Any ranking success with Moz Local?
-
In the last three months, our Tampa office has gone from a listing score of 2% to 72% and is considerably higher than everyone else on the first page for Moz Local...but we are on the 13th page! We have not improved at all, even though our score has dramatically.
I know that the listing is only a part of the local equation, but it just a little shocking to me we haven't moved up even one page. Anyone have any success with this tool that translated to increased rankings for local? If so, how long did it take you to see results?
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Excellent discussion going on here, ladies and gents! I am so impressed by the deep questions and answers present here. Our community makes me proud!
Ruben, I'd like to bring up a couple of things to add to this good topic.
-
You might like to read my Moz Post http://moz.com/blog/local-landing-pages-guide which covers the concept of building out pages for various locations in some depth.
-
Citations are a big part of the picture - absolutely! They serve 2 main functions which are a) to help customers find you on a wide variety of platforms and b) to build a consistent, trustworthy body of information about your business on the web, which is then crawled by search engines, causing them to have confidence in the cluster of data they have about your business which can then increase your chances of being considered a relevant answer for certain queries.
So, it's a 1-2 punch kind of thing, building citations. There are direct benefits in a customer finding your listing on a site like Superpages and indirect benefits in the consistency and prevalence of your citations helping search engines to feel confident about the validity and prominence of your business.
This being said, it's my belief and understanding that it takes time for validity/prominence to actually start affecting rank. Every local business platform has its own schedule for taking a citation from zero to live, and then I have to think about search engine bots picking this up and stirring it around in the bucket in which they've got all my other business data. Then, I have to take into account whether my citation building has, in fact, surpassed what my direct local competitors have done or has simply brought me on par with them, meaning citation building will not be the difference-maker I'd love it to be, because my toughest competitors have done the same thing I have (meaning, I'm going to have to find some other way to distance myself from the field).
In sum, citation building is a must-do for any local business that doesn't want to fall behind in their niche, but it takes time to see the positive effects from it and the level of positivity is going to directly relate to the stiffness of the competition. You are in a tough market - law in major cities, which I would consider one of the most difficult ranking environments. Yes, you've got to get those citations in good shape, but my honest appraisal of this is that you are going to have to go way beyond these basics to surpass what is doubtless a highly active/ heavily marketed competitor base. The usual advice of build excellent content, implement on-page Local SEO, build citations, earn reviews is going to be common to all your competitors', so finding something that they're not all already doing may be necessary to see yourself rise in the SERPs by dint of some extra creative, superior effort.
Hope these thoughts are helpful! Glad you brought up this topic, and I hope once Moz Local has had a few more months to bake in the oven, we'll be able to publish some case studies that prove a correlation between participation and positive results!
-
-
Will do, thanks!
- Ruben
-
I concur wholeheartedly with every point Robert has made.
Bottom line, and you know this - you said you did - Moz is only one piece of the puzzle. As Robert said, it's in its early days, but I like it. For $49 it doesn't promise the world. It says it'll update 10 of the most important recipients and aggregators of local data with our your most important local data. It does that. And it provides a wealth of educational material to accompany it.
I recommend you take Robert up on his offer or continue down the path of self-optimization making sure you fill in remaining blanks. I have a post on how to do local SEO if you want to start there. It won't answer all your questions, nor will it result in as good an outcome as you'll get from hiring a pro like Robert, but it might help.
Donna
-
Ruben
I did not mean for that to come off as harsh or a judgement, it was meant really as being based on what you had written. When I re-read it, to me it seemed a bit blunt. Sorry.
With what you are trying to accomplish around Tampa, there are some things you need to change with all you are doing and, unfortunately, they are a bit long for this format. I am willing to provide you a site you can look at that I know they will not mind where you can see in real life the way to approach this. If you will email or PM me, I will provide that to you. (I am unwilling to put a site name out for this forum since it is a client site and not one I own.)
With your last statement:_ Though, now it looks like I have some other strategies thanks to you all to implement, and that's exciting, but I'm still disappointed. MozLocal, at least for me, has been completely worthless. _I think you have to put it into perspective.
For me, as an agency, most of these Local tools we do not use. I am speaking to any like Yext, etc. and including Moz Local in that. I want to be clear that my respect for Moz is only 1000 times more than Yext, and their product has been out a relatively short amount of time. If there has been a company I have come to trust it is Moz, so if they are not providing a service at the highest level, I believe they will make it right and you should email them or put in a support ticket.
With any SaaS, you have to be very clear what it is they are providing and I will tell you oftentimes I have to force myself to take the time to read everything they say they are supplying so I can be clear as to what I will or will not receive. As an agency and having a bit of notoriety, I get a call a day about ranking software, linking software, Local software, etc. I try a lot of it, but only end up using any of it rarely. We use Moz analytics, megalytics (which IMO is the best reporting software in the business), MajesticSEO, SEMRush, ahrefs, etc.
With the Local like Yext, I think it is simply not appropriate to accept money over time and then if someone quits paying you take down all their info. There is NO WAY that taking it down will improve the outcomes of Yext and certainly it will damage the business. In essence a person/business is held hostage. I do not know what Moz does, but IMO Yext is in it for the money based on their actions. It is not about improving outcomes.
So, with the local, once you have your listings correct, you are at a place where you then must maintain your NAP and guard it and then make sure your site is as optimized as possible to take advantage of Local.I know that is a lot to take in, but I hope it provides clarity.
Best,
Robert
edited to provide info on valuing Local SaaS
-
"I think the issue you are having is looking at Moz Local as if it is a tool to guarantee you will show up on page one of the 7 pack.:"
I do not think that at all, and that's the part I want to make clear. I have not seen ANY change in the ranking. When I saw Moz's pitch about this product, yes, I thought it might get me a really good ranking, but at the very least, I would have sworn there would be some improvement.
When I went through the Moz Pro software and optimized all my pages, etc, etc, I saw massive improvement. This product...nothing.
Though, now it looks like I have some other strategies thanks to you all to implement, and that's exciting, but I'm still disappointed. MozLocal, at least for me, has been completely worthless.
-
You can rank in both Ruben. We handle several law firm clients and about 30 sites for them. Yes, I have clients who are in Houston and other near areas and we do have them ranking in both areas. You are doing overkill if you are trying to do a separate page for every service at the firm for each location for simply business reasons. First and foremost, a search on Tampa is more "locally" global. In other words there are people in Trinity or St. Pete, etc. who will search on attorney Tampa. There are not that many in Tampa who will search attorney Trinity. So, you need a Tampa page minimally for the Tampa office. Kemprugelawgroup.com/Tampa... /Trinity, etc. Here is how I would set it up. The site would be a Tampa site with dropdown menu for "areas Serviced" or something similar. You might have Trinity, St. Pete, and Clearwater. (Just because a bunch of people will want to say you cannot do that- yes you can. What you cannot do is say you have an office in those other areas when you do not.) Frankly, if you handle it correctly, you can even show up for those searches.
I think the issue you are having is looking at Moz Local as if it is a tool to guarantee you will show up on page one of the 7 pack. I think that is a much more dynamic process than listing with data aggregators, citation sites, etc. It would be nice if someone from Moz Local would chime in here.
I suggest you create two pages for any city you want to rank in. One will be your "contact" page and one a "content" page. We try out variations until we find which works best for a given site in terms of ranking in local and organic. One page for each.
LMK if this helps you understand it a bit better.
Robert
-
Sorry. It's a best practice and has been for a while. Extra work, but adds clarity for visitors and search engines alike.
-
Hi Donna,
Well, I was under the impression, if you have two brick-and-mortar offices then you can rank in each location, but I didn't know I needed separate pages for everything. I...guess that's wrong. I will check out the SEJ article; I appreciate you providing it for me.
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Robert,
I understand what you are saying about how to check where you rank, but not how we are optimized for Trinity and not Tampa. Earlier this year, we opened a second office in Tampa. After we got verified by Google and everyone else. I got MozLocal to help us rank there.
I made sure to add our new phone, address and everything else to the site. So, I'm not sure what else I could do other than that for on-page optimization? I guess I could build out separate pages for each location as Donna suggested?
Either way, I'd greatly appreciate any concepts you'd like to share with me on any ways to improve our performance. Feel free to respond here, message me or email me at [email protected]
Thanks,
Ruben
P.S. I'm glad you liked it here!
-
I agree with Robert, you're mixing apples and oranges - trying to rank in Trinity and Tampa at the same time. You're also correct in noting that listings are only part of the equation.
Search Engine Journal published a post back in April that succinctly summarizes what you need to do to rank well in multiple locations. It also points you to the Google's Places Quality Guidelines if you're not already familiar with them.
Bottom line though, you need a dedicated page per location on your website. Each location page has to be clearly differentiated with a unique (and local !) phone number and content. This is the page you should be submitting to Google Places via Moz Local.
Make sense? Or am I telling you something you already know?
-
Ruben,
I hate to hear anyone is struggling to rank locally and I have an agency and we do Local for clients. I am a huge Moz fan, but do not use the Moz Local. I am answering because you are making an assumption that I think I can assist in. When I read what Moz Local does, they get you listed on the major data aggregators (easy big picture version). You are located in Trinity, FL. (I had a business in Tampa for several years).
When I search from a computer based in Trinity with an incognito search for - Personal Injury Lawyer - you are ranked second in the 7-pack and 4th in organic.When I add - Tampa - to the search (and computer still in Trinity) you are not in the 7 pack, but you are ranked 20th in organic (page 2 # 10) for ..../personal-injury.
The issue is you are locally optimized for Trinity FL where you are. (So, I guess, it is working for you.) The problem is if you are trying to rank locally in Tampa even though really your are in the Tampa/St. Pete/ Clearwater area, you are really in Trinity and you are ranking well there. To truly know how you rank, you have to be set to an incognito or &PWS=0 search and have the computer geo located to the area you are searching for.
I know this is confusing and I also know it makes people want to go get virtual offices ( don't do it please), but there are other tools you can use to assist you beyond just optimizing locally and still being able to rank in some of these areas. LMK if you understand and I will be happy to lay out a few concepts that might help.
Best of luck
Robert (I miss running around the bay there!)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Local Optimization for Multiple Businesses Issues/Strategy
Hello Everyone, So we have a client with a geo-focused ‘sports’ site but they also have a second site they are using to promote the seasonal camps they run. Local demographics and traffic would be a priority and main source of traffic. We know it would be ideal to have all of it consolidated but in this case a separate site was needed. The camp site would be under a different Name but they do not really have a different physical location from the primary site. Assuming we can’t find a discernable different location we could use; from a local optimization perspective we have two questions: Does that mean that we shouldn’t venture into local listings that need an address and trying to rank for map results and instead shift focus to other local strategies (i.e. geo-relevant content, link acquisition….etc.)? – We don’t want to dilute or devalue the primary site at all but if possible would like to be able to come up for both. Should we avoid listing the address on the camp site as text for similar reasons? We know the same business could be listed for multiple locations but any suggestions on the opposite approach or input would be very appreciated. Please let us know if there is anything we could provide details for that might help. Looking forward to hearing from all of you! Thank you in advance. Best,
Local Listings | | Ben-R0 -
Virtual offices and local seo
Hi,
Local Listings | | corn2015
Are there any downsides to registering busiensses in directories that have virtual office addresses?0 -
Placement of products in URL-structure for best category page rankings
Hi! I have some questions regarding the optimal URL-hierarchy placement of products in a marketplace setting where the end goal is to attract traffic to category pages. Let me start off with some background, thanks in advance for the help. TLDR Goal: Increase category page rankings. Alternative 1 - Products and category pages separated, flat product structure. Category page: oursite.com/category/subcategory Product / listing page: oursite.com/listing-1 Alternative 2 - Products and category pages separated, hierarchal product structure. Category page: oursite.com/category/subcategory Product / listing page: oursite.com/product/category/subcat/listing Alternative 3 - Products placed directly under category page. Category page: oursite.com/category/subcategory Product / listing page: oursite.com/category/subcategory/listing I run a commercial real estate marketplace, which means that our potential search traffic is _extremely _geographic. For example, some common searches are (not originally in english): Office space for lease {City X} Office space for lease {Neighborhood Y} Retail space {Neighborhood Z} And so on... These terms are already quite competitive, where the top results are our competitors geographic and type category pages. For example: _competitor.com/type/city/neighborhood , _is a top result, where the user reaches a landing page that shows all the {type} spaces for lease in {neighborhood}. These users are out to find which spaces are available for lease in these geographical areas, and not individual spaces. I.e. users do not search in the same extent for an individual product, in this case a specific empty space. Our approach has been to place an extreme bias towards a heavy geographical hierarchy. This means that basically any search, resulting in a category page, on our site results in a well structured URL like the following: _oursite.com/type/state/city/district/street, _since we are using Google Maps API's, this is easy and relevant for the user. Our geographical categorization beats our competitors both on extensiveness and usability, especially in long-tail search phrases where our competitors don't care to categorize where we are seeing real search volumes. The hierarchy only extends as far down as the user has searched, for example a lot of our searched just end up being _oursite.com/type/state/city/district. _ Now we are wondering how we should place our products, the empty spaces, in this URL structure. Our original hypothesis was that we should include the products in the original hierarchy, resulting in: oursite.com/category/subcategory/product. Our thinking was that we would both be serving the user with an understandable and relevant URL, and also provide search bots with a logical structure for our site and most importantly content for our category pages. Our landing pages are very dynamic, providing information by relaying graphical information on a map instead of in an SEO-friendly manner. I would however go as far as to say that these dynamic pages provide a ton of value for the user, much more so than our competitors, by describing relevant information about the neighborhood kind of like Trulia, just not in a bot-readable manner. This results in trying to rank them on their own merits being a challenge, whereas we were hoping we could create relevancy by placing products / listings and maybe even blog posts on the topic within the same URL-hierarchy. As of right now our current structure is oursite.com/products/category/subcategory/product. In other words, they are categorized in the same geographical fashion but under a separate URL-path. Our results so far is that we basically only rank for the product pages, and rank extremely poorly for our category pages, which is our ultimate goal to enhance. This is why we developed the above hypothesis. However, what we learned when we did some initial research is that very few e-commerce stores place their products directly below their categories. Most of the major websites we studied, and we looked at quite a few, just go for **alternative 1 **from above. The crux is that most of them choose alternative 1 but simultaneously implement bread crumbs that emulate alternative 3, just without the actual URL's. So, what I'm asking is, what are the actual benefits or downsides of the three alternatives? I feel as if I have a pretty firm grasp on how this could be done, I just need to better understand why most seem to choose to flatline their products or listings in the alternative 1 fashion. Thanks, Viktor
Local Listings | | Viktorsodd0 -
A site is preforming well for 1 local term, but with a slight change to the term it dosnt rank.
Ive got a site thats currently ranking #2 in the local 7 pack listings for the search term : "garden design [city]" but is not ranking at all for "garden designer [city]" (note the "er" at the end of designer). The search traffic for these 2 terms is pretty much the same, and id like to get the site ranking for "garden designer [city]". The only thing i can think of is thats different is that in the <title>tag for the homepage of the site we have "Garden Design [City] - .....", is there any other way i can try and up the local 7 pack ranking for my site other than changing the title tag ?</p> <p>Im thinking of running a link building campaign for the phrase "garden designer [city]", but apart from that i cant think of anything else that could help up my rankings for this, any ideas ?</p></title>
Local Listings | | Sam-P0 -
Local SEO and Sites by Order of Opinion?
Okay, so we were just having a discussion about which sites/directories are the most important to be listed in for Local SEO. Ultimately we were looking to 'sort' these by order of importance for the typical local business. Google My Business Yelp Yahoo! Local Bing Local Foursquare YellowPages.com SuperPages.com CitySearch HotFrog How would you order them? Would you add anything to the list? Thanks!
Local Listings | | ClickMonsterIM1 -
Sponsored Listings Hurting Local SEO?
We use a service which sponsors listings on various popular directories. In turn, it changes our phone number so that I can qualify if the call is a lead or not and then charge us. Unfortunately, while this service helps exposure on those directories, the phone number as well as the website are different. How much of a problem is this for our local SEO? Other directories include Suerpages and Citysearch. -Brant
Local Listings | | BCB11210 -
Why there is sometimes A-1 in Local result title?
Here is an exemple: https://plus.google.com/local/Montréal, QC/s/a-1?hl=fr Is this a legacy from Yellow Pages? A way to be first in the paper edition or it's something else?
Local Listings | | TVFreak0 -
How To Rank Individual Pages Locally?
Hello, A fellow business owner recommend that I signup for Moz to ask questions about local SEO. I just have a few questions, but please excuse my ignorance since SEO isn't something I'm very familiar with. My company has locations in 3 different cities in the state of Arkansas. I've noticed that when I type in certain keywords on Google such as "web design", I see a lot of organic listings from web design companies in my local area - but if I were to search from another city, different listings show up that are related to that city. I have 3 different pages on my company's website for each of our locations that gives a little bit of information about them - such as the general manager, storefront photos, and the employee of the month. What can I do to get each of the pages to rank higher on Google in their respective cities? I've heard a lot of different things mentioned such as having the name, address, and phone number listed. Including Google Maps on the page with our location. And some other stuff such as including stuff such as a "KML file" and a "schema markup". If anyone can give me a list of definitive suggestions, it would be greatly appreciated.
Local Listings | | CyberAlien1