Are businesses still hiring SEO that use strategies that could lead to a Google penalty?
-
Is anyone worried that businesses know so little about SEO that they are continuing to hire SEO consultants that use strategies that could land the website with a Google penalty? I ask because we did some research with businesses and found the results worrying: blog farms, over optimised anchor text. We will be releasing the data later this week, but wondered if it something for the SEO community to worry about and what can be done about it.
-
Thanks for the answer Marie. That is true about the SEO in the middle who can talk the talk and can get away sounding like a pro. It's also true that many small businesses, especially those online, have little budget but have the desire, if not the need, to rank and just can't afford big budgets, so they are at the mercy of the cheaper SEOs.
-
At my office we have two people working almost 40 hours each per week on content and one person filling the sales. That, in my opinion, is what is required to produce rain when you don't have a big brand name generating automatic traffic. (We also make a little money from ads.) Most business are not willing to spend that kind of time on content. The only SEO that we do is on-site.
-
Yes.
A few years ago there was a massive pool of people who called themselves SEOs who could generally accomplish decent rankings by using techniques that are not in line with the quality guidelines. Now, that pool has gotten a lot smaller. In my opinion the "good SEOs" are those who are extremely knowledgable about on-site SEO and know how to properly create content and promote that content.
Those are skills, however that take years to learn. Gone are the days where someone can take a quick course, buy a few links, slap up some spammy microsites and rank. Yet, some people are still trying because that's all they knew. And sadly, business owners are still buying this crap.
What bothers me the most though is the type of SEO provider who is borderline. They promise that they are "white hat" and don't make spammy links, but they'll happily post links on their private blog network and submit guest posts to hundreds of sites that will publish them. The business owner often hears "white hat" and is easily convinced that this stuff is going to work.
I had a client recently contact me to ask me my opinion on the new SEO work they were getting done. I had removed a link penalty for them a couple of years ago and thought I had educated them well on what type of SEO is acceptable. They interviewed several people for an in house SEO job and had me sit in on the interviews so that I could ask them questions to make sure that they were within Google's guidelines. They didn't have one candidate whom I felt understood Google's guidelines. They all wanted to guest post, but just do it on "authoritative sites". A little bit of guest posting is ok...but if that's your main SEO strategy, that's not good. I lost touch with this client until they just recently contacted me. They had hired a great guy who had "white hat" strategies and asked if I could review 150 links he built for them. That's a red flag, isn't it? Any time you can build 150 links you're probably crossing into unnatural territory. Well, these links were all comment spam and forum profile spam. I couldn't believe it.
I think though that the main problem is cost. Anyone who thoroughly understands the technical aspects of SEO and can legitimately build a site's traffic is going to cost $3000+ a month (perhaps less, depending on the niche). So, if I'm a small time small business and can't afford $3000+ a month, I'm going to be looking for the $500 a month type of package...and sadly, this is usually not going to move the needle much.
-
The problem with many websites is a lack of content.
The business owner doesn't want to write the content (can't write, doesn't have time, can't afford, etc.). The SEO has a hard time finding someone to write content that fits the business and satisfies the owner.
So, the SEO is left trying to promote and optimize a turd.
This is what creates demand for low quality SEO and links that are bought or provided but never earned.
Are businesses still hiring SEO that use strategies that could lead to a Google penalty?
Yes, as explained above.
-
Yes. Serious SEOs have the analytics to show business their worth, showing that SEO is more than just keyword research etc etc. However, many there has been a rise in small online business opening with little budget. Online start ups can be up and running with little budget. They are creating the demand for low quality SEO providing links but not earning them.
-
There is nothing to be done about it, but stay the course. Unfortunately their are no credentials for SEO as such. So anyone can claim to be an expert. Ironically it would be difficult to create a course as there are so many potential solutions given most sites have unique criteria.
All that said the new Search Analytics has given me hope in setting identifiable dashboards for clients - ie simply clicks per page. We are introducing that. Measurable and identifiable tangible results.
On worried - not at all, though some give SEO a bad name, good quality work leads to more work from word of mouth than is almost achievable...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google spider
If someone provide 1 or more cent discount to our customers who put up a link on their site, and wanted to actually show the referral discount in their shopping cart for that customer, can Google see that and realize they are providing a discount for a link? Can Google see what's displayed in our their web application - like in the upload, shopping cart and complete transaction pages?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | K_Monestel0 -
Google Manual Penalty - Dilemma?
Hi Guys, A while back, my company had a 'partial match' manual penalty from google for 'unnatural links' pointing to our site. This glorious feat was accomplished by our previous SEO agency for quite heavily spamming links (directories, all kinds of low quality sites). That being said, when the penalty hit we really didnt see any drop in traffic. In fact, it was not long after the penalty that we launched a new website and since our traffic has grown quite significantly. we've doubled our total visits from prior penalty to now. This previous SEO also did submit a couple of reconsideration requests (both done loosely as to fool Google by only removing a small amount of links, then abit more the next time when it failed - this was obviously never going to work). Since then, I myself have submitted a reconsideration request which was very thorough, disavowing 85 Domains (every single one at domain level rather than the individual URLs as I didnt want to take any chances), as well as getting a fair few links removed from when the webmaster responded. I documented this all and made multiple contacts to the webmasters so i could show this to Google. This reconsideration request was not successful - Google made some new backlinks magically appear that i had not seen previously. But really, my main point is; am I going to do more damage removing more and more links in order to remove the penalty, because as it stands we haven't actually noticed any negative effects from the penalty! Perhaps the negative effects have not been noticed due to the fact that not long after the penalty, we did get a new site which was much improved and therefore would naturally get much more traffic than the old site, but overall it has not been majorly noticed. What do you guys think - is it worth risking drop in rankings to remove the penalty so we don't face any future issues, or should I not go too heavy with the link removal in order to preserve current rankings? (im really interested to see peoples views on this, so please leave a comment if you can help!)
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Sandicliffe0 -
80% of traffic lost over night, Google Penalty?
Hi all.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Hemjakt
I have a website called Hemjakt (http://www.hemjakt.se/) which is a search engine for real estate currently only available on the Swedish market. The application crawl real estate websites and collect all estates on a single searchable application. The site has been released for a few months and have seen a steady growth since release, increasing by 20% weekly up to ~900 visitors per day. 3 days ago, over night, I lost 80% of my traffic. Instead of 900 visitors per day I'm at ~100 visitors per day and when I search for long, specific queries such as "Åsgatan 15, Villa 12 rum i Alsike, Knivsta" ( <adress><house type=""><rooms><area> <city>), I'm now only found on the fifth page. I suspect that I have become a subject of a Google Penalty. How to get out of this mess?</city></rooms></house></adress> Just like all search engines or applications, I do crawl other websites and scrape their content. My content is ~90% unique from the source material and I do add user value by giving them the possibility to compare houses, get ton of more data to compare pricing and history, giving them extra functionalities that source site do not offer and so on. My analytics data show good user engagement. Here is one example of a Source page and a page at my site:
Source: http://www.hemnet.se/bostad/villa-12rum-alsike-knivsta-kommun-asgatan-15-6200964
My Site: http://www.hemjakt.se/bostad/55860-asgatan-15/ So: How do I actually confirm that this is the reason I lost my traffic? When I search for my branded query, I still get result. Also I'm still indexed by Google. If I am penalized. I'm not attempting to do anything Black Hat and I really believe that the app gives a lot of value to the users. What tweaks or suggestions do you have to changes of the application, to be able to continue running the service in a way that Google is fine with?0 -
Disavow links leading to 404
Looking at the link profile anchor text of a site i'm working on new links keep popping up in the reports with let's say very distasteful anchor text. These links are obviously spam and link to old forum pages for the site that doesn't exist any more, so the majority seem to trigger the 404 page. I understand that the 404 page (404 header response) does not flow any link power, or damage, but given the nature and volume of the sites linking to the "domain" would it be a good idea to completely disassociate and disavow these domains?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MickEdwards0 -
Why does Google recommend schema for local business/ organizations?
Why does Google recommend schema for local business/ organizations? The reason I ask is I was in Structed Data Testing Tool, and I was running some businesses and organizations through it. Yet every time, it says this "information will not appear as a rich snippet in search results, because it seems to describe an organization. Google does not currently display organization information in rich snippets". Additionally, many of times when you do search the restaurant or a related query it will still show telephone number and reviews and location. Would it be better to list it as a place, since I want to have its reviews and location show up thanks? I would be interested to hear what everyone else opinions are on this thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | PeterRota0 -
Rollover design & SEO
After reading this article http://www.seomoz.org/blog/designing-for-seo some questions came up from my developers. In the article it says "One potential solution to this problem is a mouse-over. Initially when viewed, the panel will look as it does on the left hand side (exactly as the designer want it), yet when a user rolls over the image the panel changes into what you see on the right hand side (exactly what the SEO wants)." My developers say" Having text in the rollovers is almost like hiding text and everyone knows in SEO that you should never hide text. "In the article he explains that it is not hidden text since its visible & readable by the engines.What are everyone's thoughts on this? Completely acceptable or iffy?Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | DCochrane0 -
How Google deal with a Domain Buy
Hello folks, How is google dealing with those clever peoples who decide to buy a famous place on internet( domain ), to be their domain name. For example if someone buy a very well ranked domain name for some keywords in their niche, is there any punishment? Whats the bad things about buy a domain? Thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | augustos0 -
Will Google Penalize Content put in a Div with a Scrollbar?
I noticed Moosejaw was adding quite a bit of content to the bottom of category pages via a div tag that makes use of a scroll bar. Could a site be penalized by Google for this technique? Example: http://www.moosejaw.com/moosejaw/shop/search_Patagonia-Clothing____
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BrandLabs0