Can anyone explain some below SEO questions ?
-
- Can we do link building like directory, article, press releases, classifieds, business listing, social bookmarking etc.
- We need to check DA, Alexa, Page Rank, cBlock IP before publishing any kind of Link but how much Max or Min. no. should be for consider any website like DA should be min 20-30-40 etc..
- How can consider a natural links?
- Which type anchor text should be in any kind of links may be directory etc.
- In website interlinking we should put Exact Links or no need to put any links For.ex.my website is abc.com.au then we can put link for Website Design keywords or Should be long tail keyword.
- How can we do content marketing means we should post blog in internal website or need to create External Blog like BlogSpot, WordPress.
- In blog we should put any keyword link OR should be post without links.
- We can put link on no follow website.
- Why more website coming on Google first page but they are doing Spammy links like exact keywords links, unnatural links etc..
Thanks,
Akhilesh
-
Hi Akhilesh,
Can you provide some context to your questions? They are a little surprising, since in several other Q&A questions you've gone and offered your services to other people asking for service providers stating that you have a talented pool of SEO experts.
-
Hi Samuel Scott
Many thanks for quick reply.
Can you clear me two remaining points as well.
I think its very tough to gain link that others give you.
My question is if any website put our links and we will put self then how can recognize this will earning links.
When we interlinking any internal webpage from website then we should put Exact keywords Links or no need to put any links.
If we publish any Blog then we should put any keywords links in Blog content or will not put any link.What is you view?
-
Akhilesh, thanks for the questions. In general, I would think of "SEO" as not a "bag of tricks" to manipulate Google. Thankfully, that died years ago. Rather, "SEO" is a collection of best practices that help you to build an online brand that deserves to rank highly.
Here's my personal take on your questions:
Can we do link building like directory, article, press releases, classifieds, business listing, social bookmarking etc.
No. The best links today are not that ones that you directly get -- the best links are the ones that others give you. It is "earning links" and not "building them." And how do you do that? Basically, two general ways: 1. Create awesome, authoritative content on your website's topic and use social media and PR to promote it so that people will find it and link to it themselves. 2.) Build such an amazing website with a great user-experience that word will spread naturally via word of mouth.
These "earned links" are difficult and costly to get. But nothing useful ever comes quickly and cheaply. If true "SEO" were quick and cheap, then everyone in the Moz community would be millionaires by now.
We need to check DA, Alexa, Page Rank, cBlock IP before publishing any kind of Link but how much Max or Min. no. should be for consider any website like DA should be min 20-30-40 etc..
Don't worry about checking metrics. Focus on websites that are naturally relevant to you. If I publish a website about football (soccer, for Americans), then I want links from other websites about football regardless of their "domain authority." In the same way, I probably wouldn't care that much about a link from a website about cooking even if it had a DA of 90. Think like a human being, not like a machine -- in the end, that's what Google wants to do.
How can consider a natural links?
If you are asking what I think you are asking, then the links that are "earned" (as described above) are as natural as you can get.
Which type anchor text should be in any kind of links may be directory etc.
Don't think about anchor text. If you think about it too much, you will just get into trouble. Let people use whatever anchor text they want so that it will not look manipulated.
In website interlinking we should put Exact Links or no need to put any links For.ex.my website is abc.com.au then we can put link for Website Design keywords or Should be long tail keyword.
I don't understand. Can you clarify?
How can we do content marketing means we should post blog in internal website or need to create External Blog like BlogSpot, WordPress.
Put your blog on your own domain (you can use a platform such as Wordpress on your domain). If you put it on a different domain, then your "authority" will be diffused. Keep it "all under one roof."
In blog we should put any keyword link OR should be post without links.
I don't understand. Can you clarify?
We can put link on no follow website.
Don't worry about whether the links are follow or nofollow. A quality link on a relevant website may send valuable referral traffic. One rule: If Google did not exist, would you want this link? If the answer is "no," then skip it.
Why more website coming on Google first page but they are doing Spammy links like exact keywords links, unnatural links etc..
This is just my opinion, but I think fewer and fewer spammy websites are ranking highly following Google's Penguin, Panda, and other updates. Sure, Google is not perfect and will never be perfect, but it's getting better.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
The Importance of Bold Keywords in SEO?
Hi all, Recently I came cross an RV lifestyle blog named RVing Trends. The website features high-quality contents about handy RV camping tips & guides, and in-depth RV product reviews. They seem to spend a lot of effort on the content quality. I've followed this website for a few months and can see they've been producing 3,000-5,000 word length contents regularly. One thing I notice is that they emphasize the main keyword as bold in almost the posts. You can check 1 sample here about RV mattress reviews. Just want to ask for your opinions about the efficiency of this technique and is the keyword density still important for blog content to rank well in Google. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TungNM1930 -
Opinion on Gotch SEO methods & services
I would love to get you all's take on Gotch SEO. I am gearing up to link build for a site in the next several months, and have been reading up from sources other than Moz, in preparation. (Need to re-read Moz's guide, too, but I have already read it last year) I'm reading Gotch SEO's main link building method articles right now, and am wondering what you all think. Do you think they have a good approach and are generally reliable? Likewise, has anyone used their service for getting a link? What was your experience? Or if you haven't used the service, any quick takes on it?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | scienceisrad0 -
'SEO Footers'
We have an internal debate going on right now about the use of a link list of SEO pages in the footer. My stance is that they serve no purpose to people (heatmaps consistently show near zero activity), therefore they shouldn't be used. I believe that if something on a website is user-facing, then it should also beneficial to a user - not solely there for bots. There are much better ways to get bots to those pages, and for those people who didn't enter through an SEO page, internal linking where appropriate will be much more effective at getting them there. However, I have some opposition to this theory and wanted to get some community feedback on the topic. Anyone have thoughts, experience, or data to share on this subject?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | LoganRay1 -
Pharma Hack/Grey hat SEO. Cannot get site to rank, tons of incoming bad links
I have been working on a website trying to get it to show up in the SERPs again. It is being indexed which is great, it has some errors that I'm fixing now. But for the most part it should be ranking. It don't show any penalties going on, but when I did a backlink search we keep getting the cialis, viagra etc inbound links. First thought was Pharma Hack. But it's not a WP site and I recently rebuilt it. So whatever bad code could have been there it's not anymore. It doesn't show up in google either for the search site:www.mysite.com viagra cialis etc... So I'm wondering if anyone has any insight in a direction to point me? I don't understand what would be causing this to still not rank. Only thing it ranks for is it's name. Any suggestions would be very appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WeBuyCars.com0 -
Can a hidden menu damage a website page?
Website (A) - has a landing page offering courses Website (B) - ( A different organisation) has a link to Website A. The goal landing page when you click on he link takes you to Website A's Courses page which is already a popular page with visitors who search for or come directly into Website A. Owners of Website A want to ADD an Extra Menu Item to the MENU BAR on their Courses page to offer some specific courses to visitors who come from Website (B) to Website (A) - BUT the additional MENU ITEM is ONLY TO BE DISPLAYED if you come from having clicked on the link at Website (B). This link both parties are intending to track However, if you come to the Courses landing page on Website (A) directly from a search engine or directly typing in the URL address of the landing page - you will not see this EXTRA Menu Item with its link to courses, it only appears should you visit Website (A) having come from Website (B). The above approach is making me twitch as to what the programmer wants to do as to me this looks like a form of 'cloaking'. What I am not understanding that Website (A) URL ADDRESS landing page is demonstrating outwardly to Google a Menu Bar that appears normal, but I come to the same URL ADDRESS from Website (B) and I end up seeing an ADDITIONAL MENU ITEM How will Google look at this LANDING PAGE? Surely it must see the CODING INSTRUCTIONS sitting there behind this page to assist it in serving up in effect TWO VERSIONS of the page when actually the URL itself does not change. What should I advise the developer as I don't want the landing page of Website (A) which is doing fine right now, end up with some sort of penalty from the search engines through this exercise. Many thanks in advance of answers from the community.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ICTADVIS0 -
Google is giving one of my competitors a quasi page 1 monopoly, how can I complain?
Hi, When you search for "business plan software" on google.co.uk, 7 of the 11 first results are results from 1 company selling 2 products, see below: #1. Government site (related to "business plan" but not to "business plan software")
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | tbps
#2. Product 1 from Palo Alto Software (livePlan)
#3. bplan.co.uk: content site of Palo Alto Software (relevant to "business plan" but only relevant to "business plan software" because it is featuring and linking to their Product 1 and Product 2 sites)
#4. Same site as #3 but different url
#5. Palo Alto Software Product 2 (Business Plan Pro) page on Palo Alto Software .co.uk corporate site
#6. Same result as #5 but different url (the features page)
#7. Palo Alto Software Product 2 (Business Plan Pro) local site
#8, #9 and #10 are ok
#11. Same as #3 but the .com version instead of the .co.uk This seems wrong to me as it creates an illusion of choice for the customer (especially because they use different sites) whereas in reality the results are showcasing only 2 products. Only 1 of Palo Alto Software's competitors is present on page 1 of the search results (the rest of them are on page 2 and page 3). Did some of you experience a similar issue in a different sector? What would be the best way to point it out to Google? Thanks in advance Guillaume0 -
Identifying a Negative SEO Campaign
Hi A friend/clients site has recently dropped 2-3 pages (from an average #2 - #3 position on page 1 over last few months) for a primary target keyword & suspects a Neg SEO campaign hence asked me to look into it. I checked on Removeem and the KW does not generate a red (or even a pink) result. I looked at Ahrefs & MajSEO, backlinks and referring domains have dropped over the period the KW dropped hence presume i can be sure its not a neg campaign since this would show an opposite pattern (as per articles like this: http://moz.com/blog/to-catch-a-spammer-uncovering-negative-seo ) ? Also site has very few site wide backlinks. The keyword is a 3 word phrase with 2 of those words being in the domain and brand name hence presume such kw are relatively safe from neg seo campaigns anyway I would have presumed the backlink/ref-domain drop may well explain the ranking drop but site still in first field of view of page 1 for the other keyphrases which 2 out of the 3 are words are same as effected keyphrase (and also in the domain/brand name) so would have thought these would have dropped too if a neg campaign. Also many of the anchor texts in the disapeared backlinks are for one of the other partial match variant keyphrases which are still top of page 1. Anchor text is at 4.35% for the effected kw according to MajSEO Im pretty confident from the above that i can conclude no negative seo campaign has occurred, nor other type of penalty and probably just a 'wobble' at Google that may well right itself shortly Would appreciate feedback though from others that im concluding correctly just for confirmation ? Many Thanks Dan
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Dan-Lawrence1 -
Has anyone used this? www.linkdetox.com/
Has anyone used this? www.linkdetox.com/ Any opinions about it?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Llanero0