Drop in keyword rankings with a multi-region website
-
Hi everyone,
I know that variations if this question have been asked on this forum and have been answered by Google also.
Google's response seems to be clear that "Websites that provide content for different regions and in different languages sometimes create content that is the same or similar but available on different URLs. This is generally not a problem as long as the content is for different users in different countries."
This was our approach when launching a new .co.nz website recently to coincide with us opening a new office in Auckland. Our original site is still our .com.au site. We went with a new domain name over a sub directory or sub domain for the reasons in the same Google article.
After launching the NZ site in February and steadily growing some rankings, we've noticed in the last week or so a drastic drop in our keyword rankings (and traffic) for no apparent reason. There are no apparent issues in Search Console or with the Moz Site Crawl, so I'm wondering what's going on? I know rankings can fluctuate widely, especially when you're not on page 1 (which we're not) but the sudden and drastic drop did concern me.
Currently, our AUS site's content is basically being replicated on the NZ site (e.g. blog posts, about us, company history, etc.).
I just wanted to bounce it off you all to see whether you think it could be the "duplicate content" on the NZ site, or could it be something else?
I'd really appreciate your input!
Cheers,
Nathan
-
Ah, all very helpful, thanks!
Some interesting bits to pull apart here, I think:
-
hreflang tagging is unlikely to improve your rankings for any given language/territory/page/keyword; rather, it's more likely to prevent the wrong content from showing up in the wrong territory. Make sense?
-
I'd try to manage expectations around "restoring" rankings. What if your performance dropped because of strong competitor activity, changing consumer behaviour, or other factors? Whilst your international setup is part of that picture, the reality is much more complex. I'd try to shift the conversation away from working out ways to / waiting for your rankings to "restore" from a magic bullet fix, and start talking about the many strategies and tactics you might deploy to improve rankings gradually moving forwards.
-
I'd be _really _nervous of outsourced link building. If you're handing money to a third party to get you links, you're only a small amounts of semantics away from buying links outright. What are the doing, exactly? Are you producing exceptionally high quality, useful information and resources, which they're helping to shine a spotlight on - or are you paying them a fee for them to magically acquire links? It feels like, of all the possible risks and causes of your problems, this is the area I'd want to scrutinise the most; and in the meantime, start looking into ways in which your pages can earn links without having to pay a mysterious third party!
-
-
Hey there!
No worries, thought you'd just missed it or something.
OK so I've added the correct hreflang en-AU and en-NZ values to both the .co.nz and .com.au pages.
I've also gone into Google Search Console and confirmed that the .co.nz was targeting New Zealand which it is. I've also gone into Crawl and done a 'Fetch as Google' for the home page and blog page of .co.nz plus 'linked pages.' There are no hreflang errors.
I've also checked all pages on both sites and all correctly have the 'rel=canonical' tag.
Re the blog posts, at this stage we don't have the resources to write different content for each site. We're happy to keep writing the blog posts for the .com.au site and duplicating it for the .co.nz site AS LONG as our SEO isn't being negatively impacted. Our clients/markets/services are very similar — almost identical and just differ in location (i.e. Australia vs New Zealand).
The above was completed about 4 weeks ago now and we still haven't seen an increase in rankings for the .co.nz site (or back to where we were) — only for a couple of keywords that we're actually not targeting.
Just a couple of questions:
1. How long does it usually take for the hreflang tag to kick in and restore rankings?
2. How long does it take to actually get some keyword rankings for the new .co.nz site, considering that our .com.au site is performing reasonably well (although it is 5+ years older)?
3. Is there anything I'm missing here that I could do? Should I be really worried that the .co.nz site isn't ranking for our top 10 targeted keywords since launching the site back in February (6 months ago) or is it normal to break the '51+' ranking for at least some of the keywords. Sorry, a difficult question I know. In addition to Moz, I'm also tracking rankings on Ahrefs.
4. I'm outsourcing some of the link building, but I'm monitoring it closely. Could that be a reason for a drop in rankings also?
I know some of the above is a little hard to answer, but I'd really appreciate your help!
-
Yikes, sorry, I didn't see your responses. Sorry for the delayed response!
Your understanding is correct. It doesn't matter whether the content is duplicated within a single domain, across multiple domains, or multiple subdomains - if it's duplicate but targeting different languages and/or territories, then you need to use hreflang tags to manage that. If the pages are the same in all but phone number (where the phone number is targeting a different territory), that's exactly the kind of situation where you should be using hreflang tags.
Separately, all pages should use canonical tags which reference the correct version of themselves (note, not the alternate/hreflang equivalent), as way of declaring that they're the correct version of that localised page. The hreflang tags take care of the relationship between the multilingual versions without the need to try and do anything clever with pointing canonical references between them.
The blog question is more complex. Are your audiences/products/services different enough in those markets to warrant a distinct content strategy? Does that make sense, strategically?
If the content is different, then you don't want hreflang tags on those individual pages, because you've no equivalent resource/page to reference. Challenging!
So, in a nutshell:
Use hreflang tags everywhere where you've very-similar/duplicate pages which only differ in terms of which territory they serve - regardless of which domain they're on.
Use canonical tags on all pages/templates, to reference the correct version of that page/template - but this shouldn't try and do anything clever in terms of its relationship with the hreflang tags.
Where content isn't the same between multiple sites/pages, don't use hreflang tags (but do still use canonical tags).
Make sense?
-
Also, would you recommend that I rel=canonical in addition to the hreflang tag for any pages on the .co.nz site that are similar (or identical) to the .com.au site — including the .com.nz home page? For example the home pages of both sites are almost identical except for the ccTLD and a phone number...
Just thinking if I do that, the .co.nz site will only rank for a few pages which are unique to itself (e.g. location page about the Auckland office which isn't on the .com.au site).
At present, all of the "product" pages are pretty much identical as are the "blog" posts.
Speaking of blog content, is it also ideal to write "different" blog content for the .co.nz site and the .com.au site going forward to avoid the hrefland and rel=canonical issues?
Sorry lots of questions I know!
-
Sorry for the delay!
OK I'll give that a go! Although everything I've read/watched from Google and others, seems a little unclear if it is required for a standalone .com.au (Aus) and a .co.nz (New Zealand) ccTLD — more for either sub domains or sub directories of the same domain.
Assuming that without the hreflang, Google views the content as duplicate content and that's the reason for the drop in rankings? Or is it something else?
Yes both sites are correctly targeted in Google Search Console.
Just need to figure out now the best way to do the hreflang now!
Cheers.
-
Ah, I definitely suspect that our candidate here is the hreflang tagging.
The use-case definitely extends to the same content/language targeting multiple different countries, and it's implemented in exactly the same way. For each page/URL, you'll need to point to the equivalent page on the other site (either via tags or in the XML sitemap).
You'll want each page to have an _en-_au and _en-_zn value.
I'd double-check that you're targeting the right regions for each site in Search Console, too.
I'd be very surprised if that doesn't fix everything pretty much overnight!
-
Hey Jono!
Thanks so much for your time and effort here. Really appreciated! Responses below.
- Are you using hreflang tagging between the sites/content; and if so, are you confident that this is correctly configured and maintained? No as I thought that was only required for sites for different languages. Both of our AUS and NZ sites are english. Maybe I've missed something here...
- How much is your content localised to the market in question - or is it just copied without variation? There is some localisation, more around the specific locations where we operate but the overall service offering and our blog posts are pretty much identical. The majority of pages are the same across both sites (e.g. About Us, Our Services, Testimonials, Blog) but there are a few pages which specifically describe each of our locations.
- Does your product/service/price/proposition or availability vary by location? They do slightly but overall the service is very similar. For example, we offer conference venues, meeting rooms and function rooms with a consistent service and pricing, but each location differs slightly in terms of where it's situated, its benefits and the services it offers specifically.
- How much does the competition vary by territory; who's beating you, and what are they doing differently? For AUS, most of the competition is made up of hotels and multi-listing sites plus some of our direct competitors who also specialise in conference venues, meeting rooms and function rooms but aren't hotels. Our main competitors have been around for a few years longer than us. Our NZ site only launched in February so early days.
- Has performance dropped on both sites, or just one? And are there particular pages or keywords which have suffered? No, our AUS site is performing well and increasing in ranking gradually. However, the NZ site dropped dramatically in 1 week and never made it back. Our highest spots were 24/28/29 and in that week, they dropped back to 51+. All pages/keywords were affected.
If you could probe these areas a little, we might be able to steer towards a better understanding of what's going on. So appreciated.
-
Hello!
Could I ask a few questions to help me understand the broader context?
- Are you using hreflang tagging between the sites/content; and if so, are you confident that this is correctly configured and maintained?
- How much is your content localised to the market in question - or is it just copied without variation?
- Does your product/service/price/proposition or availability vary by location?
- How much does the competition vary by territory; who's beating you, and what are they doing differently?
- Has performance dropped on both sites, or just one? And are there particular pages or keywords which have suffered?
If you could probe these areas a little, we might be able to steer towards a better understanding of what's going on.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rankings Dropped to Nothing
We're kind of in crisis mode, as our ad revenue is about to take a huge hit. Hoping someone can help me figure out what to do next. Site: https://indoorgardening.com Here's what I did (below) that I think broke things somehow. I'm clearly not an SEO expert but thought I was making things better. And things did improve over the last week or so but then fell apart 2 days ago. 1. Most posts did not have a Yoast focus keyword. I added keyword phrases and used Yoast suggestions to optimize for that and for readability. 2. In some cases I changed post titles to better reflect the keyword phrase. 3. In some cases I changed the slug per Yoast's suggestion and did a 301 redirect from the old slug to the new one. 4. I used Grammarly to fix all spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. 5. Some Yoast-suggested changes that were made: Image alt tags, subheading structures, adding keyword to subheadings, first paragraph, and meta description, changed sentence length for those over 20 words to clean up the text, added transition words where applicable, reworded passive voice sentences, added internal links when needed, eliminated consecutive sentences (first word), improved Flesch reading ease when necessary. 6. I also added or changed Amazon affiliate links where needed and swapped out images when necessary. Results:
Technical SEO | | Jbyron
I started this project about 3 weeks ago. On 11/29 we had one of our highest traffic days, with 1017 hits coming from Google. On 11/30, 257 hits came from Google, and on 12/1, 3 (three!!) hits came from Google. At this point, 82 of 89 posts have a double green "Good" score in Yoast; 6 are "OK" and 1 does not have a focus keyword designated. Thanks in advance for any help anyone can provide. -John0 -
Sudden drop in rankings over 7 days
Hello fellow SEOs, I am having a few issues with one of the sites I manage. The site in question has dropped for a number of terms in the last 7 days, including: logo design - dropped 2 places, now 19th logo design uk - dropped 2 places, now 8th logo designer - dropped 3 places, now 20th bespoke logo design - dropped 3 places, now 10th I'm worry that the site might drop for more terms if I just leave it alone. I haven't made any changes to the site but I have noticed that our number of inbound links has increased by 58% in the last 7 days. I have put the site through OSE and used the spam analysis tool. There's only one domain linking to my client that has an orange spam flag but this link isn't newly acquired. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Technical SEO | | UE-Web0 -
Why my site is not ranking for any of the keywords?
We have a site for Property management software, we have done everything like set proper Title and descriptions, heading tags, robots tag is also ok, set schema and its ok with Google webmaster too also we are doing Social media promotion. can you please check our website and tell me what is the problem??
Technical SEO | | rootwaysinc0 -
301 Redirect to add juice from Keyword A to Keyword B
Here's our situation: Our company sells Employee HANDBOOKS (the book that explains to employees how the company itself is run, more or less). That's the technically correct term for them. However, many people use this term interchangeably with Employee MANUALS. Employee MANUALS are actually slightly different. (they're more specific, usually a list of common office policies and procedures and how to do them) When doing Keyword research, we learned that many, many people search for Employee MANUALS when they actually are interested in an employee HANDBOOK. We've got our page optimized for the Keyword Employee HANDBOOKS, because in our copy we always refer to it as such. Here's my question: Would it be "cloacking" or some other blackhat nonsense if we did this: #1. Take a copy of the current page, and make a second page for it with a slightly different URL, but optimize the SEO-relevant parts for the phrase Employee MANUAL. #2. That page will also include a 301-redirect towards the original page, which is identical except the SEO bits are optimized for Employee HANDBOOKS. My understanding here is that we'd get the SEO juice from the phrase Employee Manual, without actually having to do the upkeep on two different pages. We also avoid having to have a random page SEO optimized for an improper term just because of the general confusion about what the product is called. Are we on the right track here? Or is this going to annoy Google, or not have the result I'm predicting? Any insight is appreciated!
Technical SEO | | CEDRSolutions0 -
Frustrating Drop in Rankings Despite Good DA
The page below
Technical SEO | | Jayblue
http://www.carefundraisingsupplies.co.uk/fundraising-products/Charity-Collection-Buckets seems unable to budge from a position of near 100 despite previously been around 16 and moving up. We cannot seem to find any issues that are obvious and even some quality link building has moved it down further. Any idease from anyone? The search phrase we are targetting is Charity Collection Buckets0 -
Are these redirects damaging my rankings
Hi, just been going through my google webmaster tools and i have found a number of soft 404 errors and was shocked to see these redirects going to my home page. | URL | Response Code | Detected |
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-184886
| --- | --- | --- |<colgroup><col style="width: 45px;"><col style="width: 80px;"><col><col style="width: 120px;"><col style="width: 90px;"></colgroup>
| | 1 | staging1/jupgrade2/component/k2/item/475-gastric-band-hypnotherapy-expert-says-government-are-not-doing-enough-to-fight-obesity | | 7/25/13 |
| | 2 | staging1/jupgrade2/category-menu/item/1068-coronation-street-nick-proposes-to-leanne | | 7/28/13 |
| | 3 | staging1/jupgrade2/category-menu/item/1086-coronation-street-fiz-nearly-gets-tyrone-in-trouble-with-kirsty | | 7/28/13 |
| | 4 | staging1/jupgrade2/category-menu/item/1155-coronation-street-kylie-considers-telling-david-about-her-affair | | 7/28/13 |
| | 5 | staging1/jupgrade2/category-menu/item/1157-coronation-street-fiz-is-worried-when-kirsty-pays-her-a-visit | | 7/28/13 |
| | 6 | staging1/jupgrade2/component/k2/item/750-actress-hilary-duff-is-sued-over-car-accident | | 7/25/13 |
| | 7 | staging1/jupgrade2/component/k2/item/843-what-your-dogs-bottom-scooting-behaviour%E2%80%99-really-meansI would have thought that the developer who upgraded my site would have either had these blocked or directed them to the correct page. i am now guessing that there are going to be hundreds of these appearing and would like some serious advice.normally with old pages i would have them going to the relevant articles or pages but it seems the developer has redirected hundreds of these to my home page, which i guess is going to confuse google. i would like to know if this will confuse google have all these pages going to my home page.i have tried to find out where the developer in my site has redirected the pages as they are not in my htaccess file, i use joomla.can anyone let me know what i should be doing with these to solve the problemmany thanks |0 -
Only my website homepage is appearing in search and the other indvidual pages are not coming up?This happened after the website revamp
We have revamped our website http://www.wsinetpower.com/ after te revamp the SEO rankings went down and the inner pages are not appearing in serach. What could be the reason
Technical SEO | | Muna0 -
How to attach at text to image that other websites use from my website
I often have other websites link to my website. They will do this with an image that they pull off of my website. (actually my website continues to serve the image). These inbound links are great, but they don't have alt text. Is there a way for me to attach alt text to the images, or is this something the other website needs to code themselves?
Technical SEO | | EugeneF0