Drop in keyword rankings with a multi-region website
-
Hi everyone,
I know that variations if this question have been asked on this forum and have been answered by Google also.
Google's response seems to be clear that "Websites that provide content for different regions and in different languages sometimes create content that is the same or similar but available on different URLs. This is generally not a problem as long as the content is for different users in different countries."
This was our approach when launching a new .co.nz website recently to coincide with us opening a new office in Auckland. Our original site is still our .com.au site. We went with a new domain name over a sub directory or sub domain for the reasons in the same Google article.
After launching the NZ site in February and steadily growing some rankings, we've noticed in the last week or so a drastic drop in our keyword rankings (and traffic) for no apparent reason. There are no apparent issues in Search Console or with the Moz Site Crawl, so I'm wondering what's going on? I know rankings can fluctuate widely, especially when you're not on page 1 (which we're not) but the sudden and drastic drop did concern me.
Currently, our AUS site's content is basically being replicated on the NZ site (e.g. blog posts, about us, company history, etc.).
I just wanted to bounce it off you all to see whether you think it could be the "duplicate content" on the NZ site, or could it be something else?
I'd really appreciate your input!
Cheers,
Nathan
-
Ah, all very helpful, thanks!
Some interesting bits to pull apart here, I think:
-
hreflang tagging is unlikely to improve your rankings for any given language/territory/page/keyword; rather, it's more likely to prevent the wrong content from showing up in the wrong territory. Make sense?
-
I'd try to manage expectations around "restoring" rankings. What if your performance dropped because of strong competitor activity, changing consumer behaviour, or other factors? Whilst your international setup is part of that picture, the reality is much more complex. I'd try to shift the conversation away from working out ways to / waiting for your rankings to "restore" from a magic bullet fix, and start talking about the many strategies and tactics you might deploy to improve rankings gradually moving forwards.
-
I'd be _really _nervous of outsourced link building. If you're handing money to a third party to get you links, you're only a small amounts of semantics away from buying links outright. What are the doing, exactly? Are you producing exceptionally high quality, useful information and resources, which they're helping to shine a spotlight on - or are you paying them a fee for them to magically acquire links? It feels like, of all the possible risks and causes of your problems, this is the area I'd want to scrutinise the most; and in the meantime, start looking into ways in which your pages can earn links without having to pay a mysterious third party!
-
-
Hey there!
No worries, thought you'd just missed it or something.
OK so I've added the correct hreflang en-AU and en-NZ values to both the .co.nz and .com.au pages.
I've also gone into Google Search Console and confirmed that the .co.nz was targeting New Zealand which it is. I've also gone into Crawl and done a 'Fetch as Google' for the home page and blog page of .co.nz plus 'linked pages.' There are no hreflang errors.
I've also checked all pages on both sites and all correctly have the 'rel=canonical' tag.
Re the blog posts, at this stage we don't have the resources to write different content for each site. We're happy to keep writing the blog posts for the .com.au site and duplicating it for the .co.nz site AS LONG as our SEO isn't being negatively impacted. Our clients/markets/services are very similar — almost identical and just differ in location (i.e. Australia vs New Zealand).
The above was completed about 4 weeks ago now and we still haven't seen an increase in rankings for the .co.nz site (or back to where we were) — only for a couple of keywords that we're actually not targeting.
Just a couple of questions:
1. How long does it usually take for the hreflang tag to kick in and restore rankings?
2. How long does it take to actually get some keyword rankings for the new .co.nz site, considering that our .com.au site is performing reasonably well (although it is 5+ years older)?
3. Is there anything I'm missing here that I could do? Should I be really worried that the .co.nz site isn't ranking for our top 10 targeted keywords since launching the site back in February (6 months ago) or is it normal to break the '51+' ranking for at least some of the keywords. Sorry, a difficult question I know. In addition to Moz, I'm also tracking rankings on Ahrefs.
4. I'm outsourcing some of the link building, but I'm monitoring it closely. Could that be a reason for a drop in rankings also?
I know some of the above is a little hard to answer, but I'd really appreciate your help!
-
Yikes, sorry, I didn't see your responses. Sorry for the delayed response!
Your understanding is correct. It doesn't matter whether the content is duplicated within a single domain, across multiple domains, or multiple subdomains - if it's duplicate but targeting different languages and/or territories, then you need to use hreflang tags to manage that. If the pages are the same in all but phone number (where the phone number is targeting a different territory), that's exactly the kind of situation where you should be using hreflang tags.
Separately, all pages should use canonical tags which reference the correct version of themselves (note, not the alternate/hreflang equivalent), as way of declaring that they're the correct version of that localised page. The hreflang tags take care of the relationship between the multilingual versions without the need to try and do anything clever with pointing canonical references between them.
The blog question is more complex. Are your audiences/products/services different enough in those markets to warrant a distinct content strategy? Does that make sense, strategically?
If the content is different, then you don't want hreflang tags on those individual pages, because you've no equivalent resource/page to reference. Challenging!
So, in a nutshell:
Use hreflang tags everywhere where you've very-similar/duplicate pages which only differ in terms of which territory they serve - regardless of which domain they're on.
Use canonical tags on all pages/templates, to reference the correct version of that page/template - but this shouldn't try and do anything clever in terms of its relationship with the hreflang tags.
Where content isn't the same between multiple sites/pages, don't use hreflang tags (but do still use canonical tags).
Make sense?
-
Also, would you recommend that I rel=canonical in addition to the hreflang tag for any pages on the .co.nz site that are similar (or identical) to the .com.au site — including the .com.nz home page? For example the home pages of both sites are almost identical except for the ccTLD and a phone number...
Just thinking if I do that, the .co.nz site will only rank for a few pages which are unique to itself (e.g. location page about the Auckland office which isn't on the .com.au site).
At present, all of the "product" pages are pretty much identical as are the "blog" posts.
Speaking of blog content, is it also ideal to write "different" blog content for the .co.nz site and the .com.au site going forward to avoid the hrefland and rel=canonical issues?
Sorry lots of questions I know!
-
Sorry for the delay!
OK I'll give that a go! Although everything I've read/watched from Google and others, seems a little unclear if it is required for a standalone .com.au (Aus) and a .co.nz (New Zealand) ccTLD — more for either sub domains or sub directories of the same domain.
Assuming that without the hreflang, Google views the content as duplicate content and that's the reason for the drop in rankings? Or is it something else?
Yes both sites are correctly targeted in Google Search Console.
Just need to figure out now the best way to do the hreflang now!
Cheers.
-
Ah, I definitely suspect that our candidate here is the hreflang tagging.
The use-case definitely extends to the same content/language targeting multiple different countries, and it's implemented in exactly the same way. For each page/URL, you'll need to point to the equivalent page on the other site (either via tags or in the XML sitemap).
You'll want each page to have an _en-_au and _en-_zn value.
I'd double-check that you're targeting the right regions for each site in Search Console, too.
I'd be very surprised if that doesn't fix everything pretty much overnight!
-
Hey Jono!
Thanks so much for your time and effort here. Really appreciated! Responses below.
- Are you using hreflang tagging between the sites/content; and if so, are you confident that this is correctly configured and maintained? No as I thought that was only required for sites for different languages. Both of our AUS and NZ sites are english. Maybe I've missed something here...
- How much is your content localised to the market in question - or is it just copied without variation? There is some localisation, more around the specific locations where we operate but the overall service offering and our blog posts are pretty much identical. The majority of pages are the same across both sites (e.g. About Us, Our Services, Testimonials, Blog) but there are a few pages which specifically describe each of our locations.
- Does your product/service/price/proposition or availability vary by location? They do slightly but overall the service is very similar. For example, we offer conference venues, meeting rooms and function rooms with a consistent service and pricing, but each location differs slightly in terms of where it's situated, its benefits and the services it offers specifically.
- How much does the competition vary by territory; who's beating you, and what are they doing differently? For AUS, most of the competition is made up of hotels and multi-listing sites plus some of our direct competitors who also specialise in conference venues, meeting rooms and function rooms but aren't hotels. Our main competitors have been around for a few years longer than us. Our NZ site only launched in February so early days.
- Has performance dropped on both sites, or just one? And are there particular pages or keywords which have suffered? No, our AUS site is performing well and increasing in ranking gradually. However, the NZ site dropped dramatically in 1 week and never made it back. Our highest spots were 24/28/29 and in that week, they dropped back to 51+. All pages/keywords were affected.
If you could probe these areas a little, we might be able to steer towards a better understanding of what's going on. So appreciated.
-
Hello!
Could I ask a few questions to help me understand the broader context?
- Are you using hreflang tagging between the sites/content; and if so, are you confident that this is correctly configured and maintained?
- How much is your content localised to the market in question - or is it just copied without variation?
- Does your product/service/price/proposition or availability vary by location?
- How much does the competition vary by territory; who's beating you, and what are they doing differently?
- Has performance dropped on both sites, or just one? And are there particular pages or keywords which have suffered?
If you could probe these areas a little, we might be able to steer towards a better understanding of what's going on.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keywords and stop words
Hello, I'm trying to rank my page for this keyword: "Rehab Royal Oak Michigan" But when you use that in a sentence, it just doesn't work. To make it grammatically correct I need to use "Rehab in Royal Oak Michigan" But now i'm using a stop word and i'm not sure if this counts it as a synonym or not - can someone help? Thanks!!
Technical SEO | | Michael_Myles_Himself0 -
How to rank 1 page for multiple keywords in the new way
Hi There It has been a little while since I was involved with KW's in earnest. 1.5 years ago and beyond I did really well with SEO. I'm not in a hugely competitive market but we found our keywords, we wrote great web pages for 1,2,3 keywords and when we found more great keywords that we built a new page to rank for. For example: One big hitting keyword was "Rugged PDA", we created a category page for Rugged PDA's. Another was "Rugged Handheld" so we had a new page for that. We then long tailed "semi rugged PDA", "waterproof rugged PDA" etc etc and built sub category pages. We were legit, did lots of content marketing, ran a blog tweeted etc and we did really well to be honest. However these days it's not working, One of Rand's whiteboard sessions stated that you need to build bigger topic based pages that delivered on more keywords (The one about shoes!). This is great as we love that idea as we can have 1 big category page that offers great value to the visitor, however I am struggling to work out how we target a bigger list of keywords to the one page or to fewer pages. To underline this the MOZ page rankers also still seem to work in the same way where they expect 1 or 2 KW's per page to get A ranks to them, so I'm confused!! For example Rugged PDA is an old term, Google trends is showing that it's glory days are over and we know that the term "Rugged Smartphone" is the one to use as we all use smartphones not PDAs these days. However we also see a lot about Rugged + Phone, Mobile, Cell, Handheld, tablet, device, phablet... all relevant to one big category page. So I run these KW's through google search to see if the same pages come up as a test to see if Google thinks they all mean the same, I get a few, but not much overlap. How do we therefore have 1 page that talks about all kinds of great stuff about the "Rugged smartphone" but one that also targets rugged handheld, rugged android device etc etc? I've spent 2 days catching up, i'm none the wiser on this specific element but i'm sure I am just missing one key element of common sense here and any help is very much appreciated. Regards Dave
Technical SEO | | Raptor-crew0 -
My seo company has a footer link that links to my site by keyword will this effect my rankings
My old SEo company has a footer link by keyword to my site so it acts like a site wide link will this effect my rankings. My site was in the top 5 for many keywords now page 2 and 3 so I am trying to see what has effected it as we havent changed what we do
Technical SEO | | Casefun0 -
When will seomoz rank my website?
Hi all, I am really excited to be here. I joined seo moz three weeks ago. Seo moz crawled my website twice and still under competitive domain analysis my domain authority is 1 and everything else underneath is zero. I fixed some errors and warning after first crawl but still nothing in root domain metrics. Can anyone please explain whats happening? Thank you!
Technical SEO | | proaspirant0 -
Local Keywords Not Ranking Well in a Geographic Location (but Rank Very Well Outside of Geographic Location)
Has anyone experienced, in the last few months, an issue where a website that once ranked well for 'local' terms in Google stopped ranking well for those terms (but saw a ranking decrease only within the geographic location contained within those keywords)? For example only, some 'root' keywords could be: Chicago dentist Chicago dentists dentist Chicago dentists Chicago What happens is that when a searcher searches from within the geographic area of Chicago, IL, the target website no longer ranks on the 1st page for these types of keyword phrases, but they used to rank in the top 3 perhaps. However, if someone was to search for the same keyword phrases from another city outside of Chicago or set a custom location (such as Illinois or even Milwaukee, WI perhaps) in their Google search, the target website appears to have normal (high) 1st page rankings for these types of terms. My own theory: At first I thought it was a Penguin related issue but the client's rankings overall haven't appeared to have been affected on the date(s) of Penguin updates. Authority Labs and Raven Tools (which uses Authority Labs data) did not detect any ranking decrease and still reports all the local keyword rankings as high on the 1st page of Google. However, when the client themselves goes to check their own rankings (as they are within that affected geographic area), they are no where to be found on the 1st page. :S After some digging I found that (one of) the company's Google Places listings (the main office listing) became an 'unsupported' status in Google Maps. So now I am thinking that this phenomenon is due to the fact that other listings are now appearing in search results for the same location. For example, in this case, an individual dentist's Google Places listing (who works within the dental office) is being displayed instead of the actual dental office's listing. Also, the dentist's name on the Google Places listing is being swapped out by Google with the name of the dental office, but if you click through to the Google Places listing, it shows the name of the individual Dentist. Anyone encounter a similar issue or have any other theories besides the Google Places issue?
Technical SEO | | OrionGroup0 -
Keyword and URL
I have a client who has a popular name (like 'Joe Smith'). His blog URL has only his first name and the name of his company in it, like joe.company.com. His blog doesn't rank well at all in the first 3-4 Google SERPs. I was thinking of advising him to change the URL of his blog to joesmith.company.com, and having his webmaster do 301 redirects from the old URL to the new one. Do you think this is a good strategy, or would you recommend something else? I realize ranking isn't just about the URL, it's about links, etc. But I think making his URL more specific to his name could help. Any advice greatly appreciated! Jim
Technical SEO | | JamesAMartin0 -
Subdomain and Domain Rankings
I have read here that domain names with keywords might add a boost to your search rank For instance using a completely inane example monkey-fights.com might get a boost compared to mfl.com (monkey fighting league) when searching for "monkey fights" There seems to be a hot debate as to how much bonus the first domain might get over the second, but leaving that aside for the moment. Question 1. Would monkey-fights.mfl.com get the same kind of bonus as a root domain bonus? Question 2. If the answer to 1 above was yes would a 301 redirect from the suddomain URL to root domain URL retain that bonus I was just thinking on how hard it is to get root domains these days that are not either being squatted on etc. and if this might be a way to get the same bonus, or maybe subdomains are less bonus prone and so it would be a waste of time Thanks
Technical SEO | | bThere0 -
Keyword stuffing
I'm working on this page at the moment - http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/berghaus-bid6.html. The keyword we're going for is, unsurprisingly, 'Berghaus'. The SEOmoz on page report has flagged up a possible issue with keyword stuffing as the term is mention around 25 times. Is it worth altering this, which could be quite tricky as a lot of the page is dynamically generated? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | neooptic0