URL Link Counts
-
Hi
Can someone clarify what the URL link counts in the SERP report means? Is this total internal links on this page?
My followed internal links are very high compared with sites I am comparing against, some sites only have 1 internal followed link - is this possible? Have they simply no followed all the rest on that page?
-
Hey Becky
I recommend looking at the metrics directly in OSE to get a side-by-side comparison
You will find a breakdown of the page, sub-domain, and entire root domain metrics at this link.
Hope this helps!
-
Thanks, I'm just confused as we have showing 3.4K and everyone else has 1 - 12?
just seems like a really inconsistent number - or we are way out for something?
This is the page I am looking at http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/sack-trucks
-
And yes, it would be rather odd for a website to have only one internal followed link. It is possible that something funky with their CMS has all links no-followed, but even then.
-
Hi Becky,
So first it is important to note that the Moz Link Index (MozScape I think it's called?) is not a complete picture of all the links on the internet. So if you see a website ranking better than yours, but you have better links according to Moz, try checking a tool like Ahrefs.com as a "second opinion" on what links each site has. Sometimes the best ranked sites only have a handful of links, but they're incredibly focused links from valued sites in that industry.
A great example of that is Moz itself, none of my local competitors have written content for Moz over the years, so even if they have some really good links, or even more links, the few links I have earned by having YouMoz content promoted to the main blog (and just the YouMoz content itself) have given me some very specific valuable links from Moz, arguably the most authoritative website on SEO that exists. So that one link is just worth a ton in Google's eyes, vs. my competitors who haven't earned that link themselves (even though they could, probably easily, but don't tell them that).
When you're asking about internal links vs. total URL links, unless it specifically says "internal" links or "external" links it probably means all links. Internal links (just covering all the bases) are links inside your website to other pages inside your website, ie a link from your "homepage" to your "about us" page. That is a sitewide link internal to your website that is probably in the menu of every page. Only links that are internal would be counted that way, and it's a safe bet that the Moz tool has found 100% of the internal links on your site.
Now external links - again the Moz tool may or may not have found all the links on the entire internet that point to your site and your competitors sites - but those are links from when another website links to your website, from one domain to your domain. So when we're evaluating value in a link report, we're saying "Okay this guy has 50,000 links and I have 12 it's probably going to be impossible to compete with him for these primary keywords".
Alternatively, you may say "I have 500 links and this guy has 3 and he's kicking my ass, what gives?!" That comes back to the fact that not all links are created equal, again similar to how my competitors might have more links than me, but I just have better links. I've done guest posts, I've been interviewed about SEO, we monitor HARO religiously for anything SEO or marketing related, etc. Our links are few (because we rarely focus on our own stuff) but they're of such a high quality that they make up for the lack of volume (in many cases).
Now saying all this - and forgive me if I said anything you already knew, I just wanted to be sure I covered the basics before moving on just in case - your question is ultimately "Can I trust the SERP Report as a means to show me how my stats rate vs. the sites I am trying to beat on Google?"
I'll go un-vague and just say... No. You can't. You shouldn't rely heavily on that tool as a means of generating a "To-Do" list for your website in order to help you rank. Link metrics are incredibly important, arguably worth more than anything you can do to your actual website (outside of creating outstanding shareable content) but at the same time not all links are created equally, so if you are using the SERP tool and saying "I have better numbers than person in Rank #1, I should be doing better than them" you are going to wind up pulling your hair out.
There are hundreds and hundreds of factors that go into Google's algorithm, maybe less broad there are dozens of factors that we generally look at from a "low hanging fruit" perspective on what we should change to improve our rankings.
I always run the on-page Grader tool from Moz when I am comparing pages, to see if there are any obvious keyword problems or if the Title tag is lacking in focus. The Title tag is incredibly important. One of the biggest resources that Moz creates is their Search Ranking Factors report, so if you wanted to review your website vs. that report, you might find some items where you know you are lacking and then that gives you an idea of what should be on your ToDo list.
The SERP Report isn't going to be a good gauge of like... if I go from 50 to 150 links I will beat competitor X, because that assumption is based on all links being equal, which they are not. Google cares about the age of links, the authority of the linking site, the relevance of the content, the social shares of the content, etc, etc. Everything has a footprint online so the bigger the footprint the more noise it looks like it's making the better it is assumed to be.
This is probably way more of an answer than you wanted, but there you go. I recommend you dive into the Search Ranking Factors report from 2015 and see if anything there pops up as severely lacking on your site, and see if you can target those items to make a big difference. Just keep in mind, even that report is based on the opinions of hundreds of SEOs so while it is really good, it is not a guarantee'd roadmap for ranking well - there are few guarantees in search.
Moz's 2015 Search Ranking Report - https://mza.seotoolninja.com/search-ranking-factors
Hope this helped!
-
Links is "All links to this page including internal, external, followed, and nofollowed".
It's same number as if drop this URL into OSE where it's count as "Total Links" -
Don't know really what you mean... Did you mean the SERP overlay? In that case: total/all external links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why are Internal, nofollowed links good for Domain Authority?
I always thought that internal links should be 'followed' to preserve link-juice.
Moz Bar | | BottleGreenWebsites
I've just been checking my Domain Authority Links overview, and the competitor with the most no-follow internal links has been rewarded with a higher Moz DA score.
Can anyone explain why this would be the case? JRJ4Dwn1 -
URL is Inaccesible
Hi, I have tried this url: https://www.3dquickprinting.com/ on Moz onpage grader but it responds "Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible." I have checked my Robots.txt but it does not have any entry to block MOZ crawler. Please see: #User-Agent: *
Moz Bar | | HiteshP
#Crawl-Delay: 30 #For robots.txt
User-agent: BLEXBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: MJ12bot
Disallow: /
User-agent: TwengaBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: 008
Disallow: /
User-agent: WotBox
Disallow: / Please advice what to do get rid from this error. Thanks,0 -
Why do i get multiple variations of my url with ?order=asc and ?view=list at the end of it in my crawl report?
I just did a crawl for one my clients to validate any error in the structure. Next thing I know is that the website have multiple variation of the same url with query like ?order=asc and ?view=list at the end of it. I am wondering why these url variations appears in the crawl I just did since bots aren't suppose to go further thant the ? normally. Just to show you a couple of url's of my crawl test. <colgroup><col width="484"></colgroup>
Moz Bar | | alexrbrg
| https://test.com/exemple/?per_page=9 |
| https://test.com/exemple/?per_page=15 |
| https://test.com/exemple/?per_page=30 |
| https://test.com/exemple/?orderby=popularity |
| https://test.com/exemple/?orderby=date |
| https://test.com/exemple/?orderby=price |
| https://test.com/exemple/?orderby=price-desc |
| https://test.com/exemple/?order=asc |
| https://test.com/exemple/?order=desc |
| https://test.com/exemple/?view=list | Thank you Guys0 -
Unusual "internal links" causing SEO issues?
Hi all, I'm working on an ecommerce site which has been around for almost 20 years. Over the years it has started to suffer in Google's search results and the decision was recently made to completely overhaul the site. We're now very happy with the website's design, and care was taken to maintain page rank via 301s, etc. However, the site has just fallen off the bottom of Google's first search result page (for the first time in years) for our main keyword. I signed up here in the hope of using Moz's SEO tools to help us return to our former glory, but I'm seeing some confusing results: I've run a crawl test on our site, as well as on our two biggest competitors. One thing that really stood out was that we have over 1000 "internal links" to our homepage, whereas our competitors both have around 20-30 (both of which appear at the top of the first SR page). Since the rest of the "on-page SEO" looks OK, I suspect that this could be causing our problems, but I don't understand where this "internal links" number is coming from. Links to our competitor's homepage appear in the navigation bar on every single one of their product pages (which they have about 500 of), yet your report only claims that they have 30 links. The only link to the homepage appears in the site's main navigation bar (which obviously appears on every product page - exactly as it does on our competitors' sites). Additionally, almost every other page on our site apparently has 0 "internal links" and 0 page authority. Is this a problem with Moz's crawl test tool, or is our site actually at fault? The above has been asked directly to Moz staff, but I haven't had a reply. I'd hugely appreciate any words of wisdom from the community. Many thanks in advance. Nick
Moz Bar | | nick45010 -
How to find and reduce more of 100 internal links on Prestashop
hi, i'm working on a site endrena.com who has more of 466 links, but i don't know what they are, i know only the links from menu and subcategories but they are not 466. the moz onpage grader say me the category receive a A grade and it don't say me any advice like more link but if i use the rankranger onpage it found more of 466 links! Can you help me to find all this links? 166m3gz.png
Moz Bar | | seopalermo0 -
Why can't On-Page Grader grade any Hilton hotel URLs?
I'm receiving the "Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible." for every hilton hotel webpage I check when using On-Page Grader. Is Hilton blocking Moz's On-Page Grader or is something else going on? Here are a few "inaccessible URLs" from different brands within Hilton's portfolio: http://doubletree3.hilton.com/en/hotels/new-york/doubletree-by-hilton-hotel-metropolitan-new-york-city-NYCDTDT/index.html http://home2suites3.hilton.com/en/hotels/tennessee/home2-suites-by-hilton-nashville-vanderbilt-tn-BNAHTHT/index.html http://hamptoninn3.hilton.com/en/hotels/florida/hampton-inn-and-suites-destin-DSINEHX/index.html http://hiltongardeninn3.hilton.com/en/hotels/georgia/hilton-garden-inn-atlanta-downtown-ATLDOGI/index.html Thanks in advance.
Moz Bar | | Just-Me0 -
How to find all 301 redirect for URL xyz.com/products (internal and external)?
This is what we are thinking: Get all URL of the xyz.com/products using XENU software. Search those URL on google (site;xyz.com url ) to find out if they are crawled by google, do the same on bing (as currently google shows 4k URL and bing 11k ) Use opensiteexplorer (301 redirect ) and using (internal external) to get the desired result. Is this the right approach? If not, what is the best way to find the correct result? All suggestions are welcome.
Moz Bar | | tpt.com0 -
Ajax #! URL support?
Hi Moz, My site is currently following the convention outlined here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/174992?hl=en Basically since pages are generated via Ajax we are setup to direct bots that replace the #! in a url with ?escaped_fragment to cached versions of the ajax generated content. For example, if the bot sees this url: http://www.discoverymap.com/#!/California/Map-of-Carmel/73 it will replace it will instead access the page: http://www.discoverymap.com/?escaped_fragment=/California/Map-of-Carmel/73 In which case my server serves the cached html instead of the live page. This is all per Googles direction and is indexing fine. However the MOZ bot does not do this. It seems like a fairly straight-forward feature to support. Rather than ignoring the hash, you look to see if it is a #! and then try to spider the url replaced with ?escaped_fragment. Our server does the rest. If this is something MOZ plans on supporting in the future I would love to know. If there is other information that would be great. Also, pushstate is not practical for everyone due to limited browser support, etc. Thanks, Dustin Updates: I am editing my question because it won't let me respond to my own question. It says I need to sign up for MOZ analytics. I was signed up for Moz Analytics?! Now I am not? I responded to my invitation weeks ago? Anyway, you are misunderstanding how this process works. There is no site-map involved. The bot reads this URL on the page: http://www.discoverymap.com/#!/California/Map-of-Carmel/73 And when it is ready to spider the page for content it, it spider's this URL instead: http://www.discoverymap.com/?escaped_fragment=/California/Map-of-Carmel/73 The server does the rest, it is simply telling Roger to recognize the #! format and replace it with ?escaped_fragment Though I obviously do not know how Roger is coded but it is a simple string replacement. Thanks.
Moz Bar | | oneactlife0