Does a long scrolling page of text perform better than a page that has the content in sections that have to be moused over to be seen? Are there any articles or research on this?
Posts made by SirSud
-
Does google prefer expanded text to text that you have to mouse over to show?
-
RE: What's the best thing to put in the footer on a PPC landing page?
Very good answer! If they get down that far it means they're still looking for confidence and need to be further convinced. Thanks for the inspiration.
-
RE: What's the best thing to put in the footer on a PPC landing page?
Thanks for the typo just had updated the copy today and added the link. I think I'm going to add an about us tab with testimonials and stuff. I've noticed If I have too much linking than I usually decrease conversion rates.
-
RE: What's the best thing to put in the footer on a PPC landing page?
Here's the page in question. A/B testing is good once you have ideas but right now I'm still in the idea creation state for what to put in the footer.
-
RE: What's the best thing to put in the footer on a PPC landing page?
I'm using an isolated page though so links to other pages on the site wouldn't be appropriate. Currently I just have our address and a privacy policy link. Wanted to see if I should put something in there.
-
What's the best thing to put in the footer on a PPC landing page?
From a conversion perspective what are the best elements to have in the footer of a Paid landing page.
-
RE: Schema.org on Youtube iframe embed?
Interesting. Thanks that's valuable. Maybe I'll just leave it with the iframe?
-
Schema.org on Youtube iframe embed?
So I've tried scouring the internet on the proper way to markup youtube videos. I know there's the VideoObject propery but that seems to be more made for the old school embed code that looks like this:
<embed width="100%" id="video-player-flash" height="100%" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://s.ytimg.com/yt/swfbin/watch_as3-vflpp9opi.swf" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="el=embedded&fexp=904001%2C914057%2C918000%2C910206%2C907217%2C907335%2C921602%2C919306%2C922600%2C919316%2C920704%2C912804%2C913542%2C919324%2C912706&is_html5_mobile_device=false&tabsb=1&hl=en_US&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dial800.com%2Fblog%2Fvideos%2Fdial800-product-overview-video&iurl=http%3A%2F%2Fi4.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2Fgk1aD9UCKYA%2Fhqdefault.jpg&tspto=12000&probably_logged_in=1&tsp_buffer=10&video_id=gk1aD9UCKYA&tsp_dvrloop=50&sendtmp=1&enablejsapi=1&sk=WZy3rFIXzzhTB_BpmE1p1tTsbxMib1vIC&rel=1&playlist_module=http%3A%2F%2Fs.ytimg.com%2Fyt%2Fswfbin%2Fplaylist_module-vfl3lol2H.swf&jsapicallback=ytPlayerOnYouTubePlayerReady&playerapiid=player1&framer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dial800.com%2Fblog%2Fvideos%2Fdial800-product-overview-video">
Do I need to use that code or is it possible to mark it up using just the clean iframe src that youtube provides now?
-
RE: Duplicate Articles
The magazine has already given us the ok, like I said they're much more offline focused so it's more about what Google thinks. I think I agree about playing it safe with the canonical tag though. Thanks!
-
RE: Duplicate Articles
Our site doesn't have the largest audience yet but management simply wants a place they can go or send clients to easily find everything in one place. The magazine is more for offline advertising but they post it online as well.
-
Duplicate Articles
We submit articles to a magazine which either get posted as text or in a flash container. Management would like to post it to our site as well. I'm sure this has been asked a million times but is this a bad thing to do? Do I need to a rel=canonical tag to the articles? Most of the articles posted to that other site do not contain a link back to our site.
-
Batch lookup domain authority on list of URL's?
I found this site the describes how to use excel to batch lookup url's using seomoz api.
The only problem is the seomoz api times out and returns 1 if I try dragging the formula down the cells which leaves me copying, waiting 5 seconds and copying again.
This is basically as slow as manually looking up each url. Does anyone know a workaround?