SEO- Manufacturer v Distributor
-
In respect to a safety clothing manufacturer manage SEO on behalf of, I've noticed that product distributors own 85% of the page 1 SERPs leaving product manufacturers such as my client largely under represented for the vast majority of search queries such as 'safety boots'.
Love to hear your opinion on why this is and how I can combat it? TIA!
-
Yep this is widely known. In-fact, you may be surprised to learn that even those who both manufacture AND distribute their products are also under the kosh here. I work with a number of fashion brands who produce their clothing (which in many cases is really stylish, really high quality stuff) only to see their direct sales (from their own site) hindered by larger 'pure distribution' sites (sites which just distribute loads of items but don't manufacture any)
Here's the truth of the matter. It's not that distributors get some kind of unfair special treatment. Rather, it's that distributors aren't bound by the same limitations as manufacturers, or manufacturers with online distribution
I love all the brands that I work with, I think their goods are grade A (otherwise I wouldn't work with them). That being said, they can only list their own products on-site. Users commonly search for slightly broader terms which imply that they want to see a range of products to choose from (e.g: "men's shirts", "supportive bras" or "tailormade suits"). The truth is that for a user, the distribution sites ARE better. They can see a huge range of products on these sites and compare them all to find the best deal. This is part of the 'rise of the aggregators' phenomena. Nowadays, unless you're incredibly special - if you don't aggregate, you lose out (end of)
There's a reason that giant product aggregation sites (ASOS, eBay, Amazon, Bra-Stop) are killing it. They give people a one stop shop to solve their issue, then continue their lives happy that they have got a good deal. Even the services industry isn't immune to this, just look at sites like Money Supermarket and how dominant they are in Google's SERPs
Now you might say, ok - that makes sense for category level terms, but often these guys are beating my client even on product level terms. Why is that?
Well - by being such useful sites that make a big difference to user's lives, these sites organically spawn vast amounts of digital PR and UGC link coverage. They're frequently mentioned by the BBC, Forbes... you name it, they're in there (all the time and repeatedly). This builds up a colossal amount of SEO authority, which you basically can't compete with
Finally: often these distribution-only sites, because they are so dominant, are a client's main revenue stream (more than their own sites). That's because client's get paranoid that they will offend their distributors and they will then refuse to stock their products. That could be a disaster! But due to this paranoia, they often give distributors better prices for their products, than even their own native sites (if they are manufacturing and distributing directly as well - some do, some don't)
Due to this, they lose EVEN MORE product-level listings, as Google knows their listings are the worst deal for users. These patterns of thinking, keep the dominant distributors on top and leave crumbs for the rest of us
In the end, their success on Google is really a business decision and NOT a pure-SEO decision. Do they want to bite the bullet and cut their distributors off from their products, keeping all the Google SERPs for themselves? Well certainly that would cut those guys out completely - but any distributor originating cross-traffic would be lost. What if a user visited the distributor site for another search query (not related to your client's product), then saw your client's product later in their journey and purchased it? All of THAT traffic (which is substantial) is going to be immediately lost. So although cutting out the middle-men might seem smart, it's an incredibly unwise knee-jerk reaction
Still, you can never grow above the distributors until you make this choice. It's a choice that WILL hurt you, but in the long run will allow you to reap revenue figures which you never previously dreamed of. So who makes the decision of when the time comes, to go through this necessarry pain? NOT you. Not an SEO person. That responsibility rests with the business owner alone and if I were you, I wouldn't seek to influence it (risky)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Dealing with negative SEO
Interested to know people strategies for detecting and mitigating negative SEO. Previously I've used link monitoring tool and kept an eye on all new back links coming in to any page on the site. I have then manually assessed each one again using some tools and actually visiting the website. However, this always leaves me with one dilemma. Regardless of my assessment how do search engines see that link? I run three lists a white list, grey list and blacklist. White list - very relevant and have a lot of authority. I.e. leading industry blogs and forums. Grey list - out of topic/industry, directories Blacklist - sites de-indexed by Google, illegal content or absolute spam (i.e. one page filled with hundreds of links to different domains) Do you have any thoughts? How do you assess if link is bad?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
SEO Priorities for Ecommerce Sites
Hello All! What is the best way to rank SEO tasks by PRIORITY for Ecommerce sites to improve?? It can be quite overwhelming with all the types of projects/tasks needed to improve organic rankings... How would you rank the most CRITICAL tasks to spend the MOST TIME on to the tasks you spend less on. Appreciate your input in advance 🙂 Thank you! Mark
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wickerparadise0 -
Yoast Seo + Home Page
Hi All, I'm using Studiopress Genesis Enterprise child theme in Wordpress + InstantWP + Yoast SEO. I have created a standard home page (see image) along with bespoke pages My question is this: When I select Pages | All Pages ... I cannot see the home page and therefore cannot optimise the home page with Yoast SEO. What am I doing wrong? Thanks Mark XQvbFl2taJEgFXJ
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mark_Ch0 -
SEO Problem with PowerPoint to PDF?
Can anyone think of any reasons why it would be a bad idea to use PowerPoint to create documents and then convert them to PDFs? Do you think this could cause any crawling issues for Google?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BlueLinkERP0 -
SEO for an exponentially growing site?
Hey Mozers! I was having a quick chat with a friend the other day on doing SEO for a site that grows in page size at an exponential rate and was just wondering how you would go about optimizing it? The example that we used would be a site that allowed users to upload videos and then have people vote on two videos against each other. So, if there are 100 uploaded videos and each of them are pared up with the other 99 to create a unique voting/battle page which has it's own unique URL, the site can get very large, VERY quickly. Meaning if just one more video is uploaded there would be How exactly would you go about optimizing the site? My biggest area of confusion would be generating sitemaps. I'm aware of best practices with large sitemaps (i.e. having a sitemap of sitemaps, not going over 50k in entries per sitemap etc..) But, how would you go about creating the sitemaps for this website if it's growing at an exponential rate, if at all? If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I'll clarify it. Thanks! 😃 **TL;DR How would you optimize a site that grows at an exponential rate? **
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JordanChoo0 -
Are there any SEO Tips before killing a website?
Hey guys, My company acquired another company, and after a couple of months we decided to completely kill their website. I'm not finding any info about SEO best practices for this type of situation. From the "switching domains" and "new sites" articles and blog posts I can extrapolate that I should: 301 redirect their home page to ours Look at specific pages with good authority that relate to our pages and 301 them. Look at the strongest backlinks to their site and try to change them to point to our site. Create a 404 page for the rest of their webpages that tells them that we acquired the company (hopefully with a main menu and search bar) Any other suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nrv0 -
Link Age as SEO factor?
Hi Guys
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | VividLime
I have a client who ranks well within a competitive sector of the travel industry. They are planning CMS move which will involve changing from .cfm to .aspx We will be doing the standard redirects etc However Matt's statement here on 301 redirects got me thinking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW5UL3lzBOA&t=0m24s He says that basically you loose a bit of page rank when you do a 301 redirect. Now, we will be potentially redirecting 1000s of links and my thinking is 'a lot of a little, adds up to a lot' In other words, 1000s of redirects may have a big enough impact to loose some rankings in a very competitive and aggressive space. So recommended that we contact the sites who has the link highest value and ask them to manually change the links from cfm to aspx. This will then mean that there are no loss value as with a 301 redirect. -But now I have another dilemma which I'm unsure about. So the main question:
Is link age factor in rankings ? If I update any links, this will make said link new to Google, so if link age is a factor, would this also lessen the value passed initially?0 -
What are the most underrated SEO tactics?
Looking over the discussion of underrated SEO tactics at http://sphinn.com/story/178993/ , I'm curious if folks here have any favorite SEO tactics that they feel are ignored, underrated, or somehow not appreciated by the community at large. Any thoughts? Among the tactics listed in the Sphinn post: Blog commenting Analytics to identify low-hanging keyword fruit Getting your site set up properly at the server level Unique and relevant imagery Internal links Google Place page optimization Several more... Any others that should be included? I'd personally add segmenting your keyword traffic into trademark (those that mention your brand name) versus non-trademark segments for more thorough analysis.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jcolman2