-
Hello!
Today we have some issues when Google is indexing our
instead of our seo-title. Our headline appears in the <title>tag while our seo-headline appears in the <meta name="title"> tag. And Google seems to index the <title> tag in most cases. </p> <p><strong>Here is from our source code: </strong><br /><title>Duellen: Apple Iphone 6 vs Samsung Galaxy S6 - XX</title>
Should we stick with both of these and put the same content in both <title>and <meta name="title"> tags or should we go with just one of them?</p> <p>Best regards,<br />Danne</p> <p> </p></title>
-
Ha, you got it done while I was still typing. Good, thorough answer.
-
Ok, so I've had a lot of discussion on this topic in the past but not recently. Pardon my bookmarks being a little old but they all still apply the same.
First, there is no meta value for title. See the documentation here: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_meta.asp
The only values are:
- application-name
- author
- description
- generator
- keywords
There is a standard attribute for title (http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_standardattributes.asp) but specifies a bit of text more like a "tooltip" not a title tag.
The actual <title>tag <span data-mce-mark="1">defines the title of the document. Title in a meta element defines the title of the meta element. In other words, no it has virtually no effect.</span></span></p> <p><span data-mce-mark="1"><span data-mce-mark="1">Supporting SEO docs:</span></span></p> <p>http://moz.com/community/q/title-vs-meta-title<br />http://forums.seochat.com/web-design-coding-programming-11/should-i-use-title-meta-title-460889.html<br />http://www.raisemyrank.com/articles/meta-title.htm<br />http://themeaningofweb.blogspot.com.au/2008/10/difference-between-and-nametitle-tags.html</p> <p> </p></title>
-
Hi Danne
First of all, it's only the <title>tag here that is the required HTML element, when looking at <a href="http://validator.w3.org/" target="_blank">W3C Compliant Markups</a>.</p> <p>The <meta name="title"> tag is just meta data content, and different crawlers will use or not use that information as they see fit. In the case of Google, it very seldom, if at all, ever uses this tag for its indexation purposes.</p> <p>Fast forward again to the <h1> tag, and its use is also <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/Use_h1_for_Title" target="_blank">W3C recommended</a>.</p> <p>So you can see the trend here - Google will look at the W3C elements and consider them for indexing more than the <meta name="title"> tag. To put it bluntly, the <meta name="title"> is a waste of code.</p> <p>If you want a certain phrase to be indexed, considered, or to show up in the SERP, I would add it to your <title> tag and remove the <meta name="title"> altogether, to reduce the clutter and any chance of conflicting messages.</p></title>
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Added a canonical ref tag and SERPs tanked, should we change it back?
My client's CMS uses an internal linking structure that includes index.php at the end of the URLs. The site also works using SEO-friendly URLs without index.php, so the SEO tool identified a duplicate content issue. Their marketing team thought the pages with index.php would have better link equity and rank higher, so they added a canonical ref tag, making the index.php version of the pages the canonical page. As a result, the site dropped in the rankings by a LOT and has not recovered in the last 3-months. It appears that Google had automatically selected the SEO-friendly URLs as the canonical page, and by switching, it re-indexed the entire site. The question we have is, should they change it back? Or will this cause the site to be reindexed again, resulting in an even lower ranking?
Technical SEO | | TienB240 -
Canonical error from Google
Moz couldn't explain this properly and I don't understand how to fix it. Google emailed this morning saying "Alternate page with proper canonical tag." Moz also kinda complains about the main URL and the main URL/index.html being duplicate. Of course they are. The main URL doesn't work without the index.html page. What am I missing? How can I fix this to eliminate this duplicate problem which to me isn't a problem?
Technical SEO | | RVForce0 -
General questions about implementing hreflang using XML sitemap
I created another thread regarding hreflang sitemaps. However, this one is more general and doesn't cover multiple sitemaps for different localizations so I think it's reasonable creating a new thread. We are trying to implement hreflang using XML sitemap. We have localized content for a few countries, but only 1/3 of the content is 'duplicate' localized content. How should this be presented in the sitemap? Can we have some urls with hreflang-tags and some without? Also, where should this be located? In the usual sitemap file at site.com/sitemap.xml or should we create a different sitemap site.com/hreflang.xml where we just paste all hreflang-info? And if it should be in /hreflang.xml - can we have the same URL twice (in both current sitemap and hreflang sitemap)?
Technical SEO | | Telsenome0 -
Surge in spammy links
Hi, Our website www.foodjet.com has recently seen a huge amount of spammy incoming links to non-exisiting URLS: They all target pages that lead to a 404 and which clearly do not exist on our website. Since they have started to appear our DA has plummeted. I have already disavowed some domains, but more re-appear just as fast. I have also checked if our site has been hacked, which does not seem to be the case. What am I missing? And/or what can I do?
Technical SEO | | FoodJEt0 -
Finding the reason behind not Ranking-UP
Hello, I hope you guys are doing well. I published an article about 2 months ago and I tried to write a rich article in regards to SEO. Also, did a keywords research and found my competitors. I created a lengthy but meaningful article from all the competitors. Here is the link to my Article and my targeted keyword is "CSC Scholarship 2020". You can check my domain DA & PA also. It is higher than the websites' DA, PA who are ranked on the top of the page. My content is also Lengthy and Meaningful and to-the-point but still, my Article is not generating any result for me. I want that, please investigate the main issue that is causing this problem.
Technical SEO | | HansiAliya1 -
SEO Elements for Canonicalized URLs?
I am helping a client with SEO for their ecommerce store. They have around 65 products, but close to 500 URLs all for those same products. Basically they have a bit of an index bloat problem but long story short restructuring was too much of a lift for them, so I got them set up with a canonical URL strategy to ensure all duplicate pages point to one "main" product page. Getting to the point: They also need an on-page overhaul. I've created keyword optimized titles, metas, H1s, etc. for each product. Do these elements need to be added to every single one of the 450+ product pages OR do I only need to add them to the 65 "main" product pages that everything else is pointing to, since that will ultimately be the page that gets crawled?
Technical SEO | | AJTSEO0 -
Snippet not work for my article in google
I add the script for star snippet in my website but not work in my posts you can see it in this URL https://youtech.ooo/showbox-apk-download/ when I searched in google my custom keyword "Showbox" my competitor show with star snippet in SERP but my site doesn't show snippet stars. Thank You!
Technical SEO | | JackJasonn1 -
GMB Bulk Upload Error
Hello! I am continuing to have issues with the bulk upload option.Currently, there are 12 non-verified locations in a location group in my GMB account. I have approximately 6-8 more that need to be added to this group via bulk upload. When uploading the spreadsheet, I receive an error reading "You've exceeded the limit for the about of locations you can upload to Google My Business in a single day. Try again later." It seems to happen specifically to the locations that aren't in my GMB account already. The others, the ones already in the account, are fine and simply read "No updates" when the bulk upload sheet is read. Everything else is marked as an error. Why is it marking some listings as nonviable when they come in via the bulk verification spreadsheet, which has been downloaded directly from the links Google has provided, and filled in with the help of the sample and amenities list?How do we finish uploading all of the remaining locations?I have another group, separate group (same company, groups split into US and International) under my name that may also need a bulk upload - what can I do to avoid this error in the future? Can they still be bulk uploaded to my account after I upload the first location group's listings?If you could provide any guidance, I'd be very grateful.Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | kmarsh0