Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
I just got off the phone with a customer -- they have the same exact problem.
Their Google+ Local listing has been taken over by Yodel. URL changed to the Yodel template page, and phone number changed to a tracking phone number.
I'm sure they duped someone at the business into entering the verification code for them. I'm uncertain how to fix this, but I'll have to figure it out. Did you every get it sorted?
You're probably right. No-follow would be the best solution.
I would be really surprised if you were to be actually penalized for a sponsor link like this. Particularly if the site is not a super-spammy link fest, and related to your industry. What is more likely to happen is that the weight of those inbound links will be discounted -- they just won't give you much benefit from an SEO perspective.
But, if it is a worthwhile sponsorship, meaning you get customers from those referrals, then by all means keep it!
If you are really paranoid you could ask them to add a no follow attribute to the link to your site.
Google won't have any problem with this setup and won't view URLs like /glossary#a, /glossary#b as duplicate content. You should be fine.
It's an interesting question. I see the same problem frequently with leads.
Part of the problem may lie in the tracking method -- that the transactions aren't actually recorded at the same time.
1. Your server completes and records the transaction, and composes a receipt page (this is where your ecommerce system records the transaction)
2. The browser client executes the google analytics JS on the receipt page (this is where your transaction is recorded in analytics).
There's a Q&A on the Analytics support site that provides some possible answers here. <--weak anchor text btw 
No, you add the URLs to the Sites to Search box when you are setting up your Custom Search Engine. See attached image.
For this you can just add the URLs that you exported from Open Site Explorer and import them one-per-line when you set up your Google CSE. I believe the free edition of CSE limits it to 5000 urls, which should be plenty.
http://www.google.com/cse/manage/create
So, basically you are cutting and pasting out of excel.
This question, "why doesn't my site come out on top", is pretty much the topic of all of SEOmoz. So, there are many factors to consider beyond just the title tag.
But, looking at that SERP, I can see that the one listing in the top 10 that has the fewest keywords in the title, DOES have the first word of your query, "kookaburra" , as it's domain name, which would help.
Also, that domain (www.kookaburra.biz) has the most domain authority. It is by far the strongest in terms of inbound links and followed linking root URLs.
Compare link metrics from those other sites to your site, and you'll see some significant differences:
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?site=cricmax.com
If you want to learn more, the beginners guide here on SEOmoz would be a good place to start:
http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo
With particular attention to Chapter 7:
http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo/growing-popularity-and-links
Thanks,
Chris
I think that Ajax drop down option would be a good improvement from a user experience perspective. But, being a Javascript/Ajax control, I don't think it will have an impact on your site architecture from a search perspective.
From Google's perspective the menus will not be populated with your product data because they will not trigger the ajax calls.
And, have you checked what the default URL is set to in your Google Analytics Property Settings?
Admin > Property Settings tab.
Is that set to your client's website URL?
If I spider your site I'm not seeing any /index.php urls. Does that mean you did get Joomla to cooperate with your rewriting?
Or was your problem that you'd previously had urls indexed with /index.php/ paths and you needed to remove them?
No, you add the URLs to the Sites to Search box when you are setting up your Custom Search Engine. See attached image.
It's an interesting question. I see the same problem frequently with leads.
Part of the problem may lie in the tracking method -- that the transactions aren't actually recorded at the same time.
1. Your server completes and records the transaction, and composes a receipt page (this is where your ecommerce system records the transaction)
2. The browser client executes the google analytics JS on the receipt page (this is where your transaction is recorded in analytics).
There's a Q&A on the Analytics support site that provides some possible answers here. <--weak anchor text btw
No, I believe the best practice is to focus on your single domain. The purchases would just be for the @ss covering. If you did point those domains to your primary domain, you should be sure to do a redirect rather than just aliasing the content on a second domain.
Well, in that case, I don't think you will be able to set it up as domain/blog. Using a subdomain is likely your only option, blog.domain.
But, I wouldn't worry too much about it since Google doesn't really treat the two situations much differently. Matt Cutts recently commented on this exact situation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MswMYk05tk
So, I'd go ahead and set up your blog at your secondary host, and point your subdomain to it.
Something along the lines of
if (($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']=='/')||($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']=='/index.php')) {
echo (@$pageTitle?$pageTitle.' - ':''). 'Trade prices,Next Day Delivery,Bulk Discount';
} else {
echo (@$pageTitle?$pageTitle:'');
}
So, if it is the homepage you show the whole thing, if not, show the sort version.
I would be really surprised if you were to be actually penalized for a sponsor link like this. Particularly if the site is not a super-spammy link fest, and related to your industry. What is more likely to happen is that the weight of those inbound links will be discounted -- they just won't give you much benefit from an SEO perspective.
But, if it is a worthwhile sponsorship, meaning you get customers from those referrals, then by all means keep it!
If you are really paranoid you could ask them to add a no follow attribute to the link to your site.
