Are tags important for SEO?
-
I just installed a plugin called SEO content control and it is telling me I need to write descriptions for my tags. I haven't been using tags although I did create a list of them. I don't have an endless amount of time on my hands so is this a worthwhile task?
-
Hey there - I'm going to weigh in and just concur basically with Paul. Also just like to add a link to the wordpress resource post I did on Moz which breaks down a lot of the distinctions between tags and categories. Hope that helps too.
-
Ok I did click noindex tag pages in my metarobots tags. I have to figure out how to use my robots.txt file. Thanks again!
-
Short answer - absolutely yes. If you can't make them provide a clear benefit to your visitors, don't use 'em.
Longer answer - still yes, but if you have enabled them but haven't used them at all up until now, you can also block crawling them in your robots.txt file (You'd also want to have the tag pages include a no-index metarobots tag in their headers, just in case)
Doing this would tell the search engines not to even waste their time trying to find the tag pages in the first place.
Paul
-
Wow - thanks for all that info. I appreciate it. One quick question - can I forget tags altogether - and noindex them? I don't feel any need to use them on my site.
-
I'm going to have to offer a different opinion than Chad, njam. There's nothing about tags that is intrinsically beneficial for SEO, and in fact misusing them can cause considerable SEO problems.
Bottom line, the primary purpose of tags is as an additional navigation tool for your visitors, and must be carefully implemented so not to damage your site's SEO. There's nothing magic about a tag - it's a link to your content organized in different ways
Tags are part of what's called your site's taxonomy - i.e. how it organizes its information. Tags allow the visitor to get listings of your existing content grouped by different topics - much like categories do, but on a more granular scale. And there's the kicker - tag listings are just your regular content, but grouped differently.
Because they're the same content as exists elsewhere on the site, they can easily be seen as duplicate content by the search engines, leading to a dilution of the ranking power of the actual posts. (This issue can also occur with category listings if they're not handled correctly, which is why you're already no-indexing them).
Most WordPress SEO specialists actually recommend that tag pages be no-indexed - a command that tells the search engines to not even include them in search results as they can so easily confuse the search engines about which version of your site's content is most important.
So... use tags on a website if you think they will significantly add to the visitors' ability to understand and navigate your site. Then, make sure you've taken steps to ensure they don't confuse the search engines.
Do NOT use tags just because they're available. If you don't have a clear strategy for using them, don't clutter your site with them.
If you want an idea of how tags fit into a taxonomy, here's a real-work analogy:
Think of your blog as a book on raising kids, for example. The book would have a bunch of separate chapters on things like childbirth, schooling and education, care and feeding, discipline, family finances - you get the drift.
These are the equivalent to your blog's categories - broad topics that would allow someone to pick up your book and leaf through it, immediately understanding what the book's about, and enabling them to read just the sections that apply to them.
In the back of the book is the index. It's full of words and phrases that you have used a couple times in the book, but aren't topics that deserve a whole chapter (category). These are the equivalent of your tags. For example, perhaps you mention peanut butter in the care & feeding chapter. Later, you also mention in the schooling chapter that parents shouldn't send peanut butter sandwiches in kids' lunches because of the allergy risk to others. In addition, you mention PB in passing in the finance chapter as a cheap source of protein for kids meals.
Obviously there'd be no point in having a whole chapter (category) on peanut butter, but a reader might find it useful to have the index (tags) at the back of the book show them all the places in your book you've mentioned peanut butter.
That's a bit of a facetious example, but hopefully it gives you an idea of the different uses? If not, lemme know and I'll try to clarify further. Just remember, there's nothing magic about tags for SEO and they in fact carry some risk. They are for human visitors. If the visitors don't find them useful, they shouldn't be there.
Paul
-
Ah. I had no idea tags helped with search engines. Thanks!
-
Categories help your posts get found within a website while the tags help your post get found on the search engines. My assumption is that you are using WordPress. ( For example: I run a blog on real estate investing. There are several categories to choose from inside of the WordPress website.I want people who are highly interested in reading about the niche subject of real estate investing to read my post so, I type in the categories, " investing" " real estate." This helps the visitors who are apart of the WordPress community and are interested in real estate investing find my blog. What the tags do is help people who go to Google and type in " real estate investing blogs" find my blog. This is the difference as I understand it. The good thing is that you will only have to type your tags once. Once they are in the system, it just a matter typing a few letters before it pops up.
-
Interesting. So how are tags different than categories? I already categorize all my posts and they're usually in several categories. I have category pages noindexed which was advised here on this forum.
-
No, the descriptive tags helped my blog posts get noticed and it better optimized my post for the search engines. I know that it is a pain starting out but I can say that I could tell a difference in the posts that had tags and the posts that did not.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Seeking SEO contractor
I would like to hire an SEO contractor to assist with some technical/SEO issues on our site (Schema, etc). Can anyone make a recommendation? I am looking to work with a small company. Thank you in advance for any referrals!
On-Page Optimization | | JulieALS0 -
Have I chosen the wrong SEO consultant?
Hi all I've very recently started a small chimney sweeping business for which my friend has designed and built a website, kembersembers.co.uk. Not approaching this from a tech-savvy background I have learnt a lot over the past month but am still an utter novice and as such require some form of help to get me up and running. My main and immediate priority (sweeping season starts soon!) was to have it so when my company name, kembers embers, was googled I would come up at the top of the results. I understand this can take a little time but it has been a month now since I indexed and I have been told my domain authority is 0.1% so I have sought help. I don't want to sign up to a 3/6/12 month contract with a firm so I found an SEO consultant local to me who said they could spend a couple of hours doing the right things to hopefully help jump this initial hurdle. I parted with £120 for this which I deemed to be the going rate and they do/did seem honest and professional enough. Upon meeting the consultant he has since told me that he would like to set the website up under a Wordpress template and has cajouled me into changing my hosting over to one he uses also. He says it will take a couple of hours work to do this (there goes my £120) but without this he would hit walls which would be timely to get past and so will save me money in the long run. Do these kind of suggestions ring an alarm bell to anyone? It didn't seem right that a good SEO couldn't work with what I already have so it leads me to the question is this one to avoid? On a side note I have also received bad advice from friends of friends/family who claim to know SEO but have, for example, put me in the direction of a link scheme through fiverr.com which I understand may have done me more damage than good. I am now more aware of white hat vs black hat and wish to proceed with the development of my online presence in an ethical way growing organically. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | kembosabe0 -
Do WooCommerce product tags effect SEO?
I'm just curious if I need these product tags and if they impact in any way at all SEO? - whether that be positively or negatively. on1iRin
On-Page Optimization | | xdunningx0 -
Adding Location to Title Tags has dropped SEO Rankings
After adding the suburb of my business to each title tag on my website, I've noticed their rankings have dropped from page one to page four in a lot of cases. Should I wait it out and expect to see them improve in the future? Should I revert them back to their old title tags? I'm a little concerned!
On-Page Optimization | | thomaslutrov0 -
Image Tags And Titles
Hi, I am currently revamping my website with a new look. Some questions i have with regards to the images found on a page. I know that we need an alt tag for each image. This should not be keyword spammed. However, what about the title tag for the image? What is the best practice for image title tags? Should it be the same as the alt tag? Should it be different? Should I leave it blank? If I am running a wordpress platform for my website. The defaulted settings for wordpress is that all images inside a post are clickable. When clicked, the page loads from abcdef.com/page/ to abcdef.com/page/image.jpg. This seems to be generating alot of internal links but I don't see the value of loading an image when my visitors click on that. Should I let the image be clickable or remove the link on the image for best SEO practices? Thanks for your advice. paul
On-Page Optimization | | paulgian1 -
Please review page for on page SEO
I'm working on an adult dating site review blog and am hoping to build links to the category pages. It's a wordpress blog so the posts are categorised by topics. However can you tell me if there is enough content on the page for google to identify what the page is about? The problem is that the content of each category pages is pulled from the posts. What I think is needed is some static text on the page 2-300 words that use the keyword. Here's an example of a page targeting the keywords 'online dating'. http://www.top-10-dating-reviews.com/category/online-dating/
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK
[editor's note -- thumbnails on site may not be appropriate for some workplaces] Will the page rank like this if there are a good amount of authorative links or does the page itself need work?0 -
Is On Page SEO Dead?
Hey Guys, Search Engine Roundtable has published a short post about this a few days ago, quoting senior member at WebmasterWorld forums who said: "The way I see it, on-page text today is for the "relevance" part of the total algorithm. The whole algorithm is, in broad strokes, "relevance + connectedness + quality". After you've clearly stated the relevance of the page, then the rest of your ranking power comes from elsewhere. I've added on-page bold tags with no effect. I've added or changed h1 elements with no effect. Not too long ago, those might well have done something, but that's not the game anymore. And moving from a table layout to a CSS-P layout today might get you nowhere, too. It all depends how deeply complicated the table layout was, I think." http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4408395.htm Is it true? Is on-page SEO really dead? What do you think?
On-Page Optimization | | ShivaS0 -
Summary of Anchor Text and Hash Tags
This a summary of my understanding of anchor text and hash tags, along with a question. I'm looking for confirmation of my assumptions and an answer to the question. Here we go: Given these two links on a page in order, Google will use the anchor text "first" a) First b) a) Second Given these two links on a page in order, Google will use the anchor text "Second" a) First b) Second Given these three links on a page in order, Google will use the anchor text "Second" and "Third" a) First b) Second c) Third Is this consistent with your understanding of using hash tags to get around the first link rule? Here's my question: If I have the following 4 links on a page, does 50% of the link juice go to Page A and 50% to Page B; OR 25% to Page A and 75% to page B; OR something else? www.example.com/Page-A.html www.example.com/Page-B.html#anchor1 www.example.com/Page-B.html#anchor2 www.example.com/Page-B.html#anchor3 Thanks in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | dvansant0