A campaign ghost keeps returning to my Google Analytics - Help!
-
A couple of campaign tracking links were created on my homepage (leading to internal pages), these were removed a few weeks ago (100% removed from the site).
I understand there is a 6 month window and as long as a user returns (no matter from which source) they will be counted as a session against that campaign.
Since these campaign links were set-up in error, I hoped creating a fresh new view within Google Analytics would stop them appearing.
However they are still showing as sessions even in the new view (created after removing the campaign links in question).
Is there anyway to stop this happening!? I want to be able to report on sessions correctly.
Thanks,
Sam
-
Thanks Kristina,
I set-up the filter in the following way:
Filter type - Custom
Search and Replace
Filter field - Campaign nameSearch string - 'nameofmycampaignimremoving'
Replace string -
I figured by adding in the campaign name but not replacing it with anything, Google Analytics should now pick this traffic up as direct.
The campaign is no longer showing in my traffic, so I assumed it's worked.
Is there a better way of doing this?
Sam
-
Good luck!
-
Very interesting Kristina.
I think I've figured out what's going on.
Our product is a browser based CRM hosted on a secure server, so I believe someone has previously visited our site and clicked on one of the old campaigns and then is either returning directly to our /login page or is clicking on the ? buttons within our browser-based CRM which leads to our website support articles and since our browser-based CRM is on a secure server this would count as direct traffic not referral.
So as you mentioned I will set-up a filter to have these campaigns show up as direct.
Hallelujah!
Sam
-
Hi Sam,
First, to be clear, campaigns will be overwritten if visitors come from any other source, it's just direct traffic that the campaign parameter holds on to. Here's Google's direct quote from its article on campaigns and traffic sources:
Existing campaign or traffic source data for a particular user will be overwritten by new campaign or traffic source data, regardless of the configured timeout period.
If you look at the flowchart a bit below that quote, you'll see that Google starts by looking for new campaign data, then looks for traffic source data, then, if it doesn't find either of those, uses existing campaign data.
That means your theory could still be correct, but only if all of the visits you're still seeing come in are just from direct visits. You can check this theory by using the % New Sessions column - if it's 0%, you're right, these are just returning visitors, and the best I can recommend is that you set up filters to make these show up as "direct." If it's not, though, (and I'm suspecting it's not, because I doubt this would make a large enough number for you to be concerned and reach out for help), you've still got some of those campaign URLs floating around for the public.
Here's how I'd go looking for them:
- Use a third party tool like Screaming Frog or DeepCrawl to triple check that there are no internal links on your site with those old campaign parameters. CMSs can easily miss things like this, so using an outside tool that just tries to find everything helps.
- Search for the original URLs + parameters in Google to see if any affiliates or coupon sites are using those links.
- Check your old emails - did you ever send out these URLs? It's possible that people are still accessing old emails.
- Was this a campaign that could have been shared in any other way? I know that my company often shares shortened URLs, which redirect to URLs with parameters appended. Have you shared any bit.ly or other aliased URLs that are appending those parameters you've tried to get rid of?
I hope this helps! Let me know if you still have any questions, or if anything stumps you along the way.
Best,
Kristina
-
I know it's too obvious, but what about just creating a segment, filtering out that campaign traffic?
-
Thanks, bounce rate is in the early 90% so high but not 100%, exit pages also differ.
Interesting note on the tracking code.
Since if any visitor revisits (whom orginally clicked on one of the campaign links) counts as a session against the old campaign I don't think it's as complicated as people visiting through bookmarks or browser history.
Is there really nothing I can do about these old campaigns coming back ot haunt me!?
-
Hi there.
New view wouldn't help anyhow, because it's tied to the same tracking code. My guess is that either users are getting to those pages through bookmarks or browser history, or those links were indexed somehow and now you're getting hit by bots and crawlers.
Go to campaigns, see what source/medium those sessions are coming from, also check how long those sessions are and the bounce rate. If it looks like it might be crawlers - look into ghost and referral spam filtration. here is the link on how to implement - https://mza.seotoolninja.com/blog/stop-ghost-spam-in-google-analytics-with-one-filter
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When rel canonical tag used, which page does Google considers for ranking and indexing? A/B test scenario!
Hi Moz community, We have redesigned our website and launched for A/B testing using canonical tags from old website to new website pages, so there will be no duplicate content issues and new website will be shown to the half of the website visitors successfully to calculate the metrics. However I wonder how actually Google considers it? Which pages Google will crawl and index to consider for ranking? Please share your views on this for better optimisation. Thanks
Web Design | | vtmoz0 -
Google Indexing Multi-Store Best Practice
Hi Guys, We currently have a main store view and a uk store view setup with a Litespeed Redirect for our website, redirecting UK IP Customers to the UK Store. We recently noticed that we were running into some issues with Google indexing pages from the uk site as well as the main store view. With trying to avoid duplicate content, my question being: What is the best practice for google indexing the UK and Main store views? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Web Design | | centurysafety0 -
Does interlinking on mobile site helps in seo & improvement in rankings
Hi, Does interlinking on mobile site helps in seo & improvement in rankings. Our desktop site & mobile site has same urls. Regards
Web Design | | vivekrathore0 -
Hi, I have a doubt. If we want to hide unwanted text in a web page its possible with "" tag. And my question "does a search engine crawl those text? help me.
I want to hide a lot of text behind my site page. I know its possible with that tag. But in what way a search engine looks at those text? Hidden or they are crawled and indexed.
Web Design | | FhyzicsBCPL0 -
Help with redirects
Our travel company used to maintain a set of country destination guides on our site, under the www.oursite.com/destinations/country folder path. Because we offer tours all over the world, we used these pages as high-level guides to each country so a prospect could get a sense of the highlights of those destinations. These pages operated as landing pages too. Unfortunately the pages became stale and unfocused, and we decommissioned them. In order to bring them down, we put a 301 redirect on these URLs, pointing them to a faceted-search page that showed all of our tours to that country, with URLs: www.oursite.com/trips/country. These faceted-search pages were pulling double duty as both search pages and landing pages, which isn't ideal (from a users perspective). We are now in the process of redoing our search function and we'll need to move the search URLs off /trips/ and onto /search/. Within this transition, we are going to re-launch destination guides, and I think the best place for them will be back on the old /destinations/ subfolder. So, a few moving parts here. My question: Do you see problems with reversing the redirect path completely? Ie. where we currently redirect /destinations/country to /trips/country, we are now proposing to redirect /trips/country to /destinations/country. Our concern in this equation is that, over the last few years, we've built up significant link volumes and equity to the /trips/ pages, and we don't want to lose that.
Web Design | | Adventures0 -
From Google Sites to Wordpress - Anyone Ventured this SEO terrain?
We have a few sites in Google Sites - and they are ugly! We have a majority (40+) of websites in Wordpress. But we have a few websites just stuck on Google Sites, and since Google won't let you fully edit the HTML, add scripts, or implement any technology since 2000, we want to move. The sad problem - the Google sites are ranking well. We rank well in Manhattan, Atlanta, Dallas, and Philadelphia. The problem is - the sites do not give much room for growth - and the bounce rate is high because they are so ugly. Has Anyone moved from Google sites to Wordpress? Should we just stay with Google and bite the ugly bullet? My fear is that these sites will not allow for growth. It is hard to update them and even harder to make them look nice. To get a sample - beware: www.counselingphiladelphia.com Even another reason to leave: The slider is non-semantic and terrible SEO. Google won't allow a slider script with tags and a hrefs, so the only way to implement a slider is through a Google Docs Presentation that keeps sliding. I know - terrible SEO (#donthate) but we needed something. Any advice and thoughts would help! Thanks Mozzers!
Web Design | | _Thriveworks0 -
Google changed the title?
I've been reading that Google will sometimes change the home page title, and I have finally seen this in action. Search for and on the second page you'll find but the title says Academy Dog Training. Which is not what's in the title tag for this page. Did Google change the title tag on us and if so why? How can we get them to use our title?
Web Design | | CFSSEO0 -
Google also indexed trailing slash version - PLEASE HELP
Hi Guys, We redesigned the website and somehow our canonical extension decided to add a trailing slash to all URLs. Previously our canonical URLs didn't have a trailing slash. During the redesign we haven't changed the URLs. They remained same but we have now two versions indexed. One with trailing slash one without. I've now fixed the issue and removed the the trailing slash from canonical URLs. Is this the correct way of fixing it? Will our rankings be effected in a negative way? Is there anything else I need to do. The website went live last Tuesday. Thanks
Web Design | | Jvalops0