Panda penalty removal advice
-
Hi everyone! I'm after a second (or third, or fourth!) opinion here!
I'm working on the website www.workingvoices.com that has a Panda penalty dating from the late March 2012 update. I have made a number of changes to remove potential Panda issues but haven't seen any rankings movement in the last 7 weeks and was wondering if I've missed something...
The main issues I identified and fixed were:
- Keyword stuffed near duplicate title tags - fixed with relevant unique title tags
- Copies of the website on other domains creating duplicate content issues - fixed by taking these offline
- Thin content - fixed by adding content to some pages, and noindexing other thin/tag/category pages.
Any thoughts on other areas of the site that might still be setting off the mighty Panda are appreciated!
Cheers
Damon.
-
Our site was scraped by a past empoyee who started up a competing buisness with our inside trade secrets, client list and designs. As they launched they immediately tried to put us out of buisness by:
A. hired hacks to hook us up with tons of spammy links along with a high mix of porn and virus injections sites.
B. hired hacks from the same cesspool and had them submit our images to same bad types of sites that would take the customer somewhere else
C. signed up email address to our newseltter so that when we sent out an email it would initiate a chain reaction to zombie computers and launch a DDOS attack on our site and make our own email campaigns stop sales and trash the confidence in the rest of the customers on the mailing list.
D. Gave out every know email address in our company to spammers, to the point of making it difficult to get or send emails to customers.
E. Submitted our phone number to every robot call and junk call site possible tieing up our phones and filling our voice mail."Regarding Panda timing- the site took the big hit three years ago." We to had this exact timing happen to us on top of everything else because we were too busy defending ourselves to keep up with the Google changes.
Regardless of all the horrifying past events, we have completely rebuilt the business from the inside out and migrated to a BigCommerce website from our custom site, plus added 5 social media platforms. BUT..."having to wait for Google" to reindex and give us another chance is killing us and we are concern that we may never get back in the good graces of this SE titian.
All though we have survived the battle, we still may loose the war! Even with continuing efforts to optimize our site to death and with only a fraction of the traffic, orders and income, we have to wonder:
A. What else is wrong such as trying to determine if there are duplicate content on sites out their we are unaware of.
B. Seriously considering dumping our domain (owned since 2000) and going to a new domain that would have to be reindexed and treated as fresh, hopefully optimzed content per the Google requirements, and take our chances.Input on considerations of A & B would be appreciated as we are pretty worn out after 3 years working at this.
-
In this case it was easy as they had created the duplicate domains themselves and they had control over them, so it was just a case of getting them taken down.
-
How did you find ..."opies of the website on other domains creating duplicate content issues"?
How did you ..."- fixed by taking these offline"?
We have been dealing with the same issues but did not think of the above and would like to find out if we have the same "duplicate" issues.
-
Yes, we do have Bing Webmaster Tools set up - I agree, even through Bing is limited in terms of traffic volume, Bing Webmaster Tools does give a slightly different take on things compared to Search Console.
Damon.
-
I'm also curious to know whether you've monitored Bing/Yahoo value over the course of your work. While it's rarely anywhere near Google's potential volume, I've seen good value gained from those as clients have implemented recommendations, even when Panda was a prime issue (and the subsequent panda refresh was a problem).
Overall it does sound like you're on the right track though.
-
Hello again Alan!
Agree with you 100% that this is a ongoing process. I asked the question with regards to getting the new hosting set up asap - if it wasn't going to be taken into account for the latest Panda update we would have a little more time.
As you say, having to wait for Google for almost a year to rerun Panda is really difficult for everyone (not just us). It's a really pity that we didn't pick this up earlier when Panda was running more regularly.
I've just run another crawl and we have 79x 30* redirects and 26x 40* pages, most of which are thumbnail jpgs and category pages (which are noindexed anyway). As stated above, I'll get these fixed this week.
We completed a competitor content analysis and redeveloped our main landing pages around this, and, together with our backlink profile, we think we've got a good chance of hitting the top ten SERP results - we are targeting some quite specific keywords with not particularly strong competition and have gained some excellent backlinks over the last few months.
Once again, thanks for your insight and help!
Damon.
-
Regarding 404/301 issues. The numbers I gave were for a small partial crawl of a hundred URLs. So a full Screaming Frog crawl would help to determine if it's worse. Even if its not, think of the concept where a site might have a dozen core problems, and twenty problems that by themselves might seem insignificant. At a certain point, something becomes the straw that breaks the camels back.
Regarding content - how many courses offered are actually up against competitors that have entire sections devoted to the topic just a single course page has on that site? How many have entire sites devoted to that? Understanding content depth requires understanding the scale of real and perceived competition. And if it's a course page, it may not be a "main" landing page, yet it's important in its own right.
Regarding panda timing - the site took the big hit three years ago. Waiting for, and hoping that the next update is the one that will magically reflect whatever you've done to that point isn't, in my experience, a wise perspective.
While it's true that once Google has locked a data set to then be applied to a specific algorithmic update, not taking action at a high enough level, and with enough consistency is gambling. Since true best practices marketing as a whole needs to be ongoing, efforts to strengthen on-site signals and signal relationships also needs to be ongoing. Because even if Panda weren't a factor, the competitive landscape is ever marching forward.
-
Hi Alan
Thanks for your comprehensive response - you make some very good points.
1. Host: The client is currently changing host as the current host is very entry level and we were aware that we had a problem - having said that the response times are a lot slower than when I last looked so we'll get in touch with the current host to see what they can do now.
2. 404/301 pages: Again these are on the list for the team to pick up on. I didn't actually think that there were enough to cause a problem - I can imagine if there were hundreds we might have an issue, but I would have thought 20 or so would have been OK? I'll chase to get these fixed in any case.
3. Content: I guess this is the gray area between a page not ranking due to poor page quality and a website being "algorthmically adjusted" because of poor page quality. We've worked on all our main landing pages to make them more comprehensive and from the research we have done we felt that we had done enough. We did consider noindexing the blog as well, but felt that as it was unique, while not particulary comprehensive, it shouldn't causing any Panda problems.
Quick question - is it your experience that once Panda starts running it is to late to make changes to your website? I've read that it is in a few places, but not in others places. I guess when it was running monthly it wasn't such an issue.
Once again, thank you very much for having a look - it's great to get a fresh set of eyes on the site.
Best
Damon.
-
Damon,
To start, let's be clear - Panda isn't a "penalty" - it's an algorithmic adjustment based on quality, uniqueness, relevance and trust signals.
Having audited many sites hit by the range of Panda updates, I have a pretty good understanding of what it usually takes. so having said that, I took a quick look at the site. While Andy may be correct in that you may only need to wait and hope the next or some future Panda update acknowledges the changes you've made to this point, that very well may not be enough.
1st obvious problem - your site's response times are toxic. - a crawl using Screaming Frog shows many of the pages have a response time of between 3 and 7 seconds. That's a major red flag - response times are the amount of time it takes to get to each URL. If it takes more than 2 seconds, that's typically an indicator that crawl efficiency is very weak. Crawl efficiency is a cornerstone of Panda because it reflects what is almost certainly a larger overall page processing time problem. Since Google sets a standard "ideal" page processing time of between one and three seconds, if it takes more than that just to ping the URL, the total processing time is likely going to be significantly worse.
While it's not required to always get a one to three second total process time, if too many pages are too slow across enough connection types for your visitors, that will definitely harm your site from a quality perspective.
And if too many pages have severely slow response times, Google will often abandon site crawl, which is another problem.
Next, I checked Google Page Speed Insights. Your home page scored a dismal 68 out of a possible 100 points for desktop users (85 is generally considered a good passing grade). That reinforces my concern about crawl inefficiency and poor page processing. It was even worse for mobile - scoring only 53 out of 100 points. In my second test, I got 63/100 for desktop and 49 for mobile. The different results for the two tests is due to the fact that speeds are worse at different times than others.
Just one of the issues GPSI lists is server response time (which confirms the very poor response times I saw in Screaming Frog).
Next, a partial crawl using Screaming Frog crawled 20 URLs that resulted in 404 (not found) status, which means you have internal links on your site pointing to dead ends - another quality hit. And SF found 25 internal URLs that redirect via 301 - further reinforcing crawl inefficiency. Since this was a partial crawl, those problems could be even bigger scaled across the site.
Then I poked around the site itself. http://www.workingvoices.com/courses/presentation-skills-training/keynote-speaker/ is indexed in google, as it's one of your courses. That page is possibly problematic due to the fact that there is hardly any content on that page overall. So while you may think you've dealt with thin content already, I don't think you fully grasp the need for strong, robust depth of content specific to each topic you consider important.
That's nowhere near a full audit, however the above are all examples of issues that absolutely relate to working toward a highly trusted site from Google's algorithmic perspective.
-
Hi
It looks like you have done everything correct, but you might have to wait for the next big Panda update before you start seeing any movements.
Thanks
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Remove Product & Category from URLS in Wordpress
Does anyone have experience removing /product/ and /product-category/, etc. from URLs in wordpress? I found this link from Wordpress which explains that this shouldn't be done, but I would like some opinions of those who have tried it please. https://docs.woocommerce.com/document/removing-product-product-category-or-shop-from-the-urls/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | moon-boots0 -
Manual Penalty Reconsideration Request Help
Hi All, I'm currently in the process of creating a reconsideration request for an 'Impact Links' manual penalty. So far I have downloaded all LIVE backlinks from multiple sources and audited them into groups; Domains that I'm keeping (good quality, natural links). Domains that I'm changing to No Follow (relevant good quality links that are good for the user but may be affiliated with my company, therefore changing the links to no follow rather than removing). Domains that I'm getting rid of. (poor quality sites with optimised anchor text, directories, articles sites etc.). One of my next steps is to review every historical back link to my website that is NO LONGER LIVE. To be thorough, I have planned to go through every domain (even if its no longer linking to my site) that has previously linked and straight up disavow the domain (if its poor quality).But I want to first check whether this is completely necessary for a successful reconsideration request? My concerns are that its extremely time consuming (as I'm going through the domains to avoid disavowing a good quality domain that might link back to me in future and also because the historical list is the largest list of them all!) and there is also some risk involved as some good domains might get caught in the disavowing crossfire, therefore I only really want to carry this out if its completely necessary for the success of the reconsideration request. Obviously I understand that reconsideration requests are meant to be time consuming as I'm repenting against previous SEO sin (and believe me I've already spent weeks getting to the stage I'm at right now)... But as an in house Digital Marketer with many other digital avenues to look after for my company too, I can't justify spending such a long time on something if its not 100% necessary. So overall - with a manual penalty request, would you bother sifting through domains that either don't exist anymore or no longer link to your site and disavow them for a thorough reconsideration request? Is this a necessary requirement to revoke the penalty or is Google only interested in links that are currently or recently live? All responses, thoughts and ideas are appreciated 🙂 Kind Regards Sam
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Sandicliffe0 -
Removing Blogs and 301 redirect to blog home page?
Hi, I was at the MozCon conference in Seattle this Summer and heard great concepts about deleting a lot of pages on your site that are deemed excess. It got me thinking to remove all of our old blogs that were: Sales(ee) less than 400 words Flat out bad blogs When i begin removing these links, i know i will get a lot of 404 errors because of previous social links. So in your opinion, what would you do? Do i just 301 those blogs to my main /blog page? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Shawn1240 -
Website keeps dropping in ranking with no visible penalty.
Hi everyone! I would really appreciate your help on this! The website URL is: www.gipsydharma.com It has now been over a year, but we're finding it very difficult to start ranking for any useful keywords. Some keywords like: leather boots / boots for women / handmade clothing at some point went up to page 20, but have now dropped again below page 50. Now, most of our traffic comes from social media so the business is going OK. But the question still remains, what does Google have against the above URL? Its not a super amazing website, but it provides unique and engaging content and has zero spam. I also don't think its over optimized, but I may be wrong on this. Recently, I've also noticed that the Domain Authority has also been going down, it was 46 at some point and now its 40. There's no visible penalty and all the pre-Penguin links (of which there weren't that many, I think) were cleaned up months ago, without Google suggesting that. There are very few keyword rich backlinks and a lot of them come naturally anyways. So again, any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GipsyDharma0 -
Any SEO penalties for hosting a site on a sub-domain.
Hi, A client of ours has previously been hosting their main website on a sub-domain of their primary URL. They currently have a training application being hosted on the main domain. They also currently have a redirect in place so when you go to www.xzy.com, you're redirected to xzy.xzy.com. If need need to stick with this set-up for the website relaunch later this month, my question is: are there any SEO drawbacks to having the entire site hosted on a sub-domain? Should we fight to get the training application off the main domain, at which point we can host everything on the main domain? Many thanks! Dan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ThisisPlanB0 -
Is it possible to Remove Owner History from the GWMT?
Hello, As a site owner, I've worked with several SEO firms in the past. Even though a long time has passed, they still appear in the GWMT list of admins (though inactive). I wouldn't like other companies and consultants see that in the future. Is there a way to remove them? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet0 -
Complicated Question: Removing Spam Backlinks that were Not Requested
I'm new and seeking help with the following scenario: 1. Main site: is a domain.com established authority type site 2. Second site: is a domain.org (has robots.txt to no index) but someone obviously not site owner has done negative seo campaign against the .org domain and built spammy links to it. In fact, that's all that exist on this second domain because it is used for development purposes only right now.) No one would link to this one normally as it is just secondary domain used to protect trademark and for development use.) When searching for it by domain name it does not appear on first page for search results. Checking link profile the only links that show for domain.org are spam links. Have contacted site/s where spam links were placed (no answer) Main site domain.com and domain.org have same whois and hosted on the same server as they are owned by same company Main site domain.com still appears first for its name but has lost some rankings. I am working to fix some technical issues ie: duplicate urls with CMS etc, but would like to find out what to do about the domain.org content that clearly has had someone target it with spammy non requested backlinks.) domain.com has Google webmaster tools account, no messages about unnatural liking in those reports 1. I'm not sure I should add domain.org to GWT to see if there is an unnatural link penalty applied or if this would further connect the two domains through association. If I could get some feedback/suggestions on what my options are with regards to making sure that the domain.org domain has a clean profile that would be most appreciated. Also because site owner has would like to begin using domain.org in the future for some unique content, but as it stands right now cannot because domain has been targed by poor backlinks. Anyone else run into situation where the .org or .net versions were targeted by spammy backlinks even though the domains were not actively used? What's the safest way to proceed? a) Concerned about possible co-penalty between main site domain.com and domain.org b) how to remove problems issues with domain.org so that owner can use it in future. Many thanks for your thoughts and help with this one. I appreciate any help or feedback.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | web0230 -
An Infrastructure Change for a Large eCommerce Site - Any advice?
Hello Mozers, We're currently under going quite a large infrastructure change to our website and I wouldn't to hear your thoughts on the type of things we should be careful of. We currently have close to 4,000 individual products each with their own page. The seo work is then driven behind certain pages which house a catalog display of groups of products. The groups are done by style. An example is we have a page called "Style A" which displays 8 different colours of style A. We then seo the style A page and the individual items received minimal seo work. The change would involve having one individual product page for each style but on that page the user would have the ability to purchase the different colours/variations via menus. This will result in approximately a %70 reduction in the size of our site (as several products will no longer be published) The things we are currently concerned with are: 1. The lose of equity to those unwanted 'style A' pages - I think a series of careful planned 301s will be the solution. 2. Possible loss of long tail traffic to the individual products which might not be caught by one individual page per style. 3. Internal link structure will need to be monitored to make sure that we're still highlight the most important pages as well, important. Sorry for the long post, it's a difficult change to explain without revealing the clients name - any other things we should be thinking about would be greatly appreciated! Thanks Nigel
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NigelJ0