Getting spam Links pointing to our wrong url, what to do?
-
Hey Mozzers,
Looking in my Google Search Console (Webmaster Tools), I'm getting links pointing to bogus pages on my website that result in a 404. What does one do so you can tell Google that it has been "fixed"?
Do i just 301 it to another website?
If I add it to my disavow list, does Google remove the error in my webmaster tools?
Thank you!
-
Hey Shawn,
1. If GWT is showing a 404 without a "Linked from," I wouldn't worry about it too much. Sometimes Google tries to recrawl URLs it crawled once in the past, but that doesn't mean it's causing a problem. I would double check that you don't have any internal or external links to "blog/blog," then just "mark as fixed." There's no point to disallow Google from crawling a page that isn't there in the first place.
2. Nope. The only danger of having a long robots.txt is that you may get lost while checking your rules and accidentally disallow a page you want in the index. Whenever you add a rule to robots.txt, make sure you go to Google Search Console and use the robots.txt Tester to check if you've disallowed any important pages.
Good luck!
Kristina
-
Thank you Kristina. I went ahead and disavowed some of those links. Other bogus links are still showing in GWT, such as "blog/blog/"...we only have one /blog category but Google just weirdly finds more bogus ones. When I select "Linked from", it doesn't show any sources. So my additional questions are:
1. If I add "blog/blog" to my robots.txt, do I mark the /blog/blog links in GWT "mark as fixed"?
2. Does it matter if my robots.txt is long or short?
Thank you
-
Hi Shawn,
If these are from crappy scraper sites (which it looks like they are), then I'd add it to your disavow list, yes. I don't think that'll get Google to remove your error in GWT, but remember: GWT is a separate algorithm from the actual algorithm because Google doesn't want us to see how sophisticated they are. If GWT sees "errors" in links, but you've properly disavowed, I'm fairly confident the actual Google algorithm won't penalize you.
For anyone else finding this thread: make sure that you check the sites that are linking to your broken pages before disavowing! If they're good links but out of date or mistyped, just update them.
Best,
Kristina
-
Joe,
Thanks for the update. Our website doesn't have any malware, but sucuri.net seems ideal to those who need it. Reading your article, I read:
- "Someone else from another site links to you but has a typo in their link"
In our case, these are crappy scraping sites that have bogus links pointing to us. Here's an example: Let's say you're nba.com and have a page on kobe bryant - nba.com/kobe-bryant
The link that Google is picking up from these crappy sites show a link to "nba.com/kobe-bry". If you notice, the link is incorrect and I don't want to see another 404 piling in webmaster tools.
What would you do?
-
I've seen this happen several times and the first thing to do is really clean out your site first. I'd recommend Sucuri.net to do a thorough malware cleanup. Their free plugin isn't enough, you need to go with the paid version. Are you on WordPress? I've seen this happen to 4 sites already I've helped.
Then, let all the errors 404. If you 301 them then the bad pages and links will stay alive longer. Even better to let them 410, but 404 should do the trick. I wrote about some of the reasons behind those in a post here on Moz a few years ago that still applies.
Matt Cutts has a good reply on disavowing spam links in his video here, and says:
"If you're at all stressed, if you're worried, if you're not able to sleep at night because you think Google might have something, or might see it, or we might get a spam report about you, or there might be some misunderstanding or an algorithm might rank your site lower, I would feel free to just go ahead and disavow those links as well,"
I went ahead and disavowed the DOMAINS of the most recent site, just to be extra sure. Let me know if you have follow up questions!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Getting keywords to rank on new landing pages
I've built new landing pages for a website, and have loaded them with researched keywords in the content, alt image attributes and metas etc - but, after a number of crawls, the keywords are currently being matched to other existing web pages on the website. Does anyone have any advice on 'unlatching' these keywords from these pages, and instead getting them to match with pages that have been optimised for them? Many thanks!
Moz Pro | | Darkstarr6660 -
Is a new website the only way to get better rankings?
Our website is https://www.franklin-bell.com.au. For a while now we've been trying to get a few of our pages on there to get a better rank on google. A local SEO agency told us that some of our pages are not like "the modern standard" for web pages, but our page score for the keywords we want is 90% and higher. Do we really need to completely rebuild the website (it was built in 2014) in order to get better rankings? Or is it sufficient to have the 97% page score and then just get some back links and social media referrals etc. Thanks in advance.
Moz Pro | | franklin-bell0 -
Why did I not get on page analysis
I signed up last Friday for a 30 day trial and was hoping to get the on page analysis so I could get cracking on it. Moz said the crawl was done but I have no info for on page analysis which I find really useful when I have used this before. Any ideas and are any of the MOZ moderators able to get the system to perform one so I can make changes tonight for the MOZ crawl again tomorrow? Thanks Paul
Moz Pro | | ptrobson0 -
URL, Subdomain and Root Domain Structure
Various URL Structure
Moz Pro | | Mark_Ch
mydomain.co.uk
www.mydomain.co.uk
http://www.mydomain.co.uk
http://mydomain.co.uk
mydomain.co.uk/index.html
www.mydomain.co.uk/index.html
http://www.mydomain.co.uk/index.html
http://mydomain.co.uk/index.html HTACCESS File Index Rewrite RewriteRule ^index.(htm|html|php) http://www.mydomain.co.uk/ [R=301,L]
RewriteRule ^(.)/index.(htm|html|php) http://www.mydomain.co.uk/$1/ [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^mydomain.co.uk
RewriteRule ^(.)$ http://www.mydomain.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L] Google WMT Setting: Configuration | Settings
Preferred domain: radio check on "don't set a preferred domain" SEOMoz Open Site Explorer
mydomain.co.uk - (301 Redirect) [No Data] PA38 DA30
http://www.mydomain.co.uk/index.html - (301 Redirect) [No Data] PA23 DA30 Majestic Site Explorer
Number of Referring Domains & External Backlinks vary between the following instances:
URL: http://www.mydomain.co.uk
SUBDOMAIN: www.mydomain.co.uk
ROOT DOMAIN: mydomain.co.uk
Question
I have set up my htaccess file to rewrite "Various URL Structure" to www.mydomain.co.uk. However when i view metrics in Majestic SEO, the url / Subdomain / Root Domain all differ. Why is this happening?
Is this harming my site?
What is common practice when defining URL Structure? Any other quality advise and implementation structure would be much appreciated. Regards Mark0 -
How come my Moz Points stopped incrementing
I was so happy when my Moz Points reached 100 today, but I've done a whole lot more today and it still says 100. Have I broken the system, or is it resting today (it is Sunday where I am)
Moz Pro | | loopyal0 -
Can someone explain why I have been seeing an increase in the number of Linking Page URLs in OSE that link directly to downloads?
Ever since the last couple Linkscape updates when doing competitive back link analysis I have noticed a large increase in the number of URLs of Linking Pages in OSE that result in an immediate file download. The majority of the time these downloads are not common files ie PDF, DOC files. For example, these were all in a competitors back link profile: http://download.unesp.br/linux/debian/pool/main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-relay-dbg_4.1.1-P1-17_ia64.deb http://snow.fmi.fi/data/20090210_eurasia_sd_025grid.mat http://www.rose-hulman.edu/class/me/HTML/ES204_0708_S/working model examples/Le25 mad hatter.wm?a=p&id=145880&g=5&p=sia&date=iso&o=ajgrep These are just a few I came across for a single competitor. Is this sketchy black hat SEO, some sort of error, actual links, or something else? Any information on this subject would be helpful. Thank you.
Moz Pro | | Gyi0 -
Latest OSE Update - Strange Numbers and Links
Hey everyone. I just checked our website in OSE with the latest update and noticed some strange numbers. The number of linking domains skyrocketed from 300 to 785 which definitely caught me off guard. Like all good SEOers I work hard to get links, but in a typical month I usually get between 40 and 50. To suddenly jump up by over 300 seems odd. Digging deeper, I noticed that some of the incoming link domains could be considered less than trustworthy (pages filled with links), while others I couldn't find at all on the page in question. I also never ever asked for any of these links, nor did anyone on my team. Should I be worried? I've heard of websites who purposely gain bad links to their competitors in order to penalize them. Is there an easy way to find out if this is going on? Could this possibly be a problem with OSE and just reporting non-existant links? Thanks for your feedback! Andrew BTW, the website in question is www.gooverseas.com
Moz Pro | | dunklea0 -
Link Count Per Page Including JavaScript Links - Should We Worry About Them?
With large ecommerce sites, we usually have more than 100 links per page and many times have more than 200 links on each page due to links and images in the header, footer, guided navigation and then the body product grid and content. When I use most on-page link counting tools like SEO x-ray and the SEO Moz Pro crawl report, I notice that every visible link on the page gets counted. This includes and javascript based links that expand the product grid to 30, 60 or view all, javascript sorting links, javascript links to view customer reviews for each product. etc. There was a QA post here http://www.seomoz.org/q/should-i-nofollow-the-main-navigation-on-certain-pages about nofollowing and page rank sculpting and it seems pretty unanimous that most don't think that page rank sculpting is very valuable. So my question is, are the javascript links on pages that don't link to another page viewed differently by search engines? If so, shouldn't there be a way to see on-page link count minus javascript call links that don't actually link to another page? To expand a bit on my question, we also use nofollow attributes on the text links in the left navigation that are meant for refining products just as the javascript links in the product grid are meant to refine the products, sort them, allow for product comparison, allow for viewing customer reviews, etc. So should it be ok to have 300 links on a page if the unimportant ones that you don't want crawled like the left navigation refinements and product grid javascript links all have rel="nofollow" applied to them? I know that would basicly be PageRank sculting, but it seems like the best options for shopping sites that have a lot of navigation links.
Moz Pro | | abernhardt0