How complicated would it be to optimize our current site for the Safari browser?
-
Hi all! Okay, here's the scoop. 33% of our site visitors use Safari. 18% of our visitors are on either an iPad or iPhone. According to Google Analytics, our average page load time for visitors using Safari is 411% higher than our site average of 3.8 second. So yes, average page load time pages loading in Safari is over 20 seconds...totally unacceptable, especially considering the large percentage of traffic using it.
While I understand that there are some parameters beyond our control, it is in our own best interest to try to optimize our site for Safari. We've got to do better than 20 seconds. As you might have guessed, it's also killing conversation rates on visits from that browser. While every other browser posted double-digit improvements in conversion rates over the last several months, the conversion rate for Safari visitors is down 36%...translating into 10's of thousands in lost revenue.
Question for anyone out there gifted in Web design and particular Web Dev....Do you think that it's possible/reasonable to attempt to "fix" our current site, which sits on an ancient platform with ancient code, or is this just not realistic? Would a complete redesign/replatform be the more realistic (and financially sound) way to go?
Any insights, experiences and recommendations would be greatly appreciated. If you're someone interested in spec'-ing out the project and giving us a cost estimate please private message me. Thanks so much!
-
Thank you all so very very much. Matt, I am going to drop you a PM as you suggested. Paul, wow...thank you for sharing your insights here. I am sure this is extremely helpful information not just for me, but for many other folks here who've observed some of the same things on their sites. Yes, I agree that the conversion issue could very well be a mobile optimization problem and not a Safari problem as we have spent very little to no time optimizing our mobile site. Given the traffic levels coming in via that channel, it's probably time to get crackin'!
You guys are awesome!
-
Sorry Dana - totally missed your mention about conversions being down. In that case you'll want to do some head-to-head testing with webpagetest.org.
The other thing to consider is that over half your Safari traffic is from mobile, Is it possible there's a mobile-optimisation problem and not a Safari problem? (How do the other mobile browsers perform in comparison?)
And the last suggestion I just thought of: Pingdom now offers Real User Monitoring (RUM) that purports to also be able to track the page speed of Safari users. (It uses it's own javascript module you add to your pages.) Given that this comes free for 1 site even with their free plan, seems like it would be an essential step toward getting a better handle on just where and how big the issue actually is.
P.
-
Dana, the good news here is that you have probably been worrying for nothing.
The function GA uses for tracking page timing is simply not included in Safari or Safari for iOS (phone/iPads). So those Safari figures you are seeing are completely anomalous and totally unreliable.
Here's the chart that shows which browsers have the capability to report their page speed in Analytics.
http://caniuse.com/nav-timing
As you'll notice, both desktop and mobile versions of Safari are no-go.The bad news is, just because the GA timings are worthless doesn't prove definitively you don't have any Safari issues. By far the best way to assess the situation is to analyse whether Safari-based visitors behave significantly differently on-site. Is their bounce rate higher? Time on site or conversions substantially lower? If no substantial difference compared to other browsers, you don't have an issue. (Usually this is the case - a site that performs in Chrome and Firefox almost always performs about the same in Safari, in my experience)
The one option you do have to get actual speed tests is to use webpagetest.org and select a testing location that offers the Safari browser as one of the options. Then you'll want to test multiple pages that represent the different primary templates and sections of your site. Do note though that even this will be using Safari on Windows, which was capped at version 5 back in 2012. So you can expect that current versions of Safari, especially native Mac apps, are likely faster.
Hope that sets your mind at ease, and gives you some next steps to further investigate alternative methods!
Paul
P.S When using GA page speed results, do note that by default Analytics only gathers data on 1% of page views. You need to customise your GA site snippet to push that level higher. This is critical for most sites because unless they have huge traffic volume, a 1% sample rate will be wildly inaccurate. The code snippet to add is
_gaq.push(['_setSiteSpeedSampleRate',100]);
and it has to go before the call to _trackPageview. By setting the sample rate to 100 as above, GA will try to track speed of all pageviews. It won't succeed of course, but you'll have far more reliable data. (GA will record speed data for a max of 10K hits per day)
-
Hi Dana,
I have done lots of work on site speed (a little obsessed with it but I have seen great results!) and I have made changes to a lot of sites that have massively improved load time and I have checked a couple and they are loading as quickly in Safari as the other browsers. I would be happy to give you some advice on possible quick fixes that you could make relatively easily and they will speed your site up significantly if you haven't already implemented them.
Drop me a pm with your site address and what server setup you are on Apache or IIS. I will have a look and see if there is any changes that may help
-
Hey Dana,
I've had this problem with Safari being slower as well. In fact, I just checked a handful of sites in Google Analytics and Safari is almost consistently the slowest browser. One question to look into is whether or not mobile traffic on Safari is slow. For the sites I'm looking at and for the sites I've worked on in the past, the culprit is usually Safari's desktop browser. Phones are usually within normal loading parameters (by phone standards).
Unfortunately, in most cases, the sluggish performance on Safari is due to Safari's DNS prefetching. Generally, prefetching does the opposite, but apparently can slow you down in Safari. You can read more about that here. http://macs.about.com/od/MacTroubleshootingTips/qt/Troubleshooting-Safari-Slow-Page-Loads-Caused-By-Dns-Prefetching.htm and this is another good one http://computers.tutsplus.com/tutorials/how-to-fix-slow-and-non-loading-webpages-in-safari--mac-51338 (Lots more if you Google Safari prefetching.)
I do think it is worth it to try to fix it. Here's what I would do, if I were you. Feel free to PM me if you want more help...
The way you fix this is on the client's machine, at least according to those articles (and others I've found while Google'ing around just now). However, you can try these steps out on your computer (if you've got a Mac) and see if you have an improved performance in Safari. It shouldn't take that long to test, and is probably worth it given the huge loss you are seeing due to this issue.
The next question is, well, how do I do this for everybody? The answer is to ask your visitors to use Chrome! No, seriously, one that worked for me in the past, was to detect the Safari user agent and load a slightly different version of the page that required fewer requests, meaning there will be less for Safari to prefetch. For instance, you might get rid of JavaScript, images, etc. that isn't essential. Obviously, keep the core content so that the pages are basically the same (kind of like you would for mobile detection).
This is obviously much more complicated to setup as it requires adjustments to the design as well as the code structure. But, generally simpler than trying to redo your entire website.
Before you make any such changes, it might be worth running a simple test on a key landing page that gets a lot of visits from Safari. Remove what elements you can for all user agents and see if this changes anything substantially with the site speed in Safari.
I hope that helps. Thanks,
Matthew
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
IE & Edge issues with site relaunch - advice appreciated
Hi, I've been involved in a major ecommerce site relaunch, redesign and backend and have been involved in several successful ones before. On the whole things have gone great. Of course there are some minor bugs to fix, rendering issues etc but my real concern is a significant decline in conversion rate BUT only for IE and Edge users. All other major browsers conv rate has increased. Trawling through analytics and the site itself in those browsers there is no obvious sticking points e.g bounce rate has improved on all browser inc IE & Edge, no particular point in the funnel is suffering more than others, no particular page or landing page is doing much worse than others etc. it just seems like all the kpi's (except bounce) are down a little on the 2 microsoft browsers, which has a significant impact. One of the things that changed on relaunch is that we moved to https and im wondering if that might be causing an issue with IE / Edge security or privacy settings or that functionality on the site that relies on cookies is being affected, though in testing we haven't come across anything. I'd appreciate any advice or insight. Thanks, Andy
Conversion Rate Optimization | | AndyMacLean0 -
Is anyone aware of stats stating how many people abandon pages the deeper they get in a site?
For example, let's say someone enters via a landing page, and instead of having a form there is a button to a form. What percentage of people will click the button and fill out the form vs if the form was right there on the page? Basically, I am trying to figure out what percentage of users do websites lose for every click a user makes on the site.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Firestarter-SEO0 -
Breadcrumbs for ecommerce site
We are doing a major overhaul on our site, and we have some questions about URLs, breadcrumbs and ecommerce. Currently, a product can reside in multiple categories, and can have multiple URLs based on how a user navigates to the page. We handle this via canonicals, but it's awful for SEO on many levels. O-U-C-H. The main issue is that a product can reside in multiple categories. At this point, Plan A for our overhaul is that a product URL is always going to be www.domain.com/product-name-sku.html/. Neat and clean, and avoids end-user confusion if they navigate to the product through a category that doesn't match the URL. Plan B: We can anchor a product to a category or subcategory, (www.domain.com/category-name/subcategory-name/product-name-sku.html) but we think that this cuts down on usability as users can navigate to a product through different categories, and the URL may not match the user's navigation. Based on how Google has devalued URLs for ranking purposes, I don't think that there is much of an SEO advantage to Plan B. Am I wrong? A product can show up in multiple categories - for example: www.domain.com/womens-clothing/ www.domain.com/womens-clothing/dresses/ www,domain.com/womens-clothing/dresses/maxidresses/ Category breadcrumbs take care of themselves. What is the best practice to handle the breadcrumb on the product page considering that there are multiple paths a user can take to a product? Options: 1. The breadcrumb on the product page dynamically changes based on how the user navigates to the page. The URL is always fixed as per above, but we change the breadcrumb based on the session. ex: Product: Black Ruffled MuuMuu Home > Womens Clothing > Black Ruffled MuuMuu Home > Womens Clothing > Dresses > Black Ruffled MuuMuu We would be showing Google different breadcrumbs based on how the bot navigates to the page. Are there any issues with this from an SEO perspective as it would seem to provide the better user experience? 2. The breadcrumb on a product page is always fixed. We anchor a product to a category or subcategory and the breadcrumb is always the same no matter how a user navigates to the product. This is simpler from a development perspective, and we are always showing the same breadcrumb to Google. IMHO, this is not as good for usability. ex: Breadcrumb is always: Home > Womens Clothing > Dresses > Black Ruffled MuuMuu regardless of how a user navigates to it. Which way would our ecommerce experts recommend?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | AMHC0 -
Is it better to get a new site instead of maintaining a category? I'm stuck.
If you had a website "Food for Dogs" and: Food for German shepherds was improving in search traffic & conversions Snack Food for German shepherds had no change and never resulted in conversions but resulted in many leads for #1 Food for Poodles was unchanged but improving conversions Here's the kicker... Food Container for Dogs was super high traffic but with no conversions or any activity to other categories Would you redirect "food container for dogs" to a different site and delete that tab from the original site completely? It's still related but does not offer any $ value or leads to any of the other categories. Just note that we have a different interest in this category that will support the other categories at one time, but not any time soon. We also have a major group on LinkedIN that's grown to thousands of members for the "food container for dogs" category. On top of it all, the "food container for dogs" has been increasing in rank on Google for several keyphrases to positions 2-5 (nationally) Other important question: Would keeping "food container for dogs" influence the ranking of the other keywords? (by dilution of the site's PR or any other reason?)
Conversion Rate Optimization | | HMCOE0 -
Site Design for SEO & Conversions
This is a Real Estate Website focusing on a local market. What would you change about this site for SEO Purposes? What would you change for Conversion Purposes? What would you change for Visual Appeal and User Experience? Thank you all for your help on this one. http://www.bronxpad.com
Conversion Rate Optimization | | bronxpad0 -
Conversion Rate - site feedback
Hi We gave a website a bit of a facelift last nov with the aim of increasing its position within Search Engines and getting it to begin making sales. The site: www.funkyfootstools.com is now moving in the right direction for its keyphrases, footstools and ottomans although it still needs some work. The issue I have is that from the visitors that come to the site, the stats prove they have a look around, they are just not purchasing - I am not sure if this is because of the layout, ie. usability or if there is something else. Any ideas & feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Carl
Conversion Rate Optimization | | keane-1145170 -
Conversion optimization with Optimizely, impact on SEO
I am looking into signing up with www.optimizely.com for conversion testing. They put scripting on my site which will then redirect half of my site visitors to an alternate home page. The site I want to test on is ranking quite well with Google and I do not want to hurt my rankings. And with this set up,what Google will think is my home page is not and so I am essentially sending visitors to a different page than Google reads as my home page in source code. So, my concern is whether this will have a negative impact on my SEO rankings to redirect 50% of site visitors to a different page using this testing tool? I would use Google Web Site Optimizer, but many of my sites are in Wordpress and it seems that Wordpress and web site optimizer are not so compatible. Advice would be appreciated. Thank you, Robert
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Robertnweil11