Rank regional homepages using canonicals and hreflangs
-
Here’s a situation I’ve been puzzling with for some time:
The situation
Please consider an international website targeting 3 regions. The real site has more regions, but I simplified the case for this question.There is no default language. The content for each regional version is meant for that region only.
The website.eu page is dynamic.
-
When there is no region cookie, the page is identical to website.eu/nl/ (because Netherlands is the most important region)
-
When there is a region cookie (set by a modal), there is a 302 redirect to the corresponding regional homepage
What we want
We want regional Google to index the correct regional homepages (eg. website.eu/nl/ on google.nl), instead of website.eu.
Why? Because visitors surfing to website.eu sometimes tend to ignore the region modal and therefor browse the wrong version.
For this, I set up canonicals and hreflangs as described below:The problem
It’s 40 days now since the above hreflangs and canonicals have been setup, but Google is still ranking website.eu instead of the regional homepages.
Search console’s report for website.eu:Any ideas why Google doesn’t respect our canonical?
-
Maybe I’m overlooking something in this setup (combination of hreflangs and canonicals might be confusing)? Should I remove the hreflangs on the dynamic page, because there is no self-referencing hreflang?
-
Or maybe it’s because website.eu has gathered a lot of backlinks over the years, whereas the regional homepages have much less, which might be why Google chooses to ig nore the canonical signals?
-
Or maybe it’s a matter of time and I just need to wait longer?
Note: I’m aware the language subfolders (eg. /be_nl) are not according to Google’s recommendations. But I’ve seen similar setups (like adobe.com and apple.com) where the regional homepage is showing ok.
Any help appreciated!
-
-
@terentyev Great insights!
I believe you might have nailed the issue with interlinking! I missed two home buttons on each page which were still pointing to the non-regional site. I'm getting it fixed right away and keep an eye on it.
Crawl budget shouldn't be a problem, I see a daily refresh in the logs for our homepage.
If interlinking doesn't fix it, I'll get into collecting backlinks to the regional homepages. I'll wait to see the effect of the interlinking fix though, as I'm curious what's the real cause.
Truly appreciate your feedback! Will try to report back if / what of the above helped.
-
@dmduco said in Rank regional homepages using canonicals and hreflangs:
re not according to Google’s recommendations. But I’ve seen similar setups (like adobe.com and apple.com) where the regional homepage is showing ok.
What you are describing is quite common among many international sites. Google can choose a different canonical, and you are right, it can happen because of the backlinks or because of some technical issues on your site.
I would suggest to dig into both directions.
first, please make sure that all canonicals are set up properly.
second, try to run an experiment for one of the locales that is causing your problems with adjusting interlinking within your site, to increase the internal pagerank of the pages that are not indexing correctly.
third, it would help to do more detailed backlinks analysis on each of the problematic locales, and maybe even gain a few backlinks within the appropriate locale (eg. from strong websites in the same country) even on a temporary basis, to rule out if the lack of backlinks is an issue.
Regarding the 40 days time period - it really depends on how often Google crawls your site, and your crawl budget / authority. Check googlebot logs, how often each of the problematic pages get crawled. It can also give you some clues to proceed with your investigation.Hope my suggestions will help. Let me know if you have any follow up questions, and I would appreciate some info sometimes down the road, how this issue will evolve.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Homepage is deindexed in Google
We recently noticed that our primary page was de-indexed in Google. When looking in google search console there are no manual actions taken. We did add a few new banners to the site but I have no idea why this would have negatively affected that site. I did add a new page called https://enleaf.com/company/testimonials/ that had some duplicate testimonials that were also on the home page but have since removed that. Not sure where to go from here.
Technical SEO | | AChronister0 -
Should I keep writing about the same using rel canonical?
Hi, The service we provide has not so many searches per month. A long tail keyword that describes the service well has at the most 400 searches per month. We wrote a post for this keyword and we ranked number 1 for many months. Now we're on page 2 and I the truth is we stopped writing blog posts because we were raking well for our best keywords. I added a few new posts and lost ranking on my top keywords so I gave up, deleted them and recover the rankings for the keywords I wanted the most. The problem is that I have lost these positions and I know we're supposed to be updating the blog regularly. What would you suggest? Should we keep writing about the same thing and use rel canonical? There aren't that many keywords related to what we offer. I appreciate any ideas.
Technical SEO | | Naix0 -
Rebranding: 404 to homepage?
Hello all!
Technical SEO | | JohnPalmer
I did a rebranding, [Domain A] -> [Domain B]. what to do with all the 404 pages? 1. [Domain A (404)] -> [Domain B (homepage)]?
2. [Domain A (404)] -> [Domain B (404 page + same url) - for example: xixix.com/page/bla What do you think ?0 -
Ranking Drop
hey guys, I know there is always someone here asking this questions, but I have done my fair share of investigation and have not come up with a cause. my ranking dropped from page one to page 2 or 3 last sunday in time span of 4 hours. After that I read that google was updating panda with 4.1, but don't know why I got hit exactly. my competition is all clear and some have even gained rankings, and mine dropped even though my domain and page authority increased as well. any ideas would help. I already checked all the obvious ones (such as spam, links, content, etc)
Technical SEO | | s-s1 -
Which Web host do you use?
A friend of mine has a successful website which is hosted by the company he used to use for developing his site. As he no longer uses them feels he should use it. Who do you use for hosting a small to medium sized business?
Technical SEO | | Ant710 -
Problem with Rel Canonical
Background: We check to make sure that IF you use canonical URL tags, it points to the right page. If the canonical tag points to a different URL, engines will not count this page as the reference resource and thus, it won't have an opportunity to rank. If you've not made this page the rel=canonical target, change the reference to this URL. NOTE: For pages not employing canonical URL tags, this factor does not apply. Clearly I am doing something wrong here, how do I check my various pages to see where the problem lies and how do I go about fixing it?
Technical SEO | | SallySerfas0 -
Third Party Ranking Software
I have used a number of different tools for getting ranking information and have been using Cuterank but it now seems to be report the wrong results. Any suggestions for the best third party ranking software. It would allow me to check google, yahoo and bing ranks, compare month on month and produce branded PDFs. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | highwayfive0 -
Rel=Canonical being ignored?
Hi all, We have a toys website that has several categories. It's setup such that each product has a primary category amongst the categories within it can be found. For example... Addendum's primary url is http://www.brightminds.co.uk/childrens-toys/board-games/addendum.htm but it can also be found here http://www.brightminds.co.uk/learning-toys/maths-learning/addendum.htm. Hence, in the for that url it has a rel=canonical that points to the first url. For some reason though seomoz ignores this and reports duplicate page content. It doesn't seem to record the canonical tag either. Any ideas what's going on? Thanks, Josh.
Technical SEO | | joshgeake_gmail.com0