301 redirects reduce traffic considerably
-
I recently identified an issue with our site whereby we had three different URL types for each article. As an example, we might have something like:
- /articles/my-article-name
- /articles/my-article-name.aspx
- /articles/My-Article-Name
We've since taken action to address this by implement 301 redirects from the second and third formats to the first (so everything is without the .aspx extension and is in lower case). But the results have been disconcerting.
Before the change, one of our articles receives 150 or so hits per day via the .aspx version. The other two existed but had very low traffic (1-3 per day). We decided the non .aspx and lowercase version was the version we wanted. Sure enough, when we introduced the 301 redirects on September 25th the traffic for the .aspx version just stopped (after a day) and the traffic for the non-.aspx version climbed. But not enough.
After the change, the non-.aspx version is receiving about 60-70% of the traffic that we used to have on the .aspx version. So, instead of receiving 150 per day (to the .aspx version) we are receiving around 100 or so to the non-.aspx version.
This pattern has occured across all our articles and, as a result, our site-wide traffic has dropped by about 40% or so.
Since we are using 301 redirects I had assumed that the search engines would just update to reflect the non-.aspx version.
I am sure I am missing something here. Any help would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
Mark
-
Thank you, Ryan (and Malachi). Strangely, I thought I had the redirect for non-www pages in place and I am not sure how that got broken. I do have the preference setting in Google configured. Anyway, I've fixed that and I really appreciate you checking this out.
I will investigate the traffic loss further. It's encouraging to know that my logic is sound here though.
Thanks again.
Mark
-
Ryan has great points.. also you SHOULD change the www. on your backend, but you can also tell google which one you prefer to point to in http://www.google.com/webmasters/
granted, this wont work for yahoo / bing, so def change it on your server as well.
-
After looking at your site and reviewing the issue I can offer the following recommendations:
- Review your Google Analytics to determine the exact source of your traffic loss. If you steadily received 150 hits/day on a page one week, then it dropped to 100 hits/day the next week, examine the source of the hits from each week. Is it Google Organic Search? Bing Search? E-mails? Ads? etc.
Once you determine the source, drill down further. If you determine the loss stems from Google organic search, examine your keywords and determine where you lost traffic. You need to investigate in this manner for at least a couple pages to determine a pattern.
- Your site has a major SEO issue in that it appears in both the www and non-www form.
http://www.wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
http://wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
Both of the above URLs work and return the same page. You need to decide which version of URL you want to present to users and then stick to that format 100%. Since you shared a www type of url previously I will assume that is the format you desire. In that case, 301 redirect all non-www traffic to the www equivalent. This should be possible with a single statement. Presently you have links for both URL versions, and this will affect your SEO and rankings.
Your present 301 redirect for your aspx extension and case-sensitive letters appears correct.
-
Thank you Ryan. I believe the 301's are just fine - I have used a utility to verify this and I correctly see them flagged as being redirected through 301. So, assuming that is good....
Can you clarify a little how I would verify if I am losing link juice? I am indeed in a compeitive industry (wedding planning).
Here is an example of an article that gets us a good number of visitors but which has fallen by 40% or so since we implemented the redirect (as compared to the .aspx traffic we received before).
http://www.wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
Before I implemented the 301's I had three versions of this page. The .aspx version was the "heavy hitter" in terms of visitors, with the non-.aspx and lower-and-uppercase versions very low. However, the .aspx version had a much higher readership than I am now achieving with just the URL above. Having implemenrted the redirect, the other two URLs are now "dormant" as expecetd (no traffic at all being logged, due to the 301's directing to the URL above).
So, pretty confused.
Thanks again.
Mark
-
Hi Mark.
Your reasoning and logic for the 301 redirects is sound. It is a common practice. I have two initial concerns:
-
Were the 301s done properly?
-
How much link juice are you losing with the redirect, and has it affected your rankings? This could happen if you are in an ultra-competitive industry.
Can you share some URL examples for your site?
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to protect the site from fake traffic
How to protect the site from fake traffic On Google Analytic there are no visits, but on the front of the site there are 6000 jetpack wordpress statistique https://arabtechnologie.com/
Reporting & Analytics | | BELGHOUL0 -
Should Google Trends Match Organic Traffic to My Site?
When looking at Google Trends and my Organic Traffic (using GA) as percentages of their total yearly values I have a correlation of .47. This correlation doesn't seem right when you consider that Google Trends (which is showing relative search traffic data) should match up pretty strongly to your Organic Traffic. Any thoughts on what might be going on? Why isn't Google Trends correlating with Organic Traffic? Shouldn't they be pulling from the same data set? Thanks, Jacob
Reporting & Analytics | | jacob.young.cricut0 -
Search traffic hit after switching magazine to subdomain
Hi there, I'm fairly new at all of this and would appreciate any help with understanding why our website has taken a hit in traffic. We curate an online magazine, which was previously accessible through: forensicoutreach.com. It was receiving about 2,000+ unique visitors per day up until a week ago, when we changed a few things. However, the magazine doesn't reflect what our business does, so we created a product-focused web presence on forensicoutreach.com, and moved the magazine (which everyone loved) to library.forensicoutreach.com (DA 37, PA 1). We thought separating the properties was a good idea, but now I'm not so sure. Our traffic on library.forensicoutreach.com is 1,500 (so 500 less than usual!) and our main property has about 56 unique visits a day. It's pretty substantial. A few questions: 1. If we move the library to forensicoutreach.com/library, will that make any difference? 2. Where did we go wrong here and how can we fix it? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | shivaniseos1 -
Improved keyword ranking but less traffic
Hello fellow mozzers! My collegue and I are a bit puzzled in regards to our recent website statistics. In november 2013, we upgraded the technological platform of our website to be fully HTML5 coded, and implemented the schema.org Products scheme to systematically tag all our products on the site. To prevent too much loss of visitors, we created a 301-redirect table from almost all our old URL's to the specific new ones, as we implemented a new URL structure as well. The first few months were bumpy as expected, making a huge drop in rankings before rising up again. Our keyword rankings are better then ever (60% of the keywords in top 3, average competition, 25% more on first SERP) but our number of visits dropped by about 10%. Our bounce rate went down from 20% to 14%, our returning visits are stable, but our new visitors stats dropped by 25% as well. This comparison was made between equal periods in the current year and last year, using organic data stats. (new technical platform vs. the old one) What could be the reason that our number of visits dropped 10% while our keyword ranking is better then ever? We don't have any manual penalties in GWT and can't understand why visits would drop so much while ranking improved. May it be so easy that there's just less search volume on our ranked content or does anyone have other ideas? Thank you all in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | EconostoNL0 -
Strange Traffic Spike In Google Analytics
Over the last two days I have seen a huge spike in the pageviews to my site www.learnbonds.com. Up to this point my average page views per visit has been less than 2. For the last couple of days it has jumped to 5 but the average time on the site has not increased. Upon further investigation under the browser and OS page of google analytics I found that traffic coming from internet explorer and IE with Chrome Frame is reporting 10+ pageviews per visit. Below is a screenshot. Any insight into what might be causing this and how to fix it that the community can provide would be appreciated. Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | davidwaring
DaveZUaQWJd.png?1?21800 -
How to set up a 301 redirect
I have just started using SEOmoz and found that we have both a www.adagiowaterfeatures.com site and a adagiowaterfeatures.com site. I have not been able to figure out how to set up the 301 redirect so the non-www site automatically goes to the www site. If anyone can tell me how the non-www site was set up to begin with I'd be interested. We only set up one site. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | AdagioWaterFeatures0 -
What extra shall we do to increase organic traffic for both the sites?
One of my clients has english language websites targeted for USA and UK audience with some content variations but60%-70% of the content on site remains the same. The site is hosted in USA. One is hosted on brandname.co.uk and one is on brandname.com. The precuations that we have already taken to save it from being marked duplicates are: 1. used rel=alternate element for all product detail pages2. currency in both the sites are different that is GBP and USD3. have tried to differenttate the product by using different product specific terms like Publishing Year: vis a vis published in:Author Vis a vis Written byFormat vis a vis binding type Add to cart vis a vis add to basket and so on What remains the same: 1. Title structure 2. Description 3. Product Name 4. About the product text
Reporting & Analytics | | CyrilWilson0 -
Why is my direct traffic down DRASTICALLY?
I have been seeing a trend for a while that is intesifying. My direct traffic numbers are down A LOT. We are not down 50% to LY (in actual number not just percentage of traffic) I am trying to understand what could be the causes of this issue. I was considering simply bigger meaner competition, but I actually perform decently on my returning customers. Also my performance on my brand keyword is more inline with my current trend so I would except these KW to do equally as bad if the actual brand/store was the issue. The more surprising even, is the fact that I can trace back the start of the trend exactly to the day. Overnight on Sept 22 LY direct traffic went down 30% (to LY) when it was trending UP 20-25%(to LY) before. Now, we did do a redesign of the website on May 2011 (4 months before the drop), and did change host Oct 2011 (a couple weeks after the start of the trend). Do you have any clue as to why this could be happening? Did GA start tracking direct traffic differently?
Reporting & Analytics | | CassisGroup
Any thoughts?0