Anyone using CloudFlare on multiple sites?
-
We are considering using CloudFlare as a CDN for a large group of sites. The fees are $5 to $200 depending on many factors. We tried the free trial on one site and were impressed with the results. I am wondering if any of you have any longer term experience with this and performance metrics, etc.
-
Does anyone know how many domains you can have under the business plan? Is that just for one site?
-
Since im here im going to respond to this with a couple of things.
"While Cloudflare offers many optimization services and DDoS protection, many of them break Magento and Wordpress functionality."
I've not had any issue with this. Typically if something does break in WP or Magneto its pretty simple to fix. Personally, i dont run WP sites without cloudflare, its too much of a security issue.
" Implementing caching and Google PageSpeed with Nginx or Apache shows much better performance,"
You should do this anyway....
" Worse though, Cloudflare doesn't allow you to use your own SSL on any plan under $200/moth"
Sure it does, i run 40 + sites on standard Comodo SSL certs on Cloudflare pro without issue.
"If you're a Pagespeed/YSlow nut, they you'll really be upset to learn Cloudflare adds a security cookie to everything, so there is no way to have serve content on a cookie-free domain when using Cloudflare DNS"
Thats a fair point, though perhaps not such an issue in most situations.
"Customer service is also slow and mostly automated, so don't expect great service on unpaid plans."
Again i dont really find this. Most of my accounts are CF Pro but for those that arn't, i dont notice any difference in support level. I know Business and Enterprise plans get faster support but for $200 + a month, i'd expect that anyway.
-
Old post but wanted to add a little. Been with Cloudflare for years but want to switch, so I searched Moz to learn what might happen to site ranking. I'm now neutral about Cloudflare and actually turned off extra services just to use their DNS for a few sites. While Cloudflare offers many optimization services and DDoS protection, many of them break Magento and Wordpress functionality. Implementing caching and Google PageSpeed with Nginx or Apache shows much better performance, especially in Asia. Worse though, Cloudflare doesn't allow you to use your own SSL on any plan under $200/moth. So if you have your own EV SSL, plan on dishing out for this. If you're a Pagespeed/YSlow nut, they you'll really be upset to learn Cloudflare adds a security cookie to everything, so there is no way to have serve content on a cookie-free domain when using Cloudflare DNS. Customer service is also slow and mostly automated, so don't expect great service on unpaid plans.
-
I just looked and....Out of the top 100 pages by views, 90/100 have decreased load time by one half. Pretty serious stuff there. 10 have increases of like 10 to 30% but nothing alarming.
Best
-
Since this seems like this is a pretty active site, how is the GA pagespeed tab showing that things are doing since the switch?
As for as the threats blocked, they just blacklist ip addresses, they are not usually actual threats. Think about when you run a virus scan and it says it protected you from 125 threats and then you just see that it is talking about tracking cookies. Most of the threats are known TOR exit nodes. Which some people use them for things like that, but others use them because they can access content that is blocked in their country.
As far as the file requests, it does help shed file load, which is good. But that is what a CDN would do as well. Both of them do not cache page requests either, so they do not change the actual processing and page loading time of the site. They just change the asset loading time.
-
That sounds like a great plan. Furthermore, on the high-performance sites that you have the higher CF plan on, you'll also get Railgun. I've had a chance to utilize CF's railgun technology through a partnership with a hosting company, and i can say that its quite effective with even dynamic content (unlike most CDNs). Furthermore, it may decrease your overall technology budget by mitigating the need for a separate CDN. Visit https://www.cloudflare.com/railgun to read more about it.
Good luck!
-
Our intent is to subscribe to pro, go with the lower option $5 per month on less critical sites and the much higher options on critical high performance sites. I really appreciate the input and time, I am glad I had one last good answer to give.
All the best,Robert
-
I've been using Cloudflare for about 2 years now with 10+ sites (including 2-3 that receive 20k+ unique visitors monthly), and to be quite honest I have not found a DNS provider that provides the same level of optimization and security as them. I've tried some of the top companies in the DNS industry (including Dyn, which I still use for enterprise DNS redundancy & fail-over), however they all seem to be missing functionality that I regularly use within Cloudflare, which I ended up moving back within a week. Furthermore, performance-wise, I've yet to find a service that can match site load times accomplished with an optimized CF setup.
It does take some time & experimentation to dial in the optimization/security settings within Cloudflare for your particular site(s)/technology, however once dialed in, everything runs quite well. My favorite features are the DNS-based smart redirects (you can create URL patterns which will automatically redirect pages for you at the DNS-level.) along with their DNS-based firewall. The latter stops malicious attacks at the DNS level (it can cut off the hacker/spammer at the DNS level before it hits your serrver, as long as the user accesses your site using the protected domain), and has been quite effective for us for the past 2 years. Furthermore, Cloudflare reduces load times in various ways (caching at the DNS-level, JS/CSS minified, etc). They also allow you to integrate apps such as Google Analytics without having to directly add the JS code into your site.
In regards to Cloudflare optimization, after implementing the proper settings for one of my clients ecommerce sites, we've seen load times decrease by about 3 seconds on avg. Like I've said, it does take some time to get the optimal settings for your specific site, however I feel that its definitely worth it.
I'd recommend subscribing to CloudFlare Pro ($20/month for first site, and $5 for each one afterwards), as it comes with the WAP firewall at the DNS-level (which works almost TOO well. Sometimes detects actions on the backend as SQL injection due to the query patterns), along with SSL support (really cool, you can have SSL connected at the DNS-level). I believe you also get a LOT more slots for the smart redirects, which is invaluable to me. I know I probably sound like I work for CF, but to be quite honest I've experienced nothing but great service from them. The one time I had an issue, I contacted them on Twitter (which they actively check) and they replied/fixed the issue for me within a few minutes.
Hope this helps you make a more informative decision. Feel free to send me a private message if you have any other specific questions. I'll see what I can do to help out.
-
I forgot to post before I hit good answer and it wiped out my comments. Thanks for the detailed response. I will show our info to our head of dev.
Best -
jStrong,
Thanks for the info. I think responded to both you and Prestashop at once, sorry. I like the security features a lot given some client sites are fairly sensitive.
Best -
Thanks so much for the help here. That is the other piece that we liked about what we saw in the initial tests - security. Here is the data (sorry a bit redacted due to confidentiality needs) from our head of development. It is a reasonably large site with quite a bit of traffic over a short time interval ( a few days)
- 126k total pageviews
- 105k regular visitors
- 20k crawlers/bots
- 1.5k threats (which Cloudflare forces to jump through hoops to access the site, and if failed they are denied)
- 523k total requests for files and pages - 207k were handled by Cloudflare rather than having to be handled by our server
- 8.3 GB of bandwidth total - 2.0 GB of which were handled by CloudFlare, reducing our usage and allowing other sites to deliver faster.
I appreciate the info re cookies, I will have to look into that as there may be client concerns. Great help!
-
I personally do not like cloudflare. All is fine and well until a site on your DNS starts getting DDOS'd. Then it will affect your site as well. I tend to optimize a site how I want it and then use MaxCDN as a CDN network. Then you do not have to worry about compatibility issues either, like mentioned above. I do keep a cloudflare account however, I use it to move in front of sites that are actively being attacked.
One thing I don't care for is that cloudflare tracks your users and is basically building up a tracking database. If you look on your served resources there are a couple of cloudflare cookies for this purpose.
-
Hi Robert,
We use them on a couple client sites, more for security then CDN, but the service worked as advertised and their support was helpful when needed. Also, it did not conflict with any of the sites functionality. The client has been using the service since late last year and is satisfied as well.
-
Hi RobertFisher,
I've recently integrated Cloudflare Business into a large ecommerce site (top 50k Alexa). The site had several issues that impacted page load speed, our new visitors were experiencing very long load times in the 4-7 second range.
Cloudflare is amazing for the price. at $200/month it greatly reduced the amount of HTTP requests, minification reduced our page size, and it even saved a lot of bandwidth (which translates to server cost savings and/or more for your money).
Their support service has been consistent, however, I know their Business and Enterprise customers are priority.
Most other CDNs are going to cost far more than $200. It reduced our page load speed around 50%, before optimizing the other performance configurations they have available.
You do need to do some quality and assurance testing. With any CDN, when you deliver certain things differently, like javascript files, a new conflict could arise. For example, our sliders were having trouble rendering after integrating CF, so we had to adjust the settings to get them loading properly again.
Is there something more specific I could tell you about it?
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redesign Just Starting - Should I Leave The Previous Incomplete Site or Setup A Temporary Holding Page and Redirect Previous URL'S?
Hi All I've picked up a new website project and wanted to ask about the best way to proceed with the current site during the development process. The current site is incomplete although it has been live for a while and has over 80 pages in the sitemap. Link to site https://tinyurl.com/ychwftup The business owner wants to take down the current site and simply add a landing page stating "new website coming soon". From an SEO perspective, am I better to keep the current site live until the new site is ready? Or would it not make any difference if I setup the landing page and add 301 redirects from each page in the sitemap to the landing page. Many Thanks In Advance For Any Assistance
Web Design | | ruislip180 -
Should Our Mobile Responsive Version of our Ecommerce Site include the on Page content to Help with Rankings
Hello All, We are soon to launch our new redesigned website along with a mobile responsive version but i have noticed we currently don't include the on page Content we have on the mobile version which we have on the desktop version to help with rankings etc. I am not sure how google does mobile research with regards to rankings. We have designed our responsive version to be as user friendly as possible at the expense of having to much clutter/content but I am wondering now , if we will rank on mobile if all our on page content isn't present. Just wondered if we should include it at the bottom of the pages with say a "Read more" extension to help avoid clutter? Any advice greatly appreciated thanks Pete
Web Design | | PeteC120 -
Could our drop in organic rankings have been caused by improper mobile site set-up?
Site: 12 year old financial service 'information' site with lead gen business model. Historically has held top 10 positions for top keywords and phrases. Background: The organic traffic from Google has fallen to 50% of what it was over the past 4 months compared to the same months last year. While several potential factors could be responsible/contributing (not limited to my pro-active removal of a dozen old emat links that may be perceived as unnatural despite no warning), this drop coincides with the same period the 'mobile site' was launched. Because I admittedly know the least about this potential cause, I am turning to the forum for assistance. Because the site is ~200 pages and contains many 'custom' pages with financial tables, forms, data pulled from 3rd parties, custom/different layouts we opted for creating a mobile site of only the top 12 most popular pages/topics just to have a mobile presence (instead of re-coding the entire site to make it responsive utilizing a mobile css). -These mobile pages were set up in an "m." subdomain. -We used bi-directional tagging placing a rel=canonical tag on the mobile page, and a rel=alternate tag on the desktop page. This created a loop between the pages, as advised by Google. -Some mobile pages used content from a sub page, not the primary desktop page for a particular topic. This may have broken the bi-directional 'loop', meaning the rel=canonical on the mobile page would point to a subpage, where the rel=alternate would point to the primary desktop page, even though the content did not come from that page, necessarily. The primary desktop page is the one that ranks for related keywords. In these cases, the "loop" would be broken. Is this a cause for concern? Could the authority held by the desktop page not be transferred to the mobile version, or the mobile page 'pull away' or disperse the strength of the desktop page if that 'loop' was not connected? Could not setting up the bi-directional tags correctly cause a drop in the organic rankings? -Our developer verified the site is set up according to Google's guidelines for identifying device screen size and serving appropriate version of page. -Are there any tools or utilities that I can use to identify issues, and/or verify everything is configured correctly? -Are we missing anything important in the set-up/configuration? -Could the use of a brand new subdomain 'm.' in and of itself be causing issues? -Have I identified any negative seo practices or pitfalls? Am I missing or overlooking something? While i would have preferred maintaining a single, responsive, site with mobile css, it was not realistic given the various layouts, and owner's desire to only offer the top pages in mobile format. The mobile site may have nothing to do with the organic drop, but I'd like to rule it out if so, and I have so many questions. If anyone could address my concerns, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Greg
Web Design | | seagreen0 -
Can the website pages have the site name like Title of the page | Sitename.com
Hi, Can the website pages have the site name like Title of the page | Sitename.com I have a site with 50K pages and all pages have | Sitename.com mentioned would that be a good practice or bad? Thanks Martin
Web Design | | mtthompsons0 -
From Google Sites to Wordpress - Anyone Ventured this SEO terrain?
We have a few sites in Google Sites - and they are ugly! We have a majority (40+) of websites in Wordpress. But we have a few websites just stuck on Google Sites, and since Google won't let you fully edit the HTML, add scripts, or implement any technology since 2000, we want to move. The sad problem - the Google sites are ranking well. We rank well in Manhattan, Atlanta, Dallas, and Philadelphia. The problem is - the sites do not give much room for growth - and the bounce rate is high because they are so ugly. Has Anyone moved from Google sites to Wordpress? Should we just stay with Google and bite the ugly bullet? My fear is that these sites will not allow for growth. It is hard to update them and even harder to make them look nice. To get a sample - beware: www.counselingphiladelphia.com Even another reason to leave: The slider is non-semantic and terrible SEO. Google won't allow a slider script with tags and a hrefs, so the only way to implement a slider is through a Google Docs Presentation that keeps sliding. I know - terrible SEO (#donthate) but we needed something. Any advice and thoughts would help! Thanks Mozzers!
Web Design | | _Thriveworks0 -
Infinite Scrolling vs. Pagination on an eCommerce Site
My company is looking at replacing our ecommerce site's paginated browsing with a Javascript infinite scroll function for when customers view internal search results--and possibly when they browse product categories also. Because our internal linking structure isn't very robust, I'm concerned that removing the pagination will make it harder to get the individual product pages to rank in the SERPs. We have over 5,000 products, and most of them are internally linked to from the browsing results pages in the category structure: e.g. Blue Widgets, Widgets Under $250, etc. I'm not too worried about removing pagination from the internal search results pages, but I'm concerned that doing the same for these category pages will result in de-linking the thousands of product pages that show up later in the browsing results and therefore won't be crawlable as internal links by the Googlebot. Does anyone have any ideas on what to do here? I'm already arguing against the infinite scroll, but we're a fairly design-driven company and any ammunition or alternatives would really help. For example, would serving a different page to the Googlebot in this case be a dangerous form of cloaking? (If the only difference is the presence of the pagination links.) Or is there any way to make rel=next and rel=prev tags work with infinite scrolling?
Web Design | | DownPour0 -
Site Re-Design - Running old XML site map for 301's
Hi all, We are going to launch a new site design for our current e-commerce site. I have taken this opportunity to change some categories due to keyword research and all old categories will be 301ed to best fitting new category. So I have 2 questions about moving stuff over; 1. I read that leaving the old xml site map running for the first week, would help, because this would give crawlers the chance to run through the site and follow the 301s, which would help pass the juice. How true does this sound? 2. I was thinking of re-writing all category and sub category titles, meta descriptions and on page content. The positive of this is loads of fresh content - but doing this all at the same time with the new site launch might see some major dropping in search ranking. I've identified our top traffic keyword terms/pages, would it be more wise to leave these pages, and change the others, or would the total new fresh burst have a better impact? Cheers
Web Design | | ToxicFox0 -
Duplicate Content Problem on Our Site?
Hi, Having read the SEOMOZ guide and already worried about this previously, I have decided to look further into this. Our site is 4-5 years old, poorly built by a rouge firm so we have to stick with what we have for now. Were I think we might be getting punished is duplicate content across various pages. We have a Brands page, link at top of page. Here we are meant to enter each brand we stock and a little write up on that brands. What we then put in these write ups is used on each brands item page when we click a brand name on the left nav bar. Or when we click a Product Type (eg. Footwear) then click on a brand filter on the left. So this in theory is duplicate content. The SEO title and Meta Description for each brand is then used on the Brands Page and also on each page with the Brands Product on. As we have entered this brand info, you will notice that the page www.designerboutique-online.com/all-clothing/armani-jeans/ has the same brand description in the scroll box at the top as the page www.designerboutique-online.com/shirts/armani-jeans/ and all the other product type pages. The same SEO title and same Meta descriptions. Only the products change from each one. This then applies to each brand we have (at least 15) across about 8 pages. All with different URLs but the same text. Not sure how a 301 or rel: canonical would work for this, as each URL needs to point at specific pages (eg. shirts, shorts etc...). Some brands such as Creative Recreation and Cruyff only sell footwear, so technically I think??? We could 301 to the Footwear/ URL rather than having both all-clothing and footwear file paths? This surely must be down to the bad design? Could we be losing valulable rank and juice because of this issue? And how would I go about fixing it? I want a new site, but funds are tight. But if this issue is so big that only a new site would fix it, then maybe the money would need to come forward. What do people make of this? Cheers Will
Web Design | | YNWA0