Leveraging A Second Site
-
Hi,
A client of mine has an opportunity to buy/control another site in the same niche. The client's site is the top-ranked site for the niche. The second site is also often top half of page one. The second site has a 15 year old design that is a really bad, almost non-functional, user experience and thin content. The client's site (site 1) has the best link profile and dominates organic search, but the second site's link profile is as good as our nearest competitor's link profile. Both sites have been around forever. Both sites operate in the affiliate marketing space. The client's site is a multi million dollar enterprise.
If the object were to wring the most ROI out of the second site, would you:
A) Make the second site not much more than a link slave to the first, going through the trouble to keep everything separate, including owner, hosting, G/A, log-on IPs, so as not to devalue the links to 1st site, etc?
Or...
B) Develop the second site and not worry about hiding that both are the same owner.
Or...
C) Develop the second site and still worry about it keeping it all hidden from Google.
Or...
D) Buy the second site and forward the whole thing to site 1.
I know the white hat answer is "B," but would like to hear considerations for these options and any others.
Thanks!
P.S.,
My pet peeve is folks who slam a fast/insufficient answer into an unanswered question, just to be the first. So, please don't.
-
Okay, thanks Egol!
Best... Mike
-
Thanks!
I understand your comment about "knowing it when you see it".
I am not looking for work. We are way to busy here working on our own sites and have not done work for others in over a decade.
-
Hi Egol,
Thanks for the insight. I'm going for "B," for the reasons you stated, plus hiding stuff from Google is a lot of extra work.
On insufficient first answers answers, I'll reference Supreme Court Justices Potter Stewart's famous remark about obscenity, "I know it when I see it."
You, of course, provided a great answer for which I am sincerely grateful. Thank you!
Finally, pardon my denseness, but in your last paragraph are you saying you are looking for work or are not? If you are, direct message me because I'm about maxed out work-wise.
Thanks! Best... Mike
-
If the object were to wring the most ROI out of the second site, would you:
I can't say what I would do without a deep deep understanding of the site. I wrestle with these questions about pairs of sites that I have owned for ten years. A good decision has to consider many things, some of which are... A) content overlap, B) revenue source overlap, C) staff and financial resources available to work on another site, D) staff and financial resources required to improve the other site compared to the financial benefits expected, E) how close the competition is to kicking my primary site's ass, F) how close my primary site is to kicking competition's ass, G) how the profitability and fun elements of this job compare to the MANY others that are currently on backburners at my office, H) and, most important, how much mental energy I have for the fight.
A) Make the second site not much more than a link slave to the first, going through the trouble to keep everything separate, including owner, hosting, G/A, log-on IPs, so as not to devalue the links to 1st site, etc?
I would never take this choice. Just redirect the site instead of doing something that you think you gotta hide. This choice assumes that Google is a dumbass. They ain't.
B) Develop the second site and not worry about hiding that both are the same owner.
I have one domain that is a large site and competes with two smaller sites that I also own. The smaller sites have a niche specialty, so only a tiny fraction of the large site competes with them. All of these sites have the same whois, they are all in my webmaster console, they all have the same authorship style and are hosted at the same company in the same building. They all have absolutely unique content, very different, even if same subject. There are also some links between the sites, not a lot, no money anchor text, and the links are disclosed as being affiliated or both sites owned by same company. If you do all of the above, I don't think that you need to worry about Google getting angry about it. These sites have been doing this for ten years.
C) Develop the second site and still worry about it keeping it all hidden from Google.
I think that Google knows a lot about who owns websites. I might have private whois if I don't want people getting in touch, but I would not worry about Google knowing that same company owns them as long as you are not doing anything sneaky.
D) Buy the second site and forward the whole thing to site 1.
This is white hat in my opinion, but if both sites have similar link profiles at the domain level then you might not gain much from this method. Careful study is needed to decide if this is better than option B. How much work is needed to get the second site up to your standards and improve it to a point that it will become more competitive.
My pet peeve is folks who slam a fast/insufficient answer into an unanswered question, just to be the first. So, please don't.
How do you know their intent? Fast answers might not have that intent. Maybe my answer is Insufficient because I didn't give an answer that will satisfy a lot of people. Why? I didn't give an absolute answer because there isn't one without a really detailed study that I don't have time or any intentions to give. My pet peeve is when people want a $2000 answer for free in a forum and think that a $200 answer is crap because it didn't give an absolute answer.
I think that you either say "thanks" or nothing to anyone who gives you their time. An absolute answer to your question would require a content audit, a link audit, and a lot of information about your company and the industry just to get started. I think that it is a five digit question in many situations. And, you could pay five digits to two different people and get two very different answers. In that situation, you would need to decide who to believe. How are you going to do that?.
I am not providing a insufficient answer here because I am looking for paid work. I simply give two cent answers to people who might appreciate them. I took a chance on you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Traffic going down in all sites in a niche
Hello, A client has three Ecommerce sites in a niche. Because of competition and a (possibly) non manual penalty due to doorways and paid links (though I think it's mainly competition too) our traffic is going down. What are the keys to increasing traffic at this point. Feel free to include tricks that cost money. A Hrefs (I love Moz though!) has some neat content tricks. Please give me the best tricks in the industry to increase traffic. We're adding content to the main site of the three and maybe that's what to focus on, but we're having trouble driving serious traffic with the content. We need serious traffic. We are experts in our field and capable of almost anything as far as information goes in our field. Thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
Hacked site vs No site
So I have this website that got hacked with cloaking and Google has labeled it as such in the SERPs. With due reason of coarse. My question is I am going to relaunch an entirely new redesigned website in less than 30 days, do I pull the hacked site down until then or leave it up? Which option is better?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Rich_Coffman0 -
Bad keywords sending traffic my site, but can't find the source. Advice?
Hi! My site seems to be the target of negative SEO (or some ancient black hat work that's just now coming out of the woodwork). We're getting traffic from keywords like "myanmar girls" and "myanmar celebrities" that just started in late June and only directs to our homepage. I can't seem to find the source of the traffic, though (Analytics just shows it as "Google," "Bing," and "Yahoo" even though I can't find our site showing up for these terms in search results). Is there any way to ferret out the source besides combing through every single link that is directing to us in Webmaster Tools? I'm not even sure that GWT has picked up on it since this is fairly new, and I'd really love to nip this in the bud. Thoughts? Thanks in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | 199580 -
Google authorship and multiple sites with multiple authors
Hi guys :). I am asking your help - basically I would like to know what would be the best way to set all of this up. Basically I have two main (e-commerce) sites, and a few other big web properties. What I would like to know is if it is ok to link the main sites to my real G+ account, and use alias G+ accounts for other web properties, or is that a kind of spamming? The thing is that I use a G+ account for those e-commerce sites, and would not necessarily want the other web properties to be linked to the same G+ account, as they are not really related. I do hope I was clear. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | sumare0 -
Site dropped suddenly. Is it due to htaccess?
I had a new site that was ranking on the first page for 5 keywords. My site was hacked recently and I went through a lot of trouble to restore it. Last night, I discovered that my site was nowhere to be found but when i searched site: mysite.com, it was still ranking which means it was not penalized. I discovered the issue to be a .htaccess and it have been resolved. My question is now that the .htaccess issue is resolved , will my site be restored back to the first page? Is there additional things that i should do? I have notified google by submitting my site
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | semoney0 -
Links to partner sites
I have some partnerships in some portals, usually I put the banner of my company with a link to my site on a space partners. How should I proceed? To place the banner no link? To put the link nofollow? Can’t I do it? Don’t I need to worry about it?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | soulmktpro0 -
Google-backed sites' link profiles
Curious what you SEO people think of the link profiles of these (high-ranking) Google-backed UK sites: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/domains?site=www.startupdonut.co.uk http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/domains?site=www.lawdonut.co.uk http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/domains?site=www.marketingdonut.co.uk http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/domains?site=www.itdonut.co.uk http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/domains?site=www.taxdonut.co.uk Each site has between 40k and 50k inlinks counted in OSE. However, there are relatively few linking root domains in each case: 273 for marketingdonut 216 for startupdonut 90 for lawdonut 53 for itdonut 16 for taxdonut Is there something wrong with the OSE data here? Does this imply that the average root domain linking to the taxdonut site does so with 2857 links? The sites have no significant social media stats. The sites are heavily inter-linked. Also linked from the operating business, BHP Information Solutions (tagline "Gain access to SMEs"). Is this what Google would think of as a "natural" link profile? Interestingly, they've managed to secure links on quite a few UK local authority resources pages - generally being the only commercial website on those pages.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | seqal0 -
Problems with link spam from spam blogs to competitor sites
A competitor of ours is having a great deal of success with links from spam blogs (such as: publicexperience.com or sexylizard.org) it is proving to be a nightmare. Google does not detect these (the competitor has been doing well now for over a year) and my boss is starting to think if you can’t beat them, join them. Frankly, he is right – we have built some great links but it is nigh on impossible to beat 400+ highly targeted spam links in a niche market. My question is, has anyone had success in getting this sort of stuff brought to the attention of Google and banned (I actually listed them all in a message in webmaster tools and sent them over to Google over a year ago!). This is frustrating, I do not want to join in this kind of rubbish but it is hard to put a convincing argument against it when our competitor has used the technique successfully for over a year without any penalty. Ideas? Thoughts? All help appreciated
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RodneyRiley0