Which Algorithm Change Hurt the Site? A causation/correlation issue
-
The attached graph is from google analytics, a correlation of about 14 months of Organic Google visits with algo changes, data from moz naturally
Is there any way to tell from this which will have affected the site? for example #1 or #2 seems to be responsible for the first dip, but #4 seems to fix it and it broke around 6, or is the rise between 4 and 7 an anomaly and actually 1 or 2 caused a slip from when it was released all the way to when 7 was released.
Sorry if the graph is a little cloak and dagger, that is partly because we don't have permissions to reveal much about the identity, and partly because we were trying to do a kind of double blind, separating the data from our biases
We can say though the different between the level at the start and end of the graph is at least 10,000 visits per day
-
It's really tough (and even inadvisable) to try to pin a traffic change to an algorithm update based solely on spikes in a graph. On rare occasion, it's pretty clear (Penguin is a good example, I've found), but in most cases there's just a lot of gray areas and the graph leaves out a mountain of data.
The big issue I see here is potentially seasonality and knowing what happened to the site and business. For example, you can look at #6 and #7 and call these dips, but that sort of ignores the spike. Is the dip the anomaly, or is the spike the anomaly? What drove up traffic between #4 and #6? Maybe that simply stopped, was a one-time event, or was seasonal.
Why was there volatility between #7 and #14 and then relative stability after #14? You could call #14 a "drop", but not knowing the timeline, it's hard to see how the curve might smooth in different windows. What it looks like is a period of highly volatile events followed by an evening out.
Without knowing the industry, the business, the history, and without segmenting this data, trying to make claims just based on dips and spikes in the graph is pretty dangerous, IMO. This could have virtually nothing to do with the algorithm, in theory.
-
I don't understand how dates would help? Was it not clear that the red lines are the dates of algo updates?
By abstracting the data the hope was to gain insight into how to read the graphs in relation to updates, and not just get help related to specific updates which wouldn't help much the next time we have to deal with a traffic drop problem. More a question of who to think rather than what to think.
Trying to read between the lines are you saying different algo changes take different amounts of time to kick in and that's why a more detailed graph is more useful? For example if #1 was the first penguin change, would your response be different if it was the first panda change?
-
You can use the Google Penalty Checker tool from Fruition: http://fruition.net/google-penalty-checker-tool/
I would not believe 100% on the tool results, but you can at least have an initial Analise, you'll need to go deeper to double check if this initial Analise is 100% relevant or not.
- Felipe
-
This doesn't tell me anything. If you at least had dates in there you could compare traffic dips to Google Algo Updates/Refreshes.
I understand you can't reveal the domain but I will be shocked if somebody here can tell you anything without further information. This place is full of brilliant minds, but that would take some sort of a mind-reader to tackle...
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Drupal SEO Issues
Hi, I have two questions regarding my enterprise website. It is built on the Drupal CMS. First, and in looking at Google Analytics, I'm seeing more than 6k pages listed, but over 5k have received less than 10 page views in six months. In fact, most of them are not really content pages at all. The URLs I'm seeing listed, which to me indicates actual crawlable content in GA, shows pages like this: http://www.domainname.com/node/2153
Reporting & Analytics | | jaccardi62
http://www.domainname.com/company/careers?gnk=apply&gni=8a87142e4d086a73014d2a0d65242b8e&gns=glassdoor+free
http://www.domainname.com/blog?page=1
http://www.domainname.com/resources/videos?field_video_category_value=all&page=4&page=1
http://www.domainname.com/search/site?search_api_views_fulltext=talent+pool What is the problem here? Why are these non-pages being indexed as content and why are they showing up in GA? Second question is about my blog and blog best practices. While I know blog content is important for SEO, why is my site blog pagination being indexed as content. For example, these "pages" are showing up in SERPs: http://www.domainname.com/blog/tag/business_intelligence?page=2
http://www.domainname.com/blog/topic/expansion?page=5
http://www.domainname.com/blog/weeks_news_april_26 What is the best way to fix this? Thanks in advance for your help!0 -
Dip in traffic from Pune for our sites in Google Analytics
Hi, We have noticed dip in traffic from Pune after 6th May'14 in our Google Analytics account for few of our sites. Did anyone noticed the same for your site. Kindly let me know if you have any idea. Thank and Regards
Reporting & Analytics | | vivekrathore0 -
Index.php and /
Hello, We have a php system and in the MOZ error report our index.php shows up as a duplicate for / (home page). I instituted a rel canonical on the index.php because the / gets better rank than the other. This said, the error report through MOZ still shows them as duplicates. Should I be using a 301 instead? Please help! Also, I would love a good technical SEO book (for bridging the gap between SEO and programmer) if someone can recommend one? Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | lfrazer0 -
How to find goo.gl/ URLs in Google Analytics
Hello! How does one go about finding the impact of goo.gl/ shortened URLs in Google Analytics? (I know I should be using Campaigns, but this was for an old project.) Thanks in advance! Erik
Reporting & Analytics | | SmileMoreSEO0 -
Can 500 errors hurt rankings for an entire site or just the pages with the errors?
I'm working with a site that had over 700 500 errors after a redesign in april. Most of them were fixed in June, but there are still about 200. Can 500 errors affect rankings sitewide, or just the pages with the errors? Thanks for reading!
Reporting & Analytics | | DA20130 -
Measuring events to external sites
Im having problem measuring click on ads by using events in GA or Jetpack. For example when I checked out yesterday this is what I read: 1. In GA events it says 12 clicks 2. In Jetpack it says 9 clicks But when I look at Referrals to the actual site directly it says 18 clicks Which one is the rights one? I need this because I use this to invoice clients end of month! and it cant be any "maybe".something. cheers, R
Reporting & Analytics | | rrrobertsson0 -
What is the best way to track mobile sites in Google Analytics?
Hello! I am wondering what the pros and cons of using the regular Google Analytics tracking code on a mobile site versus the tracking documentation from Google specifically on it found at http://code.google.com/mobile/analytics/docs/web/ which is still in labs mode. Does the mobile specific tracking have the same features as the regular one to be able to track events and report the same statistics? Thanks for the help on this one!
Reporting & Analytics | | CabbageTree0 -
URL-structure change - former long-tail traffic gone
Hey people, I'm sure many of you applied changes to the URL structure of a client's or your own website before. So did I for obvious reason: The structure before was like www.domain.com/brand_page/_22-key-word-translatedkeyword.php (ranked 20). This was changed to www.domain.com/key-word.html.
Reporting & Analytics | | dumperama
Edit: Also on-page it was optimized, but only taking out worthless links like "keyword-link to other page" and adding a relevant SEO text (also valuable for the user) Now, for the targeted short-tail keyword, the outcome was great - ranking increased by 17 landing the page on the first SERP. But: Before this page garnered a wide range of long-tail keyword traffic.To be exact: 2600 different keywords generated traffic for that page in a period of 1 month. Now the newly structured site (also on-page optimized) only receives traffic from around 100 keywords. You can imagine that the absolute amount of visits also dropped. So I'd like to know if you observed similar results. Another question that's coming up in this context: How regularly does Google refresh the keywords associated with a page? Like: Is this page really relevant for this one keyword we associated it with 5 years ago? Because it is clear, when I'm looking at the aforementioned 2600 KW in detail, most don't have anything to do with the site, i.e. are not mentioned at all. Still they generated valuable traffic though. All of this is really crucial to this project, because soon the whole website's supposed to be relaunched with optimized URL structure and of course everything else that's need SEO wise... I'd love to hear your experiences. Thanks!!0