Schema Markup Location
-
I had a quick question, I want to do schema markup for a local business. Do I need to put it on every page, or just the home page? Also, where should put it i.e. Header, Body, or footer
-
Thank you both, I appreciate it.
-
Peter,
Definitely add it to every page, not just the home page.
As John mentioned, aesthetics are important in determining the best locations. Here are a couple of considerations:
- Aesthetics and usability (where it will best benefit the visitor while also achieving your goal)
- Common areas where it will be automatically inserted into each new page, especially in CMS/ blog sites, such as footer or sidebar
Limitations occur when you have a business with multiple locations (more than 2 or 3), as it will start to create aesthetic and space problems for you. In these situations, you will have to determine the best method on a case by case basis. For example, if you have a bank with one main location and 10 branches in a metro area. You may decide to run the main office location schema on the common pages and then use the individual location schema on their specific contact/ location pages.
Hope this helps.
-
Peter.
The markup is added to content (text) on your website already.
For example, if you have your address and phone number placed in your footer or sidebar, you would add the markup to them.
So naturally where ever you fell your content should sit within the aesthetics of your website, you just add the schema markup around that content.
If for example you have your address in the footer on every page, yes add the markup to every page. Marking up as much content as possible can help the search engines.
Or if you have an events page, with several events on that page, you would add the markup to each event.
Have a look here ... if you have not already http://schema.org/LocalBusiness
There are lots of properties you can use ...
Hope that helps
Regards
John
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Local SEO - ranking the same page for multiple locations
Hi everyone, I am aware that issue of local SEO has been approached numerous times, but the situation that I'm dealing with is slightly different, so I'd love to receive your expert advice. I'm running the website of a property management company which services multiple locations (www.homevault.com). From our local offices in the city center, we also service neighboring towns and communities ( ex: we have an office in Charlotte NC, from which we service Charlotte plus a dozen other towns nearby). We wanted to avoid creating dozens of extra local service pages, particularly since our offers are identical per metropolitan area and we're talking of 20-30 additional local pages for each area. Instead, we decided to create local service pages only for the main locations. Needless to say, we're now ranking for the main locations, but we're missing on all searches for property management in neighboring towns (we're doing good on searches such as 'charlotte property management', but we're practically invisible for 'davidson property management', although we're searvicing that area as well). What we've done so far to try and fix the situation: 1. The current location pages do include descriptions of areas that we serve. 2. We've included 1-2 keywords for the sattelite locations in the main location pages, but we're nowhere near the optimization needed to rank for local searches in neighboring towns (ie, some main local service pages rank on pages 2-4 for sattelite towns, so not good enough). 3. We've included the searviced areas in our local GMBs, directories, social media profiles etc. None of these solutions appear to work great. Should I go ahead and create the classic local pages for each and every town and optimize them on those particular keywords, even if the offer is practically the same, and the number of pages risks going out of control? Any other better ideas? Many thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HomeVaultPM0 -
FAQ Schema
Is it alright to make use of Schema for a questions and answer structure if they questions are all brand specific? Like common Q&As about your products or company ? Are will Google potentially consider this spammy?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchStan0 -
Crediting a second website when I have 2 setup depending on location
Hello Moz Community! I'm a bit stuck with this one and have read a few varying answers! Basically I have an eCommerce website on a .com domain name selling to the UK and Europe currently. I have recently created a very similar selling the same products but solely to the US with a .US domain name. What is the best practice with this, will the 2 separate sites be okay left as they are, or do I need to credit the UK site from the US site as they are incredibly similar? The sites are: www.rhinox-group.com www.rhinox-group.us Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | josh.sprakes0 -
Schema for restaurants and menus?
Hi all, Anyone have experience with using Schema for restaurants other than the normal local business NAP? Is there a way to use Schema markup for food menus as well? Examples and schema code much appreciated 🙂 Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RickyShockley0 -
Google + and Schema
I've noticed with a few of the restaurant clients I work with that Schema isn't contributing at all to their SERP -- their Google + page is. Is there any way to have more control over what Google is pulling to help make UX better? I.e. showing photos of the restaurant without a logo, etc.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Anti-Alex0 -
Will Schema help my website?
I'm doing SEO on a website, zing.co.nz, which is a soon to launch company. At the moment there is a splash sight up, which will be replaced by the real sight in a few weeks upon launch. Is it worth me putting in Schemas (for the first time) so that it is recognized as an organization? Will this effect us in the serps? Thanks for your help 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Startupfactory0 -
Rel Author markup for a Book Product?
Hi mozzers, I'm writing up some recommendations for a rebuild of a large bookstore E-commerce site which includes a section on structured data. I'm looking through schema markup and specifically the Product, Thing, CreativeWork and Book schemas. I'm confused however as to whether rel author is applicable/suitable to a book product page? The author of the page is the website, but the author of the book is the Author. The author's name within the product will be linked to their Author Profile page on the website which could potentially include a link to their Google+ page (if they have it... probably <0.01% of Authors, but should be enough for Google to connect the dots). It could work but I don't want to attribute authorship of the page to the book author - I just want to markup the product page to indicate who the author of a book product is. My concern is also that I want the product image to be displayed in SERPs, not the Author photo. Does anybody have any experience or advice regarding this? Cheers Andrew
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gloyns0 -
Schema Embedded items Hierarchy
Marking up an attorney bio. Using: http://schema.org/Attorney http://schema.org/Person Hierarchy for Attorney is: Thing > Organization > LocalBusiness > ProfessionalService > Attorney Hierarchy for Person is: Thing > Person So, should I use: Larry Lawyer Firm: Law Firm Name Address: 742 Evergreen Terrace Or should Attorney be the top itemtype? Does it even really matter?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gyi0