General Advice or Strategies on optimizing Non-Plural and Plural
-
Moz,
I was just looking for any insights, advice, personal experiences in optimization for keywords that have Non Plural and Plural variants,
Basically from my keyword and traffic research i have gathered the majority of the search traffic i am looking to gain is coming through the singular spelling of the keyword i am currently optimizing and updating our page for,
From experience with this we have always ranked for the general non plural quantity page and brought traffic from both,
My Example : Our lollipops page which has meta information targeted towards 'Lollipops' rather than the singular 'Lollipop' but links to Singular information pages that are targeting the singular word 'Lollipop'
This way seemed to make sense as it wouldn't be good for user experience to have titles and headers on a page listing multiple products as a single instance, the content of the page would mostly reflect this targeting also,
To make things worse the page language and content is in German where their seems to be many ways of saying the same word from my understanding,
Am i doing the right thing in not sacrificing my user experience to target the singular version of the word ?
Just some advice please? Apologies i struggled to get my question across well,
Thanks
James
-
Thank you both for the feedback,
Yes, I am not looking to have two pages correct,
The theme and topic of the page is currently targeting the plural variant, and i feel this is the best way for it with how our site is laid out,
However i am saying it would be possible for me to change how the content is written to accommodate the singular variant of the word (Where more search traffic is) however i don't think this would be the right thing to do,
If i stick to my guns and the content and page is targeted towards plural, Google would still look after me for ranking for both variants,
I content and translation support from a colleague in Germany, and have as long as it takes
Thanks
James
-
Touche...... Robert..... Touche.....
To address my point more thoroughly, when people are searching for something and include a geo-location, I almost consider that a separate metric. It is adding a very specific term to the search engine then restricts to a location. I don't think most people utilize their browsers capability to it's full potential, and most people don't realize that you could just search for plumber and most likely Google is going to determine the best results for your area. (I could be completely wrong on all of this by the way).
When I look for a plumber in Los Angeles I usually search for "Plumber Who Has The Best Plumbers Crack, Los Angeles, Ca" You don't? I kid. I completely agree with you in this regard. If I am looking for a store/service/restaurant in a specific location then yes I would agree.
In a general sense, if I was just searching for something, coffee, lollypops, turtles, I would never search for something in such a general sense. Now unfortunately I often have to come to terms with the fact that just because I do something, doesn't mean everybody else does, however, even my mother tells me she types full sentences into Google when she searches.
Now I know you are sitting there asking yourself how this all relates to plurals? The point I was trying to make originally was that once the phrase is determined to be most beneficial for SEO purposes, optimize from there. I would bet that regardless there will be enough times where both words have to be used just to make it grammatically correct.
At the end of the day the Lollipop vs Lollipops will lead you to the same place, much like your statement below. Both Lollipop & Lollipops have been used 5 times (well 6 now) in this thread. They both seem pretty optimized to me. I mean, this page alone will probably be #1 on Google for Lollipop & Lollipops! (7)
Regardless I agree with what Robert said below. Robert has drastically more experience than I do, I would defer to what he said in a heartbeat!
Thanks!
Lollipop (8/7)
-
James,
It seems that simplified your question is this: If I have searchers looking for the singular and the plural of the same term, can I have a meta description that is singular or plural instead of having two pages with separate meta descriptions. You are trying to avoid duplicate content, additional work, etc.
I can tell you that we rarely (there are no absolutes to this) have a singular and a plural page. Whether products like electronic cigarette or services like plumbers, electricians, etc. This arrangement works fine for us.
Now, you added German to the mix and that is wholly a different topic. It has been years and years since Herr Knipper was teaching me Deutsch and throwing erasers at me daily. You have to be very careful and you may (if you are not fluent) want to employ a search firm that has that specific expertise. I would not take on a site in German, Swedish, Spanish, etc. unless I had that expertise on board or through a consultant. Yes, we do international sites.
Hope this helps,
Robert
-
I mostly disagree with "People don't use Google/Yahoo/Bing for one or 2 word searches anymore..."
I think it is very dependent on the search and can show data to prove it. Take a term like plumber or smithville plumber; people do not search for toilet clogged plumber in Smithville. They do search for the plumber, plumber smithville, or smithville plumber. NOTE: we are talking not every single human in Smithville but 80% plus.
Also, I do not think it really addresses the plurals issue.
Best
-
James,
Google is smart. Very smart. I would wager that Google is able to identify the difference between the usage of word in plural form, rather than a separate word all together.
When was the last time you searched for one word? People don't use Google/Yahoo/Bing for one or 2 word searches anymore, so my immediate suggestion is optimize for which ever term makes the most sense for the phrase you are optimizing for.
Use the keyword tools. Are people searching for "Green watermelon lollipop" or "cheap, bulk, lollipops" and then optimize from there. As far as it being an other language, you will just have to find out whats the most common term.
If I start a website that sells glasses I'm not gonna call it SpectacleShop.com, unless I want to target the geriatric community. Regardless, find what the most common term for lollipop is, and then optimize for the phrase that works for what you are selling. For what people are searching. Google is in the business of providing information. You need to make it as easy as possible for Google to provide YOUR information.
Also this is a good Moz thread on this same topic http://moz.com/community/q/singular-vs-plural-seo
Hope this helps!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Optimizing for close keyword variants
I am planning my seo project using Moz tools. I am finding keywords that are close to each other. What is the best way to optimize? If I made a page for each of the close words, it would pretty much be duplicate content. Is it best to go ahead and make a page for each and try to make content a bit different? How different does it have to be? Or, would i try to use the different versions of the keyword on one good page. Thank you!
Keyword Research | | bhsiao0 -
Optimizing Webpages for Keywords- Using Text Links to Distribute Internal Page Rank
My Manhattan based commercial real estate firm hired an SEO firm. The company conducted a content audit, created a keyword matrix and suggested optimizing 51 pages for specific keywords. A specific price per page was quoted, which I understand and accept. I was under thought that setting up internal text links to redistribute page rank and thereby improve ranking for competitive terms was included in the price. But this task was not included in their quote. I really want to avoid getting nickeled and dimed to death. Should this cost be included, or legitimately is setting up the internal link structure something that is an additional expense? If this task is legitimately an extra, how labor intensive is it? A lit bit of extra time when re-writing pages or a completely different task that would be quite time consuming? Also, I believe the flow of page rank within a site can have a big effect on ranking, so setting up internal links is critical. Are these assumptions correct? For some background, www.nyc-officespace-leader.com gets 4,500 organic visits per month. Google Page Rank is 2 and the site was hit by Panda in 2012 but has partially recovered. I would really appreciate some insight from the MOZ community. I do not want to pay too much or too little for these services. THANKS, Alan
Keyword Research | | Kingalan10 -
Penalty for on-page optimizing too many pages?
Hey in the process of building a new site in the fitness niche - targeting keywords such as: <colgroup><col width="387"></colgroup>
Keyword Research | | monster99
| how to get a flat stomach |
| how to get rid of belly fat fast |
| how to get rid of belly fat for women |
| how to get rid of love handles fast |
| how to get skinny |
| how to have more energy |
| how to loose weight fast |
| how to lose love handles |
| how to lose love handles fast |
| how to lose lower belly fat | All these keywords get decent search volume. My question, alot of the content for these keywords would be similar for example - "how to get a flat stomach", "how to lose love handles" and "how to get skinny" would pretty much have similar content. I could build a single page for all these keywords but i loose all the ranking benefits from doing on-page optimization such as creating a page for each of these keywords and optimizing it for each of these keywords (e.g. putting the keyword in the URL and Title) But if i build individual pages, to me it doesn't look natural optimizing multiple pages for the keyword terms, plus i loose the benefits of building a single page (e.g. less costly, not as much outreach activity required, etc) You could argue however that if you create individual pages for each of these keywords you are addressing the query directly as theres a slight difference between "how to lose love handles and how to get a flat stomach. But i guess thats up to google to decide. So how would you approach this? Cheers, Chris0 -
Keyword: singular vs plural
Hi, I've been putting some efforts to rank well for "San Antonio Wedding Photographer". I am ranked ok for that but not so on "San Antonio Wedding Photographers". My website is http://www.soobumimphotography.com/ So now, I am trying to rank for "San Antonio Wedding Photographers" instead since Google auto fills wedding "photographers" in search term. Question - Should I change my site title and some post / page title etc? What's the best way to do this? Thank you Soobum
Keyword Research | | BistosAmerica0 -
Optimizing for two nearly identical keywords.
Hi Mozzers, So in one of my campaigns I'm trying to optimize for "Personal Trainer Minneapolis" and "Minneapolis Personal Trainer". Would the best tactic be: Develop and optimize two pages. One for each of these similar keywords. (Clearly not the best UX). or Try to optimize a single page for both. Thanks for your thoughts!
Keyword Research | | JesseCWalker0 -
Is there really "keyword strategy" for sites with User Generated content? Any experiences?
I am starting website focused on consumer complaints/reviews with purely User Generated content. Is there really "keyword strategy" for such sites? I can only think of analyzing competition's keywords and understanding long tail http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-big-is-your-long-tail-whiteboard-friday. Any experiences? Or ideas?
Keyword Research | | ShoutOut0 -
How do you optimize for compound keywords
What is the best way to handle keywords like "switchplate covers"? The key word may be seen as either a 2 or 3 word phrase, depending how you handle the compound term: "switch plate" or "switchplate" In google KW it shows different results for switch plate vs switchplate as well as using cover vs covers. I've tried using all the variations in my descriptions, titles and H2s but I think this is diluting them all. Can anyone show me best practice guidelenes or examples of good solutions to these kinds of compound key words? Thanks Handcrafter
Keyword Research | | stephenfishman0 -
Best Keyword Research Tool / Strategy / Approach?
Currently, I list every root word (one word) I can think of for the client. Then start a 2 word keyword section, making every possible connection with my root words. Then move to 3 word, 4 word, and so on. I do this all in a word document and by hand. Does anybody have ANYTHING (tool/strategy) that does something similar? I'm looking for anything that can expedite this process. My manual method makes me feel like I'm always forgetting certain combinations of words.
Keyword Research | | MichaelWeisbaum0