A campaign ghost keeps returning to my Google Analytics - Help!
-
A couple of campaign tracking links were created on my homepage (leading to internal pages), these were removed a few weeks ago (100% removed from the site).
I understand there is a 6 month window and as long as a user returns (no matter from which source) they will be counted as a session against that campaign.
Since these campaign links were set-up in error, I hoped creating a fresh new view within Google Analytics would stop them appearing.
However they are still showing as sessions even in the new view (created after removing the campaign links in question).
Is there anyway to stop this happening!? I want to be able to report on sessions correctly.
Thanks,
Sam
-
Thanks Kristina,
I set-up the filter in the following way:
Filter type - Custom
Search and Replace
Filter field - Campaign nameSearch string - 'nameofmycampaignimremoving'
Replace string -
I figured by adding in the campaign name but not replacing it with anything, Google Analytics should now pick this traffic up as direct.
The campaign is no longer showing in my traffic, so I assumed it's worked.
Is there a better way of doing this?
Sam
-
Good luck!
-
Very interesting Kristina.
I think I've figured out what's going on.
Our product is a browser based CRM hosted on a secure server, so I believe someone has previously visited our site and clicked on one of the old campaigns and then is either returning directly to our /login page or is clicking on the ? buttons within our browser-based CRM which leads to our website support articles and since our browser-based CRM is on a secure server this would count as direct traffic not referral.
So as you mentioned I will set-up a filter to have these campaigns show up as direct.
Hallelujah!
Sam
-
Hi Sam,
First, to be clear, campaigns will be overwritten if visitors come from any other source, it's just direct traffic that the campaign parameter holds on to. Here's Google's direct quote from its article on campaigns and traffic sources:
Existing campaign or traffic source data for a particular user will be overwritten by new campaign or traffic source data, regardless of the configured timeout period.
If you look at the flowchart a bit below that quote, you'll see that Google starts by looking for new campaign data, then looks for traffic source data, then, if it doesn't find either of those, uses existing campaign data.
That means your theory could still be correct, but only if all of the visits you're still seeing come in are just from direct visits. You can check this theory by using the % New Sessions column - if it's 0%, you're right, these are just returning visitors, and the best I can recommend is that you set up filters to make these show up as "direct." If it's not, though, (and I'm suspecting it's not, because I doubt this would make a large enough number for you to be concerned and reach out for help), you've still got some of those campaign URLs floating around for the public.
Here's how I'd go looking for them:
- Use a third party tool like Screaming Frog or DeepCrawl to triple check that there are no internal links on your site with those old campaign parameters. CMSs can easily miss things like this, so using an outside tool that just tries to find everything helps.
- Search for the original URLs + parameters in Google to see if any affiliates or coupon sites are using those links.
- Check your old emails - did you ever send out these URLs? It's possible that people are still accessing old emails.
- Was this a campaign that could have been shared in any other way? I know that my company often shares shortened URLs, which redirect to URLs with parameters appended. Have you shared any bit.ly or other aliased URLs that are appending those parameters you've tried to get rid of?
I hope this helps! Let me know if you still have any questions, or if anything stumps you along the way.
Best,
Kristina
-
I know it's too obvious, but what about just creating a segment, filtering out that campaign traffic?
-
Thanks, bounce rate is in the early 90% so high but not 100%, exit pages also differ.
Interesting note on the tracking code.
Since if any visitor revisits (whom orginally clicked on one of the campaign links) counts as a session against the old campaign I don't think it's as complicated as people visiting through bookmarks or browser history.
Is there really nothing I can do about these old campaigns coming back ot haunt me!?
-
Hi there.
New view wouldn't help anyhow, because it's tied to the same tracking code. My guess is that either users are getting to those pages through bookmarks or browser history, or those links were indexed somehow and now you're getting hit by bots and crawlers.
Go to campaigns, see what source/medium those sessions are coming from, also check how long those sessions are and the bounce rate. If it looks like it might be crawlers - look into ghost and referral spam filtration. here is the link on how to implement - https://mza.seotoolninja.com/blog/stop-ghost-spam-in-google-analytics-with-one-filter
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does the blog widget with latest blog-posts at homepage helps in SEO?
Hi all, We are planning to add a widget at our website homepage which displays recent blog-posts with dates. Google favours new and latest content. So will these consistent new posts help in improving website ranking? Thanks
Web Design | | vtmoz0 -
My news site not showing in "In the news" list on Google Web Search
I got a news website (www.tapscape.com) which is 6 years old and has been on Google News since 2012. However, whenever I publish a news article, it never shows up "In the news" list on Google Web Search. I have already added the schema.org/NewsArticle on the website and have checked it if it's working or not on Google structured data testing tool. I see everything shows on on the structured data testing tool. The site already has a news sitemap (http://www.tapscape.com/news-sitemap.xml) and has been added to Google webmaster tools. News articles show perfectly fine in the News tab, but why isn't the articles being shown on "In the news" list on the Google web search? My site has a strong backlink background already, so I don't think I need to work on the backlinks. Please let me know what I'm doing wrong, and how can I get it to the news articles on "In the news" list. Below is a screenshot that I have attached to this question to help you understand what I mean to say. 1qoArRs
Web Design | | hakhan2010 -
Is it against google guidelines to use third party review sites as well as have reviews on my site marked up with schema?
So, i look after a site for my family business. We have teamed up with the third party site TrustPilot because we like the way it enables us to send out reviews to our customers directly from our system. It's been going great and some of the reviews have been brilliant. I have used a couple of these reviews on our site and marked them up with: REVIEW CONTENT We work in the service industry and so one of the problems we have found is that getting our customers to actually go online and leave a review. They normally just leave their comments on a job sheet that the workers have signed when they leave. So I have created a page on our site where we post some of the reviews the guys receive too. I have used the following: REVIEW TITLE REVIEW Written by: CUSTOMER NAME Type of Service:House Removal Date published: DATE PUBLISHED 10 / 10 stars I was just wondering I was told that this could be against googles guidelines and as i've seen a bit of a drop in our rankings in the last week or so i'm a little concerned. Is this getting me penalised? Should I not use my reviews referencing the ones on trust pilot and should i not have my own reviews page with rich snippets?
Web Design | | BearPaw881 -
No cache meta tags - does it help Google get back and reindex faster?
I saw these meta tags on a site and am trying to figure out their benefit. These meta tags are on the home page, product pages, every page of the site. Will it cause search engine bots to come back and index pages faster? Will it cause slower page loading in browsers if nothing is cached? http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache"/> http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache,no-store,must-revalidate"/> http-equiv="expires" content="0"/>
Web Design | | CFSSEO0 -
404 page in Windows IIS. HELP!
I run a real estate website.
Web Design | | Jeepster
My webmaster needs to create a 404 page for listings when they get deleted.
So far all he's come up with is 302-redirect to a standard "error template" page.
Can anyone suggest a 404 how-to guide I can show him?
Thanks0 -
Next Google Index..?
Hi Guys, Does anybody have an idea when the next Google index is due roughly and if there is anyway I can tell approx when these are due to happen and how would I know? Thanks In advance, Craig Fenton IT
Web Design | | craigyboy0 -
Why is this page removed from Google & Bing indices?
This page has been removed from indices at Bing and Google, and I can't figure out why. http://www.pingg.com/occasion/weddings This page used to be in those indices There are plenty of internal links to it The rest of the site is fine It's not blocked by meta robots, robots.txt or canonical URL There's nothing else to suggest that the page is being penalized
Web Design | | Ehren0 -
Do Pages That Rearrange Set Off Any Red Flags for Google?
We have a broad content site that includes crowdsourced lists of items. A lot of the pages allow voting, which causes the content on the pages (sometimes the content is up to 10 pages deep) to completely rearrange, and therefore spread out and switch pages often among the (up to 10) pages of content. Now, could this be causing any kind of duplicate content or any other kind of red flags for Google? I know that the more the page changes the better, but if it's all the same content that is being moved up and down constantly, could Google think we're pulling some kind of "making it look like we have new content" scheme and ding us for these pages? If so, what would anyone recommend we do? Let's take an example of a list of companies with bad customer service. We let the internet vote them up and down all the time, the order changes depending on the votes in real time. Is that page doomed, or does Google see it and love it?
Web Design | | BG19850