Sitemap issues
-
Hi ALL
Okay I'm a bit confused here, but it says I have submitted 72 (pages) im assuming and its returning only (2 pages) have been indexed?
I submitted a new site map for each of my 3 top level domains and checked it today and its showing this result attached.
We are still having issues with meta tags showing up in the incorrect country.
If anyone knows how I can attend to this knightmare would be much appreciated lol
-
Awesome response Dirk! Thanks again for your endless help!
-
Hey again!
...I can't believe I didn't think of the simplicity of this earlier...
"it's even faster if you sort the url's in alphabetical order & delete the rows containing priority / lastmod /.. - then you only need to do a find/replace on the <loc>/</loc> "
100,000 spreadsheets and I don't even think of sorting for this task. Unreal. I laughed at myself aloud when I read it.
Thank you per usual my friend!
-
Hi Patrick,
Your method is a good one - I use more or less the same trick to retrieve url's from a sitemap in xls (it's even faster if you sort the url's in alphabetical order & delete the rows containing priority / lastmod /.. - then you only need to do a find/replace on the <loc>/</loc> )
It's just in this specific case as the sitemap was generated in Screaming Frog that it's easier to eliminate these redirected url's upfront.
Dirk
-
Thanks so much Dirk - this is great. I was speaking to how I found the specific errors. Thanks for posting this for the sitemap - definitely left a big chunk out on my part!
-
Hi Justin
The how-to of Patrick is correct - but as you are generating your sitemap using Screaming Frog there is really no need to go through this manual processing.
If you only need to create the sitemap:
Go to Configuration > Spider -
Tab: Basic settings: uncheck everything apart from "Crawl Canonicals" (unchecking Images/CSS/JS/External links is not strictly necessary but speeds up the crawl)Advanced: Check "Always Follow redirects" / "Respect Noindex" / "Respect Canonical"
After the crawl - generate the sitemap - it will now only contain the "final" url's - after the redirects.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
PS Try to avoid internal links which are redirected - better to replace these links by links to the final destination
-
Hi Justin
Probably the easiest way to eliminate these cross references is to ask your programmer to put all links as relative links rather than as absolute links. Relative links have the disadvantage that they can generate endless loops if something is wrong with the HTML - but this is something you can easily check with Screaming Frog.
If you check the .com version - example https://www.zenory.com/blog/tag/love/ -it's calling zenory.co.nz for plenty of links (just check the source & search for .co.nz) - both the http & the https version
You can check all these pages by hand - but I guess your programmer must be able to do this in an automated way.
It is also the case the other way round- on the .co.nz version - you'll find references in the source to the .com version
In screaming frog - the links with "NZ" are the only ones which should stay absolute - as they point to the other version
Hope this clarifies
Dirk
-
Wow thanks Patrick, let me run this and see how I go, thanks so much for your help!!!
-
Dirk, thanks so much for your help!
Could you tell me how to identify with the urls that are cross referencing - I tried using screaming frog and I found under the **external and clicked on inlinks and outlinks. **But whats really caught my eye, is alot of the links are from the blog with the same anchor text "name" others are showing up as a different name as well. Some are saying NZ NZ or AU AU as the anchor text and I think this has to do with the flag drop down to change the top level domains.
For eg:
FROM: https://www.zenory.co.nz/blog/tag/love/
TO: https://www.zenory.com.au/categories/love-relationships
Anchor Text: Twinflame Reading
-
Hi Justin
Yep! I use ScreamingFrog, here's how I do it:
-
Goto your /sitemap.xml
-
Select all + copy
-
Paste into Excel column A
-
Select column A
-
Turn "Wrap Text" off
-
Delete rows 1 through 5
-
Select column A again
-
"Find and Replace" the following:
-
<lastmod></lastmod>
-
<changefreq></changefreq>
-
daily
-
Whatever the date is
-
Priority numbers, usually 0.5 to 1.0
-
"Replace With" nothing, no spaces, nothing
-
You'll hit "Replace All" after every text string you put in, one at a time
-
With Column A still select, hit F5
-
Click "Special"
-
Click "Blank" and "Ok"
-
Right click in the spreadsheet
-
Select "Delete" and "Shift Rows Up"
Walla! You have your list. Now copy this list, and open ScreamingFrog. Click "Mode" up top and click "List". Click "Upload List" and click "Paste". Paste your URLs in there and hit Start.
Your sitemap will be crawled.
Here are URLs that returned 301 redirects:
https://www.zenory.com/blog/chat-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings-private/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/live-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings/Here are URLs that returned 503 Service Unavailable codes twice, but 200s now:
https://www.zenory.com/blog/spiritually-love/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/automatic-writing-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/psychic-nori/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/zodiac-signs/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/soul-mate-relationship-challenges/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/zenoryadmin/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/soulmate-separation-break-ups/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/how-to-find-a-genuine-psychic/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/mind-body-soul/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/twin-flame-norishing-your-flame-to-find-its-twin/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/tips-psychic-reading/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/tips-to-dealing-with-a-broken-heart/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/the-difference-between-soul-mates-and-twin-flames/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/sex-love/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-advice-break-ups/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/ginny/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/chanelling-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/first-release-cycle-2015/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-shaman-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/chat-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-medium-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/trinity/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-readings-karmic-relationships/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/can-psychic-readings-heal-broken-heart/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/guidance-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/mercury-retrograde-effects-life/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings-private/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychics-mind-readers/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/angel-card-readings-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/cheating-relationship/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/long-distance-relationship/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/soulmate-psychic-reading/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/live-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-readings-using-rune-stones/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-clairvoyant-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-guidance-long-distance-relationships/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/libby/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings/I would check on that when you can. Check in Webmaster Tools if any issues have arrived there as well.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
-
Thanks so much Patrick! Can you recommend how I would go about finding the urls that are redirecting in the sitemap? I'm assuming screaming frog?
-
Hi Justin
Google doesn't seem to be figuring out (even with the correct hreflang in place) which site should be shown for each country.
If you look at the cached versions of your .com.au & .com versions it always the .co.nz version which is cached - this is probably also the reason why the meta description is wrong (it's always coming from the .co.nz version) and why the % of url's indexed for each sitemap (for the .com & .com.au version) is so low.
Try to rigorously eliminate all cross-references in your site - to make it more obvious for Google that these are 3 different sites:
-
in the footer - the links in the second column are pointing to the .co.nz version (latest articles) - change these links to relative ones
-
on all sites there are elements you load from the .com domain (see latest blog entries - the images are loaded from the .com domain for all tld's
As long as you send these confusing signals to Google - Google will mix up the different versions of your site.
rgds,
Dirk
-
-
Hi there Justin
Everything looks fine from here - there are a couple URLs that need to be updated in your sitemap as they are redirecting.
Google takes time to index, so give this a little more time. You could ask Google to recrawl your URLs but that's very unnecessary at the moment; just something to note.
I would make sure your internal links are all good to go and "follow" so that crawlers can at least find URLs that way.
I did a quick site: search on Google, so far you have 58 pages indexed. You should be okay.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
Hi Justin,
Similar question asked in this post @ http://moz.com/community/q/webmaster-tools-indexed-pages-vs-sitemap
Hope this helps you.
Thanks
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Crawl anamoly issue on Search Console
Has anyone checked the crwal anamoly issue under the index section on Search console? We recently move to a new site and I'm seeing a huge list of excluded urls which are classified as crawl anamoly (they all lead to 404 page). Does anyone know that if we need to 301 redirect all the links? Is there any other smarter/ more efficiently way to deal with them like set up canonical link (I thought that's what they're used for isn't it?) Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | greenshinenewenergy0 -
Active, Old Large site with SEO issues... Fix or Rebuild?
Looking for opinions and guidance here. Would sincerely appreciate help. I started a site long, long ago (1996 to be exact) focused on travel in the US. The site did very well in the search results up until panda as I built it off templates using public databases to fill in the blanks where I didn't have curated content. The site currently indexes around 310,000 pages. I haven't been actively working on the site for years and while user content has kept things somewhat current, I am jumping back into this site as it provides income for my parents (who are retired). My questions is this. Will it be easier to track through all my issues and repair, or rebuild as a new site so I can insure everything is in order with today's SEO? and bonus points for this answer ... how do you handle 301 redirects for thousands of incoming links 😕 Some info to help: CURRENTLY DA is in the low 40s some pages still rank on first page of SERPs (long-tail mainly) urls are dynamic (I have built multiple versions through the years and the last major overhaul was prior to CMS popularity for this size of site) domain is short (4 letters) but not really what I want at this point Lots of original content, but oddly that content has been copied by other sites through the years WHAT I WANT TO DO get into a CMS so that anyone can add/curate content without needing tech knowledge change to a more relevant domain (I have a different vision) remove old, boilerplate content, but keep original
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Millibit1 -
Site redesign what to consider to avoid any issues
Hi GUYS I want to avoid getting myself into a bad situation with google, so I'm just wanting to know if there are any steps I would need to take whilst I'm redesigning and developing my site as I'm currently deploying our new designs. One thing I noticed, i have my new designs and content on our development server to run through any checks before deploying it to the live environment, however while our live site is up, I have duplicate content on the live site that exactly matches the dev site for obvious reasons but do I need to tell google that the dev site is for development purposes only so google knows I'm not duplicating content? I have searched around to find some more info about this, if anyone has some insight i would be glad to know your thoughts. Thank you in advance
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | edward-may0 -
Is there any reason to Nofollow Internal Links or XML Sitemap?
I am viewing a new client's site and they have the following nofollow(S) on their site homepage. Is there a reason for this? Also, they people who originally built their site have a footer link on every page to their company (I guess to promote their work). They didn't "nofollow" that link lol... What are the thoughts on footer links? About Us Privacy Policy Customer Service Shipping & Returns Blog Contact Us Site Map Thanks James Chronicle
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Atlanta-SMO0 -
Potential spam issue - back links
Hi - we have a client whom we work with for SEO. During a review we noticed in Webmaster Tools, there was an IP address with over 30,000 links to our clients site. The IP address is 92.60.0.123. From looking up the IP address details, it looks like it is based in Europe - but we are unable to establish what it is, where the links are and who created it. We are concerned it could be a potential spammer trying to cause an issue with the SEO campaign. Is there any way of finding out any more details apart from the basic information about the location of the IP address? Also - if we submit a disavow via webmaster tools, we are unsure what issue it will have on the clients site if we do not know what it is and the type of links it is creating. Any ideas? Thanks for your help! Phil.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Globalgraphics0 -
Are Links from blogs with person using keyword anchor text a Penguin 2.0 issue?
Hello, I am continuing a complete clean up of a clients link profile and would like to know if Penguin is against links from blogs with the user including keywords as anchor text? So far I have been attempting to get them removed before I go for a disavow. An example would be the work clothing comment at the bottom of: http://www.fashionstyleyou.co.uk/beat-the-caffeine-rush.html/comment-page-1 I am also questioning if we should keep any link directories, so far I have been ruthless, but worry I will be losing a hell of a lot of links. For example I have kept the following: http://www.business-directory-uk.co.uk//clothing.htm Your comments are welcomed!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarzVentures0 -
Google Sitemaps & punishment for bad URLS?
Hoping y'all have some input here. This is along story, but I'll boil it down: Site X bought the url of Site Y. 301 redirects were added to direct traffic (and help transfer linkjuice) from urls in Site X to relevant urls in Site Y, but 2 days before a "change of address" notice was submitted in Google Webmaster Tools, an auto-generating sitemap somehow applied urls from Site Y to the sitemap of Site X, so essentially the sitemap contained urls that were not the url of Site X. Is there any documentation out there that Google would punish Site X for having essentially unrelated urls in its sitemap by downgrading organic search rankings because it may view that mistake as black hat (or otherwise evil) tactics? I suspect this because the site continues to rank well organically in Yahoo & Bing, yet is nonexistent on Google suddenly. Thoughts?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RUNNERagency0 -
Google Sitemaps & punishment for bad URLS?
Hoping y'all have some input here. This is along story, but I'll boil it down: Site X bought the url of Site Y. 301 redirects were added to direct traffic (and help transfer linkjuice) from urls in Site X to relevant urls in Site Y, but 2 days before a "change of address" notice was submitted in Google Webmaster Tools, an auto-generating sitemap somehow applied urls from Site Y to the sitemap of Site X, so essentially the sitemap contained urls that were not the url of Site X. Is there any documentation out there that Google would punish Site X for having essentially unrelated urls in its sitemap by downgrading organic search rankings because it may view that mistake as black hat (or otherwise evil) tactics? I suspect this because the site continues to rank well organically in Yahoo & Bing, yet is nonexistent on Google suddenly. Thoughts?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RUNNERagency0