Ideas on why Pages Per Visit Dropped?
-
Week over week our pages per visit continue to drop. Any ideas on where to look to diagnose?
-
Thanks for your candor, EGOL. Was just looking for some insight on where I might look outside of the obvious markers I'd already evaluated.
These forums have been been extremely helpful in the past when folks have encountered similar issues before mine.
Have a great day!
-
We're a news media site,
This is some of the most volatile stuff on the web.
Really... if you have concerns and don't know what's going on it would be best to hire a pro to review the site instead of chasing shots in the dark from people who have never seen the site.
Your effort and theirs could be divining for a problem that does not exist.
-
Thanks, Tom. I'm quite puzzled because I don't see anything that would indicate why organic search pages per visit have dropped 7%.
404s and server errors are fairly stable. We did see a spike last Monday from spam that we have since fixed, so not sure if that would translate to organic.
Our organic traffic was growing in the teens week over week, and in the past few weeks, we are down by 2% or flat. I know this is kind of a micro look, but I try to stay on top of things as much as possible.
And now the pages per visit are down two weeks in a row. We're a news media site, so I'm trying to see if I can see a pattern, but can't seem to find one.
Thanks for your input.
If any other ideas pop into your head about pages per visit or ideas on stabilizing traffic, I'd be grateful.
Thanks,
Lisa
-
Hi Aggie
This really could be a number of things, but there's a few places to start looking.
First, I would jump into your webmaster tools and see if you have had a spike in errors, which you can find in the traffic tab. If the Googlebot is seeing 404 or server errors, your users might be getting the same thing. Look for any spikes in those graphs and see if there is anything that might put a user off.
Next, I would look at segmenting your analytics data. Are you looking at all of your traffic as a whole? It may be worthwhile to look at the data over time in segments, such as the non-paid search, referral, and paid search segments Google analytics provides. It may be that there is one particular traffic channel that is driving the "bad" traffic - such as PPC ads that aren't converting or referral traffic from a new partner. For instance, one of my clients places a banner on an affiliated website with its own tracking URL. We saw traffic increase over a number of weeks, but bounce rate, dwell time and pages per visit fell and it turned out that the users referred from the banner were, by in large, bouncing straight off. After running it for a bit longer, we decided to remove the banner as it wasn't driving relevant traffic. If you see anything unnatural in these segments, you might be able to identify the cause.
Similarly, have you started ranking for any "educational" terms lately? By that I mean, have you started ranking for terms like "what is [keyword]" or "[keyword] explained"? If so, you may be getting traffic for the terms, but because your landing pages have served their purpose, users are arriving, reading, and leaving. Not a lot you can do in this case to improve pages per visit, but you could be able to capture some lead data by adding an email signup to those landing pages.
You should also have a look at your user journeys in Google analytics, which you can find if you go to Audience -> Visitors Flow in the left hand side navigation. See if you can see a pattern here - are there particularly pages that users are going to that has seen a jump in exit rate over time? Look at those pages - has any HTML/javascript code gone wrong? Is anything broken on those pages? Are they, in fact, just low quality pages that you could improve? This might also reveal something.
Don't be too worried though if you can't see anything standing out. Sometimes these things happen and recover - other times user behaviour simply changes. These methods above might be able to point out any faults you need to address or any improvements you could make. But if your traffic and conversions are steady, pages per visit decreasing isn't such a bad thing. In fact, if conversions are steady (how ever you measure them), one could argue that users taking a shorter time (and journey) to convert show that they're trusting your brand and website more to make the decision earlier.
Hope this helps Aggie!
-
Irving-
404 pages seem to be stable as do referring sites, and no navigation updates. I'm not sure about the GA tagging. I did not implement the tagging, so I wouldn't know where to look to find out.
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Lisa
-
Did you update any navigation lately?
Are pages still properly tagged with analytics?
Have you seen a spike in 404 pages?
Are visitors coming from the same places, or are you getting unqualified traffic?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Would there be any benefit to creating multiple pages of the same content to target different titles?
Obviously, the duplicated pages would be canonical, but would there be a way of anchoring a page land by search term entry? For example: If you have a site that sells cars you could use this method but have a page that has (brand) cars for sale, finance options, best car for a family, how far will the (brand) car go for on a full tank and so on? Then making all the information blocks h2's but using the same H2s for the duplicated page titles. Then it gets complicated, If someone searches "best car for a family" and the page title for the duplicated page is clicked how would you anchor this user to the section of the page with this information? Could there be a benefit to doing this or would it just not work?
Algorithm Updates | | Evosite10 -
What happens when we canonical and point to a page which has been redirected to another page? Google response!
Hi all, I would like to know the different scenarios Google going to respond when we use canonical and redirect for duplicate pages. Let's say A to B are duplicate pages with 95% same content and C Doesn't have same content but context wise similar and priority page we expect to rank for. What happens if we canonical from A to B and set redirect from B to C? What if both A and B are pointed to C with canonical? What if A or B deleted and other one is canonical to C? Note: We can noindex or 301 redirect as they have their own visitors. This is more about showing most relevant content to the audience and avoid duplicate content in search results. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Ctr question with home page and product pages
do you believe that the advantage of targeting a search term on the home page is now worse off than before? as I understand it ctr is a big factor now And as far as i can see if two pages are equal on page etc the better ctr will win out, the issue with the home page is the serp stars cannot be used hence the ctr on a product page will be higher? I feel if you where able to get a home page up quicker (1 year instead of two) you still lost out in the end due to the product page winning on ctr? do you think this is correct?
Algorithm Updates | | BobAnderson0 -
Significant Drop In Traffic Early April
I had a downward slide in Google organic traffic at the beginning of April (around 8-10th). It doesn't coincide with any of the algo updates, and I can't figure out what the cause it. Has anyone else experienced such a drop? Any suggestions as to finding the source/cause? TIA
Algorithm Updates | | inhouseseo0 -
Organic listing & map listing on 1st page of Google
Hi, Back then, a company could get multiple listings in SERP, one in Google Maps area and a homepage or internal pages from organic search results. But lately, I've noticed that Google are now putting together the maps & organic listings. This observation has been confirmed by a couple of SEO people and I thought it made sense, but one day I stumble with this KWP "bmw dealership phoenix" and saw that www.bmwnorthscottsdale.com has separate listing for google places and organic results. Any idea how this company did this? Please see the attached image
Algorithm Updates | | ao5000000 -
Why has my homepage been replaced in Google by my Facebook page?
Hi. I was wondering if others have had this happen to them. Lately, I've noticed that on a couple of my sites the homepage no longer appears in the Google SERP. Instead, a Facebook page I've created appears in the position the homepage used to get. My subpages still get listed in Google--just not the homepage. Obviously, I'd prefer that both the homepage and Facebook page appear. Any thoughts on what's going on? Thanks for your help!
Algorithm Updates | | TuxedoCat0 -
Site name appended to page title in google search
Hi there, I have a strange problem concerning how the search results for my site appears in Google. The site is Texaspoker.dk and for some strange reason that name is appended at the end of the page title when I search for it in Google. The site name is not added to the page titles on the site. If I search in Google.dk (the relevant search engine for the country I am targeting) for "Unibet Fast Poker" I get the following page title displayed in the search results: Unibet Fast Poker starter i dag - få €10 og prøv ... - Texaspoker.dk If you visit the actual page you can see that there is no site name added to the page title: http://www.texaspoker.dk/unibet-fast-poker It looks like it is only being appended to the pages that contains rich snippets markup and not he forum threads where the rich snippets for some reason doesn't work. If I do a search for "Afstemning: Foretrukne TOPS Events" the title appears as it should without the site name being added: Afstemning: Foretrukne TOPS Events Anybody have any experience regarding this or an idea to why this is happening? Maybe the rich snippets are automatically pulling the publisher name from my Google+ account... edited: It doesn't seem to have anything to do with rich snippets, if I search for "Billeder og stuff v.2" the site name is also appended and if I search for "bedste poker bonus" the site name is not.
Algorithm Updates | | MPO0 -
First page slot 1 spot doesn't equal global monthly traffic
We have a client who has occupied the top spot on Google for the past several months. According to the Google Adwords keyword suggestion tool, this keyword should generate around 5,000 Global and Local Monthly average visits. Trends show this keyword has consistent month over month traffic. The keyword search type is broad match. When we look at analytics, they're only getting 5 visits per month. Shouldn't the top spot get the lion's share of traffic? We've noticed this trend on several of our clients whose traffic doesn't really increase proportionate to the estimated search volume that Google returns in the Adwords tool. Ideas? We see the estimated traffic and tell clients, "Once we get you in that top organic slot, you'll get most of that traffic," but it's not correlating. Thanks so much.
Algorithm Updates | | GravitateOnline0