Sitemap issues
-
Hi ALL
Okay I'm a bit confused here, but it says I have submitted 72 (pages) im assuming and its returning only (2 pages) have been indexed?
I submitted a new site map for each of my 3 top level domains and checked it today and its showing this result attached.
We are still having issues with meta tags showing up in the incorrect country.
If anyone knows how I can attend to this knightmare would be much appreciated lol
-
Awesome response Dirk! Thanks again for your endless help!
-
Hey again!
...I can't believe I didn't think of the simplicity of this earlier...
"it's even faster if you sort the url's in alphabetical order & delete the rows containing priority / lastmod /.. - then you only need to do a find/replace on the <loc>/</loc> "
100,000 spreadsheets and I don't even think of sorting for this task. Unreal. I laughed at myself aloud when I read it.
Thank you per usual my friend!
-
Hi Patrick,
Your method is a good one - I use more or less the same trick to retrieve url's from a sitemap in xls (it's even faster if you sort the url's in alphabetical order & delete the rows containing priority / lastmod /.. - then you only need to do a find/replace on the <loc>/</loc> )
It's just in this specific case as the sitemap was generated in Screaming Frog that it's easier to eliminate these redirected url's upfront.
Dirk
-
Thanks so much Dirk - this is great. I was speaking to how I found the specific errors. Thanks for posting this for the sitemap - definitely left a big chunk out on my part!
-
Hi Justin
The how-to of Patrick is correct - but as you are generating your sitemap using Screaming Frog there is really no need to go through this manual processing.
If you only need to create the sitemap:
Go to Configuration > Spider -
Tab: Basic settings: uncheck everything apart from "Crawl Canonicals" (unchecking Images/CSS/JS/External links is not strictly necessary but speeds up the crawl)Advanced: Check "Always Follow redirects" / "Respect Noindex" / "Respect Canonical"
After the crawl - generate the sitemap - it will now only contain the "final" url's - after the redirects.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
PS Try to avoid internal links which are redirected - better to replace these links by links to the final destination
-
Hi Justin
Probably the easiest way to eliminate these cross references is to ask your programmer to put all links as relative links rather than as absolute links. Relative links have the disadvantage that they can generate endless loops if something is wrong with the HTML - but this is something you can easily check with Screaming Frog.
If you check the .com version - example https://www.zenory.com/blog/tag/love/ -it's calling zenory.co.nz for plenty of links (just check the source & search for .co.nz) - both the http & the https version
You can check all these pages by hand - but I guess your programmer must be able to do this in an automated way.
It is also the case the other way round- on the .co.nz version - you'll find references in the source to the .com version
In screaming frog - the links with "NZ" are the only ones which should stay absolute - as they point to the other version
Hope this clarifies
Dirk
-
Wow thanks Patrick, let me run this and see how I go, thanks so much for your help!!!
-
Dirk, thanks so much for your help!
Could you tell me how to identify with the urls that are cross referencing - I tried using screaming frog and I found under the **external and clicked on inlinks and outlinks. **But whats really caught my eye, is alot of the links are from the blog with the same anchor text "name" others are showing up as a different name as well. Some are saying NZ NZ or AU AU as the anchor text and I think this has to do with the flag drop down to change the top level domains.
For eg:
FROM: https://www.zenory.co.nz/blog/tag/love/
TO: https://www.zenory.com.au/categories/love-relationships
Anchor Text: Twinflame Reading
-
Hi Justin
Yep! I use ScreamingFrog, here's how I do it:
-
Goto your /sitemap.xml
-
Select all + copy
-
Paste into Excel column A
-
Select column A
-
Turn "Wrap Text" off
-
Delete rows 1 through 5
-
Select column A again
-
"Find and Replace" the following:
-
<lastmod></lastmod>
-
<changefreq></changefreq>
-
daily
-
Whatever the date is
-
Priority numbers, usually 0.5 to 1.0
-
"Replace With" nothing, no spaces, nothing
-
You'll hit "Replace All" after every text string you put in, one at a time
-
With Column A still select, hit F5
-
Click "Special"
-
Click "Blank" and "Ok"
-
Right click in the spreadsheet
-
Select "Delete" and "Shift Rows Up"
Walla! You have your list. Now copy this list, and open ScreamingFrog. Click "Mode" up top and click "List". Click "Upload List" and click "Paste". Paste your URLs in there and hit Start.
Your sitemap will be crawled.
Here are URLs that returned 301 redirects:
https://www.zenory.com/blog/chat-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings-private/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/live-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings/Here are URLs that returned 503 Service Unavailable codes twice, but 200s now:
https://www.zenory.com/blog/spiritually-love/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/automatic-writing-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/psychic-nori/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/zodiac-signs/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/soul-mate-relationship-challenges/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/zenoryadmin/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/soulmate-separation-break-ups/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/how-to-find-a-genuine-psychic/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/mind-body-soul/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/twin-flame-norishing-your-flame-to-find-its-twin/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/tips-psychic-reading/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/tips-to-dealing-with-a-broken-heart/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/the-difference-between-soul-mates-and-twin-flames/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/sex-love/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-advice-break-ups/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/ginny/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/chanelling-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/first-release-cycle-2015/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-shaman-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/chat-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-medium-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/trinity/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-readings-karmic-relationships/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/can-psychic-readings-heal-broken-heart/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/guidance-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/mercury-retrograde-effects-life/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings-private/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychics-mind-readers/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/angel-card-readings-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/cheating-relationship/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/long-distance-relationship/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/soulmate-psychic-reading/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/live-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-readings-using-rune-stones/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-clairvoyant-psychic-readings/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/psychic-guidance-long-distance-relationships/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/author/libby/
https://www.zenory.com/blog/online-psychic-readings/I would check on that when you can. Check in Webmaster Tools if any issues have arrived there as well.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
-
Thanks so much Patrick! Can you recommend how I would go about finding the urls that are redirecting in the sitemap? I'm assuming screaming frog?
-
Hi Justin
Google doesn't seem to be figuring out (even with the correct hreflang in place) which site should be shown for each country.
If you look at the cached versions of your .com.au & .com versions it always the .co.nz version which is cached - this is probably also the reason why the meta description is wrong (it's always coming from the .co.nz version) and why the % of url's indexed for each sitemap (for the .com & .com.au version) is so low.
Try to rigorously eliminate all cross-references in your site - to make it more obvious for Google that these are 3 different sites:
-
in the footer - the links in the second column are pointing to the .co.nz version (latest articles) - change these links to relative ones
-
on all sites there are elements you load from the .com domain (see latest blog entries - the images are loaded from the .com domain for all tld's
As long as you send these confusing signals to Google - Google will mix up the different versions of your site.
rgds,
Dirk
-
-
Hi there Justin
Everything looks fine from here - there are a couple URLs that need to be updated in your sitemap as they are redirecting.
Google takes time to index, so give this a little more time. You could ask Google to recrawl your URLs but that's very unnecessary at the moment; just something to note.
I would make sure your internal links are all good to go and "follow" so that crawlers can at least find URLs that way.
I did a quick site: search on Google, so far you have 58 pages indexed. You should be okay.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
Hi Justin,
Similar question asked in this post @ http://moz.com/community/q/webmaster-tools-indexed-pages-vs-sitemap
Hope this helps you.
Thanks
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sitemap issues 19 warnings
Hi Guys I seem to be having a lot of sitemap issues. 1. I have 3 top level domains, all with the co.nz sitemap that was submitted 2. I'm in the midst of a site re-design so I'm unsure if I should be updating these now or when the new site goes live (in two weeks) 3. I have 19 warnings from GWT for the co.nz site and they gave me 3 examples looks like 404 errors however I'm not too sure and a bit green on my behalf to find out where the issues are and how to fix them. (it is also showing that 95 pages submitted and only 53 were indexed) 4. I generated recently 2 sitemaps for .com and com.au submitted these both to google and when i create i still see the co.nz sitemap Would love some guidance around this. Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | edward-may0 -
Image Optimization & Duplicate Content Issues
Hello Everyone, I have a new site that we're building which will incorporate some product thumbnail images cut and pasted from other sites and I would like some advice on how to properly manage those images on our site. Here's one sample scenario from the new website: We're building furniture and the client has the option of selecting 50 plastic laminate finish options from the Formica company. We'll cut and paste those 50 thumbnails of the various plastic laminate finishes and incorporate them into our site. Rather than sending our website visitors over to the Formica site, we want them to stay put on our site, and select the finishes from our pages. The borrowed thumbnail images will not represent the majority of the site's content and we have plenty of our own images and original content. As it does not make sense for us to order 50 samples from Formica & photograph them ourselves, what is the best way to handle to issue? Thanks in advance, Scott
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ccbamatx0 -
Is there any reason to Nofollow Internal Links or XML Sitemap?
I am viewing a new client's site and they have the following nofollow(S) on their site homepage. Is there a reason for this? Also, they people who originally built their site have a footer link on every page to their company (I guess to promote their work). They didn't "nofollow" that link lol... What are the thoughts on footer links? About Us Privacy Policy Customer Service Shipping & Returns Blog Contact Us Site Map Thanks James Chronicle
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Atlanta-SMO0 -
Does Lazy Loading Create Indexing Issues of products?
I have store with 5000+ products in one category & i m using Lazy Loading . Does this effects in indexing these 5000 products. as google says they index or read max 1000 links on one page.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | innovatebizz0 -
Does IP Blacklist cause SEO issues?
Hi, Our IP was recently blacklisted - we had a malicious script sending out bulk mail in a Joomla installation. Does it hurt our SEO if we have a domain hosted on that IP? Any solid evidence? Thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | bjs20100 -
A client/Spam penalty issue
Wondering if I could pick the brains of those with more wisdom than me... Firstly, sorry but unable to give the client's url on this topic. I know that will not help with people giving answers but the client would prefer it if this thread etc didn't appear when people type their name in google. Right, to cut a long story short..gained a new client a few months back, did the usual things when starting the project of reviewing the backlinks using OSE and Majestic. There were a few iffy links but got most of those removed. In the last couple of months have been building backlinks via guest blogging and using bloggerlinkup and myblogguest (and some industry specific directories found using linkprospector tool). All way going well, the client were getting about 2.5k hits a day, on about 13k impressions. Then came the last Google update. The client were hit, but not massively. Seemed to drop from top 3 for a lot of keywords to average position of 5-8, so still first page. The traffic went down after this. All the sites which replaced the client were the big name brands in the niche (home improvement, sites such as BandQ, Homebase, for the fellow UK'ers). This was annoying but understandable. However, on 27th June. We got the following message in WMT - Google has detected a pattern of artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site. Buying links or participating in link schemes in order to manipulate PageRank are violations of Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | GrumpyCarl
As a result, Google has applied a manual spam action to xxxx.co.uk/. There may be other actions on your site or parts of your site. This was a shock to say the least. A few days later the traffic on the site went down more and the impressions dropped to about 10k a day (oddly the rankings seem to be where they were after the Google update so perhaps a delayed message). To get back up to date....after digging around more it appears there are a lot of SENUKE type links to the site - links on poor wiki sites,a lot of blog commenting links, mostly from irrelevant sites, i enclose a couple of examples below. I have broken the links so they don't get any link benefit from this site. They are all safe for work http:// jonnyhetherington. com/2012/02/i-need-a-new-bbq/?replytocom=984 http:// www.acgworld. cn/archives/529/comment-page-3 In addition to this there is a lot of forum spam, links from porn sites and links from sites with Malware warnings. To be honest, it is almost perfect negative seo!! I contacted several of the sites in question (about 450) and requested they remove the links, the vast majority of the sites have no contact on them so I cannot get the links removed. I did a disavow on these links and then a reconsideration request but was told that this is unsuccessful as the site still was being naughty. Given that I can neither remove the links myself or get Google to ignore them, my options for lifting this penalty are limited. What would be the course of action others would take, please. Thanks and sorry for overally long post0 -
SEO best practice: Use tags for SEO purpose? To add or not to add to Sitemap?
Hi Moz community, New to the Moz community and hopefully first post/comment of many to come. I am somewhat new to the industry and have a question that I would like to ask and get your opinions on. It is most likely something that is a very simple answer, but here goes: I have a website that is for a local moving company (so small amounts of traffic and very few pages) that was built on Wordpress... I was told when I first started that I should create tags for some of the cities serviced in the area. I did so and tagged the first blog post to each tag. Turned out to be about 12-15 tags, which in turn created 12-15 additional pages. These tags are listed in the footer area of each page. There are less than 20 pages in the website excluding the tags. Now, I know that each of these pages are showing as duplicate content. To me, this just does not seem like best practices to me. For someone quite new to the industry, what would you suggest I do in order to best deal with this situation. Should I even keep the tags? Should I keep and not index? Should I add/remove from site map? Thanks in advance for any help and I look forward to being a long time member of SEOMoz.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BWrightTLM0 -
Being penalized for unnatural links, determining the issue, and fixing the problem. What to do?
Hi all, A client has been penalised, having received the message in Google Webmasters last week, along with two more yesterday. It seems the penalty is for something specific: “As a result, for this specific incident we are taking very targeted action on the unnatural links instead of your site as a whole“. This is the first time I've had to deal with this so I'll be a bit layman about it The penalty, firstly, seems to be for the old domain, from which there is a re-direct to the current one. This redirect has been in place since Feb 2012 (no link building has been done for the old domain since then). In Webmasters, I have the old and new domains set up separately and the messages are only coming for the old (but affecting the new, obviously). I need to determine if it’s the old or new URL I’m being hit for, or would that even matter? Some questionable links I can see in WM: There is an affiliate for whom WM is showing 154,000 links (all followed) from their individual products listings to the client’s site (as a related product) but they’re linking to the new domain if that matters. Could this affiliate be an issue? There is also Updowner, which has added 2000+ links unbeknownst to me but apparently they are discounted by Google. I see a ton of recent directory submissions - right up until last week - that I am not responsible for. Could that be intentional spam targeting? I did also use a 3<sup>rd</sup> party link building company for Feb, March and April who ‘manually’ submitted the new domain to directories and social bookmarking sites. Could this be issue? For what kind of time-scale are penalties usually imposed - how far back (or how recently) are they penalising for? Ranking were going really well until this happened last Thursday. Will directories with non-followed links effect us negatively - one such one has over 2000 links. What is the most conclusive way to determine which are the poor, penalty-incurring links pointing to us? I know I now have to contact all the dodgy directories the site is now listed on to get links removed, but any and all advice on how to rectify this, along with determining what had gone wrong, will be most appreciated. Cheers, David
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Martin_S0