Improving Search Click through Rate
-
We are having a problem on our website with click through rates. We are getting between 100-150k impressions through search but we are only getting between 500-1000 clicks to the site. What strategies have you used in the past to help improve your click through rates? Thanks!
-
The number of suggestions from EGOL and a look through a headline-writing post like this or this or this will quickly show that there are a whole vast array of different ways to write headlines. And after all, what is a <title>element but a headline on a search listing? So the big question is how do you find out which of these different ways of approaching things will work the best to increase CTRs?</p> <p>Answer: you will never know unless you test.</p> <p>Unfortunately you can't test <title> element and META description content directly. But you can test it indirectly using PPC. Here's how:</p> <ol> <li>Set up a number of low-budget PPC campaigns for the keywords you are targeting organically</li> <li>Test a few ad variations that push different buttons for your audience</li> <li>Adapt the one with the best CTR to fit your <title> tag and META description.</li> </ol> <p>Do this a few times and you should start seeing some commonality in your best performers, at which point you will know what works best for your audience. But keep testing, because you never know when something will surprise you (and because PPC is a perfectly viable medium for any online marketing effort).</p> <p>At the same time:</p> <ul> <li>Make sure all your authorship tagging is in place</li> <li>Use microdata as outlined on schema.org to get any rich snippets that you can</li> <li>Use Moz Analytics or a combination of Screaming Frog and Excel to make sure your <title> tags and META descriptions are unique.</li> </ul> <p>Between <title> elements optimised for CTR, META descriptions working hard, and rich snippets you should have all your bases covered.</p></title>
-
There's a lot of factors that can affect click-through rates from the search results. The first and most obvious is your visibility or rank.
The impression numbers alone don't tell the whole story. If you're being included in the search results, but are ranking on page 2 (or worse) then you're only going to get crumbs instead of a nice big slice of search traffic pie. So, the first thing to do is to work on getting your snippet high-enough in the search results to be seen!
It can be very tempting to look at your Webmaster Tools data (or data in a third party tools) and respond by tinkering with your title and meta-description without ever look at the search result pages (SERPS) you're appearing on.
Just looking at the SERPS can often explain why you're not getting the clicks you think you deserve. Reasons include:
- Well known brand(s) dominating the search results
- Competition from Adwords on the page. (remember to turn off your ad-blocker if you use one!)
- As Ken said, are competitors using Rich Snippets to draw those visitors eye-balls.
- Is Google displaying the Title and Description you want/expect it to show?
When you look at the SERPS you should also look at the type of pages that are appearing there. What does Google think are the best pages for the searchers query. Does this help you understand the searchers intent? What is it they were looking for? What is it that the other pages in the SERPS are providing?
Look at the words/language that other pages are using. Is your snippet the most compelling compared to them? How can you differentiate yourself from these other results. It sounds like management/marketing BS, but what's your unique value proposition? Can you get that across in a few words?
Ignore the fact that your page is obviously the best one for a minute, and try to put yourself in the head of the searcher. Think, "Am I going to find what I'm looking for?", "What's in it for me if I click on this result?" Is it obvious that the searcher will find what they are looking for if they click on your snippet?
Is the right page on your site ranking, with a less compelling snippet? I've seen blog posts out-rank the service landing page that the site would really like to appear in the search results, completely undermining the lovingly crafted title and meta-description created on the service page.
Lots of nice Title tips from EGOL there - try some!
-
EGOL has some great title suggestions.
I would add authorship and rich snippets as well. We have seen increased CTR with those. The rich snippets have been really good because they show the product ratings from our reviews.That really makes the listing stand out in the results.
Ken
-
<title><strong>Secrets</strong> xxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxx xxx</title> Everybody wants to be in on the secret. Mystery, controversy gets lots of clicks.
<title>xxxx xxxx xxxxxx xxx <strong>Only $XX.XX</strong></title> If you can't outrank the manufacturer who charges MSRP, then offer a fantastic discount. You can rank and #2 and take ALL of their sales.
<title>xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx <strong>Ships Immediately</strong></title> Everybody wants their stuff yesterday. Lots of people are in a hurry.
<title><strong>Free Beer</strong> xxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxx</title> Everybody clicks just to see if its true.
<title>xxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx<strong>?</strong></title> (questions elicit more clicks than statements)
<title><strong>OMG!</strong> xxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx</title> Every dumbass will click this.
<title><strong>Who says that</strong> xxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx<strong>?</strong></title> Dumbasses are suckers for this too.
<title>xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx <strong>Free Shipping</strong></title> People hate shipping charges more than sales tax.
<title><strong>My Sorryass Brand:</strong> xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx</title> Unless you are so famous that your brand name alone will elicit clicks, don't put your sorryass brand on the front of the title tag. Nobody cares. Instead tell them you go what they are looking for.
<title>xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx - <strong>My Sorryass Brand</strong></title> This is a waste of title tag real estate too.
<title><strong>Grass Skirts</strong></title> Sometimes your keyword is all that you need. Don't stink it up with your ego or a bunch of SEO crap. These short title tags can rank really well and pull in the clicks.
Before you write your title tag, ask yourself what the searcher is really looking for. Then if you offer that get it in the title tag. If you don't offer that you better get it.
Go out and look at your competitors title tags. If they are offering <title>Haircuts - Only $5.00</title> then maybe you want to say <title>We fix bad haircuts $25.00</title>
Learn more here http://moz.com/learn/seo/title-tag
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
UTM source errors in google search console
Dear Friends, I need help with UTM source and UTM medium errors. There are 300 such errors on my site which is affecting the site i think, The URL appended at the end is utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign= How do i resolve this? Please help me with it.Thanks ccEpFDn.png ccEpFDn.png
Reporting & Analytics | | marketing910 -
Delays in Search Console Data
We are seeing big delays in search console data this month. In the past we have seen delays of a few days, but I have never noticed it being this long before. At the moment we have no data since 23rd February. Have I just never noticed this before or is this particularly long? Is anyone else seeing the same thing?
Reporting & Analytics | | Wagada0 -
When I click an outgoing link from Analytics - why are they all broken?
On one of my websites, if I visit the Behavior > Site Content section of Anayltics any link I try to open is broken. Google Analytics is appending the domain before every URL causing it to open in a popup but as a broken link. Example: Trying to click a link to a page on the website at this URL: http://www.thisisanexample.com/test.html But in the Analytics popup browser this is what it tries to load: www.thisisanexample.comhttp://www.thisisanexample.com/test.html So I can't preview any of the content within Google Analytics. I feel like this is a settings issue somewhere... Any ideas?
Reporting & Analytics | | ShawnW0 -
Does anyone know where in Google Analytics I can find the number of clicks/Facebook Shares?
I'm trying to track in Google Analytics how many people are clicking the Facebook "share" button. I'm not sure if I have it properly set up. Here's the link that I followed to set up the tracking in analytics: http://www.simoahava.com/analytics/google-tag-manager-track-social-interactions/
Reporting & Analytics | | EPICcreative0 -
Google Search Bar Vs Address Bar To Determine Number Of Times the Domain Name Is Typed In..
Hello, I'm trying to get a rough estimate of how many times a domain name that we're interested in acquiring is typed in to the address bar. If the google keyword tool says for instance, that the exact match domain name is typed in 720 times, how many times it typed in to the address bar? example.com - 720 global searches Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | Optimize0 -
What's the final word on Image Search tracking in Google Analytics?
Sorry if this has been answered but I can't seem to get a straight answer to my questions by searching around. How is traffic referred by Google Images counted in Google Analytics? I know it used to be referral traffic from google.com/imgres. A lot of things I have read say that it should all be under google/organic now, but my site still gets referral traffic from google.com/imgres, so that can't be. However I also get traffic as google/organic that I am pretty sure is from image search, because we don't rank for the keyword normally, but we do for image search. What's the deal? How is traffic from an embedded image in a regular result page counted? How can I segment my image search traffic better? It would be great to see image search traffic as it's own medium. I found a script here -- http://jrom.net/google-images-in-google-analytics -- that looks promising, has anyone used it or can recommend another way? I haven't used the GA API very much so I want to make sure the script is kosher and won't screw up my numbers.
Reporting & Analytics | | tact0 -
The brainstorm of finding the reason of the URL decrease on original search result and the procedures of fixing the problem?
Hi guys: i just any one have some idea of how to find the mainly reasons of the listed position on google search original result decrease and the procedures of fixing those problem. Appreciate for any feedback. David
Reporting & Analytics | | skyten0 -
Conversion rates by browser & OS - any feedback/experts/experience?
Hi, Ive been evaluating conversion rates by operating system and by browser for a client. Ive picked up significant and somewhat disturbing trends. As you'd expect the bulk of traffic is coming from a Windows/Internet Explorer combination. This is unfortunately one of the worst combinations (Windows/Firefox & Windows/Safari did worse. Chrome/Windows was significantly the best combination with Windows). Windows also performs much worse than Mac. E.g. Windows/Firefox performs worse than Mac/Firefox. Overall conversion rate for Mac is 7.07% compared to 5.69% Windows. This is based on hundreds of thousands of visits and equates to tens of thousands of dollars difference in revenue. Generally later versions of browsers perform better on both main operating systems e.g IE 9.0 converts at 6.33% compared to 8.0 at 5.80% on Windows and Firefox 4.01 on the Mac converts at 7.57% compared to 3.6.16 at 6.54% (although this dataset is smaller than Windows/IE). Page load speeds (recorded in the clients analytics) are significantly faster on Mac than Windows (as expected really). Being Windows/IE and specifically Windows IE8 represents the bulk of traffic should we be addressing this? Will any optimisation negatively affect better performing Mac/Browser combinations? Understanding that Mac users equate to 'better' converting visitors - what else could be done there? Anyone have thoughts or experience on optimising pages for improved conversion rates via IE and Windows? Thanks in advance, Andy
Reporting & Analytics | | AndyMacLean0