Is it better to shorten my existing url to use only keyword after domain with a 301 redirect from existing url
-
I have a long existing URL that has included my key word but the url has about 5 additional words in the text ( eg url would have
" /super widgets in stock at the widget store " as url text after domain. keywords is super widget
The URL was at the top of search results for my keyword for many years until recently. Is it better to shorten my url text to now use only my keyword " /super-widgets " after the domain with a 301 direct from my existing url to optimize it
Thanks
-
Thank you Gaston. Anyone have any input regarding SSL certificates and submitting various url versions to Google Search Console. My certificate is only for a single url so should this be the site that I specify to GSC. Volusion does not allow wild card or multi-site ssl certificates. I'm a little confused as to what is the best way to proceed. The older non secured url version is the one with a long analytics history.
-
Hi Howard,
Sorry for the late reply, just been terribly busy.Dont worry about the redirection, as long its 301 and dont have more than 3 hops or redirection loops.
Remember that the ranking strenght is not in the URL and it being short or having the keyword focused in the path. Your page will rank as long as google understand that you bring value to searchers and you send Google the correct signals about the keyword.
Be consistent with the content, URLs, title and meta tags.Best luck!
GR -
Thanks again. Just wondering if you know how long it takes for the redirect to start passing on seo value once I set up the 301 and delete the original page
-
Thanks Joseph
-
No problem. URL shortening with 301 redirects and making sure it is a keyword-focused URL path is a great way to often get some quick wins and improvements in rankings. Godspeed!
-
Shorter is better, we often use https://backlinko.com/on-page-seo as a guideline for on-site stuff like this, and we have seen increases in rankings wiht shortening a URL to just include the target keyword and then setting up a proper 301 redirect as well.
-
Thanks for your reply. I guess I'm trying to use my Meta Title to help users understand and using the URL text to focus more sharply on the keyword itself, and additionally trying to weigh out the benefits of focus on keyword vs user benefits vs the loss of any link juice due to 301 redirecting from what was once a strong page to my new re-optimized page.
-
Thank you for your feedback.
-
Hi Howard, to answer your question, in my experience 9 times out of 10 the answer is Yes.
An example of this is a page on our website that we were trying to rank for "PPC Kansas City".
Initially, our URL was https://seo-kansas-city.com/services/google-adwords-campaigns/, but we then changed it to https://seo-kansas-city.com/services/ppc/ and added a 301 redirect from the old URL to the new URL.
This resulted in our rankings jumping from page 2 on Google to the top 3-5 positions on page 1 of Google. We also still rank in the top 3-5 for "google adwords kansas city" and "google adwords campaigns kansas city".
I would just be sure to be tracking the target keyword rankings for that page specifically before you make the change.
Hope this helps and best of success to you!
-
Hi!
im just jumping in to say that the rule in URLs should always be to help users.
Think it this way: Users should be able to understand the content (or what that page is about) with the URL and also be able to remember in order to just type it into the address box in a browser.Of course that is utopic, but also misleading to say that focus only in keeping it short. Because only for the sake of shortening the URL you might harm the other idea behind: helping users.
What Joseph said is correct, just wanted to express my thoughts on this.
Also, yes. I'd go with /super-widgets if and only if your content will be talking about super widget (what ever thar are) and you're trying to rank for that exact keyword.
Hope it helps.
Best luck
GR -
Hello there,
Google will truncate your URL when it exceeds a pixel length. I usually keep it as short as possible, make sure it let people understand what they might expect from that page, but not too long to look annoying. Here are some tips:
- Keep it as short as possible
- Don't use stop words
- Avoid using special characters (dash is fine and can be used as spaces)
I couldn't list all of the tips but this few guides will help you whenever you creating a new page and URL.
https://mza.bundledseo.com/blog/15-seo-best-practices-for-structuring-urls
https://mza.bundledseo.com/learn/seo/url
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-friendly-url-structure-2/202790/
Hope this helps,
Joseph Yap
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Changing existing URL's to improve SEO
Here's a general question: At what PR/page rank (or Moz 'page authority') would you no longer change an existing URL that's cryptic to one that includes the related page keyword or at least relevant terms? Does using a 301 redirect to the new URL preserve the page rank? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | flyntime_tx0 -
URL structure
Hello all, I am about to sort out my websites link structure, and was wondering which approach to our services page would be best. should we have: services/digital-marketing & services/website-design etc or: digital-marketing/website-design & digital-marketing/seo Basically I see digital marketing as the top level category that is the umbrella term for all of our digital services. But would it make more sense to have service to be the main category and digital marketing within that (along with all the other services from web design to seo)? all thoughts welcome!
On-Page Optimization | | wseabrook0 -
URL Question
This url looks bad: http://www.patrickmunoz.com/#!classes/c1vw1 And when you click around the page change doesn't actually occur, it's a fade into the next page. I think this is a major problem for rankings. Although pages are crawled: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.patrickmunoz.com%2F&oq=site%3A&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j69i58j69i59l3j69i61.3548j0j7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 When I search for a simple page - "patrick munoz FAQs" nothing comes up:
On-Page Optimization | | tylerfraser
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.patrickmunoz.com%2F&oq=site%3A&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j69i58j69i59l3j69i61.3548j0j7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=patrick+munoz+|+FAQs Do you think this is a bad url configuration? Thanks! Tyler0 -
301 vs 302 redirect
Hello Mozers, I have a website which offers subscriptions on a monthly basis, when one profile expires the link of the profile gets a 301 redirect to the main category, just that if the member chooses to come back after a while he can reactivate the profile and the link will work again and the 301 will disappear, Should I be doing 302 redirect, as from this point of view it's only a temporarily redirect ? Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | asmedia0 -
Boatload of 301 Redirects Question
We have a client that came to us and they recently did a site makeover. Previously they had all their pages in root directory including 75+ spammy article pages. On their makeover, they moved all the article pages into a directory and added 301 redirects. In going over their site we noticed they have redundant articles, like an article on blue-marble-article.htm and blue-marbles-article.htm Playing on singular and plural with dulpicate content for most part with exception to making it plural. If they have 75 articles, Id say 1/3 are actually somewhat original content. I would like to 301 redirect 2/3's of the articles to better re-written article pages but that would add a whole lot more 301 redirects. We would then have a 301 redirect from root directory to article directory, then another 301 redirect from spam article to new re-written article. My question is, would this be too many redirects for googlebot to sort through and would it be too confusing or send bad signals? Or should I create a new directory with all good articles and just redirect the entire old articles directory to the new one? Or just delete the redirects and old spammy directory and let those fall on a 404 error page. Id hate to lose 50-75 pages but I think its in fact those spammy pages that could be why the site fell from top of first page google to third page and now 10th page in a years time. I know, Im confused just typing this out. Hope it makes sense for some good feedback and advise. Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | anthonytjm0 -
Temperary redirects
I have a problem with temp redirects, I have a dating site and the redirects happen when guests on the site are prompted to purchase a subscription while trying gain access to the sites contents. I was told to change them to 301 redirects but don't know how. any help, thanks guys.
On-Page Optimization | | clickit2getwithit0 -
Is it better to include the secondary keyword or site name in a title tag?
When I add a site name to my title tag with long-tailed primary and secondary keywords the title tag is longer than 70 characters. I need to include all three parts, so what should I do? At 70 characters the site name is usually partially cut off. I do not want to get penalized by Google, but I need to include the site name to have consistency. I am using the format Primary Keyword-Secondary Keyword | Site name
On-Page Optimization | | lwilkins0 -
Has anyone noticed a big delta between Google and Bing rankings? For example, we rank favorably in Google, but not so favorably in Bing. Are there different tactics I should use to rank better in Bing?
An example is in Google, we currently rank #1 & #2 for "yoga pants" for Athleta and Old Navy. In Bing, I'm on page 2. Any thoughts here?
On-Page Optimization | | kpr0