If my keywords aren't driving any traffic to my site, why am I still ranking for them?
-
In several of our campaigns we have watched our keywords steadily climb the rankings without ever registering so much as a blip in the traffic data column.
If these keywords aren't driving any traffic to our site, how are we still ranking for them?
-
Adobe has a huge #1 ranking that I doubt gets them any traffic, other than SEOs using it to prove a point. Same with Apple Quicktime, Yahoo Maps, and almost anyone else who ranks highly for "Click Here". An extreme example, but one that's useful to show that traffic and rankings aren't the same.
-
Thanks (everybody) for answering. I think the problem we're running into is #1 here. I think we do a decent job with the on-page things and with using keywords that do describe the actual pages they're linked to...
Now I just need to reassess our actual research.
Thanks again.
-
You've gotten some great responses here. I just wanted to add my gut reaction to your question.
If a keyword ranks #1 but no one is around to click on it does it really matter?
My advice would be to take a look at the keywords again and determine if they are the most valuable words you should be ranking for.
Sometimes the best targeted words don't bring the traffic and the best trafficked words don't bring the qualified visits.
-
Without more infos about your site is not that easy to answer.
For instance it could be so because your site have a very good links' profile both at page level and domain level, so that you PA and DA are better than your competitors.
Anyway, there is no official information - from what I know - between traffic and rankings, therefore a site can rank high and not receiving the traffic expected.
Honestly, the no-traffic issue is what I would look to solve first of all.
Ask yourself these questions:
- I am ranking well for the correct keywords?
- That keyword is the correct one? For instance you are ranking for a query that is used for a totally different kind of Search than the one you have "assigned" to the KW itself.
- If I am ranking and keyword correctly target my public, are the meta description and the landing pages well done... I remind you that now, with instant even more fast, many sites risk to be checked just using the instant preview function.
-
If these keywords aren't driving any traffic to our site, how are we still ranking for them?
Ranking and traffic are two completely separate items. You can receive tremendous traffic for a page that is not even indexed. Likewise you can receive no traffic for a page where you have the #1 ranking.
There are numerous other factors to consider:
-
What is the title for the page? Certain titles will have a significantly higher or lower appear to users, and therefore yield a higher or lower CTR.
-
What is the meta description for the page? The same CTR factors apply to the meta description as to the title.
-
What is the page's URL? Users may decide to visit a page or not based solely on it's URL. If a URL seems spammy, or long some uses will choose another result.
When I earn a first page ranking for a term, but not the #1 spot, my next thought is what change can I make to the title or meta description to cause users to select my results over the listings from other sites.
Another consideration is the traffic for the term. I can make up a word, write an article and receive the #1 ranking for that word. But since the traffic volume will be zero, that ranking isn't helpful. On the other hand, having the #15 ranking for the term "insurance" and receiving 1% of the millions of searches for that term would be a lot of traffic.
-
-
What rank are you achieving? I don't have a lot of my own data but it is my understanding that visitors only go up dramatically when reaching the very top. There is this one article I have bookmarked has an interesting graph measuring click-through rate by Google rank.
Here is the entire article. The graph is on page 2. I may have to run my own data now!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Large site with content silo's - best practice for deep indexing silo content
Thanks in advance for any advice/links/discussion. This honestly might be a scenario where we need to do some A/B testing. We have a massive (5 Million) content silo that is the basis for our long tail search strategy. Organic search traffic hits our individual "product" pages and we've divided our silo with a parent category & then secondarily with a field (so we can cross link to other content silo's using the same parent/field categorizations). We don't anticipate, nor expect to have top level category pages receive organic traffic - most people are searching for the individual/specific product (long tail). We're not trying to rank or get traffic for searches of all products in "category X" and others are competing and spending a lot in that area (head). The intent/purpose of the site structure/taxonomy is to more easily enable bots/crawlers to get deeper into our content silos. We've built the page for humans, but included link structure/taxonomy to assist crawlers. So here's my question on best practices. How to handle categories with 1,000+ pages/pagination. With our most popular product categories, there might be 100,000's products in one category. My top level hub page for a category looks like www.mysite/categoryA and the page build is showing 50 products and then pagination from 1-1000+. Currently we're using rel=next for pagination and for pages like www.mysite/categoryA?page=6 we make it reference itself as canonical (not the first/top page www.mysite/categoryA). Our goal is deep crawl/indexation of our silo. I use ScreamingFrog and SEOMoz campaign crawl to sample (site takes a week+ to fully crawl) and with each of these tools it "looks" like crawlers have gotten a bit "bogged down" with large categories with tons of pagination. For example rather than crawl multiple categories or fields to get to multiple product pages, some bots will hit all 1,000 (rel=next) pages of a single category. I don't want to waste crawl budget going through 1,000 pages of a single category, versus discovering/crawling more categories. I can't seem to find a consensus as to how to approach the issue. I can't have a page that lists "all" - there's just too much, so we're going to need pagination. I'm not worried about category pagination pages cannibalizing traffic as I don't expect any (should I make pages 2-1,000) noindex and canonically reference the main/first page in the category?). Should I worry about crawlers going deep in pagination among 1 category versus getting to more top level categories? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | DrewProZ1 -
MoZ vs SEMRush - Keyword Difficulty and Keyword With Low Competition.
Hi, My question is very focussed regarding these 2 tools. Is it correct to understand that MoZ tells keyword difficulty and not which keyword is easy to compete. And SEMRush tells which keyword is easy to compete but does not tell which keywords are difficult to compete? I mean one (Moz) misses the one part and the other (SEMRush) misses the other part. Hope some will enlighten me to the point. Best
Moz Pro | | Sequelmed0 -
I have a duplicate content on my Moz crawler, but google hasn't indexed those pages: do I still need to get rid of the tags?
I received an urgent error from the Moz crawler that I have duplicate content on my site due to the tags I have. For example: http://www.1forjustice.com/graves-amendment/ The real article found here: http://www.1forjustice.com/car-accident-rental-car/ I didn't think this was a big deal, because when I looked at my GWT these pages weren't indexed (picture attached). Question: should I bother fixing this from an SEO perspective? If Google isn't indexing the pages, then am I losing link juice? 6c2kxiZ
Moz Pro | | Perenich0 -
Why doesn't OSE show results from sites like Wikipedia, YouTube, Twitter, etc.?
I know OSE used to provide link data from these domains. But I have been doing link profile lookups on sites that I know have links from these domains - and they don't show up in my results. Just to make sure, they don't even show up when I sort the sites by domain authority.
Moz Pro | | ProspectMX0 -
Cities in Keywords Ranking Reports
So I've been in the habit of creating a master list of keywords concatenated with the city name so I can track my local rankings versus competitors. 1. Is this the correct thing to do to help hone in on who competitive my sites are ranking in the local market? 2. If so, by doing this the On Page reports seem to be totally screwed, because the searches I'm tracking (with city) vs the keywords I want to analyse for on-page ranking (without city), are different. What is the solution?
Moz Pro | | justlawonline0 -
Why site is getting ranked in top three positions on Bing and Yahoo but not in Google?
My site Business-Training-Schools.com is getting descent traffic from Bing and Yahoo but very little from Google. Can you please help me in finding out the root cause of it?
Moz Pro | | HQP0 -
Using the 'Organic Traffic Data ' feature.
I don't have access to the clients Google Analytics Password. Can you set it up without being redirected to Google webmasters? Is there a way to insert a simple code into the website and then have SEOmoz double check the code? Thanks so much
Moz Pro | | Robin_Jennings0 -
It won't let me print the secon or third pages of site errors.
When I place the site errors page in pdf format it won't let me print the second or any of the other webpages containing content about my site. Does any one know why?
Moz Pro | | ibex0