Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Great thanks guys.

So a page like this - http://www.getinspired365.com/the-more-you-like-yourself-the-less-you-are-like-anyone-else-which-makes-you-unique - I guess is a bit better as it has some original written copy down the left hand side (around 200 words). So it sounds like you're suggesting I need to do more stuff like this to pad out the pages and to make them better quality.

One question I had - why would Google not just penalise all the pages? So if you are right (and I am not disputing that you are) why are some pages, with nothing on them bar a quote and the person's name ranking but some others not ranking. I'd have thought the whole lot would not rank? Also, some pages that have more in the way of original content (http://www.getinspired365.com/the-more-you-like-yourself-the-less-you-are-like-anyone-else-which-makes-you-unique) are not ranking vs some that have no original content but yet are ranking.

Perfect, thanks so much for taking the time to reply.

So a page like this - http://www.getinspired365.com/cancer-quotes - has a "uniqueness" about it as I have written the copy down the left hand side (around 200 words). So it sounds like you're suggesting I need to do more stuff like this to pad out the pages and to make them better quality.

For some pages we have created our own bio's (for people) and "did you knows" that are all written by us - but again some are ranking, some are not. And some which haven't got either feature and literally just contain the person's name and their quotes are ranking. Having said that, we'll add more original content to these pages and see what difference that makes. Thanks again.

One question I had - why would Google not just penalise all the pages? Some pages that have more in the way of original content (http://www.getinspired365.com/the-more-you-like-yourself-the-less-you-are-like-anyone-else-which-makes-you-unique) are not ranking vs some that have no original content but yet are ranking. Thanks!

I have run a site called getinspired365.com for the last few years. All it does is dish out a new inspiring video everyday. Recently we decided to implement an SEO strategy around the creation of quote pages. We have created 200,000 different quote pages (e.g. http://www.getinspired365.com/brave-men-rejoice-in-adversity-just-as-brave-soldiers-triumph-in-war). As well as this, we've created 15,000 author pages (e.g.http://www.getinspired365.com/george-washington-quotes). We initially did a small batch to see if we could rank for different terms such as the start of a particular quote or "person's name quotes" and fortunately we ranked pretty well - on the first page for a lot of quotes, and authors.

What we then did was release all of these new pages over the next week or two - so 215,000 pages. They've all indexed fine and we've received no errors on Webmaster Tools. We've not done any blackhat stuff and our domain is pretty solid having been featured by Techcrunch, BBC and others. On MOZ our individual pages are getting an "A" grade for SEO. We did this activity around 10 weeks ago.

However, almost all of these pages are not ranking anywhere in Google. We accept that they may not rank on page 1 but they're not even ranking in the top 20 pages despite our small batch ranking really well. Some brand new pages, weirdly, are ranking (e.g.http://www.getinspired365.com/andrea-bocelli-quotes ranks on page 2 and http://www.getinspired365.com/walter-sisulu-quotes ranks page 1). We've seen no real rise in search impressions within Webmaster tools - so it is as though there's a penalty on our site, but not on all of our site - and not on just the new pages.

I just wondered if anyone had any idea what could be causing the issue? Is it simply that we have released too much content too quickly? And if so, would you recommend de-indexing everything and almost starting again by just doing very small batches over a long period of time.

Really appreciate any advice you may be able to offer.

thanks,
Steve

Great, thanks for this. Will look into this and probably give it a go.

Thanks for replying. The site is getinspired365 dot com.

We saw a spike of 11,000, then 29,000 then back down a steady ~1500.

Yes, we have structured our sitemap such that there is 7 sitemaps (one for authors of 15,000) and then 5 for our quotes (40,000 each) and one for our topics (2000). Looking at it around 90% has successfully been indexed. This was done around 2 months ago and as I say it has pretty much all been indexed but it is not ranking - at all. However, our first batch of content is ranking and ranking really well. It is as though this new content has some sort of penalty and is therefore not ranking in Google but I am not sure 1. What the penalty is and 2. How to fix it? I want to deindex the entire site and start again, and just add the content in much smaller batches but I am not sure how best to do that.

thanks

Hi there,

We run a quotes based site and so have hundreds of thousands of pages. We released a batch of pages (around 2500) and they ranked really well. Encouraged by this we released the remaining ~300,000 pages in just a couple of days. These have been indexed but are not ranking any where. We presume this is because we released too much too quickly. So we want to roll back what we've done and release them in smaller batches.

So I wondered if:

1. Can we de-index thousands of pages, and if so what's the best way of doing this?

2. Can we then re-index these pages but over a much greater time period without changing the pages at all - or would we need to change the pages/the URL's etc?

thanks!

Steve

Hi there,

We released around 4000 pieces of new content, which all ranked in the first page and did well. We had a database of ~400,000 pieces and so we released the entire library in a couple of days (all remaining 396,000 pages).

The pages have indexed.

The pages are not ranking, although the initial batch are still ranking as are a handful (literally a handful) of the new 396,000. When I say not ranking - I mean not ranking anywhere (gone up as far as page 20), yet the initial batch we'd be ranking for competitive terms on page 1.

Do Google penalise you for releasing such a volume of content in such a short space of time? If so, should we deindex all that content and re-release in slow batches? And finally, if that is the course of action we should take is there any good articles around deindexing content at scale.

Thanks so much for any help you are able to provide.

Steve