Write new articles or republish old ones?
-
Hi,
we run a tourism information website about a region in italy, and each year, during special occasions such as christmas, easter and so on we publish an article with a "what to do on Christmas / Easter / .... in the Langhe" (collecting events, activities, etc.).Is it better to "reuse" the old articles and change only the year in the title and of course the content (providing that we are gonna keep the URL without year), or to publish a new one?
thanks!
-
Thanks for information
-
@Nomansahil009 said in Write new articles or republish old ones?:
Always write new content or update old content but never republish your old already published and indexed content.
Google knows what you doing it can impacts you site SEO, so better you should write you new content if that not the case you should update you old content.
If we write new content and 301 redirect the old content, will the credit be transferred to the new article?
Are the backlinks received on the previous page directed to the new page? -
I suggest making new articles instead of just updating old ones. Even though it might be easier to reuse what you already have and just change the year, it's important to think about what your readers want. They're likely looking for fresh and exciting content, not just the same thing with a small tweak.
-
Always write new content or update old content but never republish your old already published and indexed content.
Google knows what you doing it can impacts you site SEO, so better you should write you new content if that not the case you should update you old content.
-
@Enrico_Cassinelli said in Write new articles or republish old ones?:
This is a great question, Enrico! Deciding whether to reuse or create a new article for seasonal occasions like Christmas and Easter depends on several factors:Reusing the old article with updates (pros):
SEO benefits: Keeping the same URL can maintain existing backlinks and search engine ranking for that specific keyword ("what to do on Christmas in the Langhe").
Saves time and effort: Updating an existing article is quicker than writing a new one, especially if the core content remains relevant.
Continuity for returning visitors: Familiar format and structure might be beneficial for users who have read previous articles.
Cons of reusing:Stale content: Readers might feel it's repetitive if changes are minimal.
Missing out on trends and updates: New events, activities, or recommendations might be overlooked.
Less engagement: A completely new article can generate more buzz and attract new readers.
Creating a new article (pros):Fresh and exciting content: Showcases your commitment to providing updated information and keeps readers engaged.
Opportunity to expand and improve: Include new recommendations, trends, and insights.
Potentially reach a wider audience: New article can attract new search engine traffic.
Cons of creating a new article:SEO impact: Starting from scratch might take longer to rank in search results for the same keyword.
More time and effort required: Writing a new article takes more time and resources.
Loss of previous backlinks: If you change the URL, existing backlinks might not carry over to the new article.
Recommendation:I suggest a hybrid approach:
Reuse the main structure and relevant evergreen content of the old article.
Update the content significantly: Include new events, activities, recommendations, and insights for the upcoming season.
Highlight the updates in the title and introduction.
Consider adding visuals and multimedia to refresh the presentation.
This balances the SEO benefits of keeping the URL with the freshness and engagement of new content. You can also create a short "What's new this year" section at the top of the article to further emphasize the updates. -
One more thought on this: it is a generally good idea to have MORE valuable pages on your website than LESS pages. If you look at big authority websites. they have millions of pages. On the other hand, small and poor quality websites have a small number of valuable pages. On our sites like RealtyCinema or Bizpages (https://bizpages.org) we are keen to develop a greater number of good quality unique pages. BUT! there is one important thing that I mentioned in my previous post: the pages should focus on different keywords, they should not be just copies. In this case you improve chances that this or that page gets a high ranking in search engines and brings traffic/clients.
-
It also depends on what your goals are. If your current article is on the same topic as the previous one, it is likely that the two articles will compete for the same keywords in search engines and Google will have to choose one of the two to show in its SERPS. On the other hand, it is possible to make variations to the Title/Description and article keywords to try cover more topics with 2 articles.
-
Deciding whether to write new articles or republish old ones depends on various factors. Creating fresh content is ideal for staying relevant, attracting new audiences, and addressing current trends. However, republishing can be beneficial for revisiting evergreen topics, reaching new audiences, and optimizing for search engines. A balanced approach, combining both strategies, allows for a mix of timely, original content and the revitalization of valuable existing articles. Consider audience engagement, SEO goals, and the ever-changing landscape of your niche when determining the most effective content strategy for your platform.
-
I think it completely depends on your situation.
Is the information in your old article still relevant and valuable?
Yes: Republish with updates and optimizations.
No: Write a new article on the same topic with fresh information.
Do you have time and resources to create new content?
Yes: Write new articles on trending topics or to explore new directions.
No: Republish some older articles that are still valuable and relevant. -
I think you have to delete your old pages. Create new ones. Redirect the old URL onto new post.
Waterproof socks for wudu.
-
@Enrico_Cassinelli Both approaches—updating existing articles or creating new ones—have their pros and cons,
Updating Existing Articles: Pros:
Preserving Authority: If your existing articles have gained authority and backlinks, updating them can help maintain that authority. Consistency: Keeping the same URL provides consistency for your audience, and they know where to find the updated information each year. Time-Saving: It can be quicker to update an existing article than to create an entirely new one from scratch.
Creating New Articles: Pros:
Fresh Content: Search engines often favor fresh and new content. Creating a new article signals to search engines that it's current and relevant. Audience Engagement: New content might attract more attention and engagement from your audience. Variety: Having a variety of content can cater to different preferences within your audience.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Service Page Strategy Should We Use to Target City-Specific Local Intent Service Keywords?
Hey guys! We are targeting a number of cities in the Nassau and Suffolk County areas for foundation repair, insulation, and mold remediation keywords, and we were debating on creating city-specific pages for each location and service, or creating one service page for each type of service that contains all of the services and solutions within that service category for each city. Example: City-Specific Pages for Each Service: One page for say foundation repair, one page for foundation crack repair, one page for foundation problems, etc. (for each target city) Service Category Pages for Each City: One page for foundation contractors that lists all services on one page in sections. Which one do you think is better for local SEO and rankings? Both seem to have their advantages and disadvantages to me. Just to throw a couple out there, the category pages may not rank as high as the city pages for each individual service if our competitors have a whole page designed for that service and we only have a part of a page covering the topic. At the same time, they would save labor hours, technical issues would be less, and they would be condensed, and we would have WAY less mess on the backend. I appreciate your expert opinion on this one. The site is www. zavzaseal.com in case you want to check us out.
Local SEO | | everysecond0 -
What would be Best Content Starategy For My Dental Website?
Greetings to all Moz Fellows! Our organization specializes in digital dentistry, and we aim to establish a thriving blog focused on this subject to attract a wide range of clients from all across the United States. We would greatly appreciate any advice on the most effective strategies for achieving this goal.
Content Development | | SEOBrandBoca
@MOZ-LUCY1230 -
Chat GPT
I want to get your thoughts on Chat GPT for creating articles on my site to drive SEO. Does Google approve of this type of content or not? I seems quite good quality - I suppose a key question also is: is it duplicate content? I have used on Propress website and also on blog sites so need to understand if this will reduce my rankings. Thanks
Content Development | | Katie231
Matthew1 -
Is it a good idea to publish a list of players in my industry, including competitors?
I am working with an e-commerce site that does mostly B2B sales in a very commoditized industrial product segment in which very few manufacturers sell direct. It's all done through distributors and resellers, like our site. We don't often win on price, but we do win enough SERP battles to get the visitors and provide great customer service, so we have gained a following and we do compete well for some very large orders. We list several thousand products and in a given month, visitors regularly hit over 1,000 different landing pages. While we make most money from relatively few items, most items are sold only once a year, maybe twice. It's a very longtail business, and therefore tough to do a great job optimizing all pages down the tail. So, one thing I'm doing is building out a set of resource pages with common questions, terminology and other useful bits so the site gains more traffic and authority, in the hope of boosting product pages. e.g., an in-depth category definition in the glossary could link to all the items in a category. In addition to adding content that augments product pages, I'd like to create basically a map of the whole industry, including brand name manufacturers, white label manufacturers, distributors, etc. If it's going to be a truly comprehensive list, it should include my competitors. Given that I have never found such a list, it feels like this could be a good page and earn some links. Since it's unlikely much traffic will even find that page, compared to product pages, are there potential pitfalls I should be aware of? I get the feeling if I create a page that others bookmark and visit when hunting for products in our market, we win, even if most visitors to that page won't buy from us. I've been in this industry for four years now, and it's amazing how hard it is to find some companies. Only a handful even think about SEO, since they sell through other channels. Should I link to all my competitors (which is only about a dozen) among hundreds of other industry links?
Content Development | | Mike_Sobol0 -
Should I split long form content?
I have quite a long content on my site. By length I mean around 8000-9000 words. I optimized it to cover almost all searches related to a topic. But this length makes me uneasy for some reason. I do not think that users will find what they are looking for in such a long content. However, I don't want to neglect the SEO aspect of the content. I can talk about something like this without sharing the keywords completely: Title + for girls Title + for boys Title + for kids Title + for girlfriend Title + for boyfriend Title + for students As I said, in the current situation, these are all sub-headings (H2) of 8000-9000-word content. When I make a separate content for each of them, I can bring them all closer to 1500-2000 words. However, I am undecided whether this is the right step in terms of SEO and content optimization. What are your views?
SEO Tactics | | mozasea0 -
My Blog Post Not Appearing In Top - Covered every aspect of the topic
Hello Moz Team, hope everyone is doing well, I have question regarding mine blog post recently that I published: https://mobilemall.pk/blog/definition-of-cuboid-surface-area-volume-basic-properties/ My target keywords in this post are Cuboid Definition, Cuboid Surface Area, Cuboid Volume. I have considered and applied every good SEO practice, like H Tags, gave links to authority sites, featured image, other images, etc but my post is still not appearing in top 3, 5 or even 10 I have covered each and every aspect of the topic, Can anyone let me know what's the reason and any suggestion for me. Thanks!
Content Development | | JoeySolicitor1 -
Renaming web pages vs new web site
I am struggling with renaming a lot of my web pages because I used short form acronyms vs long form keyword page names and now my pages aren't ranking where they should be and used to be. I am weighing a whole new web site or just a massive update with new page names. I also have an old domain that 301's to the new url but the old one outranks the new one. If you search google for cheap tubes the first domain you see is www.cheaptubesinc.com (the 301'd version) when the real url is www.cheaptubes.com. I know I am getting a duplicate content penalty and when moz crawls my site they see 2X the page that I really have. I tried fixing this with canonical tags but it only helped 5 pages according the moz crawls since doing them. Since last July 4th my business has been declining and I know there was an SEO algorithm update last July 4th. I think either method of renaming the web pages with better SEO for instance cheaptubes.com/single-wall-carbon-nanotubes.htm vs cheaptubes.com/swnts.htm as it is currently. In either case, it is still an HTML 2 website done on frontpage and the question I keep asking myself is if I should just scrap the whole site and start over with a more modern format. Should I try to get a new site together with good SEO and publish it quickly vs rename and 301 a bunch of pages? What about the old site? Do I need to track the old page names and 301 them to the new ones? Any help is appreciates Mike
Content Development | | cheaptubes0 -
If I write a article for a client and use Social Book Marking software, will this add value (or does the value depend on how ofen it gets shared)?
I'm about to start experimenting with bookmarking software. My first step is trying Ping.com (because it's free), but I am also keen to try Onlywire.com (which comes at a cost- darn). My questions are: when I create an article for a client and post to all these social sites will this make a difference? Or will it only make a difference if people share the article? Has anyone been experimenting with social bookmarking software that can tell me what results they have had and how they got there? Thanks a mil!
Content Development | | 2Stroke0