No Control Over Subdomains - What Will the Effect Be?
-
Hello all,
I work for a university and I my small team is responsible for the digital marketing, website, etc. We recently had a big initiative on SEO and generating traffic to our website.
The issue I am having is that my department only "owns" the www subdomain. There are lots of other subdomains out there. For example, a specific department can have its own subdomain at department.domain.com and students can have their own webpage at students.domain.com, etc.
I know the possibilities of domain cannibilization, but has any one run into long term problems with a similar situation or had success in altering the views of a large organization?
If I do get the opportunity to help some of these other domains, what is best to help our overall domain authority? Should the focus be on removing similar content to the www subdomain or cleaning up errors? Some of these subdomains have hundreds of 4XX errors.
-
Thank you for that reply. As you mentioned, I think I am more struggling with my task and that unified mission across all subdomains in an industry where only a handful of institutions can make that happen.
There was lots of good information to take from this. Thank you.
-
It all depends upon how intensely these domains and sub-domains are networked together. If they're very strongly interlinked, Google will likely consider them to be a single website. That brings benefits such as the pooling of SEO authority, but also weaknesses such as the transference or spread of Google penalties. That being said, if one sub domain really doesn't have their sh*t together but other departments have created genuinely useful resources, Google will be loathe to impact useful pages just because 'someone else in the same family' doesn't really know what they're doing.
The largest problem will be lack of vision and operating within the confines of an organisation where, people all have different ideas instead of letting data do the talking. All decisions should be data-led. If the data says, this area of your site is the most important and it also has the biggest opportunities - all efforts should be focused there. If you fundamentally lack the ability to direct all of the things which impact marketing (content, UX, CRO, SEO, design) across all sub-domains with one unified vision, you'll always be limited in terms of the gains you can make. On the other hand within such an organisation, that may be well understood and respected (thus alleviating some tensions)
Domain authority does not come from you, your resources or anything that your organisation does. Authority is a reflection of how popular and useful, the rest of the web finds your websites, pages, resources and content. Editorial (not advertorial or ad-based) links to your live pages from recent, authoritative sources garner your domain (and pages) additional authority. What you're struggling against is the shell of academic culture. It's a sector where, if people do X and teach Y they earn Z. They are happy to be institutionalised (sorry if that offends anyone but it's true) so they seldom consider the impact which the views of others have upon their success
I remember I had a debate with a uni tutor once who got on my case because I complained about their attendance (in terms of being a lecturer). They said academia is not a business and that I shouldn't hold it as a service I was paying for. Further down the line I was unable to finish an essay within the specified time limit and was told "well in the future, when you are employed - your employer will expect you to be able to cut to the chase. Knowledge for the sake of knowledge isn't worth anything" - **small wonder **I went ballistic at the double-standards which had been put across to me
The point is, your organisation's authority isn't determined (in SEO or real-life terms) by their arbitrary academic choices. It's determined by performance, and how useful people find the specified website or organisation. Everyone in life asks "what's the ROI on that?" - especially since tuition fees are pretty high in the USA and creeping up in the UK too
When you get good, non-manipulative, editorial links from external sources (of high relevance and repute), which Google doesn't think have been produced 'for SEO alone' - your SEO authority grows larger. With more authority in a given area, you have more power to rank (as long as errors and crawl barrier don't inhibit that authority from cascading down to the relevant sub-pages). Removing roadblocks like errors, could make you rank much better. But if your authority is low, it'll do jack diddly squat
You need to engage your organisation from a more PR-esque perspective, then when you have built up some good links - tackle the errors much more aggressively. That's my 2pence anyway
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to create a smooth blog migration from subdomain to subfolder main?
Hi mozzers, We have decided to migrate the blog subdomain to the domain's subfolder (blog.example.com to example.com/blog). To do this the most effective way and avoid impact SEO negatively I believe I have to follow this checklist: Create a list of all 301 redirects from blog.example.com/post-1 to example.com/post-1 Make sure title tags remain the same on main domain Make sure internal links remain the same Is there something else I am missing? Any other best practices? I also would like to have all blog post as AMPs. Any recommendations if this something we should do since we are not a media site? Any other tips on successfully implementing those types of pages? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ty19861 -
Would you rate-control Googlebot? How much crawling is too much crawling?
One of our sites is very large - over 500M pages. Google has indexed 1/8th of the site - and they tend to crawl between 800k and 1M pages per day. A few times a year, Google will significantly increase their crawl rate - overnight hitting 2M pages per day or more. This creates big problems for us, because at 1M pages per day Google is consuming 70% of our API capacity, and the API overall is at 90% capacity. At 2M pages per day, 20% of our page requests are 500 errors. I've lobbied for an investment / overhaul of the API configuration to allow for more Google bandwidth without compromising user experience. My tech team counters that it's a wasted investment - as Google will crawl to our capacity whatever that capacity is. Questions to Enterprise SEOs: *Is there any validity to the tech team's claim? I thought Google's crawl rate was based on a combination of PageRank and the frequency of page updates. This indicates there is some upper limit - which we perhaps haven't reached - but which would stabilize once reached. *We've asked Google to rate-limit our crawl rate in the past. Is that harmful? I've always looked at a robust crawl rate as a good problem to have. Is 1.5M Googlebot API calls a day desirable, or something any reasonable Enterprise SEO would seek to throttle back? *What about setting a longer refresh rate in the sitemaps? Would that reduce the daily crawl demand? We could set increase it to a month, but at 500M pages Google could still have a ball at the 2M pages/day rate. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lzhao0 -
Reversing the bad effects of a problematic 301 redirect
I have a previously very strong ranking page that is now omitted from the SERPs, but only for one specific keyword phrase. I think I found the reason, which I'll explain, and I hope I can hear some confirmation of my theory and a way to correct it. Let's use the following made up domain and keywords: Political blog SiteA.com had a few news articles about "Blue Widgets" (like 10 out of 10,000 pages). They became exceedingly popular, so on SiteA.com we created a reference-type page about "Blue Widgets" and in the news articles we already had about Blue Widgets we added rich anchor text (Blue Widgets) links that pointed to this new About Blue Widgets page. (long before we wised up about keyword rich anchor texts and Google!) After seeing how much traffic was coming to the About Blue Widgets page, we created a whole new site, SiteB.com, which was about Widgets (not just Blue Widgets), a page for each color of widget, and other pages about widgets. SiteB.com has an important and popular page, SiteB.com/blue-widgets, which is about Blue Widgets. We then 301 redirected the SiteA.com's About Blue Widgets page to SiteB.com/blue-widgets. This page in SiteB.com ranked very high (like #2, #3) for years. Two weeks ago SiteB.com/blue-widgets fell out of the SERPs, but only for the phrase "Blue Widgets". The page still gets lots of traffic from other queries, and even the "Blue Widgets" query will bring up other pages on SiteB.com. So, the only thing hit is the specific query "Blue Widgets" for the specific page SiteB.com/blue-widgets. It seems obvious to me that Google took the combination of a) a site that it probably no longer liked since we sold it (SiteA.com) since it's gone downhill, b) the rich keyword anchor text on SiteA.com pages pointing to the SiteA.com page optimized for that keyword, and c) then being 301 Redirected to a SiteB.com Blue Widgets page optimized for that same anchor text. I only discovered the SiteA.com redirects last week, which I had completely forgotten about, and had them removed right away. My question is, 1) if this indeed was the issue, now that the redirects from SiteA.com to SiteB.com are gone will my ranking eventually go back to normal? and 2) is there anything I can do to get Google to notice the change and have it go back to how it was?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bizzer0 -
Will multiple domains for the same local business hurt its rankings?
If I have a mold removal client who has domain1.com, which is several years old, and he creates a new domain2.com with the same info (reworded), but changes over the citations to domain2 will it 1. lower domain1.com's rankings? 2. make ranking either site harder since there are now 2 sites for the same thing? 3. reduce the ability for either site to gain a higher domain authority since links can now go to either
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Atomicx0 -
Does anyone knows when .guru domains will became active or if they are already
Does anyone knows when .guru domains will became active or if they are already
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | maestrosonrisas0 -
Domain registered with US provider; hosted with UK - SEO effects?
My boss wants me to register a domain with a US company. However, most of our customers are in the UK. Though I would host any future website using a UK hosting provider, I don't know if registering the domain with a US provider would make any difference SEO-wise?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JacobFunnell0 -
Keyword Rich Domain Redirects to Brand Name But How Will SEO Work For It?
If i have a keyword rich domain name, but i redirect it to a brand domain name, will doing seo for the keyword rich domain name be effective in showing up on google under that domain, for the keyword i do SEO for? or does this cause a conflict for spiders/robots as soon as they realize the page they want to check out is getting redirected to another domain name?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lafurniturestore2 -
Would using display:none; to hide a section of text effect SEO negatively?
I have seen several sites that put a div feature at the bottom of a page to hide content. If you click on the button, it will extend the page down and be loaded with paragraphs of text rich with keywords. Does anyone know is this is viewed as a negative with Google?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | netmkting0