How to detect which is a bad link ?
-
Hi..
Our Link Builders at office collects the lists for directories, social bookmarking websites and press releases, article directories.
But Im not sure, which all are good links, etc, since I dont get time to check.
Is there a way, I can train them to know, which is a bad link, so they can just ignore that link ?
-
This is a great tool, it will show you not only the sites they are linking to, but the sites that the sites they are linking to are linking to, if that makes sense.lol
This has false negatives, like "sussex" gets flagged for "sex" so you need to read between the lines, but it's extremely valuable to tell at a glance if the site you are interested in getting a link from is linking to bad places such as adult, meds or casino sites.
-
Great! Now, I have an idea to clean our lists then. Thanks.
-
How to detect which is a bad link ?
The first step is defining what makes a link "bad". Everyone can agree a link which violates a search engine's terms and has a risk of getting the site penalized is bad. Your link builder should be intimately familiar with Google's Technical and Quality Guidelines.Any site which violates those guidelines should be avoided.
Another thought is links which do not add any positive value to a site should be avoided. One strategy is to install Google's toolbar and any page with a PR of 0 should not be used. There is a strong change the site has been penalized. Toolbar PR is updated only once every 3-4 months so it is not a great tool, but it can still help.
If you use the SEOmoz search you will find there are articles which relate to link building published almost on a monthly basis. A good WBF on the topic: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-link-farming
In short, you know what good links look like. Links from reputable sites such as the New York Times, Time Magazine, government organizations like the FDA, authentic colleges such as UCLA, etc are great links to earn. You also know what bad links like. Link exchanges, paid links, penalized sites, spammy sites, low quality (most) link directories, etc. are bad links.
The challenge link builders face is their job is to build links but quality is always going to have a measure of subjectivity to it. A link builder is always seeking to boost their numbers, meanwhile if you do a bad job of link building you can cause a site to be penalized and removed from Google's index. You can also cause a situation where a lesser penalty is incurred meaning only particular pages or links are penalized. The client may lose a lot of traffic and not even realize it because the impact is not site wide. If you do realize the error, it can be difficult to fix because in many cases the link can't simply be removed so you need to bury it with good links (i.e. build 10 good links for every bad one).
Treat link building like marketing. When a link builder reaches out to the community and becomes a genuine part of it by becoming known in a positive manner, they have the opportunity to earn quality links. Spending time looking for blogs which do not nofollow comments, forums which offer followed links, article directories, free directories, link exchanges, footer links, etc. is mostly a complete waste of time. Links of such low quality that OSE cannot see them are mostly a waste of time. Clients want links which can potentially improve their traffic, and the link you just earned from a PR8 chinese web blog who allow followed comments isn't going to help with that goal. Google already decided before you found the blog site the link was of no value, but the link builder still builds the link and pats themselves on the back for their good "find', the client pays for the link, but receives no value.
How to detect a bad link? Put on your marketing hat and ask yourself if a search engine did not exist, is this a link I desire for traffic? If the answer is yes, it is a good link. If the answer is no, there is a strong likelihood you should look elsewhere for your link.
-
The easiest thing to do is to download a SEO plugin for Firefox or Chrome. SEOmoz actually has a really good. Once that is downloaded and they start looking into good sites to link build with, you need to explain to them the importance of quality. A lot of companies are not putting their time into finding quality and it will eventually down grade you. Maybe for a short term it will do well, but in the long run it will not. The ones I look at are inbound links, domain authority, linking domains, and domain trust. I make sure that they are all good. After I find a good site, I make sure that the site has follow links. If you have Chrome, there's an awesome really easy tool called SEO for chrome that allows you to click a button and it will highlight those that are not follow links. I have this permanently on. THe last thing I check is that the page where my link is going to go also has a good page authority/page rank. This is also really important.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Partner links - is this bad?
I have been looking at whys to get natural links, another SEO company said that instead of doing Guest Blog Posts there now adding single links to partner pages on websites which have a follow link. To me this sounds like basically a links page rebadged as a partners page. Is this a dangerous practice? or does this carry some weight with the search engines?
Link Building | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Clean up bad links or start again?
I am looking to take on a new client but when I looked at their current backlinks they have 420 low quality spammy irrelevant backlinks, all with keyword anchor text and no branded links at all. The site is still ranking well at the moment but I don't expect this to be the case long-term. Would you try and remove the old links and then disavow any that you can't remove or would you start again on a new domain? Not sure which way to play it! Thanks! Karen
Link Building | | Karen_Dauncey0 -
If bad links are now ignored why bother to resubmit a reconsideration letter?
So what I don't get is that Google says it will not trust and ignore these Spam type links so you lose only the value from those specific links.So if someone was hit with a penalty why should you bother to write a reconsideration letter if Google is supposedly just ignoring the value of the poor links anyway? On the other hand in their message they do state if you are able to remove any of the links you can resubmit --- this is sending conflicting messages. Back in the day you get your entire site hurt, now it seems like it can potentially just be a few keywords or pages.Does it make sense with the new roll out in March 2013 to still do a reconsideration request?
Link Building | | SEOEnthusiast0 -
Reciprocol Links
Am I correct in stating that linking to every article about your company is a bad idea. I see a lot of sites with followed links to the articles that link to them. Is this not devaluing the link? I've been recommending removing the links or no indexing the page and no following the links. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Link Building | | brandonschultz0 -
Pursuing Links on Sites You Have a Link From
Is it a bad idea to spend resources to get a second link from a site that already links to you? It seems like the marginal value of each additional link is much smaller than the first link.
Link Building | | ProjectLabs0 -
Linking to a pdf
Hi All I have a pdf that people can download from my site, what I want to know is that when people link to the pdf does the pdf share link power to pages linked to from within the pdf (like a html page would) or is the link power being waisted going to the pdf and should I somehow get the links to a normal page? The pdf is a free downloadable resource to people in the party planning industry and so gets linked to quite a bit by sites telling their readers to get the information we provide. Thanks for your thoughts Sean
Link Building | | SKE0 -
Build links through blogging?
Although my site is a wordpress site it presently has about as many static pages as blog posts. The site has a lot of directory links and is doing pretty good with a PR3 after about a year. When I first put the site up I had a well known blogging expert help me with the permalinks and a couple of other things and he said that with a blog there is no need to build links, it can all be done through natural link acquisition off of the blog posts. I was skeptical at the time because it seemed that a lawyer's site was something not a lot of people would be interested enough in to link to it. Now I am thinking about trying his stragegy, as 1 of my blog posts that I put up on a very topical subject immediately got about 15 backlinks. My questions are: Is it reasonable to try to build links just by posting frequent topical blog posts? If yes, should I have links in the blog posts to my home page, to internal pages, or both? \ Paul
Link Building | | diogenes0 -
If I write a PR release on a site such as PRweb with anchor-text links that is picked up and published by other news sites, do the engines consider this duplicate content or additional, beneficial links?
I recently wrote a news release on PRweb that was picked up identically by 8 other news websites, with the same anchor-text links as the original. Is the reproduction of duplicate content and links across different websites like this to the benefit or detriment of SEO and ranking power? Some of the links are: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/view/pressrelease/eventa-new-eventa-christmas-parties-website-is-launched-648923?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Alert&utm_content=pressrelease http://www.prweb.com/releases/christmasparties/neweventasite/prweb8562064.htm Many thanks!!
Link Building | | RobertHill0