Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Well, they really exist. Of course it is not a usual thing.

I know that they should be nofollow's, but they are no follow's. The question is if Google ignores wrong versions or not.

What do you think about the mistyped version? Is Google smart enough to ignore them, or smart enough to translate them?

Does rel****=****"nofollow" mean the same thing as rel=****"no follow"? I mean written in one word or two words.

Can Google feel the difference?

Thanks

Thanks, Iain!

Our case seems a bit more complicated (or more simple). Page loading time is very long due to the large amount of posts, so we must reduce the amount of comments.

Hello,

We've got product pages with comments. We have collected so many comments for the last two years on these pages so they made problems to our website. We plan to cut every posts older than one year to solve this problem.

Could it be bad for SEO? (Yes, these are really unique and relevant posts...)

How could I predict the consequences?

Thanks!

Hi stukerr,

No, it's not indexed in DMOZ. Maybe it could cause the issue, but not for now.

I have to tell you that using the keyword as the anchor of the sitelink can be useful for somebody else. That's why I think that somehow our sitelink was manipulated: not the url but the anchor itself.

Hi Adam,

Thank you for your answer. My problem is that sitelink url is OK (that's why I do not want to demote it). But sitelink's anchor is a word that we do not want to use, because it is against our policy. I can send you exact details in a private message if you would like to know more.

As far as I know anchors and alt texts do not use this word.

It seems a very special issue.

Imre

Hi all,

I checked a website of my company: sitelinks in SERP are with the correct url, but one of the sitelinks’ title is completely irrelevant.

Is it possible that it was changed from "outside"? Or maybe it's a bug?

Thank you,

Imre

Well, they really exist. Of course it is not a usual thing.

I know that they should be nofollow's, but they are no follow's. The question is if Google ignores wrong versions or not.

What do you think about the mistyped version? Is Google smart enough to ignore them, or smart enough to translate them?