figure out what the best things to do to protect his other sites (which are very high quality valuable sites which rank well) from getting punished.
STEPS I'M CONSIDERING:
Robots no follow
Separate hosting server
Different person's name on a private domain registration
Adding additional pages, so it's not a 1-page "doorway"
Many thanks in advance to anyone who would share their experience and help me protect my client in the best way possible. I've told him there are risks, but he still wants to go ahead.
MC
-
Thanks so much! That answers my question.
-
Sorry, I think I confused myself after I read the replies
Meta Robots (NOINDEX) is probably your best bet, then. Canonical would be a decent bet if you expected the landings pages to have inbound links or other ranking signals (like a 301, they can help consolidate those signals). If it's a landing page purely for purposes outside of organic search, though, simply blocking it is fine.
-
Hi,
Thanks so much for your responses.
To clarify, as I said in my original question:
"There will be no attempt to optimize the landing page/no attempt to get the page to rank."Adding NO FOLLOW makes perfect sense.
One follow up question...
I'm not sure if I would need the REL=Canonical if there's no duplication issue? Would NO FOLLOW be enough to handle any issues?
Thanks again,
MC -
Just to clarify on a point William raised - do you want the "doorway" page to rank? That's where the trouble usually starts. Vanity URLs and landing pages are fine - if you canonical them, NOINDEX (or even 301-redirect, if you don't care if the URL changes), then Google isn't going to see any attempt at manipulative content.
The other issue is generally relevance. The problem in the past was when people used a doorway page to bring visitors in on one term or set of terms and then that was just a link to a wildly different site. If the landing page is relevant and non-duplicate, it's not nearly as big of a deal.
Personally, I would not do private registration, separate hosting, etc., because that honestly looks like you are trying to hide this page and get away with something. Just don't index the page, and you should be fine. I've used landing pages for paid search on all kinds of URLs, and as long as organic didn't see them, it's no problem at all.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ecommerce web design read more toggle vs menu link on home page and product pages
Hello, We have an Ecommerce store. We have a lot of content on the home page and product pages and we are going back and forth between which one to use between a toggle "Read More" "Show Less" toggle for each section and a anchor linked menu. We have long product pages We're thinking a read more toggle is more appropriate for category descriptions so that they can go at the top of the category and not take up space. But the read more toggle with lots of content scrolls the page down and doesn't scroll it back up when you hit "show less" We're leaning towards a linked menu for the home pages and product pages for this reason, but an accordion type set of toggles would look nicer. What do you recommend, and how have you set up your read more toggles if they have lots of info so that they are not confusing? Are there other options? ' Not looking for code (I can do that) I'm looking for ideas on the cleanest home page, category pages, and product pages when they have tons and tons of textual content. Wanting to trim it up and make it look compact and neat! Thanks!
Web Design | | BobGW0 -
H Tags for an Events Page
I wanted to get the thoughts of people here about how to best structure an events listing page for SEO. I have a list of events, all with dates, event titles, location name, city and zip. What I do currently is listed below. I also show a version for how I could revise it, but it would require me to duplicate the event date on the page. Any ideas, suggestions or best practice examples you can point me to would be greatly appreciated. Current Structure <state>Events - H1 Tag
Web Design | | abiondo
Friday, December 5, 2014 - H2 Tag
Event Title 1 - H3
Location Name, City, State - P Tags Event Title 2 - H3
Location Name, City, State - P Tags</state> I was wondering if I would see better results by doing the following instead. The benefits I see of this approach are the event titles are h2 instead of h3 tags and the con I see is duplicating the event dates <state>Events - H1 Tag</state>
Event Title 1 - H2
Friday, December 5, 2014
Location Name, City, State - P Tags
Event Title 2 - H2
Friday, December 5, 2014
Location Name, City, State - P Tags thanks, Anthony0 -
Why aren't Images in G+ product page posts showing up in SERPs for brand searches?
Before 1-2 weeks ago, our G+ posts containing links to our product pages would show up in in SERPs (when searching for our brand name) with a thumbnail of the product image. Now, they do not (see image below for visual). Our tech team confirmed there hasn't been any coding change that might be to blame and I see that this isn't happening to other sites. Any idea what may be the problem here? tcnhLgy
Web Design | | znotes0 -
Will keyword optimization for a landing page impact SEO for subsequent pages?
For example, if I optimize keyword “pleurx” really well on our landing page, I'd like to know if subsequent
Web Design | | Todd_Kendrick
pages linking back to that landing page will rank higher than before for “pleurx”
even if “pleurx” wasn't optimized on the subsequent pages. Thanks! -Andrew0 -
How do I identify what is causing my Duplicate Page Content problem?
Hello, I'm trying to put my finger on what exactly is causing my duplicate page content problem... For example, SEOMoz is picking up these four pages as having the same content: http://www.penncare.net/ambulancedivision/braunambulances/express.aspx http://www.penncare.net/ambulancedivision/recentdeliveries/millcreekparamedicservice.aspx http://www.penncare.net/ambulancedivision/recentdeliveries/monongaliaems.aspx http://www.penncare.net/softwaredivision/emschartssoftware/emschartsvideos.aspx As you can tell, they really aren't serving the same content in the body of the page. Anybody have an idea what might be causing these pages to show up as Duplicate Page Content? At first I thought it was the photo gallery module that might be causing it, but that only exists on two of the pages... Thanks in advance!
Web Design | | BGroup0 -
Best way of conserving link juice from non important pages
If I have a bunch of non important pages on my website which are of little use in the SE's index - IE contact us pages, pages which are near duplicate and conflict with KW's targetting other pages etc, what is the best way of retaining the link juice that would normally be passed to these pages? Most recent discussion I have read has said that with nofollow you effectively just loose link juice, as opposed to conserving it, so that doesn't seem a great option. If I do "noindex" on these pages, would that conserve the link juice in the site, or again would it be just lost? It seems quite a tricky situation as many pages are legitimate for customer usability, but are not worth having in the SE's index and you better off consolidating link juice - so it seems you are getting penilised for making something "for users". Thanks
Web Design | | James770