Google Places: Multiple company listings. How to rank the HQ page over a branch location.
-
Hi Moz experts! I have a client with Google Place listings for multiple branch locations and for some reason the fully SEO optimized Head Office listing is being beaten by an un-optimized branch listing.
The HQ listing gets a tonne of traffic where as the ranking and unoptimized branch location doesn't and is the main listing when searching through Google.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
-
Jon, I took a look at this(the screencast was helpful). I would go to this blog and read about the local directory ecosystem: https://getlisted.org/static/resources/local-search-data-providers.html One of my suspicions is that the other office has more local citations than your head office. The other things is that your site and many of the references on the site do not really differentiate between the locations. For example on Careers each address directs to the same page. You may want to consider modifying you map so that there is a mini site under the main site for each location. This would help signal multiple locations and a hierarchy to the different search engines. Ron
-
Thank you for the links, Freddy.
Looking now at your bit.ly URL, I see you have a large number of locations, making this problem more complex. I was under the impression that you only had two. I am a bit confused by what I am seeing in the examples vs. your notes.
Is this your HQ? In Bathurst?
https://plus.google.com/113521293483420343122/about?gl=au&hl=en
When I access the bit.ly URL for Google Maps, I am seeing a South Guilford in the A position and Bathurst in the B position, but your screencast is highlighting a Kewdale location as the one appearing for your branded search in the organic results. So, not sure what is up with this discrepancy. I am in the USA, so I may be seeing results in a different order in Maps, even with your link.
One thing that immediately jumps out at me is a violation of the Google Places Quality Guidelines. Many of your listings have 'City Branch' in the business title and this is not allowed. For example: Westrac - Bathurst Branch. This is not allowed, per these guidelines:
Do not attempt to manipulate search results by adding extraneous keywords or a description of your business in the business name field.
This needs to be cleaned up.
Because I am confused about which of your branches is HQ, I'm not sure which Google+ Local page to look at. Can you please provide a link to the HQ listing? The Bathurst one I looked at in G Maps Position B looks completely unoptimized.
Something else I've noted is that it appears you are linking all of your +Local pages to the homepage of your website. Have considered building a landing page for each branch and linking to that instead of the homepage?
Do any of these locations share a phone number? Have you gone through all of this listings to see if the phone number of one of them is ending up live on another one of the listings?
Here is a similar thread on the Google And Your Business Forum:
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!searchin/business/branch/business/WPptzqIgcj8/OKWaMlCtxQsJ
Thought you might like to take a glance at that.
This is as far as I've been able to dig. I'll stop back by if you can provide further clarification, Freddy.
-
HI Everyone,
Thanks you for your responses everyone, sorry for my late reply.
Please see the search with the keyword 'westrac' via google.com.au. The results are in this screenshot http://screencast.com/t/rgUpDppIx15B. This is the smaller branch showing.
You can see the locations here: http://bit.ly/18J6eYa
HQ location is location B (hidden under C and D) and location A is the smaller branch.
We have tested the keyword 'westrac' from location B and also from another location near map marker F, approx 25 mins drive away.
We have suspended the google place listing for location A, the smaller branch some time ago and added a new listing for the same location without a website url to try and overcome the problem but I think the original listing for the branch is still showing as the url is present.
Hope this helps and thank you again for everyone's help!
Freddy
-
Jon,
I am willing to help as well but I need the data. One other thing that I thought about based on Miriam's comments is you may want to use open site explorer to look at the relative in bound links, specifically local directories on the HQ vs the branch. One thing that might have happened is whomever set up your directory listings gave a URL for HQ rather than the URL for the branch.
Ron
-
Hi Jon,
Unfortunately, what you are experiencing is one of the potential issues with having multiple listings, whether this is for multiple practitioners within a single location or multiple locations within a region. It is up to Google to decide which of your listings they consider to be most authoritative.
I will repeat a question asked by Ron. How far apart are your different locations? Are you searching from a single location or are you going to the devices at different offices and searching for the respective locations from them? Google will typically localize the results either to your device, or to keyword indicators you provide in the search term, such as a city name. Would you like to provide more specifics as to what you are searching for and from where you are searching for it?
I will be happy to stop back by this thread if you can provide some further details.
-
Not really sure about this but try to get more citations from different quality locations under the HQ address and keywords and add links that points to your HQ address listing, thin might help!
-
Jon,
Where are their relative locations? Where are you when you do the search relative to each location? How many inbound links on the HQ VS branch ? Have you looked at the localized content ?
Ron
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Home Page Disappears From Google - But Rest of Site Still Ranked
As title suggests we are running into a serious issue of the home page disapearing from Google search results whilst the rest of the site still remains. We search for it naturally cannot find a trace, then use a "site:" command in Google and still the home page does not come up. We go into web masters and inspect the home page and even Google states that the page is indexable. We then run the "Request Indexing" and the site comes back on Google. This is having a damaging affect and we would like to understand why this issue is happening. Please note this is not happening on just one of our sites but has happened to three which are all located on the same server. One of our brand which has the issue is: www.henweekends.co.uk
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JH_OffLimits0 -
If a page ranks in the wrong country and is redirected, does that problem pass to the new page?
Hi guys, I'm having a weird problem: A new multilingual site was launched about 2 months ago. It has correct hreflang tags and Geo targetting in GSC for every language version. We redirected some relevant pages (with good PA) from another website of our client's. It turned out that the pages were not ranking in the correct country markets (for example, the en-gb page ranking in the USA). The pages from our site seem to have the same problem. Do you think they inherited it due to the redirects? Is it possible that Google will sort things out over some time, given the fact that the new pages have correct hreflangs? Is there stuff we could do to help ranking in the correct country markets?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ParisChildress1 -
Wrong Pages Ranking
Good Afternoon We had an issue a while ago with the incorrect pages ranking in Google for some of our key terms. For example the page ranking for the term in Hotels in Spain was an individual information page for one particular hotel in Spain rather than the top level page which is optimised for "Hotels in Spain" The individual property page was ranking around 36-40 so we tightened up all the internal linking structure to ensure the term "Hotels in Spain" was pointing to the correct page and de-optimised the individual property page for the term. After a few weeks, everything seemed to be working and we were ranking top of second page for correct page however, ranking report today has reversed our good fortune and the incorrect page is ranking in a low position Any further suggestions or advise would be very much appreciated. Ideally, I don't want to remove the page that is ranking as it's still relevant for a search for that particular hotel
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ham19790 -
Irrelevant Landing Pages are Ranking on Google SERP
Hi, I have noticed that Google likes to rank random pages on my site higher in the SERPs than the actual relevant content page for that service. Please let me know why it is happening?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RuchiPardal0 -
Pagination on a product page with reviews spread out on multiple pages
Our current product pages markup only have the canonical URL on the first page (each page loads more user reviews). Since we don't want to increase load times, we don't currently have a canonical view all product page. Do we need to mark up each subsequent page with its own canonical URL? My understanding was that canonical and rel next prev tags are independent of each other. So that if we mark up the middle pages with a paginated URL, e.g: Product page #1http://www.example.co.uk/Product.aspx?p=2692"/>http://www.example.co.uk/Product.aspx?p=2692&pageid=2" />**Product page #2 **http://www.example.co.uk/Product.aspx?p=2692&pageid=2"/>http://www.example.co.uk/Product.aspx?p=2692" />http://www.example.co.uk/Product.aspx?p=2692&pageid=3" />Would mean that each canonical page would suggest to google another piece of unique content, which this obviously isn't. Is the PREV NEXT able to "override" the canonical and explain to Googlebot that its part of a series? Wouldn't the canonical then be redundant?Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Don340 -
Multiple Locations Google Places (URL's)?
I'm managing a restaurant chain with 10 locations. Can they all share the home page url of the corporate site in Google Places or is it better to link each location url separately? Meaning can I use www.company.com for all locations in Google places for all locations or is it better to go with www.company.com/location.html for each location. The page authority of the home page is 60 while individual location pages the page authority is in the 20's. Hope this makes sense. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | YMD
Gary0 -
Google Filter? Drop from top first page to bottom second page?
My site has dropped from the first page top spots to the bottom second page, about 2 month ago. From time to time it reappears in the first page, is this some kind of google filter? How do I solve this issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ofer230 -
How do Google Site Search pages rank
We have started using Google Site Search (via an XML feed from Google) to power our search engines. So we have a whole load of pages we could link to of the format /search?q=keyword, and we are considering doing away with our more traditional category listing pages (e.g. /biology - not powered by GSS) which account for much of our current natural search landing pages. My question is would the GoogleBot treat these search pages any differently? My fear is it would somehow see them as duplicate search results and downgrade their links. However, since we are coding the XML from GSS into our own HTML format, it may not even be able to tell.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EdwardUpton610