Is SeoMOZ Crawl Diagnostics wrong here?
-
We've been getting a ton of critical errors (about 80,000) in SeoMoz' Crawl Diagnostics saying we have duplicate content in our client's E-commerce site. Some of the errors are correct, but a lot of the pages are variations like:
www.example.com/productlist?page=1
www.example.com/productlist?page=2
However, in our source code we have used rel="prev" and rel="next" so in my opinion we should be alright.
Would love to hear from you if we have made a mistake or if it is an error in SeoMoz.
Here's a full paste of the script:
-
Just a minor clarification - you can use both rel=prev/next and rel=canonical, IF you have something like search filters. Then, the canonical would point to the unfiltered current page and the rel=prev/next would point to the filtered paginated pages. Yeah, I know, that made a lot of sense. Let's say your page is:
http://example.com/stuff?page=2&sort=price
...then you might have
It's more than a little confusing.
Definitely check out that JavaScript issue, though - it might be that bots aren't seeing what people are seeing, and that could be very dangerous.
-
Hi,
In regards the rel=next you are absolutely right, I must have overlooked it or just searched for the prev tag. So yes as far as proper implementation of the prev/next in that respect it is correct and please ignore that last part of my first post!
Turning of javascript is instructive to see all those tags on their individual page and helps clarify what exactly is being outputted and when without the dynamic loading, providing you don't miss a rel=next tag that is really there
-
Hi Lynn,
Thank you very much for your answer / analysis! As you said "It is a bit confusing" and I will just read your answer a couple of times...
I will grant your answer "Good answer" for you thorough analysis! I think it is spot on with the double "next/prev" and "rel=can" tags. I do have one remark. You said: When I turn off javescript, I get this:
In my opinion this is alright, because it shouldn't have a "prev" as this is the initial page.
-
Hi,
I had a look at what I assume is the site and I think you have a combination of things going on that is likely causing confusion (to you, to the moz bot, probably to google too!)
Firstly, it is not recommended to use rel prev/next and rel canonical on the same page. With that what you are effectively doing is only indexing the first page of the results since all the other pages rel canonical back to the first one. If you have a 'view all' type page then you could rel canonical all of the paginated pages back to this one and you would not need to use the prev/next tags at all. It is also possible that your use of relative canonical links in combination with the above is also causing confusion, usually best to use absolute urls if possible.
Beyond that, the site dynamically loads more products as you scroll down the page which also results in the url changing to hoeretelefon/? for ALL the pages. If that is a problem or not depends on how it is coded and how the google and seomoz bots are deciding to parse the page, but it certainly adds another potential area of complexity to the issue.
Lastly, if you browse the site with javascript turned off you can see something odd in that the initial page /elektronik/baerbar-lyd/hoeretelefon has no prev/next OR canonical tag but has a link to /elektronik/baerbar-lyd/hoeretelefon?page=1 on which you find prev/next and canonicals back to the non paginated version. So you are basically skipping the pagination setup that goes from the original to the page=1 (but also giving a canonical back to the original page).
Phew! It is a bit confusing. I would recommend deciding on if you want to go with prev/next or canonical in the first place and take it from there. I would think that if you have the ability to canonical to a 'see all products page' then this might be the best way to go since it should theoretically take care of any issues the dynamic loading is causing also.
Hope that helps!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Crawl Diagnostics - Historical Summary
As we've been fixing errors on our website, the crawl diagnostic graphs have been showing great results (top left to bottom right for errors). The problem is the graphs themselves aren't very pretty. I can't use them in my internal reports (all internal reports are standardised colours/formats). Is there anyway of exporting the top level summary with historic data so the graphs can be recreated in company colours? I don't want the detailed CSV breakdown of what errors occurred, but rather than on X date there were Y errors, the next month Z errors and so forth. The data must already be in the SEOMoz system in order to create the graphs themselves - I was hoping this can be made available to us if it isn't already? Does anyone know if there is already a way of doing this? I've tried to 'inspect element' and find the underlying data in the source code but to no avail, and can't see any exports that would do this. Thanks in advance Dean
Moz Pro | | FashionLux0 -
SEOmoz tool Issue?
Hi Mozzers, I am doing a web maintenance task for a client and it's been weeks that Moz is detecting 49 duplicate pages ( contact page). I thought resolving the issue when creating the xml sitemap and excluding those duplicates. The moz tool would still detect them, so I went in making a search with some of these duplicate to check if they were indexed but non of them were indexed. So my question is has anyone recently experienced similar issues? Is the moz tool not 100% accurate? Thanks for sharing your thoughts and answers
Moz Pro | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Drop in Number of Crawled pages by SEOMOZ?
I noticed that the number of Crawled Pages on my website has been 2 pages only over past week. Before that the number of crawled pages was over 1000. My site has numerous pages as it is a Travel website that pulls search results for Flights, Cars, Hotels, Cruises and Vacation packages so there is a huge Database there. Can someone help? Thanks !
Moz Pro | | sherohass0 -
Links & page authority crawl
I see the links and page authority have not been updated in over a month... does anyone know how often it gets updated?
Moz Pro | | nazmiyal0 -
Fixing errors from SEOmoz diagnostic survey
I just ran a report from the SEOmoz diagnostic survey and was surprised to see errors. How did I fix these errors? Thanks in advance for your help, I have been pleasantly surprised at the thoughtfulness and responsiveness of this community: Errors: 5XX (server error) Overly Dynamic URL 302 Temporary Redirect Too many on page links (how many is ideal?)
Moz Pro | | TheVolkinator0 -
Can I exclude pages from my Crawl Diagnostics?
Right now my crawl diagnostic information is being skewed because it's including the onsite search from my website. Is there a way to remove certain pages like search from the errors and warnings of the crawl diagnostic? My search pages are coming up as: Long URL Title Element Too Long Missing Meta Description Blocked by meta-robots (Which is how I want it) Rel Canonical Here is what the crawl diagnostic thinks my page URL looks like: website.com/search/gutter%25252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525 252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252 525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525 252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252 52525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252Bcleaning/ Thank you, Jonathan
Moz Pro | | JonathanGoodman0 -
Can SEOMOZ do Local SEO ?
Most of our clients are local but we can not get local or regional (for example VA State or Washington DC) SERP results within SEOMOZ. it would be nice to create custom search profiles based on region (State or County) and track SERP within SEOMOZ. Ranking reports and even keyword difficulty analysis etc. within SEOMOZ are misleading for local web sites. SEOMOZ default site setup assumes every business doing SEO serves all over the US. I think it will be very beneficial if we have a choice to select State or County of local web sites during initial campaing set up at SEOMOZ. what do you think? do you know any work around of this problem? Thanks,
Moz Pro | | CertifiedSEO
Lewis2 -
SEOMoz Campaign Tool
I've noticed that when looking at the SEOmoz tool, specifically the On Page analysis tool, it is still looking at an old url. About two months ago I made updates to all of our category page URLs. Previously the old urls were stuffed with keywords, strange characters and were really long. When looking at the on-page tool though it is referencing the old urls for keywords and I'm wondering why? I figure its been long enough to recognize the new urls. Is the paring of a keyword and a url saved and just graded on a weekly basis to produce the report? I had expected to see the new url's by now which are also represented in the sitemap. Around that same time I also added our TellAFriend Page and Review pages to our Robots.txt file as not to be crawled but I still see these pages come up in the errors report. Should this update as well?
Moz Pro | | dgmiles0