Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
-
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question.
This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community.
**Context... **
We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat.
However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme.
In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth.
Make sense so far?
Context end.....
Issue.
Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on).
Possible reason?
Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO.
2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO).
When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page?
I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout.
Isaac.
EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
-
Ok yes. Thank you! All makes sense.
Long term we'd love to have people landing on the notebook page for the appropriate search term. It would make a nicer customer journey, and the user would feel like they were 'in the right place'.
But short term as you say, we'll focus on what's ranking and go with that momentum.
Thanks again!
Isaac.
-
Google definitely sees "design your own notebook" and "design your own diary" as two different searches, but Google looks at the "intent" behind a search, not just the keywords behind the search. The "intent" for the "design your own notebook" and "design your own diary" are very similar, both are related to getting a type of custom designed book that you can write in (the Knowledge Graph video discusses this).
Though your diary page may not have any external links pointing to it that's not the only thing google's Algorithm looks for. Maybe your diary page has more user data showing a positive experience behind it? Maybe your link structure has identified it as more important than your notebook page? There really could be a lot of reasons why it's identifying the diary page as better than your notebook page.
I used Moz's Open Site Explorer tool and took a quick look at your different pages and I found that your diary page has a page authority of 21 and your notebook page has a page authority of 1 (which is automatically given no matter what). So there's quite a bit of difference as far as Moz is concerned (and you can pretty confidently say "as far as Google is concerned") between which should be shown.
From a pure marketing perspective (I'm going to take off the SEO hat and just talk about driving results now), you want to look at the end goal. If I was in your shoes, I wouldn't forget about your notebook page (I'd definitely keep working on helping it rank better) but I would focus most of my efforts on maximizing the potential of your page that's ranking. Focus on conversion optimization, get yourself some gold stars using schema/reviews, work on getting more links to that page. It's about using the current momentum you instead of stopping and trying to start from scratch.
Hopefully that helps!
-Jacob
-
Canonical answer makes perfect sense.... thank you so much!
Can I just clarify something?
What do you mean by the diary page has more authority than the notebook page? From back links? Or from internal link structure? (I didn't think we had any back links to these pages you see).
I'm personally convinced that Google sees 'design your own notebook' and 'design your own diary' as significantly different searches. 2 reasons. The huge difference in the SERP results for those two searches, and, that they belong to different groups in Ad words.
One problem I've identified is that we do technically have a keyword cannibalisation issues. We have the word notebook in the 'Diary - Notebook' drop down.
Out side of removing these words, is there anything else we should look at on site to help the notebook page rank for appropriate search terms? Or would you suggest optimising the diary page for both notebook and diaries terms? Perhaps as a more short term solution?
Again, thank you for your response. This is such an empowering place
Isaac.
-
Answer to why diary page is showing up instead of notebook:
I would say that the reason your diary page is showing up in the SERPS (even when people are searching for "notebooks") is because the keywords "notebook" and "diary" are part of the same Knowledge Graph and can sometimes be synonyms.
Beyond this your http://www.toaddiaries.co.uk/design-your-own/diaries page seems to have more authority then your notebook page, so it really is "cannibalizing" the "notebook" keyword. It's not a horrible thing to happen, we have the same thing occurring with our website (our "lawn mowing" page cannibalizes our "lawn care" page). Because the "intent" can be very similar for the two keywords our conversion rate doesn't suffer, I'd assume the same (or something similar) for yours.
Answer to the canonical tag/internal linking situation:
When you place a canonical tag on a page you're directing google's crawlers to identify it the same as the page it's pointing to. So if Google's algorithm is identifying your internal linking as a positive it will count towards the page your canonical tag is pointing to. Here's a pretty solid article on it (link).
Hopefully that helps.
-Jacob
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I add canonical links to pages that are redirected?
Hello! I am a little confused concerning canonical links. I have several URLs that all access my page, but I redirect them all. A lot of places I am told to redirect them or use canonicals. Other places, I read that I should always use canonicals. What is the right way for me? If I should use canonicals as well as redirects, which links should I do this on? I redirect my pages like this: http to https:
On-Page Optimization | | hermanok
http://example.com -> https://example.com www to non-www:
https://www.example.com -> https://example.com Remove trailing slashes
https://example.com/ -> https://example.com Would-be 404-requests to index.php?p=$1
https://example.com/home -> https://example.com/index.php?p=home ( show as https://example.com/home ) Example:
http://www.example.com/home/ -> http://www.example.com/home/ -> https://example.com/home/ -> https://example.com/home -> https://example.com/index.php?p=home ( shows as https://example.com/home ) Thank you!0 -
Google ranking is HORRIBLE. Following SEOMoz suggestions and just can't climb.
First of all, the URL is stores.dhsequipment.com. In January, this online store switched from Homestead to Big Commerce. Since the store updated, we decided now is the time to update our product descriptions, URL's, title tags and meta descriptions. (For the first time, we had the ability to customize our URL's.) Product Description: I went through 2,500 products and updated the product description. I added an H1 & H2 to each description, and included pertinent information such as part numbers. Each product also received a new page title, meta description (which is usually the first line of the product description, don't know if this is bad or not) and a new URL, (which did redirect). Once I would complete a section, I would submit a new sitemap to Webmaster Tools. After a month and nothing happening, I started using SEOMoz which helped me rebuild some of my more important pages, such as the home page and main category pages such as: http://stores.dhsequipmentparts.com/stihl-ts420-parts/
On-Page Optimization | | pearldesign
http://stores.dhsequipmentparts.com/stihl-ts700-parts-stihl-ts800-parts/ I fetched these pages in Webmaster Tools after completion. However, it's been several weeks since and I'm still on page 4 or 5 in the SERPs. Just a little history on the store; this store has been in operation for more than 6 years. Previously, we ranked on page one for 75%+ of our products. My belief is because our URL's had history, probably more so than our competitors. I'm not sure what I should do. Business is super slow and we can't afford to wait much longer.0 -
Page rank question
Hi all, pretty standard SEO question that I'm sure you are all getting asked day in, day out... the following page: http://www.3wisemonkeys.co.uk/dvd/portable-dvd-player-car/ It's targetting keywords "portable dvd", "portable DVD player", "portable DVD players" & "portable dvd player for car". The page gets a grade A via Moz analytics On-page grader for the keywords. We have incoming links and I believe the page is structured correctly with all meta tags, H1 etc and tried not too overload the tags with keywords. We have the keywords in the URL etc. We are still stuck on page 2 for all phrases. Any thoughts or suggestions as to what we are doing wrong please? Any help would be great.
On-Page Optimization | | jasef0 -
Conflicting Canonical Tag in On-Page Report
I'm going through my site with the "One-Page report card for some PPC landing pages. If I have this canonical tag on my page : I get a Fail in the "Critical Factors Section here: Appropriate Use of Rel Canonical but a Pass in the Optional Factors here: Canonical URL Tag Usage If I take the canonical link out, the opposite happens, what am I missing? Is the format wrong? Thanks Michael
On-Page Optimization | | mjrinvent0 -
Opinions please on Duplicate page titles & too many on-page links warnings.-
Hello folks, I'm a total SEO newbe but totally enjoying
On-Page Optimization | | CSC
using SEOmoz to learn more. We have ecommerce sites and the 1st crawl flags – as appears typical too many on-page links. We display up to 20 products (each with three links!)
and I’m trying to push to have fewer but meeting resistance from colleagues.
We have links duplicated all over the site believing it eases navigation. My question is just how critical is the number of products displayed
and the resulting volume of links to SEO results? Also we currently have collections of products displayed
across several pages which of course have the same page title and this is flagged
as a duplication error. I wonder if product auto-scrolling help as this means only a certain number of products are displayed at one time on one page thus reducing links and the need for duplicate page titles? My superiors are resisting change (perhaps nervous of spoiling
what already works) and I need to know where to direct my persuasive powers! Many thanks in anticipation, Spence0 -
Why does the on page report reports a full path link as Cannibalize link?
On the seomoz on page report i get a cannibalize error. This is due to a link being full path. When i change the link to relative path then there is no Cannibalize error. Should i change the internal links of the site to relative path? I would appreciate your help.
On-Page Optimization | | pickaweb0 -
Anchor Texts on Internal Links on my Site Question
[Hey folks, Anchor text question for internal links on my site. We all know that proper anchor text is important for rankings, both in links pointing to your site and links on your site. Google webmaster tools is showing my top internal anchor text links to be letters. This is because of navigation on the site which is in a global footer on hundreds of thousands of pages. Do you think that this dilutes or minimizes the relevance of the real anchor texts that we are targeting which trail behind these, or if this went away it would have no effect on the rest of the anchor texts on the site. How would you handle this, we can just get rid of this navigation because it's passing PR and helping the pages get spidered. Thanks in advance. Anchor text 1. g 2. q 3. d 4. v 5. k 6. t 7. o 8. u 9. a 10. p 11. m 12. r 13. e 14. x 15. y 16. l 17. i 18. z 19. c 20. j 21. s 22. b 23. f 24. h 25. w 26. n](mailto:[email protected])
On-Page Optimization | | irvingw0 -
SERP listing of a websites' 'categories'
Hi all, just wondering if anyone has thoughts on what I can do to encourage SERP listings that include website categories, eg http://www.google.com.au/search?q=seomoz&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a . I'm assuming search engines only display type of listings when the search query closely matches the domain name? Thank heaps!
On-Page Optimization | | TheWebSearchMarketingCompany0